
EXCLUSIVE: Joel Burke, who wrote the book on Estonia's modern history, is American — that's not weird at all
Of course, Joel Burke asked for some context about the claims of white genocide in South Africa. He is, after all, an American. He is also a tech nerd, and, importantly for this information trade, the author of Rebooting a Nation: The Incredible Rise of Estonia, E-Government and the Startup Revolution – so Daily Maverick schooled him on SA history over lunch at the e-Governance Conference (and promised not to mention where he works).
Question: Joel, who are you when you're not trying to reboot a nation — and what's this book about, really?
Answer: I'm Joel Burke. I wrote Rebooting a Nation: The Incredible Rise of Estonia, E-Government and the Startup Revolution. It covers Estonia's digital transformation journey — from shedding Soviet shackles to becoming a digital powerhouse.
Q: Rebooting a Nation sounds like a Silicon Valley pitch for regime change. What exactly does the book dig into?
A: It's split into three parts: the economic upheaval that shaped modern Estonia; the nuts and bolts of e-government infrastructure (think digital ID and the X-Road); and finally, a look into Estonia's 'country-as-a-service' ambition — a concept that's both literal and slightly sci-fi.
Q: There's this almost mythic quote floating around: 'This is what happens when you let engineers build a country.' You buy into that?
A: It's apocryphal, but not inaccurate. Estonia, during the Soviet era, was a kind of bootcamp for engineers. That engineering mindset – pragmatic, systems-driven – has left fingerprints all over their digital governance approach.
Q: Sure, having tech-heads in power helps. But what's the secret sauce beyond that?
A: More than just having tech-minded people, I think it was also at least an elite or societal consensus that they were going to invest long-term in developing these e-government services. If you look at the timeline, while they did it quite fast, it didn't happen in just one administration, but over a series. This highlights the importance of building things with a long-term view and having collective buy-in.
Q: Estonia doesn't have oil, rare earth minerals or much coastline. How does it sell itself to the world?
A: Through conversations, I've observed a sense that because they don't have any natural resources, what they are selling to the world, and quite aggressively in Africa, is this idea of digitalisation. It's intangible, consisting of strategies and things they can build and implement independently. I often think of Estonia as analogous to places like Singapore or Israel in this way; without natural resources, they invest in their people and build up knowledge industries.
Q: And does the government actually support those local tech businesses, or is it all just marketing brochures and startup memes?
A: The Estonian government acts like a beta customer. It uses homegrown digital services and then those companies – like Nortal and Cybernetica – go global. It's a national proof-of-concept pipeline, not just flag-waving.
Q: You drew an analogy between exporting digital infrastructure and the defence industry in your book. Can you explain that comparison?
A: It's not a perfect analogy, but I compared it in my book. While Estonia is small, building and helping another country like South Africa or Namibia develop its e-government system is a way of forging a very deep, long-term relationship. It's not the same as selling F-35s, but helping build digital infrastructure to run a country is a pretty deep relationship. This is both an economic strategy for the companies and part of a long-term diplomatic strategy for Estonia. Being small, they want to maximise their number of friends.
Q: Why the focus on exporting digitalisation, particularly to regions like Africa?
A: I think there's a feeling that Estonia got to leapfrog much of the West when they gained independence. They jumped directly to modern systems; for instance, they never really used cheques in banking here. There is a feeling that Africa could potentially do this too. There's a belief that Africa could move much faster than some older nations with entrenched bureaucracy. It's seen as an exciting opportunity for many Estonians and companies.
Q: How does Estonia position itself internationally, within organisations like the EU and Nato?
A: I think there's always an element of Estonia trying to be the exemplar of all things, like Western values, the EU, and also America. For instance, regarding military defence spending in Nato, Estonia has always met its commitments and gone above and beyond. They are planning for a very high percentage next year. It shows the country is really trying to make a difference.
Q: Besides its digital achievements, how else does Estonia try to stand out internationally?
A: Estonia wants to stand out in a way that doesn't just bucket them as 'one of these poor post-Soviet countries'. They work very hard to differentiate themselves. They aim to be seen as more than just Nordic or part of a less developed group. They highlight achievements like super low corruption (tied with Iceland or something, ranked high globally), ease of doing business, digitalisation, and startups. In international relations, they try to be a model citizen and maintain strong alliances. It's about showing they are a strong democratic nation that has invented amazing things and that they matter.
Q: Sounds slick. But under the hood, what are Estonia's unresolved issues?
A: Inequality. For a tiny country, they're surprisingly far down the global equality rankings. The gap between Tallinn and everywhere else is wide, and there's also a lingering divide between Estonian and Russian-speaking populations.
