‘Felt like I was body slammed:' Senior attacked by complete stranger in Downtown Vancouver
A senior was attacked by a stranger in Downtown Vancouver on Friday, May 16.
A 70-year-old Vancouver man was simply on his way to plug a parking meter, when he was suddenly pushed to the ground by a complete stranger.
As he was walking on Homer Street around 3 p.m. Friday, he glanced at his phone and vaguely noticed a man in the distance.
Then he heard his head crack.
'It felt like I was body-slammed or shoved backwards, onto the pavement,' said the victim, who CTV News is not identifying, from his home.
'You're wondering, 'What's going on, what's happening?' as I'm falling backwards. And when my head hit the pavement, you still don't understand what's just gone on.'
He told CTV News that when he looked up, he could see his attacker casually walking away, and heard him say, ''Oh sorry man,' or 'whoops.''
'At that point, I raised my head, and I realized there was an awful lot of blood coming out of my head,' he said
Two Good Samaritans rushed to his side and brought him indoors.
Paramedics found a piece of glass at the back of his head and sent him to hospital for stitches.
'I feel so grateful this wasn't horrific,' he said, pointing out that several innocent people have been stabbed in unprovoked attack over recent years in the same area.
He argued Canada needs tougher laws and is calling on the federal government to make it a priority.
'I've always been aware of what's going on around me, but what I've noticed in the last week, if suddenly somebody appears beside me when I'm waiting to cross the street, and I didn't see them approach, I kind of shutter,' he told CTV News.
'There's times where you sort of think about how lucky you are, for one thing, and how much worse it could have been,' said the senior.
Derrick James McFeeters, was arrested on Granville Street, and is facing a charge of assault causing bodily harm.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
42 minutes ago
- CBC
Mistrial in Daniel Bard's fraud trial, new lawyer to be appointed
Social Sharing A mistrial was declared Tuesday in Daniel Bard's trial in Moncton provincial court on alleged financial crimes. Bard, 60, has been on trial on 19 charges of fraud, theft, money laundering and possession of property obtained by crime. A series of developments Tuesday saw Bard's lawyer withdraw from the case, a judge order the government fund a new lawyer, and Judge Anne Richard declare a mistrial. Essentially, this means the trial will start over again once Bard has a new lawyer. Bard had no comment as he left the courthouse. Crown prosecutors also declined to comment. Tim Dubé, a lawyer appointed by the judge to assist with the case, told reporters a mistrial was the appropriate outcome in the circumstances. "It's a disappointing outcome for sure, but it's the only potential and possible outcome that the judge could decide on," Dubé said. "Declaring a mistrial was the only remedy that was left." WATCH | New lawyer, trial dates needed for Daniel Bard: Mistrial in Moncton financial crimes trial 2 hours ago Duration 1:13 A mistrial was declared by a judge Tuesday in Daniel Bard's trial in Moncton on 19 charges that include fraud, theft and money laundering. The 60-year-old's lawyer withdrew from the case over health issues. That means he needs a new lawyer and a new trial will have to be scheduled Some of the allegations date to when Bard was a vice-president of investment attraction for 3+ Corp., which was a municipally funded economic development agency for the Moncton region. In 2019, CBC reported that Bard was accused by several business owners and individuals of receiving hundreds of thousands of dollars in administrative and brokerage fees while working for the agency but failing to deliver on promises and then vanishing. Bard was charged in 2022, and originally set to go on trial in late 2023, but the trial was rescheduled when he parted ways with his lawyer. Bard filed a Rowbotham application to have the government fund a lawyer for a person denied legal aid. That was approved, with James Matheson taking over as his lawyer. Bard's six-week trial by judge-alone started April 22 but faced delays over Matheson's health. Matheson told the court he has an eye issue that requires surgery, which was causing him to experience vertigo. Matheson's health led the judge to appoint Dubé as amicus curiae, a Latin phrase meaning friend of the court, to assist with cross-examination. The judge ordered Dubé to take a larger role in the trial, including being able to hold confidential discussions with Bard, as Matheson's health problems continued to affect the trial. When Matheson was ordered by a doctor to take a medical leave in mid-May, Dubé was expected to take over as the trial continued. However, Dubé also took a medical leave. Both lawyers were back in court Tuesday when the judge was expected to get an update on when the trial could resume. But Matheson told the judge he was not improving and would be placed off work for an extended period. He asked to be removed as Bard's lawyer, saying that delaying the case further would be unfair to Bard. "I'm truly and so sorry that this situation has developed the way it has," Matheson told the judge. Bard told the judge he agreed with Matheson's departure. Government to fund new lawyer The judge asked if Bard would seek a new lawyer through a Rowbotham application. Bard said he would. After a short break, Crown prosecutor Andrew Pollabauer said the province's attorney general would approve the request. Dubé had filed an application asking the judge to stay the charges Bard faced, alleging his Charter right to a timely trial had been violated. That issue was expected to be discussed June 11. However, Dubé said they were withdrawing that application. Pollabauer said the Crown didn't believe it would be fair to continue the trial without Bard represented by a lawyer, inviting the judge to declare a mistrial. "I grant that remedy as well," Richard said. Because Dubé's appointment was tied to Matheson, the judge ruled his role ended Tuesday with Matheson's withdrawal. The judge scheduled Bard to return to court June 17, when a new lawyer is expected to be named, and new trial dates may be set.
