Public Hearing For ‘Decision-Makers' Will No Longer Proceed: Inquiry Chair
The decision by the Inquiry follows former Ministers declining an invitation to participate in the hearing. The detail of the Inquiry's decision, including concerns that the former Ministers raised about the hearing, is set out in a procedural Minute that can be accessed on the Inquiry website: https://www.covid19lessons.royalcommission.nz/the-inquiry/procedural-minutes
A primary purpose of the Inquiry is to develop carefully considered findings and practical recommendations based on lessons learned. Mr Illingworth says the hearings were intended to enhance public confidence in the Inquiry's processes by enabling the public to see former Ministers – who have critical insights into the pandemic response – questioned in public.
'The COVID-19 pandemic was a significant event that affected every New Zealander. The government at the time, through its ministers, made decisions about how we as a nation responded to that pandemic, which had implications for all of us.
'We have been tasked with reviewing those decisions, and we thought it was important that the public see and hear for themselves important evidence about why some key decisions about the response to COVID-19 were made and for what reason.'
Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
The Inquiry has not changed its view that a public hearing would enhance public confidence in its processes, but there were a number of factors that contributed to the decision to no longer proceed, says Mr Illingworth.
This includes that former Ministers and senior officials have provided a significant amount of information via private interviews, and all have offered to provide further information if requested; the need to use efficient processes and to avoid unnecessary cost and delay; the impact on public confidence of a 'decision-makers' hearing proceeding without the attendance of key decision-makers; and the fact that the Inquiry has other mechanisms available to obtain necessary evidence and also to increase transparency and public confidence.
'We are confident that the former Ministers declining to attend the hearing does not hamper us in our ability to obtain the information we need to be able to properly complete our task. Public hearings are only one mechanism of obtaining evidence, and their use is restricted under our terms of reference,' says Mr Illingworth.
The Inquiry has given careful consideration to whether to issue a summons to the former Ministers but has decided not to proceed with that course of action.
'On balance we are of the view that a summons is undesirable given that the former Ministers continue to co-operate with the evidence-gathering of the Inquiry. It is our opinion that the use of summonses to achieve their participation at a public hearing would be legalistic and adversarial, which our terms of reference prohibit,' says Mr Illingworth.
The Inquiry is giving further consideration to how it will collect evidence going forward and will provide more information about this as part of its regular communication.
The Inquiry is due to report back to the Governor General at the end of February 2026. The decision not to proceed with a hearing will not impact on the Inquiry's timelines.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
15 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
'They are ashamed': Former Labour ministers slammed for refusing to appear at Covid hearing
By Russell Palmer of RNZ All three coalition parties are criticising Labour's former ministers for refusing to appear at a public Covid-19 hearing, saying they're trying to avoid scrutiny. The second phase of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Covid-19 pandemic was secured in coalition agreements between all three governing parties. The chair, Grant Illingworth KC, yesterday confirmed that a week-long public hearing with decision-makers would not go ahead because former ministers had refused to participate. They include former prime minister Dame Jacinda Ardern, current Labour leader Chris Hipkins, who was at times the health and Covid-19 response minister, former finance minister Grant Robertson and former health minister and current MP Ayesha Verrall, Those former ministers argue they have provided ample evidence privately to the commission, which - despite having the power to - declined to summons them, saying on balance it was "undesirable given that the former ministers continue to co-operate with the evidence-gathering of the inquiry". "We are confident that the former ministers declining to attend the hearing does not hamper us in our ability to obtain the information we need to be able to properly complete our task. Public hearings are only one mechanism of obtaining evidence, and their use is restricted under our terms of reference," Illingworth said. The reasoning the ministers gave to the inquiry - according to a document the inquiry released - included that former ministers were conventionally interviewed privately for Royal Commissions of Inquiry, that they had cooperated so far and repeating the evidence publicly would be "performative rather than