Q: Where do you see the main sources of this inequality?
A: I break it up into two buckets. There's Tallinn and the rest of the country divide. Tallinn is where the startup ecosystem, conferences and wealth creation are happening. This is somewhat natural, collecting wealth in the city. The second bucket is the Estonian-speaking and Russian-speaking Estonian divide. This has been a long-term challenge regarding integration and human rights. If you only speak Russian in a country where Estonian or English is the lingua franca for business, you can end up with fewer job opportunities. This creates inequality.
Q: How is Estonia trying to address this inequality, particularly the linguistic divide?
A: The country has started transitioning to all-Estonian education after Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Education overall is good, with high Pisa scores. However, there's still a historical legacy from the time it was an occupied country, which was only 30 years ago and within people's lifetimes. Just like you can still see economic data differences between West and East Germany, Estonia struggles with this legacy. They are making serious efforts to correct it, but it takes time.
Q: Can e-governance play a role in bridging these gaps and reducing inequality?
A: I think so. Estonia identified tech and digital as areas where the country was on a level playing field with the rest of the world in the early 90s. Tech does have a great way of levelling the playing field. There are active entrepreneurs trying to bring more people into the system and integrate them, helping people get into the core tech industry, which is key. DM
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Malema should apologise for 'Kill the Boer' chant
Pastor Mark Burns said Malema singing the song is "hurting my white brothers and sister" in SA. An American pastor who is a fierce ally and supporter of US President Donald Trump believes the EFF and its leader Julius Malema should not be taken seriously and are attention-seekers for chanting the 'divisive' 'Kill the Boer, kill the farmer'. Pastor Burns has defended his stance that there is no white genocide being perpetrated against white Afrikaners in South Africa After recently visiting South Africa and speaking to white farmers, Burns said he does not believe there is a genocide being perpetrated against White Afrikaners in the country, adding everyone he talked to was 'extremely shocked to discover that this was the narrative being played out in Washington, DC.' Ambush Last month, Trump ambushed President Cyril Ramaphosa by playing a video of Malema's speech to support his claims of an alleged white genocide against farmers. He also questioned why the EFF leader had not been arrested. WATCH Pastor Mark Burns speaking about Malema ALSO READ: 'There is no white genocide happening here,' says Trump's top pastor after SA visit Meeting Malema Burns said he believes 'Kill the Boer, kill the farmer' is a chant 'designed to pull people apart and not biblical'. 'The fact that we're talking about him [Malema] is not even good because, you know, that's spewing hate. Unless he wants to come and apologise and say, 'you know what, pastor, you're right, me singing that song is hurting my white brothers and sisters here in my beautiful nation, even though it is important, and it has historical evidence.' 'Yes, Mandela, whom President Trump spoke highly of, has great respect for him, and he spoke about him twice, did sing that song. Even your Constitutional [Court], I think, voted that it was his [Malema's] legal right to sing the song, it's still causing division in our nation, on a nation that is still pretty new from apartheid,' Burn said. Burns dismissed the EFF leader as 'just a character who is screaming, trying to garner attention for himself'. ALSO READ: 'There is doubt in Trump's head about genocide in SA,' Ramaphosa says [VIDEO] 'Kill the Boer, kill the farmer' In March, AfriForum suffered a final blow in its attempt to have the controversial chant 'Kill the Boer, kill the farmer' declared as hate speech. The Constitutional Court (ConCourt) delivered a brief ruling dismissing AfriForum's application for leave to appeal. Malema said he would never be intimidated by Trump. 'Well, I'm not fearful. As a revolutionary, part of being killed is one of those honours you must wear with pride, but I'm not going to be reckless. 'I will never stop singing a song that Winnie Mandela sang. That would be a betrayal to the struggle of our people'. 'False propaganda' Burns said he has been accused of spreading 'false propaganda' about no white genocide taking place in South Africa. 'To those accusing me of spreading false propaganda because I don't believe there is a white genocide happening among South African farmers, I say this: go speak to the White Afrikaans farmers and former apartheid leaders I met with. 'Some of them are strongly anti-ANC, yet they still shared serious concerns about safety in their communities. If that is considered false propaganda, then they are being accused of spreading it about their own people, which doesn't make sense,' Burns said. ALSO READ: WATCH: Donald Trump ambushes Cyril Ramaphosa in Oval Office Killing of white people Burns added that he is not denying that some white individuals may have been killed because of their race. 'But based on what I saw and what was shared with me, far more black South Africans are being killed by the same criminal elements that are thriving in a weak and struggling economy. 'Let's be clear. There is only one South Africa. The days of racial division under the apartheid government are over. South Africa is the Rainbow Nation, built on unity, diversity, and hope. 'White Afrikaans, Black Africans, and all others are South Africans together. The future of the country depends on people standing together, not apart,' Burns said. Who is Burns? Burns is the minister of Harvest Worship Centre in South Carolina and a Republican who ran for state governor. He served as a board member of pastors for Trump. An early supporter of Trump in 2016, Time magazine named Burns one of the US president's top advisors. ALSO READ: Piers Morgan slams Ramaphosa for defending 'Kill the Boer' chant [VIDEO]


Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
E-hailing drivers demand action over frozen licence approvals while impoundment fees soar
E-hailing drivers in Cape Town are considering legal action after the City froze licence approvals, leaving them vulnerable to having their vehicles impounded. E-hailing drivers are up in arms over the City of Cape Town freezing the approval of additional licences since the end of March, when the City claimed it had met its 'full allowed quota' of 3,354 licences. It had received more than 14,000 applications. The City and Western Cape Mobility Department, community and industry groups have been meeting to determine the next steps, with drivers complaining that they have to pay exorbitant impoundment fees for operating without licences. Looking forward, Councillor Rob Quintas, a member of the City's Mayoral Committee for Urban Mobility, told Daily Maverick: 'The revised supply and demand for metered taxi services, which includes e-hailing, has been determined. 'The City will be presenting the revised metered taxi supply and demand numbers at a Special Metered Taxi Intermodal Planning Sub-Committee meeting on 17 June 2025, and will make this information available to the public.' Western Cape Mobility Department spokesperson Muneera Allie said: 'Once approval is given (to the Permit Regulatory Entity by the City for additional applicants), and a quota is determined… applications will be handled on a first-come-first-served basis.' E-hailing drivers are required to have an operating licence or risk their cars being impounded by the City, due to an amendment to the National Land Transport Act signed in June 2024. If there is a continued shortage of operating licences, the Western Cape E-Hailing Association (WCEA) is considering taking the Western Cape Permit Regulatory Entity and City of Cape Town to court to call for a pause on impoundments until the permitting system is reformed. A court ruled in favor of e-hailing drivers in a similar case in Pretoria. There, drivers proved it was 'impossible' to obtain a permit due to City backlogs. The association also calls on the regulatory entity to stop taking applications and application fees before new permits open up. Quintas clarified: 'Legally, the regulatory entity cannot refuse to accept applications even if the upper limit of the City's supply and demand numbers have been saturated already. Therefore, the operators apply at their own risk.' The 'trauma' of impoundment Drivers in Cape Town have been feeling the impact of impoundments as the City stalls in approving new operating licences. The impoundment fees are high. One driver, who wished to remain anonymous for fear of being blocked from driving, said: 'The fees were R7,500, R2,500, and R1,000 — totalling R11,000 in one go. The car is financed, and once it was impounded, I couldn't make the instalment, couldn't pay for the business insurance, and couldn't raise money to get the car released. It's a trauma I can never forget.' According to the City of Cape Town's website: 'The impoundment fee is for the initial storage, hooking, salvaging and administration costs for the vehicle's impoundment… The fee increases for first, second and third offences.' In addition, drivers must pay for any outstanding fines before receiving their vehicle. Immediately, drivers feel the impact of impoundment. A driver said: 'I was impounded at 8.45am, 15km away from home, with no money on me. I had to walk home through unsafe areas. The police don't care how you get back — they just take your car… Where is the dignity?' In the long term, these fees can be devastating. According to the Deputy Secretary-General of the Western Cape E-hailing Association, Yusuf Dahir, a driver who works for 12 hours a day (the maximum allowed for Uber) earns approximately R1,000/day or R7,000/week. An estimated 80 to 90% of drivers do not own their vehicles. In general, R2,000-R3,000 of their weekly income goes to rent or weekly commission for the vehicle and R2,000 goes to petrol, leaving drivers with about R2,000 to take home at the end of the week. With this reality, the R10,000 impoundment fee is enormous. Drivers recognise that operating without licences is unlawful. Another driver said, 'All we ask is for the City of Cape Town to allow us to apply for e-hailing permits — and approve them. We want to feed our families through honest work.' But drivers are frustrated at the inability to acquire the necessary legal permits, and increasingly feel that the City is using them as a cash cow to collect impoundment fees. At the same time, Uber, Bolt, and other e-hailing services continue to allow new drivers to join the platforms, further allowing the cycle to continue. 