
Inside Economics: Why the Kiwi is so strong against the Aussie dollar, the big Budget squeeze ... and asset recycling
My question is: based on fundamental micro and macro-economic comparisons of the current New Zealand and Australian economies, what factors, in your opinion are keeping the Kiwi dollar in the 90c+ range to the Australian dollar?
The reason I ask is that the two places I spend time, Auckland and Brisbane, the strength of the NZ dollar is not warranted because the lived experience in each city currently is very different. And respective reserve bank rates and forecasts are diverging.
Warm regards,
John G.
A: Thanks John. You're right, the Kiwi does seem surprisingly strong against the Aussie dollar, given the state of the two economies and much lower interest rates over here. At the time of writing, the Kiwi was buying 93 Australian cents.
It had me baffled, so I asked BNZ senior markets strategist Jason Wong, who watches it all much more closely than I do.
Wong says he's also been a bit bemused by the Kiwi's strength.
But the real mystery was why it didn't fall away a lot more last year when we were clearly in recession, and the Reserve Bank (RBNZ) was cutting rates hard, he said.
Meanwhile, Australia's economic growth was holding up well, it had higher inflation and a central bank that was reluctant to cut rates.
Right now, the simplest explanation for the strength in the Kiwi dollar relative to the Aussie dollar was that Australia looked to be more exposed to the fallout of a trade war between the US and China, Wong said.
So the market view is that hard commodities like iron ore and copper are going to come under more pressure from the trade squeeze than soft commodities, such as dairy.
Dairy prices have remained strong. They are one of the key indicators that international traders consider when weighing up the New Zealand economy.
With Australia having a closer political relationship to the US and generally a more terse relationship with China, it may also find itself closer to the sharp edge of the geopolitical tension.
New Zealand's domestic economic recovery does appear to have faltered in the past few weeks, and after all the tariff turmoil, the RBNZ is expected to cut rates further.
But the same kind of story – of trade wars slowing the global economy – is playing out in Australia, so that has not affected the balance of things too much.
Perhaps, although this is just me speculating now, the Federal election is weighing on the Aussie dollar too.
It's been notable that both the major parties – Labor and the Liberal/National coalition – have been under fire for fiscally irresponsible spending promises.
Meanwhile, as was reiterated by Finance Minister Nicola Willis in her pre-Budget speech yesterday, the New Zealand Government remains committed to playing it tight. Rise against the greenback
More broadly, the Kiwi has risen sharply in value against the US currency in recent weeks.
It has been trading up around US60c – up from around US55c just a few weeks ago.
NZ Herald senior markets reporter Jamie Gray took a look at the big picture last week.
'The imposition of trade tariffs and [US President Donald] Trump's attacks on [Federal Reserve chairman Jerome] Powell have tarnished the US dollar's allure as a safe-haven currency, which has boosted the Kiwi dollar and several other currencies,' Gray wrote.
The market was taking a view that its trade policy was going to upset the US economy and that recession risk had become heightened, BNZ's Wong said.
'The other dynamic is structural, where Trump is chipping away at the bedrock that the US economy has been built on – free trade, free capital flows and an independent Federal Reserve,' he said.
'All these sorts of things are under threat, so the risk premia around US assets has increased and the weaker US dollar is a byproduct of all that.
'Over the last decade, the US dollar and the US economy have outperformed and everyone has been long [on] US dollars, wanting a piece of the action, so that trade is just beginning to unwind.' US President Donald Trump (left) looks on as his nominee to chair the Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell, takes to the podium during a press event in 2017. Photo / Getty Images Bond battle
On a similar theme at the weekend, Wellington business editor Jenée Tibshraeny has taken a look at how US indebtedness (and dependence on the bond market) is curbing Donald Trump's policy ambitions.
With US net debt nearing 100% of gross domestic product (GDP – New Zealand's is at 25%, according to the same measure of debt used in an IMF comparison), its interest costs are material, she writes.
Trump needs interest rates to fall to stimulate growth and ease the cost of servicing the US' big pile of government debt.
