Big US-funded chicken project shuts down in Lesotho
A $31.4 million (about R562-million) United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) project aimed at transforming Lesotho's poultry sector has been terminated.
The five-year initiative, launched under the American Food for Progress programme, planned to grow 28,000 poultry enterprises in Lesotho, boosting meat production by 40% and egg production by 30% by 2028.
Dubbed the Sustainable Transformation of Enterprises in the Poultry Sector (STEPS), the project was also designed to reduce Lesotho's heavy dependence on imported poultry products by empowering local farmers through access to quality inputs, financial training, and market linkages. The broader aim was to improve food security and increase incomes along the value chain.
Announcing the project, the USDA said in 2021 that Lesotho had imported poultry products worth $39-million, with more than 80% of poultry meat sourced from neighbouring countries. The country also imports inputs such as fertile eggs, day-old chicks, livestock feed, services, and veterinary products.
In an October 2023 statement, the US Embassy in Maseru said Land O'Lakes Venture37, an American company, had been selected to implement the programme in Lesotho. It partnered with the International Research Institute, the World Poultry Foundation, and the locally based Rural Self-Help Development Association.
But less than two years after its launch, the STEPS project has been terminated.
Reuters reported earlier this month that the USDA had notified grantees on 14 May 2025 that their Food for Progress awards had been ended. Speaking to GroundUp, Rural Self-Help Managing Director 'Mampho Thulo confirmed the news, saying her organisation had been notified of the decision by its partner Land O'Lakes last week.
Land O'Lakes technical advisor Tsoteli Kuleile told GroundUp that the company had been told to suspend the project and to refer all communication to the company's country director, Fidel O' Donovan. However, O' Donovan has not responded to questions sent to him by GroundUp .
'WE DIDN'T SEE IT COMING'
Thulo said their association had been worried after the US withdrew funding from other initiatives, such as USAID and PEPFAR projects, and the recent R6-billion Millennium Challenge Account. However, she had believed agricultural projects would be spared.
'We still had our fears, but we were over 90% confident that it would not be terminated… We thought they would be careful not to cut agriculture grants, especially those that transform agricultural products,' Thulo said.
She said the STEPS project was still in its early stages. A training curriculum for farmers was being finalised and tenders were being prepared for construction projects.
According to Thulo, Rural Self-Help was responsible for a $1.2-million budget under the STEPS project.
The sudden halt has left thousands of poultry farmers in limbo. While Land O'Lakes focused on national-level commercial farming, Rural Self-Help was actively engaged with grassroots farmers across seven districts, according to Thulo.
The targeted districts were Botha Bothe, Leribe, Berea, Maseru, Mafeteng, Mohale's Hoek, and Quthing, with Rural Self-Help focusing on broiler and egg layer production.
In those districts, Thulo said the organisation was working with farmers ranging from those raising chickens for subsistence to farmers keeping 500 chickens. 'The plan was to support 23,000 to 28,000 businesses by 2028,' she added.
Thulo said she had to break the news to beneficiaries. 'This beautiful project, meant to transform your poultry enterprises, is no more. We are shocked, and the farmers are shocked too.'
The association plans to meet with farmer representatives this week to chart a path forward.
Thulo said more than 10 staff members had been sent home.
Limpho Salai, chairperson of the Basotho Poultry Farmers Association, whose members were primary beneficiaries of the project, told GroundUp that Land O'Lakes technical advisor Kuleile had instructed him not to speak to the media and to refer all inquiries to him.
