Father and son accused in toddler's death appear in Brown County court
'I really am stressing and hoping that this monster can stay behind bars,' a member of the victim's family said during the hearing.
Multiple people face felonies after drugs, firearms found in Wisconsin raids
James and David Vanderleest were arrested in connection with the child's death and appeared in court for the first time Monday. The court sealed the probable cause statements in the case, a move David Vanderleest opposed, saying he wanted the records to be open to the public.
'Why are we allowing prosecutors just to lie against the Vanderleest family?' David said in court. 'That's normally what happens in this town. You're gonna do what you wanna do.'
David Vanderleest, who previously ran unsuccessfully for the Wisconsin State Senate and Assembly, is being held on a $100,000 cash bond. He is prohibited from having contact with his son or the victim's family.
James Vanderleest's bond was set at $2 million. He is also barred from contacting anyone involved in the case.
'Two million dollars — my family doesn't even have a million dollars,' James said in court. 'I've went completely bankrupt. You guys can order whatever you want, but I don't think two million or $100,000 for my dad's bond is acceptable.'
Wisconsin inmate convicted of murdering cellmate at Taycheedah Correctional Institution
Deputy District Attorney Wendy Lemkuil told the court that James instructed the child's mother and his father to lie to police and said he had already tried contacting the victim's family while in jail.
Both men are scheduled to return to court for a preliminary hearing in July.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
12 minutes ago
- Fox News
Murdaugh lead attorney says jury fix and hidden texts could blow up conviction, force new trial
The defense attorney for convicted killer Alex Murdaugh said newly uncovered evidence of jury tampering may be enough to overturn the disgraced South Carolina lawyer's murder conviction. Dick Harpootlian, a Columbia attorney and former state senator who led Murdaugh's defense, told Fox News Digital that Colleton County Clerk of Court Becky Hill's actions during the 2023 double murder trial tainted the jury and should result in a new trial. "If she had left the jury alone, clearly the worst we would have done was a mistrial," Harpootlian said. "There were two jurors—two—who would not have voted guilty had it not been for Becky Hill's influence." Murdaugh was found guilty of the murders of his wife, Maggie Murdaugh, and son, Paul Murdaugh, who were shot to death on June 7, 2021 at the family's hunting estate in Colleton County, South Carolina. He was convicted on two counts of murder and two counts of possession of a weapon during the commission of a violent crime in March 2023. Harpootlian said one juror, dubbed the "egg lady," was vocal in the jury room about her doubts and was dismissed just days before the verdict based on information provided by Hill. A second juror allegedly told the defense she was pressured into voting guilty by Hill and other jurors. The defense alleges that Hill attempted to sway the jury to sell more copies of a book she was writing about the high-profile trial. "She told several of her coworkers that a guilty verdict would be good for book sales," Harpootlian said. "She was working them to influence them to convict." Hill has been charged with misconduct in office, obstruction of justice, and perjury for allegedly influencing the Murdaugh jury, leaking sealed evidence and lying under oath during a 2024 hearing. During a 2024 evidentiary hearing, a retired South Carolina Supreme Court chief justice ruled that Hill was not credible and found she had attempted to influence the jury's deliberations. Murdaugh is currently appealing his conviction before the South Carolina Supreme Court. The state's brief is due Aug. 8, and Harpootlian said a ruling could come by the end of the year or early 2026. "We have an appeal based on judicial errors and jury tampering," Harpootlian said. Many believe we have a substantial chance of getting a new trial. If the appeal fails, the defense plans to pursue a federal habeas petition. "If we don't get a new trial, then there's something called habeas or post-conviction relief. And if you find that police or prosecutors have hidden evidence that would have been made a difference, you can appeal on that basis," Harpootlian said. In addition to the jury-tampering allegations, Harpootlian also pointed to newly uncovered text messages between Murdaugh and Curtis "Eddie" Smith, Murdaugh's alleged drug dealer, that may have changed the trajectory of the defense's strategy if they had been disclosed. The messages, revealed by FITSNews, show Smith and Murdaugh communicating in the days leading up to the June 7, 2021 murders of Murdaugh's wife and son. Harpootlian said his team was unaware of the texts during the trial and might have called Smith as a witness had they known. "Those texts—some from the very week of the murder—give us more of the timeline around those drug distributions," he said. "It might have made the difference in us calling him to the stand or not calling him to the stand." The text messages show that Smith and Murdaugh conversed in the days leading up to Murdaugh's murder of his wife and son on their family's hunting estate in Colleton County, South Carolina. "Hey Brother i need to come get the chech (sic) you got one with you or are you going to be around later," Smith texted to Murdaugh on June 3, four days before the slayings. Murdaugh replied that he would be back that afternoon and that he "had to deal with some bulls--- this morning." "Ok Brother just give me a holler," Smith texted, later adding, "Leaving the house now." The day before the murders, Murdaugh texted Smith, "Call me back." Within a span of two minutes the morning after the murder, Smith texted Murdaugh, "Tell me what I heard is not true," and, "Call me please." Those texts went unreturned, and around 6:30 p.m., and Smith cryptically texted Murdaugh, "At fishing hole." After that message was also met with silence, he texted, "803 *** **13 it will not go through on my phone." Harpootlian also questioned why Smith had not been prosecuted, calling it "perplexing" and "unjust." "Eddie Smith, according to the attorney general, is probably the largest distributor of OxyContin in the state's history—and he has not been prosecuted," he said. "Everybody else who was indicted pleaded guilty—except Eddie Smith." The defense attorney also criticized South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson, who he claims referred to Hill as "Becky Boo" during the trial. Harpootlian said Wilson's relationship with Hill is a conflict of interest and urged him to recuse himself from any future investigation into her conduct. Fox News Digital has reached out to Wilson's office for comment. "There should be a grand jury investigation into Becky Hill's conduct," he said. "But the AG hasn't opened one. Maybe he's waiting to see what the Supreme Court does." If the court grants a new trial, Harpootlian said it will be "a very different case." Since Murdaugh has already pleaded guilty to financial crimes, the prosecution will no longer be able to present weeks of financial evidence. "All that will be left is the forensic evidence and the facts," he said. "And the forensic evidence, I believe, overwhelmingly proves that Alec Murdaugh did not kill Paul and Maggie."