'Equitable balance' According to the Mobility Department's Allie, the number of permits allotted in the quota is determined to 'ensure an equitable balance between the demand and supply of metered taxi and e-hailing services'. While applications may be accepted, the regulatory entity has informed applicants that operating licences may only be issued once approval for additional applications is received. According to Maxine Bezuidenhout, the spokesperson for the City of Cape Town's Traffic Services, 42 e-hailing vehicles were impounded in April 2025, and 45 had been impounded by 30 May. Drivers can request reimbursement for the impoundment fees from Uber, but still have to pay the fee up front. Dahir says it often takes days, if not weeks, for Uber to pay out. 'It is likely they will not reimburse.' Dahir also shared concerns about how Uber gathers funds for the impoundment fees. Dahir claimed the money did not come out of pocket for Uber. Instead, according to the drivers, Uber deducted additional fees — beyond its commission — from the driver before their cars were impounded, and used that money to reimburse them for the impoundment fees. For example, according to the drivers, there were additional, 'ever-increasing' fees for accepting rides to, and pick-ups from, airports and unexplained additional deductions at the end of trips. In short, they claimed that Uber was not really paying for the impoundment fees, but rather taking it from the driver in advance through these fees. Uber 'aware of challenges' When asked directly about how the reimbursement process worked, an Uber South Africa spokesperson said in a statement: 'Uber would like to refute the claims made by the drivers. We unequivocally maintain that these claims are unfounded.' In addition, the spokesperson said: 'Uber is aware of the challenges drivers are facing in Cape Town and remains committed to supporting them while engaging relevant stakeholders. Our goal is to ensure a sustainable and inclusive approach to mobility that supports both economic opportunity and safe, reliable transport options in Cape Town.' In response to an inquiry from Daily Maverick that Uber seems to be supporting drivers operating without licences by offering to pay their impoundment fees, Quintas responded: 'Paying someone else's fine or impoundment fee is not necessarily the illegal act.' Further, Quintas appeared to defend Uber and Bolt's practice of onboarding and recruiting new drivers without the possibility of permits being granted. He said: 'E-hailing platform providers have over the years marketed their services to operators and drivers without making an operating licence a compulsory requirement to operate on their platforms. Thus, they onboard operators/drivers and allow them to operate without having a valid operating licence… It seems to be a universal practice by all e-hailing platforms to onboard operators without operating licences.'


Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Mthatha campus erupts as students rally against bail for accused in deadly protest shooting
'(Manelisi) Mampane should have stayed in jail for the rest of his life because the child that he killed will not come back,' said a student. Students at Walter Sisulu University and their parents are protesting at the university's Mthatha campus against the release of residence manager Manelisi Mampane (54), who is accused of shooting dead Sisonke Mbolekwa (24) and injuring two students during a protest in April over housing conditions. Mampane was arrested on 17 April 2025 in Mthatha. He has been charged with murder and attempted murder, and was released on bail of R10,000 at Mthatha Magistrate's Court on Tuesday, 3 June 2025. This has led to anger and frustration for students and their parents. According to the students, Mampane should have stayed in prison, and bail should not have been granted. 'Mampane should have stayed in jail for the rest of his life because the child that he killed will not come back,' said a student at the protest who wished to remain anonymous. Ayabonga Ndzumo, the mother of Lizwa Ndzumo, one of the two students who were shot and injured, told Daily Maverick that she had also joined the protest, and that the police were shooting teargas at them. The spokesperson for the Mbolekwa family, Ncedo Kolanisi, who spoke with Newzroom Afrika on Tuesday, said: 'We are shocked; we saw signs of the magistrate being biased. My suspicions are certain fans of the accused have got to him… He ignored that Lizwa cannot move freely as a student of Walter Sisulu..,' said Kolanisi. Another student at the university, Oneltiha Mbonana, told Daily Maverick that Mampane should not have received bail. '…Now students decided to protest and close the school; they got arrested or died. This is a court matter and students choose to close the N2,' said Mbonana. The South African Police Service (SAPS) has deployed police to the institution, and three students have been arrested, and they will be facing charges of public violence, damage to infrastructure and damage to property. 'The Acting Provincial Commissioner of the Eastern Cape, Major-General Thandiswa Kupiso, stated: 'We appeal for calm as we patiently allow legal processes to unfold. We encourage those who are aggrieved to channel grievances through lawful avenues.' Major-General Kupiso appealed to the students to honor the victim's memory through constructive, non-violent means, ' read an SAPS media statement released on Wednesday morning. According to SAPS Brigadier Nobuntu Gantana the murder investigation remained active, had been prioritised, and was ongoing. The SAPS said it would continue to collaborate closely with the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) to pursue justice through legal channels. The protest is ongoing. Daily Maverick reached out to Walter Sisulu University for comment, and we will update the article once this is received or more information is available. DM