informative", and it risked the recordings being "tampered with, manipulated or otherwise misused". The document noted other witnesses and their families had faced abuse after appearing in public hearings, including in the Royal Commission held in July. Hipkins told RNZ's Morning Report programme today he has been interviewed in private, answered every question fully and even given the commission more information than what he had originally been asked. He accused those involved with the Royal Commission of not knowing what they wanted because they had said public hearings wouldn't be held for five reasons, including avoiding participants being subject to abuse. "They indicated at the end of that interview [his private appearance] ... that they didn't have any further questions and any public hearing would simply be a repeat of any questions they'd already asked me." Hipkins acknowledged that the pandemic was "a really difficult time", however, he said he answered questions from media and the public on a daily basis. Asked what he had to lose by fronting up, Hipkins responded that all the former ministers had followed the same protocol for the Covid commission as had occurred in the past, citing the examples of former Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Minister Gerry Brownlee at the Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission of inquiry and other ministers involved in the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Christchurch mosque attacks. Ardern stood by her decision not to participate, with a spokesperson saying she had recently provided a three-hour interview and remained available to answer any further questions the commission had. Hipkins earlier spoke to reporters at Parliament to defend his decision, and Dr Verrall provided a written statement. Robertson, who is now vice chancellor at the University of Otago, did not respond to RNZ's requests for comment. At Parliament, senior National MP Chris Bishop used the general debate yesterday to call attention to their refusal, saying it was "perhaps unsurprising". "They are ashamed of their record, and they know that held up to the light the decisions they made in 2020 and 2021 and 2022 have led us into the problems we are enduring today. "It was really clear from the second half of 2020 and into 2021 that further stimulus of the New Zealand economy was not only not required, it was counterproductive." He said Treasury pointed to 36% of spending for the Covid response happening after June 2021. "At that point, GDP had already returned to its pre-pandemic levels and inflation was already outside the band and approaching 7.3 percent ... from financial year 2015 to 2019, core Crown debt was actually flat - it actually went down a bit. But from 2019 to 2023, net core Crown debt increased by 169 percent to $155 billion. "That is the debt disaster this government inherited. That is the inflation disaster this government inherited. That is the cause of the recession this government inherited." ACT leader David Seymour mimed running away from reporters before saying "kidding - that's the other guys". He said a lot of people would see the former ministers refusing to appear publicly as "running from accountability, and that's what erodes that trust". "I would have thought if you cared about this country and responding to its next pandemic, which will happen, then you'd want to front up and tell your story," he said. "It's good that they've co-operated in privacy, we're told, but I think the New Zealand people deserve them to show up ... I think there was an opportunity here to come and explain their perspective. Maybe we have it wrong, but they're not doing it." Seymour particularly focused on Hipkins. "The contrast between his behaviour during the pandemic - when they do anything to get in front of the cameras, when we had to endure a 20 minute lecture before they gave us the daily numbers - compared with this behaviour we've learned about today, I think that contrast speaks for itself." Asked about concerns of abuse, Seymour said the former ministers had a public duty to front up. "Are we going to let a small group of anti-social people stop our great nation from having a democratic discourse? I think the simple facts are we don't decide that 'because there's a few crazies out there we're no longer going to have a Parliament'." — Winston Peters (@winstonpeters) August 13, 2025 NZ First leader Winston Peters shared his views on X, saying the former ministers "colluded and decided to decline to give evidence". "The 'Podium of Truth' has become the 'Podium of Evasion'. These former ministers do not want to sit in a public hearing and answer the hard questions that every New Zealander deserves to know. If ever there was a definition for "a different kind of 'abuse of' power" this is it." He said they were undermining the second inquiry to avoid public scrutiny. "Those former Labour Ministers have shown they care nothing about public confidence, and worse, are treating the entire public with distain (sic) and contempt ... and had a disastrous effect on the economy and future of our country - yet they refuse to be held to account."
