Allahabad High Court upholds lower court's order appointing Advocate Commissioner to survey Sambhal mosque
The Allahabad High Court on Monday (May 19, 2025) upheld a lower court's order appointing an Advocate Commissioner to survey the 'disputed' Shahi Jama Masjid in Sambhal.
The mosque committee had approached the High Court challenging the survey, which was ordered under the suit filed by Hindu plaintiffs claiming the mosque had been built on the site by Mughal emperor Babur in 1526 after demolishing the Harihar temple, dedicated to Kalki, the last avatar of Lord Vishnu as per mythology.
Last November, a civil court in Sambhal ordered a survey of the mosque by an Advocate Commissioner. Soon after, Ramesh Raghav, the designated officer, conducted a harried survey of the mosque. The survey was followed by communal violence in the town, leading to the death of four persons.
The mosque committee, in its arguments, submitted that the dispute regarding the mosque had already been settled in the year 1877 and could not be adjudicated in the instant suit.
Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal observed that the lower had not committed any error, irregularity or illegality in allowing the survey.
'The argument set up by advocate SFA Naqvi that dispute in regard to Masjid already stood settled in 1877 and decree having been confirmed by this Court cannot be accepted at this stage in view of the fact that judgment of 1877 speaks of an old building, whereas in 1920 Juma Masjid was declared as a protected monument under the Act of 1904,' the court noted.
The court added that if the title suit was decided in favour of the mosque committee in the year 1877, then, why had it entered into an agreement in the year 1927 subjecting the structure in dispute to the Act of 1904 as the alleged agreement does not reveal the ownership of the mosque committee and clearly noted that the structure needed to be protected in pursuance of the Act of 1904 by Archaeological Department.
The court also noted this was not a case where any conversion of place of worship was taking place or any religious character of the place of worship was being changed and that the Hindu petitioners had only sought the right to access to a protected monument declared in the year 1920, under Section 18 of the Act of 1958.
'Once, it is an admitted position that the structure in question has been declared as a protected monument in 1920 and the same remained unchallenged till date, it is bound to be governed by provisions of law which existed when the notification was made and, thereafter, the laws enacted to govern such protected monument,' the court said.
It added that once the revisionist himself has subjected to the Act of 1904 (Act to provide for the preservation of Ancient Monuments) and, thereafter, to 1958 (Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act), he cannot take shelter of the Places of Worship Act of 1991 that aims to prevent the conversion of any place of worship and maintain the religious character as it was on August 15, 1947.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
43 minutes ago
- NDTV
Supreme Court Refuses To Reduce Lawyer's Sentence For Abusing Woman Judge, Says...
New Delhi: The Supreme Court today rejected a petition by a lawyer convicted of abusing a woman judicial officer in a court in Delhi. The top court refused to reduce the imprisonment sentence to 6 months and said, "Today, the majority of our officers in Delhi are women. They will not be able to function if somebody can get away like this. Think of their state," the bench commented orally. The bench of Justice PK Mishra and Justice Manmohan was hearing a plea against the order of the Delhi High Court, which upheld the conviction of a lawyer who used abusive language towards a woman judge in a challan matter inside the trial court. The lawyer used abusive, vulgar expletives after the judge had adjourned the matter. While hearing the plea, Justice Manmohan verbally remarked, "Just see the inspection report, the language used, we cannot even say in the open court". Justice Manmohan further said that if a stern view is not taken against such behaviour, women judicial officers would not be ensured a safe work environment. "Today, the majority of our officers in Delhi are women. They will not be able to function like this- if somebody can get away like this. Think of their state," the bench said. The lawyer, Sanjay Rathore, was convicted by the trial court and sentenced to 18 months' imprisonment for the offence under Section 509 (intending to outrage modesty of a woman) of the Indian Penal Code, 3 months under Section 189 (injury to public servant), and an additional three months under Section 353 (assault or criminal force against public servant to deter them from their duty). The trial court directed that the sentences would run consecutively, resulting in a total sentence of two years. Later, the High Court said that the sentence would run concurrently and not consecutively, reducing his sentence to 18 months from two years The counsel for the petitioner urged the Supreme Court bench to reduce his term of imprisonment to six months. He stressed several "mitigating factors" for this consideration, like his ageing parents and young children. He informed that the Bar Council has also acted against the lawyer.
Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
Rush Hour: Congress says Centre failed to protect Indians, HC seeks Bengaluru stampede report & more
We're building a brand-new studio to bring you bold ground reports, sharp interviews, hard-hitting podcasts, explainers and more. Support Scroll's studio fund today. The Congress has accused the Narendra Modi-led government of failing to protect the honour of Indians after photos and videos showing an Indian student being handcuffed and pinned to the floor at the Newark Airport in the United States. Party General Secretary Jairam Ramesh urged the prime minister to speak to US President Donald Trump to address the 'fear that has gripped lakhs of Indian students in America'. Ramesh said that Modi had not been able to summon the courage to speak about the 'atrocities being perpetrated against Indians in the US'. On Monday, the Consulate General of India in New York said it was in touch with local authorities about the case. The man who shot the video said that the student appeared to have been pinned to the ground because 'he was a little violent, and he was feeling disoriented'. More on Scroll. The Karnataka High Court has told the state government to submit a status report in a sealed cover on the stampede in Bengaluru on June 4. Eleven persons were killed in the stampede at the Chinnaswamy Stadium, where fans had gathered to celebrate Royal Challengers Bengaluru's victory in the Indian Premier League. The High Court took suo motu cognisance of the incident on June 5, and sought a report from the Karnataka government. However, on Tuesday, state Advocate General KM Shashikiran Shetty told the court that the government would not like to place the findings of an investigation in the public domain while a judicial inquiry was underway. The judicial commission has been told to submit its findings within a month. The case in the High Court will be heard further on Thursday. More on Scroll. Opposition leaders have accused the Bharatiya Janata Party government in Uttar Pradesh of hiding the real toll from the January 29 stampede at the Maha Kumbh pilgrimage site at Prayagraj. They cited a report published by the BBC on Tuesday which claimed that 82 persons had died in the stampede, as against the official toll of 37. Previously too, media reports have said that the actual toll from the stampede could be significantly higher. Citing the BBC report, Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav said on Tuesday that 'no information management can stop the truth from coming out'. More on Scroll. United States President Donald Trump has ordered the Marine Corps to be deployed in Los Angeles amid protests against immigration raids. Over 700 Marines based out of the Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center in California were mobilised to respond to the protests. The troops will join the National Guard – a reserve component of the US military – deployed over the weekend to quell the protests against raids and arrests carried out as part of a crackdown on undocumented migrants. The Marine Corps is a branch of the US Armed Forces that acts as a crisis response force. It is rarely deployed domestically during civil disturbances in support of a police operation. Read on.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Farmers of Kangeyam-Vellakovil at tail-end of PAP Main Canal allege excess tapping of water in Pongalur Sub-Division, demand legal action as per High Court directives
Alleging excess tapping of water in contravention of High Court directive in the upstream, the PAP (Parambikulam Aliyar Project) Vellakovil Branch Canal (Kangayam-Vellakovil) Water Conservation Association has submitted a petition to the Revenue Divisional Officer of Tiruppur South, seeking action. Citing the Madras High Court's orders issued during 2023 and 2017, president of the association P. Velusamy said in his petition submitted to the Revenue Department authorities that water flowing through the Parambikulam Main Canal from the Andipalayam measurement point must be equitably distributed between the Pongalur and Kangeyam sub-divisions, after accounting for dewatering losses, based on the proportion of their respective irrigation areas. Any deviation from this constitutes contempt of court. Despite repeated representations and complaints submitted to the relevant authorities through various channels, no effective action had been taken, Mr. Velusamy said. In the water release effected currently for the third zone, nearly three times (3/4) of the total water (158.775 mcft) is being allocated to the Pongalur sub-division, while only 1/4 of water (56.15 mcft) is reaching the Kangeyam sub-division. 'We have consistently highlighted the importance of balanced irrigation to both the district administration and the PAP authorities, yet the issue remains unaddressed,' Mr. Velusamy said. Downstream of PAP Andipalayam reading point, Pongalur sub-division was allotted 245 cusecs for 4,000 acres over a period of seven-and-a-half days. Whereas, Kangeyam sub-division received only 125 cusecs for just five days, despite having the same acreage under cultivation, he explained. As a consequence, Kangeyam and Vellakovil where rainfall was minimal were experiencing drought conditions. Despite favourable court verdicts, the authorities failed to take meaningful action. In the PAP case in 2023, the High Court had emphasised that 'equal distribution of water to all eligible ayacutdars is of paramount importance.' In 2015, the High Court had noted that 'corrupt activities, collusion of public authorities, either actively and passively cannot be overruled. Once the government officials are found in collusion, they are to be prosecuted for the offence of abetment, under IPC along with the offenders of the Commission of theft.' The Assistant Executive Engineer of Pongalur Sub-Division caused contempt of the aforementioned court orders, and hence, legal action must be taken, the petition said. Copies of the petition were also addressed to the Chief Secretary of Government of Tamil Nadu, senior officials of WRO, District Collector, Superintendent of Police, president of Monitoring Committee for PAP in Dharapuram, Tiruppur DRO and Kangeyam Tahsildar.
