&w=3840&q=100)
Iran warns of strikes on US, UK, French bases: Why that would be dangerous
Iran has warned it will target US, British, and French military bases in the region if they assist Israel in defending against Tehran's attacks. With thousands of Western troops stationed across the region and Iran's missile and drone capabilities expanding, this confrontation could trigger a far larger conflict read more
A rescue personnel walks next to a damaged vehicle at an impact site following missile attack from Iran on Israel, in Ramat Gan, Israel, June 14, 2025. File Image/Reuters
Iran has formally cautioned the United States, United Kingdom and France that if they interfere with its their forces stationed in the region will be considered legitimate targets.
This announcement was transmitted through state-controlled Iranian media on Saturday and follows intensified hostilities between Israel and Iran following attacks linked to Iran's nuclear dispute with Israel.
Western countries are now caught in a precarious position. US President Donald Trump has pledged support for Israel's defence, and American defence officials have acknowledged the role of US forces in countering airborne threats directed toward Israeli territory.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
France's President Emmanuel Macron echoed a similar stance, confirming on Friday that France would aid Israel if Iran escalated.
Meanwhile, the British government has clarified that its forces have not been directly involved in any such support operations, with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer highlighting the importance of restraint.
The risk for Iran in executing its threat lies in the possibility of drawing Western militaries directly into the conflict, at a time when Israeli airstrikes have already imposed substantial pressure on Iranian-aligned infrastructure.
Despite this, Tehran appears intent on deterring further foreign military support for Israel.
Speaking at a UN Security Council meeting, US diplomat McCoy Pitt remarked, 'No government proxy or independent actor should target American citizens, American bases or other American infrastructure in the region. The consequences for Iran would be dire.'
Where are Western forces located in the region?
The United States maintains a widespread and enduring military presence across the region. According to the Council on Foreign Relations, this includes a network of permanent and temporary facilities in no fewer than 19 locations.
There are eight fixed bases among these, located in Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain.
As of mid-2025, there are an estimated 40,000 to 50,000 American service personnel stationed across the region. These troops are distributed between major hubs and forward-deployed positions that serve logistical, intelligence, naval and aerial operational purposes.
Among the most heavily manned countries are Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, the UAE and Saudi Arabia — nations that host key facilities vital to Washington's projection of power in the region.
The United Kingdom also operates several installations across the Gulf and nearby territories. British forces are based at multiple locations, including Cyprus which is home to the Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia, which are key staging grounds for RAF combat and support aircraft under Operation Shader. These bases also feature signal intelligence capabilities.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Bahrain serves as the location of the UK Naval Support Facility, serving as the Royal Navy's primary Gulf support point, while Oman serves as the permanent joint support installation in Duqm aids maritime operations and training exercises, and it also is being developed as a key strategic anchor.
British forces also utilise the Al Udeid air base in Qatar, a central node for RAF regional command and control while RAF personnel operate from the Al Minhad air base in the United Arab Emirates.
UK forces and support staff are also present, albeit in smaller numbers, in Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states.
France, for its part, has had a naval air station — formally named the French Military Settlement in the United Arab Emirates (IMFEAU) — in Abu Dhabi since 2009, supporting both aerial and maritime operations.
What could happen if Iran struck Western assets?
Iran's threat raises alarms across military and diplomatic circles. Even though US officials have insisted their role is defensive, Iranian leadership appears convinced that Western powers are facilitating Israeli operations.
Likely Iranian targets include American military camps in Iraq, Gulf-based installations and possibly embassies and consulates. Tehran-backed armed groups remain active in Iraq, despite diminished activity from other Iranian proxy forces like Hamas and Hezbollah.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Missiles launched from Iran are intercepted, as seen from the city of Ashkelon, Israel, June 13, 2025. Reuters
Given the rising tension, the United States has already taken precautionary measures, including repositioning personnel in vulnerable areas.
A serious flashpoint could emerge if an American national were to die in the ongoing conflict, whether in Israel or another hot zone. In such a case, Trump might face increased political pressure to respond militarily.
The capabilities required to destroy deeply embedded Iranian nuclear facilities — such as those at Fordow — are currently only in the possession of the United States.
While Trump campaigned on promises to avoid prolonged wars in the region, many in his political base support Israel's strategic objectives, including the goal of confronting Tehran directly.
Escalation, however, carries far-reaching risks. If Iran's primary strikes fail to damage well-defended Israeli targets, Tehran may turn to more vulnerable points in the Gulf region.