Otago Daily Times
an hour ago
- Otago Daily Times
Father of NZ woman in US detention centre claims she will be released this week
By Kate Green of RNZ The father of a New Zealander detained in the United States believes there is a 90% chance she will be released before the end of the week. Sarah Shaw and her six-year-old son were detained by US immigration at the Canadian border three weeks ago, after she tried to leave and re-enter the US without both parts of her visa approved. On 24 July, Shaw drove across the border from her home in Washington state to Vancouver, to see two of her three children onto a direct flight to New Zealand to visit their grandparents. Waiting at the other end was her dad Rod Price, who told RNZ a frantic phone call was the first indication anything was amiss. "We got messages all the way through - yes, they're at the airport, they're on the plane, they're taking off - and then she went to go back across into the US, and then I got a frantic call to say that she's being detained and they're about to take my phone off me and they're locking me up for the night." He started to get properly concerned when he heard they had flown Shaw and Isaac to Texas, to the nearest detainment centre which accommodates families. The conditions had been difficult for them both. Her friend Victoria Besancon previously told RNZ the detention facility was "very similar to a prison". "She is in a locked room with five bunk beds, she is allowed to walk around the facility from 8am to 8pm, but outside of that she is locked in a cell with other families." But Price said among the detainees, they were the lucky ones. His daughter spoke English as a first language and had access to good lawyers - even if the logistics involved in contacting them were a little complicated. Her lawyer Minda Thorward told RNZ: "I cannot call her, she can only call me, and then I have to be available to recieve the call and press one to allow the call to come through. So communication is a little bit of an issue." Besancon has been appointed power of attorney, making logistics a little easier. The past week had brought a big increase in media coverage and pressure from Washington state officials, and staff from the New Zealand embassy had made contact with Shaw, after learning of her case from reports in the media. Besancon said it was making a difference. "They started really changing the way they've been speaking with her legal representation." And Price said they were feeling optimistic. "There's a 90% chance that she's going to be out Thursday, which is our Friday, 3pm. She's so confident that she's already booked a flight back to Seattle." If that did not go to plan, a court date was locked in for 29 August, in which Shaw would have the opportunity to fight for her release in front of a judge. Meanwhile, her other two children, aged 8 and 10, were enjoying sunny Whangaparāoa, although they were anxious for their mum, Price said. "Ah, the young fella, it's just water off a duck's back, but my granddaughter is - she won't outright say it - but you know, you can tell by their actions and their concern and questions." He said the children would be staying with him until there was someone to meet them at the other end.
Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
'So confident she's already booked a flight': Dad says '90% chance' his daughter will be released from US immigration detainment centre this week
By Kate Green of RNZ The father of a New Zealander detained in the United States believes there is a 90 percent chance she will be released before the end of the week. Sarah Shaw and her six-year-old son were detained by US immigration at the Canadian border three weeks ago, after she tried to leave and re-enter the US without both parts of her visa approved. On 24 July, Shaw drove across the border from her home in Washington state to Vancouver, to see two of her three children onto a direct flight to New Zealand to visit their grandparents. Waiting at the other end was her dad Rod Price, who told RNZ a frantic phone call was the first indication anything was amiss. "We got messages all the way through - yes, they're at the airport, they're on the plane, they're taking off - and then she went to go back across into the US, and then I got a frantic call to say that she's being detained and they're about to take my phone off me and they're locking me up for the night." He started to get properly concerned when he heard they had flown Shaw and Isaac to Texas, to the nearest detainment centre which accommodates families. The conditions had been difficult for them both. Her friend Victoria Besancon previously told RNZ the detention facility was "very similar to a prison". "She is in a locked room with five bunk beds, she is allowed to walk around the facility from 8am to 8pm, but outside of that she is locked in a cell with other families." But Price said among the detainees, they were the lucky ones. His daughter spoke English as a first language and had access to good lawyers - even if the logistics involved in contacting them were a little complicated. Her lawyer Minda Thorward told RNZ: "I cannot call her, she can only call me, and then I have to be available to recieve the call and press one to allow the call to come through. So communication is a little bit of an issue." Besancon has been appointed power of attorney, making logistics a little easier. The past week had brought a big increase in media coverage and pressure from Washington state officials, and staff from the New Zealand embassy had made contact with Shaw, after learning of her case from reports in the media. Besancon said it was making a difference. "They started really changing the way they've been speaking with her legal representation." And Price said they were feeling optimistic. "There's a 90 percent chance that she's going to be out Thursday, which is our Friday, 3pm. She's so confident that she's already booked a flight back to Seattle." If that did not go to plan, a court date was locked in for 29 August, in which Shaw would have the opportunity to fight for her release in front of a judge. Meanwhile, her other two children, aged 8 and 10, were enjoying sunny Whangaparāoa, although they were anxious for their mum, Price said. "Ah, the young fella, it's just water off a duck's back, but my granddaughter is - she won't outright say it - but you know, you can tell by their actions and their concern and questions." He said the children would be staying with him until there was someone to meet them at the other end.
