Grand Forks Public Schools to create mental health director position
The creation of the new behavioral health and wellness director comes after the resignation of the district's mental health coordinator. Whenever a position is vacated, district officials consider whether there's a way to restructure the position to better serve students.
In this instance, "there was a loud cry from a variety of people to actually elevate the position," Associate Superintendent Catherine Gillach said.
"You've heard over the course of the years some of the cries from our classroom teachers and even our special education staff themselves for help when the needs of the students might exceed what our capacity is," Gillach said, addressing the Grand Forks School Board at its regular meeting on Monday. "So really, we're looking to put this whole portfolio underneath the umbrella of somebody who has a high level of expertise and would be able to make directions and directives and that sort of thing."
The creation of the position is in alignment with the district's strategic plan, which heavily emphasizes student mental health and wellness, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic, Gillach noted.
The new director's job duties would include recruiting, hiring and training mental health staff, establishing partnerships with community-based organizations, planning for and executing crisis response efforts, grant procurement and management, co-leading Medicaid billing efforts and more, according to minutes from the June 2 meeting of the district Finance Committee, where the position was first proposed.
The director is tentatively expected to be paid $108,669, a $13,400 increase over the existing mental health coordinator position. The final number may increase based on the final candidate's experience.
In other news, the board:
* Recommended the district adopt Nike as the exclusive brand represented by district athletic programs with BSN Sports as the district's exclusive supplier of athletic apparel. BSN Sports was selected over a bid from GameOne for the values of incentives it offered in its bid, its ability to comply with the district's requirements and its experience with the district. The agreement with the district will have a term of five years. Previously, teams within the district independently purchased athletic apparel. By contracting with one distributor, the district hopes to find efficiencies.
* Approved a Finance Committee recommendation to establish a building fund ending balance of $1.62 million for fiscal year 2026. The board also heard an update from Brandon Baumbach on behalf of the Finance Committee that the committee reaffirmed its commitment to providing busing from the Red River and Central campuses to the Career Impact Academy.
* Heard an update on the district's child nutrition program from Wendie Mankie, director of child nutrition. About 7,600 students districtwide eat school breakfast and lunch, up from last year. In the 2024-2025 school year, students ate 381,811 school breakfasts, up from 380,279 in 2023-2024 and 372,890 in 2017-2018. In 24-25, students ate 890,264 school lunches, compared with 887,426 in 23-24 and 944,256 in 17-18. Last school year, 38% of students were eligible for free and reduced price meals, compared to 34% in 23-24 and 35% in 22-23. As of May 27, there was a minus-$84,439.91 negative balance of meal accounts, down from minus-$14.65 in the 2021-2022 school year. In the coming years, Director of Child Nutrition Wendy Mankie hopes to increase meal participation at breakfast and lunch, increase the amount of from-scratch cooking in the school kitchens, implement a meal repack program and incorporate more farm-to-school items in the menus.
* Accepted the resignation of Cassaundra Riewer, associate principal of Lake Agassiz Elementary. Riewer has worked at Lake Agassiz for 12 years.
* Formally appointed Amber Basting as Valley Middle School's new associate principal. Basting has been a special education coordinator for Grand Forks Central and Red River high schools for three years, and recently became head of the district's Social Academic Intervention Learning (SAIL) Center. She has a total 14 years of professional experience in education. She will be paid $100,568 annually.
* Renewed the memorandum of agreement with the city and the Grand Forks Police Department for School Resource Officer services for the upcoming school year. The MOA allows SROs in all in-town middle and high schools, and will be largely the same as previous school years, except for an increase of $3,641.68 in the contracted amount. The school district pays for half of the SRO program for a total cost to the district of $208,006.75 next school year.
* Approved a Consolidated Grant Application for federal Title funding for the district. The district is applying for nearly $2.83 million in federal funding through Title I, a decrease of nearly $221,000 since last year. Allocations for Title II, III and IV have not yet been determined, but total Title funding for the district for the 2024-2025 school year was roughly $4.208 million.
* Heard an update from the School Board Self-Assessment Committee. The board will consider future changes to how public comment portions of the meetings are structured. According to current board policy, the board does not respond to public comments made at board meetings. One option floated for future consideration is to have the board present a regular report on how the district internally responded to and handled comments.
* Pending the receipt of additional quotes, the board accepted a bid from Liberty Mutual, its current provider, for property insurance.
* Renewed Community High School's current lease through June 1, 2026, for an annual cost of $173,700.
* Recommended Crary Real Estate as the seller of the house constructed by Ben Moen and his students during the 2024-2025 school year. Crary will earn a 5% commission on the sale.