Past incidents serve as reminders: Iran was blamed for the 2019 drone and missile attacks on Saudi Aramco oil facilities and its Houthi allies successfully struck targets in the UAE in 2022.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Despite recent diplomatic efforts to ease regional hostilities, the countries that host US and allied airbases — some of whom discreetly assisted Israel's air defense — could now find themselves under threat.
Should these nations come under fire, they may seek assistance from American and allied air power, thereby expanding the theatre of war.
What's next: Escalation, patience, or proxy retaliation?
The future of this crisis hinges on Tehran's next steps. A continuation of long-range attacks appears likely, though immediate success against Israel's layered air defences is doubtful without backing from other powers, such as Russia or China — an outcome deemed improbable at this stage.
Iran may instead resort to a more patient strategy, conserving its arsenal and waiting for a more opportune moment to strike again.
This approach may involve periodic waves of drone and missile launches, each carefully timed to test or wear down Israeli and Western defences.
For Washington, this creates a dilemma. Each new round of defence support to Israel — whether in the form of air defence systems or ammunition — entangles the US deeper in a conflict Trump has sought to contain.
Not to forget, the risk of economic fallout, including surging oil prices grows with each retaliatory cycle.
With inputs from agencies
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
19 minutes ago
- Mint
Manu Joseph: What Elon Musk can learn from the ‘richest man ever'
Elon Musk, the world's richest man among those whose wealth is known, recently found himself in a rare spot for someone of his influence: overplaying his hand. In a public spat with Donald Trump, Musk denounced the American president, suggested he should be impeached and even floated a serious allegation involving the late Jeffrey Epstein, who was charged with sex trafficking minors. Musk also claimed his money helped Trump win the presidency. Such bluster would have been the doom of a billionaire in most nations. That Musk survived this is due to the one Western value he unwittingly relied on while helping ruin it: the right to criticize power fearlessly. Also Read: X factor: The rise and fall of Elon Musk as a political figure Yet, even in America, where the old habit of being the West lingers, Musk was forced to back-pedal. Trump threatened him on social media with legal scrutiny and the withdrawal of government contracts. To understand the limits of wealth when it meets state power, Musk may want to get to know, if he doesn't already, one man who many consider the richest person who ever lived. No one clarifies the relationship between money and state better than Jacob Fugger, a 16th-century banker. In today's money, Fugger's wealth would be worth some $400 billion dollars in hard assets. Musk's net worth is similar, but more volatile, as we have seen lately. But this does not demonstrate Fugger's true financial might in his time. In his book,The Richest Man Who Ever Lived: The Life and Times of Jacob Fugger, Greg Steinmetz states that when Fugger died in 1525, his wealth amounted to 2% of Europe's GDP at a time when Europe was an economic powerhouse and there was no US. In comparison, Musk's peak net worth was lower as a proportion of the US economy. Also Read: Why regretful tweets can't fix Musk's Tesla mess The political influence of Musk is impressive, but Fugger was at another level. Fugger dealt with emperors and popes. He financed wars, revolutions and once practically bought the Holy Roman Empire for his royal client. He also got a pope to cancel a Christian sin—usury, or the practice of charging interest on loans. In 1523, he wrote a letter to Charles V, one of the most powerful men on earth at the time as the holy Roman Emperor with a string of other monarchic titles. To this man, his lender Fugger wrote, 'It is well known that without me your majesty might not have acquired the imperial crown… You will order that the money which I have paid out, together with the interest upon it, shall be reckoned up and paid without further delay." The first part of the quoted line sounds like Musk and on the whole it appears even more self-destructive than Musk's online fight with Trump. But Charles paid up. Maybe because Fugger was not being as disrespectful as we imagine, maybe medieval Europe was a place where seasoned men of the world spoke frankly. Also, Fugger was right; Charles couldn't do without him. Also Read: Musk versus Trump: A case of mutually assured destruction Fugger, like Musk, was given to boasting. But his boasts were strategic—a form of advertising to remind monarchs that only he could move great sums. Whatever Fugger did must have been respectful by the customs of his time. In any case, he did not hesitate to flatter. After all, it was an age when it was not so hard for an emperor to execute a mere wealthy man, or put him away in some dungeon. But there was a delicate way to deal with power. Emperors controlled all land and they could convert it into money, but a way of the world even then was that rulers ruled by spending money and not making it. So they needed those special men who knew how to make it, who had a lot of it and who could lend it in return for various