Yet the more brazen he gets with tariff policies and threats to erode the independence of the Federal Reserve, the riskier he makes investing in US Government debt, otherwise known as bonds or treasuries.
If investors believe they're taking on more risk, they'll demand higher returns.
Tibshraeny quotes Harbour Asset Management co-chief executive Andrew Bascand, who describes the bond market as the US' 'Achilles heel'. All bets are off
Unpredictable moves on currency markets, extreme volatility on equity markets ... there's no question we're in unprecedented territory, with US policy overshadowing everything in the global economy.
BNZ head of research Stephen Toplis attempts to put a bit of context around the chaos with a research note this week titled 'Central Banks in Disarray'.
He points out that it is nearly impossible for central banks to produce credible long-term forecasts right now – and some have given up.
The Bank of Canada has stopped publishing forecasts and the European Central Bank did not provide forward guidance on its rate track when it released its latest monetary policy decision.
The RBNZ doesn't have to publish new forecasts and update its rate track until the next Monetary Policy Statement on May 28, but it's hard to know if the outlook will be much clearer then.
Toplis makes the case for pausing long-term forecasts and concentrating on more in-depth analysis of a range of different scenarios.
The RBNZ does have a track record of withdrawing guidance, he says.
In the monetary policy decisions of May 2020, August 2020, November 2020 and February 2021 (as Covid raged), it provided no Official Cash Rate (OCR) projection past March 2021.
'There is no reason why it couldn't do something similar at the May 28 announcement. It certainly couldn't be blamed for doing so,' Toplis writes.
RBNZ officials had already highlighted the possibility that they might produce more scenario analysis in future, he says. Budget squeeze
As mentioned earlier, Nicola Willis' pre-Budget speech yesterday has made it clear that the Government is sticking to its guns on the fiscal plan. Finance Minister Nicola Willis. Photo / Mark Mitchell
Despite forecasts of lower economic growth, which will translate to less tax revenue, Willis has reiterated the Government's intention to have the Crown accounts back in surplus by 2029.
That means a big cut to spending plans with a proposed operating allowance just $1.3 billion, down from $2.4b.
That, according to Treasury, won't be enough to fund the increased cost of delivering existing services, so expect to see more significant cuts to spending.
Willis argues there is scope there as the Government continues to reassess its priorities.
'The reality of global economic events is that if we'd pushed on with a larger operating allowance, then we would be staring down the barrel of even bigger deficits and debt,' Willis said.
Expect to hear plenty of debate in the coming weeks about the spending constraints, which some will argue are self-imposed.
The question ultimately comes down to how people feel about Crown debt and how quickly we need to pay it back to a more sustainable level – or exactly what a sustainable level is, for that matter.
It's a tough balancing act for any Government, given the options are limited – tax more, cut spending or borrow more. Or, sell some assets ... Asset recycling
New Zealand Initiative chair Roger Partridge made the case for another look at state asset sales in a column last week.
The Crown's accounts record $44.3b of taxpayer equity tied up in state-owned enterprises, he writes.
'Yet these businesses struggle to deliver returns that justify continued Government ownership.'
It's always a controversial topic in New Zealand, in part, I assume, because asset sales were done quite badly in the 1980s.
Of course, the extent to which people want the Government to be involved in owning and running assets is also one of the fundamental economic divides.
But ironically, one of the reasons the public is so suspicious of asset sales is down to a lack of trust in the Government to spend money wisely.
It doesn't matter how good the logic for selling an asset is; if the Crown squanders the windfall, we're no better off.
With that in mind, Partridge highlights the success New South Wales has had with a disciplined approach that ensures money from asset sales is 'recycled' into new infrastructure projects.
'NSW has generated A$53 billion ($56.9b) since 2012 through a straightforward principle: sell assets the Government does not need to own and invest the proceeds in infrastructure the public does need,' Partridge writes.
'Strong governance is the key to the success of the programme,' he says.
'Proceeds from the sale of state-owned assets were ring-fenced in the Restart NSW Fund, ensuring transparency and preventing funds from disappearing into general government spending.'