GroundUp asked for comment from the US Embassy in Maseru but no response had been received by the time of publication. Previously, the Embassy has referred similar inquiries to the US foreign affairs administration in Washington.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
32 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
US pushes countries for best offers by Wednesday as tariff deadline looms
Trump administration wants countries to detail tariff rates, potential US investments Trade group welcomes move to accelerate trade talks USTR draft letter reveals urgency to finalize deals with trading partners Court ruling challenges legality of Trump's sweeping tariff policies By Jarrett Renshaw The draft, from the office of the United States Trade Representative, provides a window into how President Donald Trump plans to bring to a close unwieldy negotiations with dozens of countries that kicked off on April 9 when he paused his 'Liberation Day' tariffs for 90 days until July 8 after stock, bond and currency markets revolted over the sweeping nature of the levies. The document suggests an urgency within the administration to complete deals against its own tight deadline. While officials such as White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett have repeatedly promised that several agreements were nearing completion, so far only one agreement has been reached with a major U.S. trading partner: Britain. Even that limited pact was more akin to a framework for ongoing talks than a final deal. In the draft, the U.S. is asking countries to list their best proposals in a number of key areas, including tariff and quota offers for purchase of U.S. industrial and agricultural products and plans to remedy any non-tariff barriers. Other requested items include any commitments on digital trade and economic security, along with country-specific commitments, according to the letter. The U.S. will evaluate the responses within days and offer 'a possible landing zone' that could include a reciprocal tariff rate, according to the letter. It was unclear which countries would receive the letter, but it was directed at those with active negotiations that included meetings and exchanges of documents. Washington has been engaged in such talks with the European Union, Japan, Vietnam and India, among others. A USTR official said trade talks were ongoing. 'Productive negotiations with many key trading partners continue at a rapid pace. It is in all parties' interest to take stock of progress and assess any next steps.' 'REGARDLESS OF ONGOING LITIGATION' Tiffany Smith, vice president of global trade policy at the National Foreign Trade Council, welcomed the USTR moves. 'We are encouraged that USTR is moving negotiations ahead as quickly as they can,' she told Reuters, adding that trade deals that removed barriers for U.S. companies abroad and lowered U.S. tariffs would be 'a win-win if they are done in a way that returns predictability and stability to trade relationships.' Trump's ambitious – and often frenetic – tariff policy is a pillar of his 'America First' economic agenda as he seeks to reshape U.S. trade relationships, reduce trade deficits and protect American industries. Republican lawmakers are also banking on tariffs to add to federal revenue and offset the cost of the tax cut legislation now working its way through Congress. Trump's tariff policies have taken investors on a rollercoaster ride. In May, U.S. stocks held their biggest rally of any month since November 2023, but that was after global indexes had cratered under the barrage of Trump's tariff announcements through February, March and early April. Stocks were little changed on Monday afternoon after Trump announced a surprise doubling of tariffs on steel and aluminum imports on Friday at an event in Pittsburgh. Meanwhile, the legality of the approach used for imposing the most sweeping of his tariffs has been cast into doubt. Last Wednesday, the Court of International Trade ruled that Trump had overstepped his authority with tariffs devised under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, including the 'Liberation Day' levies and earlier ones imposed on goods from Canada, Mexico and China related to Trump's accusations that the three countries have facilitated the flow of fentanyl into the U.S. Less than 24 hours later, an appeals court temporarily paused that decision. The tariffs at the center of the legal dispute are expected to remain in effect as the case plays out. The draft letter to trading partners warns them not to believe the tariffs will be sidelined if the court rules against Trump's use of the IEEPA. 'Regardless of ongoing litigation concerning the President's reciprocal tariff action in U.S. courts, the President intends to continue this tariff program pursuant to other robust legal authorities if necessary, so it is important that we continue our discussions on these matters,' the draft says.
Daily Maverick
8 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
EXCLUSIVE: Joel Burke, who wrote the book on Estonia's modern history, is American — that's not weird at all
Of course, Joel Burke asked for some context about the claims of white genocide in South Africa. He is, after all, an American. He is also a tech nerd, and, importantly for this information trade, the author of Rebooting a Nation: The Incredible Rise of Estonia, E-Government and the Startup Revolution – so Daily Maverick schooled him on SA history over lunch at the e-Governance Conference (and promised not to mention where he works). Question: Joel, who are you when you're not trying to reboot a nation — and what's this book about, really? Answer: I'm Joel Burke. I wrote Rebooting a Nation: The Incredible Rise of Estonia, E-Government and the Startup Revolution. It covers Estonia's digital transformation journey — from shedding Soviet shackles to becoming a digital powerhouse. Q: Rebooting a Nation sounds like a Silicon Valley pitch for regime change. What exactly does the book dig into? A: It's split into three parts: the economic upheaval that shaped modern Estonia; the nuts and bolts of e-government infrastructure (think digital ID and the X-Road); and finally, a look into Estonia's 'country-as-a-service' ambition — a concept that's both literal and slightly sci-fi. Q: There's this almost mythic quote floating around: 'This is what happens when you let engineers build a country.' You buy into that? A: It's apocryphal, but not inaccurate. Estonia, during the Soviet era, was a kind of bootcamp for engineers. That engineering mindset – pragmatic, systems-driven – has left fingerprints all over their digital governance approach. Q: Sure, having tech-heads in power helps. But what's the secret sauce beyond that? A: More than just having tech-minded