privileges, like mining rights. It was a tricky business to lend to emperors, for those powerful men were often broke and could simply renege. The only thing stopping them was a loss of reputation, which would make their future borrowing impossible or more expensive. Even so, emperors stole all the time from businessmen. Also Read: Manu Joseph: America and the bearable loneliness of losing the West When Charles's grandfather Emperor Maximilian needed funds, he didn't just ask nicely. He forced Fugger and other bankers to buy imperial bonds with no collateral, under a 'fairness' argument—that people like Fugger were able to do business because of the safety and peace Maximilian assured. Fugger wrote to Maximilian stating something many capitalists after him would say—that big business, by its very existence, is a moral force because it creates employment. But eventually, Fugger had to buy bonds. Like Musk, Fugger took great political bets. He funded the Church and also sponsored events that led to a movement against the Church, the Reformation. He also pioneered an early news network to gain an intelligence advantage over rivals. Yet, through it all, Fugger knew how to behave in front of a crown. Fugger appeared to understand that there were two streams of power—one that came from the masses, which was accumulated in one person, the power of the state. And another sort of power which came from being useful to the state. In Fugger's time, it was very clear that it was foolish to challenge the state's power. In Musk's time, there is a feeling in the West that a man like him can challenge the state, or the new emperors of our time. This is a myth. Sure, Musk is wildly famous himself, which could lead anyone in his place to overvalue it. But being famous is not the same as being the repository of the will and grouses of people. Celebrity is often not the same as politics. The author is a journalist, novelist, and the creator of the Netflix series, 'Decoupled'.
Mint
19 minutes ago
- Mint
Ajit Ranade: West Asia's upheaval intensifies India's challenges of geopolitics
Next Story Ajit Ranade The Israel-Iran war will make it harder for New Delhi to navigate global turbulence even as an oil flare-up poses a threat. But it could also spur domestic policy changes—in favour trade diversification, for example—that strengthen our economy. The fallout of the hostilities: Over a hundred people already killed, cities plunged into fear, critical infrastructure damaged and diplomacy left in the rubble. Gift this article The world crossed a dangerous threshold on 13 June. Israel attacked Iran, targeting nuclear facilities, military bases and even residential zones in order to kill top military leaders and nuclear scientists. Israel sees a nuclear-armed Iran as an existential threat and says that Iran's uranium enrichment programme had reached a point where a nuclear weapon was just weeks away. The world crossed a dangerous threshold on 13 June. Israel attacked Iran, targeting nuclear facilities, military bases and even residential zones in order to kill top military leaders and nuclear scientists. Israel sees a nuclear-armed Iran as an existential threat and says that Iran's uranium enrichment programme had reached a point where a nuclear weapon was just weeks away. The enrichment, while in violation of Iran's commitment to complying with nuclear safeguards, as noted recently by the United Nations' watchdog, was still nowhere close to weapons grade, as per US experts. Hence Israel's unprovoked attack was a big shocker. Israel so far had stopped short of full-scale war, preferring sabotage, cyber-attacks and targeted killings. But now Israel has crossed a line of no return for itself, Iran and the world. Iran launched a counter attack with over 200 ballistic missiles. It aimed at more than 150 Israeli targets that included nuclear sites and residential zones. Also Read: Javier Blas: An Israel-Iran war may not rattle the oil market The fallout of the hostilities: 130 people already killed, cities plunged into fear, critical infrastructure damaged and diplomacy left in the rubble. This escalation by Israel into war has upended Middle Eastern geopolitics. What was once a high-stakes diplomatic standoff has now escalated into a military confrontation. This will likely spiral up, notwithstanding global voices for restraint. From a statement of US President Donald Trump, it is obvious that Israel had tacit American support, with all its military might. He has been drawn into making a choice that he would have rather avoided: i.e., choosing between playing peacemaker and backing Israel solidly. On the other hand, all the Gulf states have condemned Israel's strike. But some like Saudi Arabia and the UAE might be quietly relieved at Iran's weakened position. Riyadh is Tehran's rival in a quest for regional dominance. China has stayed pointedly silent. Iran is central to its energy security and infrastructure ambitions for the Belt and Road Initiative, but Israel is also a key technology partner. Maybe China wants to position itself as a non-interventionist peacemaker, striking a contrast with unconditional support by the US for Israel, the aggressor. This Middle East distraction for Washington can work to China's advantage, as it gains manoeuvring space to flex muscle on Taiwan and in the wider Indo-Pacific. Russia had asked for an immediate Security Council meeting and resolution, knowing full well that the US will stonewall it with a veto. Hence its condemnations have lacked force. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), of which India is a member, has condemned Israel's attack, but India has carefully distanced itself from the SCO's common statement. Europe is alarmed by Israel, but not sympathetic to Iran, given the latter's record on enrichment. These actions of various international players reveal a global system where major powers are acting increasingly based on narrow transactional interests rather than any shared security architecture. It has injected fresh volatility into an already fragile global order. Israel has America's political, military and diplomatic support, whereas no major power is unequivocally with Iran. At most, it has ambivalent, conditional or weak support from various quarters. Non-state actors that could have aided it, such as Hezbollah and the Houthis, have been weakened. Hence, Tehran's resilience will be tested and it might resort to desperate measures. It has threatened strikes on the military bases of Israel's allies. These include US bases. It has also drawn attention to another lever of high-impact force with a threat to bar the movement of oil through the Strait of Hormuz, from where 20% of the world's oil flows. Meanwhile the Ali Khamenei administration is facing strong opposition at home, which Israel has sought to exploit. Instability in West Asia affects India deeply, for the stakes are immediate and structural. Some 60% of India's crude oil passes through the Strait of Hormuz. We have 8 million citizens in the Gulf region. Oil prices above $100 will worsen inflation, widen the current account deficit, hasten the rupee's fall and strain the fiscal deficit. Last year net inbound foreign direct investment (FDI) was almost negligible. Investors will now adopt a wait- and-watch attitude, thus hurting our growth prospects. New Delhi has to balance its energy security and Chahabar interests in Iran with its tech and defence partnership with Israel. It cannot remain silent on Israel's attack on Iran sovereignty because that would seem like moral abdication. This is the third such conflict where India finds itself locked in a narrow diplomatic navigation route and forced into a tight balancing act. Can New Delhi publicly and strongly condemn Russia in Ukraine? Can it condemn Israel's ongoing treatment of people in Gaza? It has to protect its strategic autonomy, while remaining a credible power with aspirations to UN Security Council membership and great power status. India's response reflects preference for non-alignment and quiet diplomacy. Also Read: Israel's war on Iran to hit Indian workforce India's foremost priority is the domestic economy, given our vulnerability to commodity prices, oil, exchange rates and investment flows. We cannot count on discounted Russian crude, not least because of the likely US reaction. Our free trade agreement with the UK will kick in next year, and a treaty with the US is uncertain. The big rate cut by the Reserve Bank surprised the market, but now in hindsight seems like a great pre-emptive strike. A large monetary stimulus will be useful ahead of signs of economic weakening. There is also massive liquidity injection. Prior to the present conflict, the 2025-26 GDP growth estimate of 6.5% was the lowest in four years. It might get worse, along with world growth, as even the World Bank's Global Economic Prospects points out. India's private sector investment-to-GDP ratio has been stagnating at 10% for a decade. A recent government survey of private sector capital expenditure intentions points to a decline this year. The government will have to keep up public capex to provide a growth impetus, as it has done in the past four years. On FDI, we must think creatively, as we need at least 2% of GDP on a net basis. New Delhi must revisit its stance on Chinese investment to allow it at least in non-sensitive sectors, such as automotive products (especially electric vehicles), infrastructure and renewable energy. Chinese exports can use Indian value chains. In the medium term, we need to diversify our energy sources and export markets. Our services export boom must go beyond Western customers. And, of course, we need a great thrust on building human capital, skilling and research. Paradoxically, the West Asian crisis might be an opportunity for India to emerge stronger with a bigger stature. The author is senior fellow with Pune International Centre. Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Anti-Trump demonstrators crowd streets, parks to join ‘No Kings' protest; U.S. organizers say millions came
