All parties on board on Justice Varma's removal; corruption in judiciary serious matter: Kiren Rijiju
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said on Friday that all political parties are on board on the issue of the impeachment of Justice Yashwant Varma , from whose residence burnt wads of currency notes were found."I have spoken to all the senior leaders of different political parties. I will also get in touch with some of the single-MP parties because I do not want to leave out any member. So it becomes a unified stand of the Parliament of India," Rijiju said in an exclusive video interview with PTI.The minister asserted that it is not the government but members of Parliament cutting across party lines, including from the Congress, who are in favour of moving a motion to remove Justice Varma "Corruption in the judiciary is an extremely sensitive and serious matter, because the judiciary is where people get justice. If there is corruption in the judiciary, it is a serious concern for everybody. That is why the motion for the removal of Justice Yashwant Varma is to be signed by all the political parties," he said.Rijiju said he is happy that the principal opposition party, Congress, has understood the severity of the matter and agreed to be on board on the issue."I am happy that they understood the things as they should be because no party can be seen to be standing with a corrupt judge or protecting a corrupt judge," he said."When it comes to corruption in the judiciary, we have to stand together. There cannot be any partisan attitude and it should not be made a political issue," Rijiju said.The Congress has said all its MPs will support the motion against Justice Varma.Rijiju said a motion for the removal of a judge has to be signed by not less than 100 MPs in the Lok Sabha and 50 in the Rajya Sabha.The petition has to be submitted to the chair, who will inform the House, constitute an inquiry in accordance with the Judges Inquiry Act and get a report in three months."So the three-month-period requirement will have to be fulfilled. And after that the inquiry report will be tabled in Parliament and a discussion held in both Houses," Rijiju said.A fire incident at Justice Varma's Lutyens' Delhi residence in March, when he was a judge of the Delhi High Court, had led to the discovery of sacks of half-burnt cash in the outhouse.Justice Varma was subsequently repatriated to the Allahabad High Court but no judicial work was assigned to him. An in-house probe ordered by then chief justice of India Sanjeev Khanna has indicted him.Though Justice Varma has denied any wrongdoing, the inquiry panel has concluded that the judge and his family members had covert or active control over the storeroom, where the cash was found, proving his misconduct serious enough to seek his removal.On former law minister Kapil Sibal's remarks drawing a parallel between Justice Varma and Justice Shekhar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court over the latter's "controversial" statement, Rijiju said Parliament cannot be guided by "one lawyer-MP's personal agenda".Noting that Sibal is a senior person, the minister alleged that he is only driven by his "personal agenda"."We will not be driven by one lawyer-MP's agenda. We are not here to set an agenda or drive an agenda. We are working purely in the interest of the country," he said.Rijiju said Sibal does not realise that many MPs have gone far beyond him in terms of understanding, intellectual capability and the knowledge of law."He is a very average lawyer.... He cannot guide the Parliament of India. The Parliament of India will be guided by all the members of Parliament," he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
9 minutes ago
- India Today
White House releases roadmap to make US the ‘crypto capital of the world'
The White House unveiled sweeping recommendations from the President's Working Group on Digital Asset Markets, outlining an ambitious strategy to solidify the United States' leadership in blockchain and digital financial report stems from Executive Order 14178, signed by President Trump earlier this year, which directed federal agencies to align policy, regulation, and innovation with his pledge to make America the 'crypto capital of the world.'advertisement'By implementing these recommendations, policymakers can ensure that the United States leads the blockchain revolution and ushers in the Golden Age of Crypto,' the Working Group said in its report. The group — composed of officials across federal regulatory agencies — recommends a mix of legislative and executive actions, including clarity on regulatory oversight, expanded crypto banking access, a robust framework for stablecoins, and modernized tax and anti-money laundering RECOMMENDATIONS:1. Regulatory Clarity and InnovationThe Working Group calls on Congress to act on bipartisan momentum behind the CLARITY Act by granting the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) the authority to oversee non-security digital asset spot markets. It also urges regulators to embrace DeFi and allow new financial products through tools like safe harbors and regulatory sandboxes.'A fit-for-purpose market structure framework is essential to support growth and innovation,' the report states.2. Crypto-Friendly Banking ReformsAfter ending "Operation Choke Point 2.0," the Trump administration now wants clear banking rules for custody, stablecoin issuance, and blockchain use. The group stresses aligning capital requirements with real risks, not just the 'fact of their presence on a distributed ledger.'3. The GENIUS Act and StablecoinsWith the recent signing of the GENIUS Act, America has enacted its first federal stablecoin framework. The group calls for swift implementation and proposes the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act, which would codify Trump's executive order banning Central Bank Digital Currencies.'The widespread adoption of dollar-backed stablecoins will modernize payments infrastructure,' the report adds.4. Combating Illicit Finance Without OverreachThe group seeks modern AML rules that protect national security without infringing on self-custody rights or targeting law-abiding citizens.5. Digital Asset Tax ReformsThe IRS and Treasury are advised to reduce red tape, clarify rules around mining, staking, and de minimis receipts, and adjust tax codes to treat digital assets as a distinct asset class — subject to modified securities and commodity rules.- EndsMust Watch
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
'I'm proud to say no Hindu can ever be a terrorist': Amit Shah in Rajya Sabha