'This ring-fencing proved crucial for maintaining public support in a state where voters were initially as sceptical of asset sales as New Zealanders.'
Partridge points out that Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has already expressed some enthusiasm for the idea of asset recycling and suggests we may see National campaign on it for next year's election.
Liam Dann is business editor-at-large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, and also presents and produces videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003. To sign up to my weekly newsletter, click on your user profile at nzherald.co.nz and select 'My newsletters'. For a step-by-step guide, click here. If you have a burning question about the quirks or intricacies of economics send it to liam.dann@nzherald.co.nz or leave a message in the comments section.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Butter proving to be a popular fundraiser
While the skyrocketing price of butter may be leaving a bitter taste in the mouths of some, one non-profit saw a golden opportunity. Southland Paws Rescue founder Amy Greig said the organisation made $1 profit on each of the 5560 blocks of butter it sold in its latest fundraiser. Ms Greig said it was the first time it had sold butter and it had been the most successful fundraiser to date. The orders for the 250g Westland Gold blocks started rolling in thick and fast after a post about it was placed on their social media page. "Word of mouth got around and people started ordering." Jingo and cheese rolls had been used to raise revenue in the past, but the butter was less work and easier to sell. One buyer ordered $1000 of butter while ironically, 500 blocks were ordered by staff from a local dairy processing factory. Ms Greig said several orders had been received from people who made cakes for others. Prices were initially marginally lower than supermarkets, but even from the time they first started receiving orders at the start of May, Westgold community fundraising prices had risen from $4 to $5.15. "I'd rather put that dollar that we got back into a local organisation for what we do . . . than letting that supermarket profit that dollar." Orders had to be prepaid and picked up once the delivery had been made because of the logistical challenge of storing pallet loads of butter. Funds raised paid for the care of the multitudes of animals the charity looked after throughout the year. While they had a good relationship with their vet, their bill still needed to be paid. Some animal healthcare expenses ran more than $1000. Leithfield School in Canterbury sold 10,000 blocks of the golden dairy bars in a recent fundraiser, RNZ said. Invercargill's Kaye's Bakery had been importing Australian butter by 10-tonne shipments to make its biscuits. Kaye's Bakery owner Luella Penniall said three years ago the company was paying $11 per kg — now it was up to $15. Stats New Zealand data shows prices have increased more than 65% in the 12 months ending at April 2025. Stats NZ also said dairy prices were the main driver for food price increases — increasing the food price index by 3.7%. The average cost for 500g of butter was $7.42, 12 months ago. Butter hit a record high of $7992 a tonne early in May before falling to $7821 in mid-May. By Toni McDonald


Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Dunedin collective to take ownership of teams
Mystery group to the rescue. After weeks of uncertainty, there is positive news for the Otago Nuggets and Southern Hoiho. In a statement released yesterday by the New Zealand National Basketball League, Sports Entertainment Group (SEN) says it intends to transfer ownership of the Nuggets and Hoiho "into the hands of a passionate collective of local Dunedin community supporters". It did not go further into the ownership structure or who was behind the passionate collective. The transaction is expected to be completed by the end of next month. SEN's Australian sponsorship team will continue to support both teams through to September 2028, the statement said. General manager of the Nuggets and Hoiho Angela Ruske said it was "incredibly good news for basketball in Otago". "The Nuggets and Hoiho are more than just teams — they bring our community together through high-energy entertainment, inspire our youth, and create meaningful pathways for local players, coaches, and officials. They also contribute economically by drawing supporters and teams from around the country to Dunedin. "SEN has done a very good job in laying the foundation, and there's a real sense of passion and purpose to build on that legacy and take both teams to new heights. "Having local ownership brings a deeper connection and commitment to our region," she said. In the statement, SEN chief executive Craig Hutchison said his organisation was pleased to be able to provide some certainty for the clubs' players, staff, stakeholders and fans. "We flagged that our aim was to sell the teams to leaders motivated to maintain and grow them within the Otago region — a region that loves its basketball and takes great pride in its national teams, backed by an amazing and passionate fan base. "We believe both clubs are in the perfect hands, with strong local support and a deep understanding of what these teams mean to the community." Transfer of the ownership is subject to approval by the NBL's commission. — APL