Masses of demonstrators packed into streets, parks and plazas across the United States on Saturday (June 14, 2025) to protest President Donald Trump, marching through downtowns and small towns, blaring anti-authoritarian chants mixed with support for protecting democracy and immigrant rights. Organizers of the 'No Kings' demonstrations said millions had marched in hundreds of events. Governors across the U.S. had urged calm and vowed no tolerance for violence, while some mobilized the National Guard ahead of marchers gathering. From Los Angeles to Florida, thousands of Americans joined rallies to denounce Trump's aggressive approach in major cities. Anti-Trump groups planned nearly 2,000 demonstrations of varying sizes which are taking place under the theme of 'No Kings' — Reuters (@Reuters) June 15, 2025 Confrontations were isolated. But police in Los Angeles, where protests over federal immigration enforcement raids erupted a week earlier and sparked demonstrations across the country, used tear gas and crowd-control munitions to clear out protesters after the formal event ended. Officers in Portland also fired tear gas and projectiles to disperse a crowd that protested in front of a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement building well into the evening. And in Salt Lake City, Utah, police were investigating a shooting during a march downtown that left one person critically injured. Three people were taken into custody, including a man believed to be the shooter, who also suffered a gunshot wound, according to Police Chief Brian Redd. 'No Kings': Protesters rallied nationwide Saturday against US President Donald Trump, ahead of a rare military parade on his 79th birthday. More: — AFP News Agency (@AFP) June 14, 2025 Redd said it was too early to tell if the shooting was politically motivated and whether those involved knew each other. The shooter appeared to be walking alongside the group of thousands who were marching, he added. Video feeds showed demonstrators running for safety as gunshots rang out. 'Trump must go now' Huge, boisterous crowds marched, danced, drummed, and chanted shoulder-to-shoulder in New York, Denver, Chicago, Austin and Los Angeles, some behind 'no kings' banners. Atlanta's 5,000-capacity event quickly reached its limit, with thousands more gathered outside barriers to hear speakers in front of the state Capitol. Officials in Seattle estimated that more than 70,000 people attended the city's largest rally downtown, the Seattle Times reported. Trump was in Washington for a military parade marking the Army's 250th anniversary that coincides with the president's birthday. About 200 protesters assembled in northwest Washington's Logan Circle and chanted 'Trump must go now' before erupting in cheers. A larger-than-life puppet of Trump — a caricature of the president wearing a crown and sitting on a golden toilet — was wheeled through the crowd. In some places, organizers handed out little American flags while others flew their flags upside down, a sign of distress. Mexican flags, which have become a fixture of the Los Angeles protests against immigration raids, also made an appearance at some demonstrations Saturday. In Culpepper, Virginia, police said one person was struck by an SUV when a 21-year-old driver intentionally accelerated his SUV into the crowd as protesters were leaving a rally. The driver was charged with reckless driving. Protests over the federal immigration enforcement raids The demonstrations come on the heels of the protests over the federal immigration enforcement raids that began last week and Trump ordering the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles, where protesters blocked a freeway and set cars on fire. 'Today, across red states and blue, rural towns and major cities, Americans stood in peaceful unity and made it clear: we don't do kings," the No Kings Coalition said in a statement Saturday afternoon after many events had ended. Thousands gathered downtown, where organizers handed out small American flags and people carried protest signs saying 'fight oligarchy' and 'deport the mini-Mussolinis." Karen Van Trieste, a 61-year-old nurse who drove up from Maryland, said she grew up in Philadelphia and wanted to be with a large group of people showing her support. 'I just feel like we need to defend our democracy,' she said. She is concerned about the Trump administration's layoffs of staff at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the fate of immigrant communities and Trump trying to rule by executive order, she said. A woman wearing a foam Statue of Liberty crown brought a speaker system and led an anti-Trump sing-along, changing the words 'young man' in the song 'Y.M.C.A.' to 'con man.' 'I am what the successful American dream looks like,' said C.C. Téllez, an immigrant from Bolivia who attended the protest. 'I've enjoyed great success here in the United States, and I've also contributed heavily to my community. And if there was space for me, I think there's a way for everybody else to belong here as well.' Thousands gathered in front of City Hall, waving signs and listening to a Native American drum circle before marching through the streets. As protesters passed National Guard troops or U.S. Marines stationed at various buildings, most interactions were friendly, with demonstrators giving fist bumps or posing for selfies. But others chanted 'shame' or 'go home' at the troops. Amid signs reading 'They fear us don't back down California' and 'We carry dreams not danger, ' one demonstrator carried a 2-foot-tall (60-centimeter) Trump pinata on a stick, with a crown on his head and sombrero hanging off his back. Another hoisted a huge helium-filled orange baby balloon with blond hair styled like Trump's. A few blocks from City Hall, protesters gathered in front of the downtown federal detention center being guarded by a line of Marines and other law enforcement. It was the first time that the Marines, in combat gear and holding rifles, have appeared at a demonstration since they were deployed to city on Friday with the stated mission of defending federal property. Peter Varadi, 54, said he voted for Mr. Trump last November for 'economic reasons.' Now, for the first time in his life, he is protesting, waving a Mexican and U.S. combined flag. 