* Recommended contract negotiations with the Grand Forks Directors' Association and Grand Forks Principals' Association be extended past the July 1 deadline. Because of scheduling conflicts, negotiators have not been able to complete negotiations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pandemic Babies Are Entering Kindergarten & We're Only Now Processing How Weird Their First Year Was
It's been five years since the pandemic first started, but parents who had kids in 2020 don't forget so easily. Especially now, as those 'pandemic babies' head off to kindergarten. As for me, my son was 8 months old when the pandemic started and daycare shut down. He learned how to crawl the same week he was home, and it was a mix of joy and panic as I juggled full-time work with no childcare. When daycare reopened, I worried he'd get sick, yes, but also that he wouldn't learn how to talk since all his teachers (and everyone he interacted with except for his parents) wore masks. Strangely enough, we didn't test positive for Covid until two years later, and fast forward to today with two more kids into the mix, and it turns out that my first one was the most verbal (and continues to be a total chatterbox). But those early days were definitely weird. I checked in with a couple of other moms whose children were also born during the pandemic, and here's what they shared. Pregnancy and Labor Sucked Big Time Katie was living in Brooklyn, NY when her son was born in March 2020. 'I delivered March 25, which was three days after NY State was put on pause…Most notably, I delivered during the week-long partner ban that NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital implemented. My husband was restricted access to the hospital, so he took me as far as he could. We said our goodbyes on the curb right outside of the entrance, and then I had to do the rest without him.' She recalls masked-up surgery, isolated recovery, nurses terrified to enter her room, and missing her husband most when her newborn wanted constant feeding. She was discharged 40 hours after delivery. 'That night, once my family had been reunited, we were all safely home and the boys were asleep—my body started shaking uncontrollably. My midwife suspected that was all the adrenaline I had stored up, releasing.' Across the ocean in London, Hannah described a similarly lonely birth experience in October 2020: 'Being in the UK we had very tough and strict restrictions throughout the whole of my pregnancy. It changed daily! In the end, my partner was not able to be in the delivery room with me until I was about to give birth. Then we had around one hour together before he was told to leave because of the restrictions and to come back the following day.' Leading up to delivery, Hannah recalls that the lack of in-person classes and support left her feeling isolated. 'Online antenatal classes aren't the same. And I really wanted to go to the store to test out all the pushchairs and make our decision together, but we didn't want to risk exposure so we bought everything online.' It Was Lonely and Anxiety-Inducing For many parents, the hardest part wasn't just the birth itself but the long, quiet aftermath. The missed 'village' of grandparents, friends and new mom groups. Ellen in Chicago, IL also delivered her baby in October 2020. 'I randomly was looking back at old notes in my Notes app the other day, and the ones from those early days are bat shit crazy. I had extreme anxiety about her health, breastfeeding, her weight, sleep safety, everything,' she tells me. Even small milestones—like introducing a new baby to friends—were fraught with anxiety or lost completely. I attended multiple baby showers and first birthday parties over Zoom that year and, well, it just wasn't the same as celebrating a tiny human in person ('you're on mute!'). As for us, we had one family come over for my son's first birthday party who we were bubbling with at the time, while other invitees came by our house and congratulated him and us from the street outside. The Kids Are Alright The other day I found one of my son's tiny face masks and asked if he remembered ever wearing it. (At one point the CDC recommended masks for kids ages 2 and up, though by the time he hit that milestone, restrictions had fortunately eased up and his school only advised, not mandated, them.) He just looked at me blankly—no recollection whatsoever. Katie reflects: 'He is a healthy, happy, funny, resourceful kid. I think one positive side effect of Covid was that my husband, who would usually travel a lot for work, was suddenly home all the time. Having him close helped to establish a very deep bond between him and both our boys.' Still, the immune system challenges were real. As Hannah recalls, once her daughter started daycare, 'Whatever she then caught she got bad—chicken pox, scarlet fever, even tiny colds took her ages to recover from. It was very scary!' These days when I have to keep a kid home from school, I try to remind myself that it will never be as bad as during the early days of the pandemic. There was a period in 2021 where my son went a full 19 weeks (I remember, I counted!) without actually making it through a full week, largely due to illness after illness and a very strict sick policy (you had to be fever-free for 48 hours, no green snot allowed, negative Covid tests, quarantine periods, etc.). But the Parents Won't Forget If the kids will grow up barely remembering, the parents are a different story. 'I think about [Covid] every year on my son's birthday,' Katie says. 'He is our goofy little Covid reminder. I still wish that my husband could have been in person at the delivery…He says that I should let this go…but I struggle with that.' Ellen echoes this. While her daughter is thriving, she admits the pandemic likely made her and her partner extra anxious beyond the normal 'this is my first kid' type of stress. 'It probably made us a little weird,' she says. (Remember when we were all wiping down groceries with Clorox wipes and hoarding toilet paper?) Ultimately, these pandemic babies have proven exactly what we hoped for—that they are resilient, adaptable and joyful despite the strangeness of their first year. But for the parents, the memories linger. It's not all bad, though. 'I can appreciate how strong our family is,' says Katie. 'We lived through something really hard and found the strength to do that in each other.' As I prepare to send my "pandemic kid" off into a new school year, I couldn't agree more. The Pandemic Taught Us That Kids Are Resilient. Parents Are Not.