NEW DELHI: "I am proud to say, no Hindu can ever be a terrorist," Union home minister Amit Shah declared in Rajya Sabha on Wednesday, hitting out at Congress for manufacturing the thesis of "saffron terror" to malign majority community as part of its politics of appeasement. "They tried to give terrorism a religious colour for the sake of votes - but people of India rejected that falsehood," he said. Shah recalled the effort in some quarters to blame Hindutva outfits for the 26/11 terror attacks that Lashkar-e-Taiba carried out in Mumbai, and said Congress neta Digvijaya Singh was among those who fanned it. tnn 'Afzal Guru couldn't be hanged as long as PC was home mantri' Home minister Amit Shah recalled the effort in some quarters to blame Hindutva outfits for the 26/11 terror attacks that Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) carried out. "All this was done for political gain. Innocent people were jailed, tortured and defamed - not in pursuit of justice but to build a story that served electoral purposes," Shah said, without naming names. Significantly, his attack came on the eve of a court judgment in the Malegaon terror blasts case - the first case allegedly involving members of Abhinav Bharat, supposedly an extremist Hindutva outfit. On Tuesday, PM Narendra Modi in Lok Sabha had also attacked Congress for talking on Hindutva terror even as "Pakistan-backed terror organisations like the LeT were carrying out bomb attacks in different parts" during its regimes. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like TV providers are furious: this gadget gives you access to all channels Techno Mag Learn More Undo In a leaked diplomatic cable, a neta can be heard saying that he was more concerned about "Hindu terror", Modi had said, in what was seen as a reference to the Wikileaks disclosure of a purported conversation between a US diplomat and Rahul Gandhi, then a Congress MP. Participating in the special discussion on Operation Sindoor and Operation Mahadev, Shah accused Congress of enabling terrorism through decades of "appeasement politics" and weakening India's internal security. "The only reason terrorism spread in this country was because of your (Congress) vote-bank calculations," he said. He also said death sentence for Afzal Guru, who was convicted for the terror attack on Parliament, could not be carried out for long as P Chidambaram was home minister. On J&K, Shah said terrorism was now at its lowest point. "There was a time when Pakistan didn't even need to send terrorists. Our own youth were being radicalised. But in the last six months, not a single Kashmiri youth has picked up a gun. All those being eliminated now are Pakistanis," he said. "In the last six months, terrorist groups have not been able to enlist a single local youth," said Shah, who emphasised that the last elections in J&K were the fairest the it has seen. "Elections in J&K were routinely rigged. One senior security officer told me that his main job during the polls was not to ensure safety but to stuff ballots," he said, adding that faith in the fairness has led to a huge turnaround in sentiment. "There was not a single village where processions were not taken out against the killings of tourists at Pahalgam," he said. On Pakistan, he reiterated, "There will be no dialogue until terrorism ends. We stopped only after they pleaded for a ceasefire - when they were on their knees."
Economic Times
39 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Coup in Ukraine? Russia claims US-UK planning to oust Zelensky and replace him with former Ukrainian Army chief
Political context and anti-corruption controversy Resetting Kiev-West relations and aid continuity Live Events Background on Valery Zaluzhny (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service ( SVR ) has accused the United States and the United Kingdom of orchestrating a secret plan to remove Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky and install former Commander-in-Chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, Valery Zaluzhny , as the new president, reported TASS According to the SVR, a clandestine meeting was held in an Alpine resort involving high-level Ukrainian officials Andrey Yermak (head of Zelensky's presidential office), Kirill Budanov (chief of Ukraine's Defense Ministry intelligence), and Valery Zaluzhny himself, alongside US and UK representatives. During this meeting, the Western allies purportedly decided to support Zaluzhny's candidacy for the SVR alleges that Yermak and Budanov quickly agreed ('snapped a salute') to this decision after securing promises from the US and UK to allow them to retain their current influential positions and have their interests taken into account in future Ukrainian personnel to Russian intelligence as reported by TASS, this secret arrangement sheds light on recent political maneuvers within Ukraine, notably Zelensky's controversial attempts to restrict the powers of local anti-corruption agencies. The SVR claims that these moves were engineered by Yermak to clear the political field for Zaluzhny's subsequent rise and provided a pretext for Western powers to paint Zelensky's administration as authoritarian, thereby justifying plans to remove him from power in the name of defending attempts to curb independent anti-corruption bodies had sparked protests in Ukraine and criticism from Western governments, which contributed to political instability. Following backlash, Zelensky even submitted a bill reversing the curtailment to reinforce the powers of these watchdogs, though with conditions such as security vetting of employees six months SVR asserts that the decision to replace Zelensky with Zaluzhny was framed as a necessary step to 'reset' Ukraine's relations with Western partners, particularly Washington , and to ensure continued military and financial aid amid Ukraine's ongoing conflict with officials question the democratic legitimacy of a top-level political decision made in secret at a foreign resort, asking Ukrainians if this is the democracy, independence, and self-determination they dreamed Zaluzhny served as Ukraine's Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces until early 2025 and currently acts as Ukraine's ambassador to the United Kingdom. He is credited with significant military leadership during Ukraine's resistance in the ongoing war. The SVR claims that both Western countries and certain Ukrainian officials see Zaluzhny as a preferable successor to official statements have been issued by the US, UK, or Ukrainian governments to confirm or deny the SVR's allegations.