'I voted for Donald Trump, and now I regret that, because he's taken this fascism to a new level,' Varadi said. 'It's Latinos now. Who's next? It's gays. Blacks after that. They're coming for everybody.' Even after the formal event ended, the downtown streets were packed with a jubilant crowd as people danced to salsa music and snacked on hot dogs and ice cream bought from vendors, many of whom are Latino immigrants. But the previously calm demonstration turned confrontational as police on horseback moved into the crowd and struck some people with wood rods and batons as they cleared the street in front of the federal building. Marchers in the crowd that stretched for blocks along Fifth Avenue had diverse reasons for coming, including anger over Trump's immigration policies, support for the Palestinian people and outrage over what they said was an erosion of free speech rights. But there were patriotic symbols, too. Leah Griswold, 32, and Amber Laree, 59, who marched in suffragette white dresses, brought 250 American flags to hand out to people in the crowd. 'Our mothers who came out, fought for our rights, and now we're fighting for future generations as well,' Griswold said. Some protesters held signs denouncing Trump while others banged drums. 'We're here because we're worried about the existential crisis of this country and the planet and our species,' said Sean Kryston, 28. Gov. Tim Walz and law enforcement encouraged people not to attend rallies 'out of an abundance of caution' following the shootings of the Democratic state lawmakers. Dozens of events were canceled, but tens of thousands still turned out for demonstrations in Duluth, Rochester and St. Paul, which included a march to the state Capitol. Walz canceled his scheduled appearance at the St. Paul event. Authorities said the suspect had 'No Kings' flyers in his car and writings mentioning the names of the victims as well as other lawmakers and officials, though they could not say if he had any other specific targets. Seda Heng, 29, of Rochester, said she was heartbroken by the shootings, but still wanted to join the rally there. 'These people are trying to do what they can for their communities, for the state, for the nation,' Heng told the Minnesota Star-Tribune. Crowds cheered anti-Trump speakers in Charlotte's First Ward Park before marching, chanting 'No kings. No crowns. We will not bow down." Marchers stretched for blocks, led by a group of people holding a giant Mexican flag and bystanders cheering and clapping along the way. People protest Trump's deployment of the National Guard Jocelyn Abarca, a 21-year-old college student, said the protest was a chance to 'speak for what's right' after mass deportations and Trump's deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles. 'If we don't stop it now, it's just going to keep getting worse,' she said. Naomi Mena said she traveled an hour to demonstrate in Charlotte to represent her 'friends and family who sadly can't have a voice out in public now' to stay safe. A rally at the Texas Capitol in Austin went off as planned despite state police briefly shutting down the building and the surrounding grounds after authorities said they received a 'credible threat' to Democratic state lawmakers who were to attend. Dozens of state troopers swarmed through the grounds about four hours before the event, but the area was later opened and the rally started on time. The building remained closed. The Department of Public Safety later said one person was taken into custody 'in connection with the threats made against state lawmakers" after a traffic stop in La Grange, Texas, about 65 miles (105 kilometers) east of Austin. State police did not detail the threat or immediately identify the person, but said there was no additional active threat. A demonstration of hundreds of people opened to 'War Pigs' by Black Sabbath playing over a sound system on the state Capitol lawn in Jackson. 'A lot of stuff that's going on now is targeting people of color, and to see so many folks out here that aren't black or brown fighting for the same causes that I'm here for, it makes me very emotional,' said Tony Cropper, who traveled from Tennessee to attend the protest. Some people wore tinfoil crowns atop their heads. Others held signs inviting motorists to 'Honk if you never text war plans.' Melissa Johnson said she drove an hour-and-a-half to Jackson to protest because 'we are losing the thread of democracy in our country." Earlier in the day, thousands of protesters lined the streets in downtown Portland for several blocks, waving signs as passing cars honked in support. They marched around the city draped in American flags to the beat of drums and music. By late afternoon, a small group of demonstrators amassed across the river to protest in front of an ICE office where three people were arrested Wednesday night after starting a small fire against the building, police said. Federal immigration officers fired tear gas, flash bangs and rubber bullets in an effort to clear out the remaining protesters in the evening. Some protesters threw water bottles back and tended to each other's wounds. The police department wrote on X that the event was declared a riot. At least two people were detained and taken inside the federal immigration building.