Business Wire
2 hours ago
- Business Wire
Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota to Join Cambia Health Solutions as Newest Affiliated Single-State Blue Plan
PORTLAND, Ore. & FARGO, N.D.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cambia Health Solutions (Cambia) and Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota (BCBSND) today announced a strategic affiliation to better serve members with access to care that's simpler and more affordable — and remains close to home. The affiliation will unify all operations and enable the organizations to share best practices for local plan innovation and services, deliver personalized member experiences and leverage Cambia's robust technology infrastructure. Strategic affiliation to better serve members with access to care that's simpler and more affordable — and remains close to home. Share Established in 1995 by four Blue Cross Blue Shield licensees, Cambia is a nonprofit health solutions company that provides management and shared services for local Blue plans across the Pacific Northwest and Mountain West, all connected by a common focus on delivering more for members. 'Affiliating with Cambia allows us to leap ahead in the capabilities we can bring to the North Dakotans we serve,' said Dan Conrad, president and CEO of BCBSND. 'We both have a deep commitment to a strong local presence today and into the future. Backed by Cambia's national scale and resources, we can offer members and customers more affordable plan solutions and personalized health tools, all while continuing to be supported by local employees who understand their health care needs.' Cambia and BCBSND share a legacy of practical innovation and community commitment. Cambia's mission is to transform health care to work better for real people and be economically sustainable. It is a founding partner and investor in Echo Health Ventures, which seeks to invest in and grow great health care companies. The health solutions company brings experience offering high-quality, cost-effective health care through personalized member tools that make it easier for people to navigate their care. BCBSND contributes deep expertise and market leadership in rural health, Medicare and Medicaid solutions, and provider collaboration. 'Cambia works every day to make health care easier and lives better for our members. For decades we've proven that we can do more when we have partners who share in this work,' said Jared Short, president and CEO of Cambia. 'BCBSND's culture and vision fit perfectly as we work together to innovate and transform health care for the communities we serve.' Members retain their current coverage and will continue to use their BCBSND insurance card just as they do today. BCBSND will continue to offer Medicare Advantage through NextBlue of North Dakota. BCBSND will maintain its local plan name, board of directors, and philanthropic foundation. It will also continue its mutual status, meaning it will remain governed by voting policyholders rather than investors. All BCBSND's reserve funds and foundation resources remain in North Dakota. Cambia will also maintain its foundation, and local health plans will operate in Idaho, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, as they do now. The areas of focus for the affiliation include: Improving the care experience with more personalized and connected solutions for members and providers. The affiliation enables investment in care solutions such as advanced primary care, mobile platforms for on-demand and virtual primary care, expanded tools for maternal and family health, and programs tailored to local communities. The affiliation enables investment in care solutions such as advanced primary care, mobile platforms for on-demand and virtual primary care, expanded tools for maternal and family health, and programs tailored to local communities. Expanding capabilities and tools to meet the unique local health needs of members and communities. Shared technology and data will create new opportunities for plans to collaborate with providers, employers and communities to support care that is more accessible, understandable and actionable for members and providers. Shared technology and data will create new opportunities for plans to collaborate with providers, employers and communities to support care that is more accessible, understandable and actionable for members and providers. Investing in transformative, financially sound solutions to improve members' health outcomes. Combined resources across operations and technology will increase agility, expand plan capabilities, provide cost savings, and simplify the experience for members and customers. The strategic affiliation is subject to regulatory approval in North Dakota and is expected to close in 2026. For more information, visit the fact sheet. About Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota BCBSND was founded in 1940 with the mission to provide members with affordable access to health care across the state. As an independent licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association (BCBSA), BCBSND is committed to transforming care and health across the state to improve outcomes, lower cost trends and make it easier to shop, buy and use health care coverage. Members have access to unmatched local service and to a comprehensive network of health care providers across the state, the nation and more than 190 countries. About Cambia Health Solutions Cambia Health Solutions, headquartered in Portland, Oregon, is dedicated to transforming health care. We put people at the heart of everything we do as we work to make the health care system more economically sustainable and efficient for people and their families. Our company reaches millions of Americans nationwide, including more than 3.6 million people served by our regional health plans. To learn more about us, visit
Time Magazine
2 hours ago
- Time Magazine
The Clashing Advice Over COVID-19 Shots for Kids