people, I think it was also at least an elite or societal consensus that they were going to invest long-term in developing these e-government services. If you look at the timeline, while they did it quite fast, it didn't happen in just one administration, but over a series. This highlights the importance of building things with a long-term view and having collective buy-in. Q: Estonia doesn't have oil, rare earth minerals or much coastline. How does it sell itself to the world? A: Through conversations, I've observed a sense that because they don't have any natural resources, what they are selling to the world, and quite aggressively in Africa, is this idea of digitalisation. It's intangible, consisting of strategies and things they can build and implement independently. I often think of Estonia as analogous to places like Singapore or Israel in this way; without natural resources, they invest in their people and build up knowledge industries. Q: And does the government actually support those local tech businesses, or is it all just marketing brochures and startup memes? A: The Estonian government acts like a beta customer. It uses homegrown digital services and then those companies – like Nortal and Cybernetica – go global. It's a national proof-of-concept pipeline, not just flag-waving. Q: You drew an analogy between exporting digital infrastructure and the defence industry in your book. Can you explain that comparison? A: It's not a perfect analogy, but I compared it in my book. While Estonia is small, building and helping another country like South Africa or Namibia develop its e-government system is a way of forging a very deep, long-term relationship. It's not the same as selling F-35s, but helping build digital infrastructure to run a country is a pretty deep relationship. This is both an economic strategy for the companies and part of a long-term diplomatic strategy for Estonia. Being small, they want to maximise their number of friends. Q: Why the focus on exporting digitalisation, particularly to regions like Africa? A: I think there's a feeling that Estonia got to leapfrog much of the West when they gained independence. They jumped directly to modern systems; for instance, they never really used cheques in banking here. There is a feeling that Africa could potentially do this too. There's a belief that Africa could move much faster than some older nations with entrenched bureaucracy. It's seen as an exciting opportunity for many Estonians and companies. Q: How does Estonia position itself internationally, within organisations like the EU and Nato? A: I think there's always an element of Estonia trying to be the exemplar of all things, like Western values, the EU, and also America. For instance, regarding military defence spending in Nato, Estonia has always met its commitments and gone above and beyond. They are planning for a very high percentage next year. It shows the country is really trying to make a difference. Q: Besides its digital achievements, how else does Estonia try to stand out internationally? A: Estonia wants to stand out in a way that doesn't just bucket them as 'one of these poor post-Soviet countries'. They work very hard to differentiate themselves. They aim to be seen as more than just Nordic or part of a less developed group. They highlight achievements like super low corruption (tied with Iceland or something, ranked high globally), ease of doing business, digitalisation, and startups. In international relations, they try to be a model citizen and maintain strong alliances. It's about showing they are a strong democratic nation that has invented amazing things and that they matter. Q: Sounds slick. But under the hood, what are Estonia's unresolved issues? A: Inequality. For a tiny country, they're surprisingly far down the global equality rankings. The gap between Tallinn and everywhere else is wide, and there's also a lingering divide between Estonian and Russian-speaking populations. Q: Where do you see the main sources of this inequality? A: I break it up into two buckets. There's Tallinn and the rest of the country divide. Tallinn is where the startup ecosystem, conferences and wealth creation are happening. This is somewhat natural, collecting wealth in the city. The second bucket is the Estonian-speaking and Russian-speaking Estonian divide. This has been a long-term challenge regarding integration and human rights. If you only speak Russian in a country where Estonian or English is the lingua franca for business, you can end up with fewer job opportunities. This creates inequality. Q: How is Estonia trying to address this inequality, particularly the linguistic divide? A: The country has started transitioning to all-Estonian education after Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Education overall is good, with high Pisa scores. However, there's still a historical legacy from the time it was an occupied country, which was only 30 years ago and within people's lifetimes. Just like you can still see economic data differences between West and East Germany, Estonia struggles with this legacy. They are making serious efforts to correct it, but it takes time. Q: Can e-governance play a role in bridging these gaps and reducing inequality? A: I think so. Estonia identified tech and digital as areas where the country was on a level playing field with the rest of the world in the early 90s. Tech does have a great way of levelling the playing field. There are active entrepreneurs trying to bring more people into the system and integrate them, helping people get into the core tech industry, which is key. DM
Daily Maverick
8 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Presidential Youth Employment Initiative delivers 76,000 job opportunities in Q4 — but it's a drop in the ocean