Forbes
12 minutes ago
- Forbes
Apple Warning—Do Not Call This Number On Your iPhone
Do not call this number. Mobile threats are surging, coming at you by email and text message faster than you can hit delete. And as the FBI has warned, plenty of these are dressed up as messages from major technology brands — Facebook, Amazon, Google, Microsoft and Apple, above all. 'Legitimate customer, security, or tech support companies will not initiate unsolicited contact with individuals,' the FBI says as 'tech support scammers continue to impersonate well-known tech companies.' Here's just one example. An email from Apple warning 'we have noticed that your Apple iCloud ID was recently used at "APPLE STORE" for $499.00 paid by Apple Pay.' For most of us the clues are there. Unlikely phrasing and an email sender address that isn't Apple. But you didn't spend the money, and the tradecraft is a real fraud that warns of a fabricated one. It's the same with phantom hacker attacks on bank accounts — a real fraudster helping protect you from an imaginary one by moving your money. This Apple warning is not what it seems. 'In order to maintain the security and privacy of your account we have placed those request on hold,' the fake Apple warning explains. And then here's the hook. Failing to call 'may lead to auto debit and charge will not be reversed.' Increasingly, these scams ask you to call a technical or customer support number. Many of these scams start with a fake call, which has prompted Google and others to stress to users they will never call you to discuss account or technical issues. You must never call these numbers, whether in emails, texts or popups on your screen. If you have any doubts, search for a legitimate contact number online and call that. Or better still, use the contact options from within your app or online account. Again, making sure you log in using normal channels and not via a link you have received. If you're reading this, you're more than likely tech savvy enough to never fall for the more blatant of these scams, although AI is making them harder to detect. But elderly relatives and those less familiar with tech are prime targets. A sudden, surprising $500 charge is very likely to push many people into making that call. Keep that in mind.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Says He'll Sue Rupert Murdoch, NewsCorp and WSJ ‘Shortly,' Orders Release of Epstein Testimony
Donald Trump vowed to sue the Rupert Murdoch, NewsCorp and the Wall Street Journal on Thursday night, not an hour after the paper published a story saying the future president had contributed a tawdry entry in a leather-bound compilation of birthday messages for then-50-year-old 'pal' Jeffrey Epstein in 2003. Half an hour after that, Trump said on his Truth Social platform that he had ordered Attorney General Pam Bondi to 'produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval.' More from TheWrap Trump Says He'll Sue Rupert Murdoch, NewsCorp and WSJ 'Shortly,' Orders Release of Epstein Testimony Trump Contributed to Suggestive Jeffrey Epstein 50th Birthday Gift, WSJ Reports: 'We Have Certain Things in Common' House Oversight Committee Democrat Accuses Fox News of 'Deceptively' Editing Trump Interview on Epstein Lawrence O'Donnell Says Rosie O'Donnell Won Donald Trump Spat After Dubbing Him 'Tangerine Mussolini' | Video 'This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now!' the president added. Trump's tirade was in response to a Thursday evening report in the Wall Street Journal, which said Trump wrote to Epstein in the birthday message that 'We have certain things in common' and 'May every day be a new wonderful secret,' part of a suggestive, typewritten entry framed by a silhouette of a naked woman and punctuated by his 'squiggly' signature that suggests pubic hair on the hand-drawn figure. Trump had spoken directly to paper before the story's publication, saying in the interview that it wasn't him, 'this is a fake thing,' and threatening a lawsuit. After it went live, he posted: 'The Wall Street Journal, and Rupert Murdoch, personally, were warned directly by President Donald J. Trump that the supposed letter they printed by President Trump to Epstein was a FAKE and, if they print it, they will be sued,' Trump posted, roughly 45 minutes after the WSJ story was published. 'Mr. Murdoch stated that he would take care of it but, obviously, did not have the power to do so.' Trump said Wall Street Journal editor Emma Tucker 'was told directly by Karoline Leavitt, and by President Trump, that the letter was a FAKE, but Emma Tucker didn't want to hear that. Instead, they are going with a false, malicious, and defamatory story anyway.' About 15 minutes later, Trump said that 'Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval. This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now!' And he wasn't done. 'The Wall Street Journal printed a FAKE letter, supposedly to Epstein,' Trump continued in a subsequent post. 'These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don't draw pictures. I told Rupert Murdoch it was a Scam, that he shouldn't print this Fake Story. But he did, and now I'm going to sue his ass off, and that of his third rate newspaper. Thank you for your attention to this matter! DJT' Trump's threats were nakedly leveraging his previous success with attacking the media in the courts, on the heels of a $16 million settlement with CBS parent company Paramount and a previous, separate settlement with ABC News for $15 post Trump Says He'll Sue Rupert Murdoch, NewsCorp and WSJ 'Shortly,' Orders Release of Epstein Testimony appeared first on TheWrap.