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
1 injured after fire at Leduc County waste management facility
A contract worker was hospitalized after a fire broke out at the Leduc and District Regional Waste Management Facility Saturday night. Leduc County Fire Services said in a news release Sunday firefighters responded to the call at 8:20 p.m. Crews arrived on scene and worked to contain the fire, which spread rapidly due to strong winds. Initial efforts by on-site staff to control the fire were unsuccessful, according to the waste management facility, located at 49444 Range Road 244 in Leduc County. "The site manager and two other operators attempted to put the fire out with soils and the regular process they've been trained on," said Lee Harris, director of operations for the facility. "That didn't work, so the fire got out of control. There were really strong winds yesterday which inflamed them." The injured worker is employed by Environmental 360 Solutions, a contractor at the site. The company has not yet responded to a request for comment from CBC News. Harris said the man was hospitalized but the facility is respecting the family's space and has no update on his current condition. Quick action from contractors and first responders helped keep the situation contained, according to Harris. "The on-site contractors did an amazing job of smouldering everything with dirt," he said. "It's under control, but because landfill fires are sort of unpredictable, we're monitoring this site to make sure those flare-ups don't happen." Alberta Occupational Health and Safety is now investigating the incident. "It is always tragic when a worker is hurt or dies on the job," OHS said in a statement to CBC News." Alberta's government is focused on having all workers return home healthy and safe after every workday." The cause of the fire is still unknown and the event has been turned over to the landfill operator, Leduc County said, adding that it may be some time before a cause is determined. The county clarified in a statement that it did not contract any equipment operators during the emergency response. Harris, with the landfill facility, said the fire was out shortly after it started but certain areas are still closed to the public.
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Moncton jury begins deliberations in casino manslaughter trial
A Moncton jury has begun deliberating in Michael Glaspy's manslaughter trial in connection with the 2023 death of a casino manager. The 12-member jury received final instructions Tuesday afternoon from Justice Christa Bourque, including how to apply the law in the case and which charges can be considered. After three weeks of testimony related to the death of Rodney Frenette, Bourque said the jury could return with a verdict of manslaughter, but that aggravated assault is also on the table. "Your only responsibility is to determine whether the Crown has proven Michael Glaspy guilty beyond a reasonable doubt," Bourque told the jury. Extensive video surveillance footage and testimony from 19 witnesses detailed an altercation between Glaspy, 53, and Frenette, 56, that took place at Casino New Brunswick on March 4, 2023. It's alleged Glaspy assaulted Frenette, who was food and beverage manager at the casino. Video footage showed the interaction between the two ended with Frenette hitting his head on the floor of the Hub City Pub. He died 24 days later in hospital. Glaspy was charged with manslaughter, a homicide that's committed without intent to kill a person, in April of 2023. To return a guilty verdict of manslaughter, the jury must consider whether the Crown has proven that Glaspy's actions "contributed significantly to Mr. Frenette's death," Bourque said. The jury should only find Glaspy guilty if they can be sure that he intentionally applied force to Frenette without his consent, Bourque explained. She also said the jury should consider whether anything that happened after Glaspy's actions on March 4 contributed to Frenette's death, and if it renders Glaspy's actions insignificant in his death. "Then, according to our laws, Michael Glaspy did not cause Mr. Frenette's death," she said. In Canada, manslaughter carries a maximum sentence of life in prison. A minimum sentence can vary based on the circumstances of the crime. Aggravated assault also on the table, justice says In court Tuesday, Bourque told jurors they should also consider aggravated assault as a lesser offence if they do not believe the Crown has successfully proven manslaughter. Aggravated assault is more serious than assault, and constitutes actions that cause severe bodily harm or endanger a person's life. For the jury to return with an aggravated assault verdict, they must consider whether the Crown has proven that Glaspy "contributed significantly to the wounding or to the endangering of Rodney Frenette's life," as well as all the other elements of assault. Bourque told the jury that Glaspy's intoxication on the day of the altercation is not a suitable defence in his case. Jury reminded of Frenette's fall in hospital Bourque's instructions, which spanned several hours Tuesday afternoon, also included a summary of some of the evidence the jury heard during the trial. Bourque reminded the jury about the testimony of both the neurosurgeon who treated Frenette in a Moncton hospital and the pathologist who performed Frenette's autopsy. She said their testimony revealed they both knew about a fall Frenette took on March 16, 2023, during his recovery in the hospital, which they read about in nurses' notes from the hospital. Bourque told the jury the notes were not admitted as exhibits in the Crown's case, which means they are not considered evidence. She reminded the jury to question the testimony of each witness they heard, to ask themselves whether they are reliable and to consider how much time has passed between the altercation and witness testimony. When it comes to the video surveillance detailing how the initial altercation unfolded and what took place afterward, Bourque told the jury to re-watch the footage as many times as it takes. "It is your interpretation of these videos that counts," she said, adding that they should rely on what they think they see on the video and not what witnesses have recalled about details like whether Glaspy landed a punch to Frenette and who started it.