Despite the creation of some jobs, youth unemployment in South Africa — now at 46.1% — remains a national crisis. The Presidential Youth Employment Intervention (PYEI) continues to deliver meaningful change in the lives of South Africa's young people, according to the deputy minister in the Presidency, Nonceba Mhlauli. At a media briefing on Monday, Mhlauli highlighted the initiative's progress during the fourth quarter (Q4) of the 2024/2025 financial year, marking five years of sustained effort to combat South Africa's unrelenting youth unemployment crisis. During Q4 alone, 76,569 job opportunities were accessed by young people in South Africa, including 60,444 through and 16,125 via the Employment Services of South Africa. Additional highlights included: 15,137 private sector placements via the Youth Employment Service; 5,504 TVET graduates placed through the Department of Higher Education and Training; 43,000+ young entrepreneurs supported by the National Youth Development Agency and the Department of Small Business Development; and 2,048 young people recruited under Phase 3 of the Revitalised National Youth Service. The innovative Jobs Boost Outcomes Fund also saw progress, with more than 5,400 young people enrolled and more than 3,000 placed into quality, sustainable jobs, with R70-million disbursed to 11 implementing partners to date. Bleak employment stats Three weeks ago, Stats SA released its Q1 Labour Force Survey for 2025, which revealed that the economy had shed 300,000 jobs and youth unemployment had increased to 46.1%. While the 76,000 job opportunities may alleviate the joblessness crisis for a small number of South Africans, it's not enough to address the crisis. 'The numbers are not as great as we want them to be, but we are seeing that we are making a difference,' said Mhlauli. The deputy minister said the recently released labour force survey showed that 132,000 new jobs were created in Q4 of 2024, and the opportunities created by the PYEI within that period contributed to the figure. 'Of course the job growth within the last quarter hasn't been as high as the previous quarter where we had almost 300,000 new jobs, but of course, in the 132,000 jobs that we are reporting in the last quarter we can see a direct correlation between what we are doing through trying to find employment opportunities for young people and the official unemployment rate of young people,' she said. Some young people still locked out In his weekly newsletter, President Cyril Ramaphosa praised the Basic Education Employment Initiative (BEEI), which on Monday saw 200,000 young people return to school, this time as teacher assistants. The BEEI, which was on hold for a year because the government failed to release the funding from the UIF Labour Activation Programme, aims to give young people work experience so they are more attractive to employers. In May, Daily Maverick reported that many unemployed young people were vying for limited employment opportunities, resulting in an overwhelming volume of applications for the very small number of opportunities offered by the nation's job placement programmes and initiatives. Omphemetse Setino (24) is one of the millions of young people who applied for the latest phase of the BEEI and didn't get a job, but still hopes to find employment. 'I applied in April and I was looking forward to actually getting a job, but I have not heard back from them, and all I feel now is disappointment,' said Setino. Setino told Daily Maverick that a position in the BEEI would have allowed him to help his mother support their household. 'I know that you can't get every job you apply for, but it's been four years since I finished matric and I am still unemployed,' he said. While he commended the government for creating pathways for employment for young people, he said more could be done. 'The only way you hear about these programmes is through word of mouth. I know so many people who are shocked when they hear the government is running a jobs programme, because the government is not communicating directly with us. They can go to malls for a political rally, but they can't go to schools to tell us which programmes are running and where. It's very disheartening,' he said. Mhlauli said the Presidency was working on addressing how it communicates about programmes in the initiative, including visiting stakeholders in their communities to raise awareness. Economic growth While Mhlauli acknowledged that the unemployment rate overshadowed the successes of the PYEI, Tshego Walker, the PYEI programme manager, said the government had to focus on economic growth because 'economic growth translates to jobs'. Walker said the department was working on a strategy to foster meaningful job creation for young people in light of the bleak unemployment stats. 'Our sister programme, Operation Vulindlela, is implementing structural reforms that will grow the economy. It is important that, as the economy grows, young people benefit from the jobs that are created, but we have seen in the last 16 years that this hasn't been the case. The relationship between economic growth and youth employment is a weak one. We have to make sure that we specifically focus on targeting young people and make sure that they benefit from that growth,' said Walker. Operation Vulindlela, launched in the aftermath of the economic toll the Covid-19 pandemic had on SA, aims to reform the nation's economy to drive growth. In May, President Cyril Ramaphosa announced the second phase of the government-led initiative, which will focus on addressing spatial inequality to bring economic opportunities to townships and rural areas and develop a Digital Transformation Roadmap, in addition to expanding on the sector-specific reforms implemented during Phase 1. Walker said the initiative was focusing on the following interventions to address challenges in job creation for young people: Inclusive hiring: The Presidency is aware of hiring practices in the private sector that don't favour young people. Through the PYEI, the Presidency plans to shift hiring practices so that young people can benefit from new job creation; Supporting sectors with growth barriers: The Presidency will focus on addressing barriers to growth in specific sectors that can create jobs for young people, like the tourism industry, where international arrivals have not recovered since the Covid-19 pandemic; and Supporting SMMEs: Given that the current labour market cannot create jobs for the one million new entrants every year to the labour force, the government will focus on supporting young entrepreneurs to create their own pathways into employment through a Youth Hustler Fund. Engaging discouraged work seekers The Q4 labour force survey revealed that approximately 1.9 million young South Africans were unemployed but had stopped actively looking for jobs because they had become discouraged about the prospect of finding employment. Walker said that by reaching young people where they live, the Revitalised National Youth Service (NYS) aimed to incentivise discouraged job seekers to re-enter the labour force. The Revitalised NYS is a paid community programme for young people. 'They don't pay for transport to town, and it's solving community needs. Currently, in Phase 4, we have 40,000 opportunities that are going to these young people,' said Walker. She said the Presidency aimed to make the NYS a catch-all for young people who weren't in training or employment, and it would function as an alternative pathway to getting this group of people engaged in the labour market. 'What we don't want is seeing young people sitting at a corner. That is precisely what we don't want and that is what we are trying to address through this programme,' said Mhlauli. DM