1News
9 hours ago
- 1News
Call to rethink tax on KiwiSaver
KiwiSaver members could be significantly better off if New Zealand adopted a taxation model similar to Australia's, an economist says. Simplicity chief economist Shamubeel Eaqub ran some numbers modelling a system similar to Australia's, where contributions and returns are taxed at 15%. In New Zealand, full tax is paid on income contributed to KiwiSaver, and returns in PIE schemes taxed at an investor's prescribed investor rate up to 28%. Eaqub said an "average" KiwiSaver investor starting now could end up $60,000 better off in nominal terms at retirement on a model similar to Australia's. If tax was not paid on contributions or returns, they could be about $1 million better off - and if only taxes on returns were removed the gain would be about $300,000. "In Australia, the context is there's some conversation about whether the tax breaks are too generous for richer people. It's not that it's perfect but the point is in other countries it's heavily incentivised for people to save in their private pension." ADVERTISEMENT But it was not in New Zealand. Kirk Hope, chief executive of the Financial Services Council, which represents KiwiSaver providers, said the Australian model was different because that country has a means-tested pension. "The tax break that occurs in New Zealand occurs when you retire, when you get national super... that is the equivalent of about $500,000. So I think it's hard to do a comparative analysis without acknowledging that there are significant differences between the schemes and what they are trying to achieve." Winter's here, supermarket spying, and TikTok's new feature. (Source: 1News) But he said if the tax on savings for New Zealanders was reduced it would give future governments more "fiscal options" in relation to superannuation. He said New Zealand previously had a system that was EET — or exempt, exempt, taxed, where contributions were tax-exempt, exempt from tax within the scheme and then fully taxed when withdrawn. The Tax Working Group in 2018 acknowledged that the change from that system had potentially created incentives for New Zealanders to direct savings into investments like houses instead. ADVERTISEMENT Hope said it would be expensive to adjust back to EET but there could be other changes that would be more affordable. The tax working group estimated that ignoring behavioural changes, it would cost $200m to $300m a year to move to a system where returns and withdrawals were not taxed, and $2.5b a year to move to an EET system. "The higher initial cost for an EET regime arises from the fact that there will be a substantial deferral period before significant amounts are withdrawn from the scheme, and thus taxed under the third 't'. Although these are very different initial costs, the costs will be the same in the long run on a net present value basis." Hope said providing different forms of tax incentives would be beneficial for savers. He said removing or reducing the employer contribution tax would be particularly useful for low-income people. Kernel Wealth founder Dean Anderson said New Zealand was one of the few countries operating a TTE — taxed contributions, taxed returns and exempt withdrawal — model. "Our future savings would be much better off under an EET approach, where we don't pay tax on the way in but on the way out. ADVERTISEMENT "With low savings rates in NZ, the government should be exploring everything in its powers to grow savings rates, which benefits NZ and Kiwis over the long term. "But it's not a surprise. The recent meek KiwiSaver policy announcement did all the hard work to announce a positive gradual increase to KiwiSaver contributions, yet they fell short by announcing a three-year policy rather than outlining a decade plus long policy of incremental KiwiSaver increases." Ana-Marie Lockyer, chief executive at Pie Funds, said KiwiSaver members were at a disadvantage compared to Australians because there was no upfront tax incentive or concession as in Australia to encourage them to contribute more. "Maybe consideration of a mid-tier flat tax rate on savings up to a certain amount would encourage savings." She said employer contributions were also taxed so investors lost the benefits of compounding, and investors paid tax on bonds and deemed dividends on global equities so they were effectively paying a capital gains tax. "So contrary to the government's stated goal of helping New Zealanders' grow their KiwiSaver balances, these factors mean New Zealanders have less incentives to make voluntary contributions and pay more tax on investment earnings, resulting in smaller balances at retirement relative to our Australian friends."