Should you give your baby a COVID-19 shot? The answer isn't as straightforward or as much of a consensus as it used to be: In an unusual move, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) is recommending a different approach to childhood vaccination than the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Both groups agree that families should make individual decisions in consultation with their doctors about whether kids should be vaccinated. But the AAP has a stricter stance for the youngest eligible children in the U.S., recommending that all of them get COVID-19 shots. The CDC stopped recommending COVID-19 vaccines for healthy children older than six months following guidance from the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., in May. The CDC does, however, recommend the shot for children who are moderately or severely immunocompromised. A day after the AAP released its recommendations, Kennedy fired back at the organization on social media, accusing them of allowing pharmaceutical-company donors to guide their recommendations. AAP maintains that its recommendations are based on science. Here's what to know about the clashing advice regarding COVID-19 vaccines for kids. What does the AAP recommend in terms of COVID-19 shots for children? Whether most children should get a COVID-19 vaccine should be based on their particular risk, the AAP says—taking into account their underlying conditions, such as asthma, obesity, or diabetes, as well as whether they live in a household with people at high risk for developing severe disease. That risk is higher for the youngest eligible age group—ages 6 months to 23 months—which is why the AAP recommends that all kids in this age group get vaccinated. 'For the youngest kids, the hospitalization rate is similar to that for adults 50 to 64 years old,' says Dr. Sean O'Leary, chair of the AAP Committee on Infectious Diseases. 'It's not nothing. And that's for something that can be prevented by a vaccine, which has been better studied than any medical product in our history. We have a very strong level of confidence in the safety of the vaccine.' HHS did not respond to TIME's request for comment. Why are the recommendations different? Generally, the CDC sets the schedule for which vaccines people should get and at which ages. The CDC makes its decision based on advice from its Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). ACIP is made up of independent experts who volunteer to review data, discuss their findings, and make recommendations to help guide the CDC. But Kennedy—a longtime vaccine-skeptic who now oversees the CDC as head of HHS—fired all members of ACIP in June, accusing them of following industry interests. Kennedy replaced them days later with people he had selected, 'many of them with strong anti-vaccine views,' says O'Leary. Read More: How Having a Baby Is Changing Under Trump After ACIP was replaced, AAP—which typically works closely with the advisory committee and other liaison groups in setting vaccination schedules—decided not to attend ACIP's first meeting under the new administration in the spring. 'We saw from that meeting that ACIP has gone off the rails, essentially, in terms of the way they are operating and the messaging from the new members, which is very much around sowing distrust about vaccines and not making evidence-based vaccine recommendations,' says O'Leary. Weeks later, the AAP and other liaison groups were asked to discontinue their participation in ACIP work groups, O'Leary says. 'We received an email un-inviting us,' he says. The reason provided, he says, was that the organizations represented 'special interest groups,' which O'Leary says is a 'poor interpretation of the rules. All of the organizations at the table have expertise, and there are a lot of reasons to have representation from professional societies.' Which advice will doctors and pharmacists follow? O'Leary says pediatricians are anticipating having to have more conversations with families about the conflicting vaccine advice, and that the AAP is providing guidance to help inform those discussions on its website and via emails to its members. 'Politics has entered the exam room in a way that it never has before,' he says. 'These discussions will be contextual, depending on how well the pediatrician knows the family, what relationship they have, and how frank they can be with them in the discussion.' Ultimately, he says, the message from pediatricians should be this: 'We are committed to the health of children, and our recommendations are based on the best available science.' Read More: What the New COVID-19 Vaccine Guidance Means For You Pharmacists must take a slightly different approach, since they are only allowed to vaccinate according to the CDC's recommendations, while doctors can vaccinate outside of strictly approved conditions or populations in so-called 'off-label' use. Since current CDC recommendations say that families should make their own decisions about whether their children receive the shot, pharmacists will vaccinate kids if parents want them to have the shots, but won't specifically recommend that people get them. 'Our guidance is to always follow what the CDC or HHS recommends,' says Rick Gates, chief pharmacy officer at Walgreens. If families come in with questions about whether their child should get the COVID-19 shot, pharmacists will probably refer them back to their pediatrician or family physician. Will insurance cover COVID-19 vaccines for kids if the CDC doesn't recommend them? It's still not clear how insurers will respond to the differing recommendations. 'This is a real concern,' says Dr. David Higgins, an infectious-disease expert at AAP. Traditionally, a recommendation from ACIP means that a shot will be covered, since any vaccines recommended by the committee have to be reimbursed by insurers under the Affordable Care Act. It's not clear how insurers will interpret the individual choice of families when it comes to vaccinating children. The AAP is urging insurers to continue covering the COVID-19 vaccine for infants six to 23 months, despite the fact that ACIP does not recommend the vaccine for all kids in this age group. 'The AAP is already engaging with private insurers and policymakers to ensure our evidence-based recommendations are covered,' Higgins says, 'and we will continue to advocate to make vaccines accessible to every child in every community.'
