logo
Mediobanca, Monte Paschi beat profit forecasts as they face off in takeover war

Mediobanca, Monte Paschi beat profit forecasts as they face off in takeover war

Reuters09-05-2025

MILAN, May 9 (Reuters) - State-backed Monte dei Paschi di Siena (BMPS.MI), opens new tab and Mediobanca (MDBI.MI), opens new tab both beat forecasts with quarterly profits on Friday, as they face off in one of the takeover battles rocking Italian finance.
To thwart Monte dei Paschi's (MPS) hostile buyout offer, Mediobanca last month unveiled its own acquisition proposal for private bank Banca Generali (BGN.MI), opens new tab, an asset it has long coveted to grow its wealth management business.
Mediobanca CEO Alberto Nagel said his experience as an adviser on financial M&A deals proved banks needed a similar culture and a chance to cut costs through overlaps for mergers to work.
"In the case of the MPS deal with us, all of that does not happen," he told a post-result press briefing.
MPS, where Italy has been successfully scaling back its presence since late 2023 after rescuing it in 2017, proposes combining Mediobanca's wealth management and investment banking businesses with its own commercial network, where the two lenders already partner in consumer finance.
It would cross-sell products through branches and use deposits to finance the other activities while keeping the two entities separate to safeguard the Mediobanca brand.
On a call with analysts MPS CEO Luigi Lovaglio thanked Nagel for "providing his view of what would work best for MPS" but made clear the bank had other ideas. "We're wide awake and we have our own vision. We like to challenge ourselves with an innovative and transformational deal," he said.
To fend off MPS, Mediobanca is proposing to sever its historic ties with Banca Generali's owner Assicurazioni Generali (GASI.MI), opens new tab. It would pay for Banca Generali by distributing the stake that currently makes it the biggest investor in Generali.
Generali would end up with around 6.5% of its capital in treasury shares.
Mediobanca, Generali and, since last November, MPS all have in common two major shareholders, Italy's Del Vecchio and Caltagirone families, which have clashed with Mediobanca as investors in Generali.
A former powerhouse of Italian capitalism as it started as a lender to large companies, Mediobanca would become a major wealth management player focused on top tier clients with Banca Generali, continuing to steer away from commercial banking.
In a display of its potential as a partner, MPS grew fees from wealth management and advisory by 21% in the first quarter, helping it to steady revenues year-on-year despite an 8% decline in income from the gap between lending and deposit rates.
At 334 million euros, Mediobanca's net profit surpassed a bank-provided analyst consensus of 304 million euros, on a 3% yearly increase in revenues from all its divisions.
Its takeover target Banca Generali also reported a better-than-expected quarterly net profit.
The private bank said the positive result, achieved despite the strong market volatility and a sharp decline of equity indexes, reflected the solidity of its business.
It also appointed Deutsche Bank as financial adviser for Mediobanca's offer.
MPS posted a 24% yearly profit rise to 413 million euros ($464 million), well above the bank-provided 341 million euro forecast, with costs and loan loss provisions declining.
MPS' core capital ratio strengthened further to 19.6% of assets, one of the highest in the sector.
($1 = 0.8908 euros)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Would you pay £575 for a Britney Spears tour T-shirt?
Would you pay £575 for a Britney Spears tour T-shirt?

Telegraph

time19 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Would you pay £575 for a Britney Spears tour T-shirt?

The Balenciaga portion of that doesn't seem to be too seismic – 4 per cent according to Kering – which is a saving grace considering what has come before; a 2023 controversy that almost destroyed the house. First of all, a campaign featuring children holding teddy bears in leather bondage gear. Weird, but not unexpected in Balenciagaland. Then the truly mind boggling follow up; a campaign featuring Isabelle Huppert and some product placed amongst some seemingly innocuous objects. Except on closer inspection – via ever-present social media sleuths – one stack of documents were Supreme Court rulings on child pornography, and another featured a diploma with a name that happens to also be that of a convicted abuser. The result was a Balenciaga bomb going off at the heart of the Kering conglomerate, with celebrity denouncements from avid fans like Kim Kardashian, who said on her Instagram stories and on Twitter that she was 'shaken' by the images, and subsequent apologies from the house. Then CEO Cédric Charbit said at the time; 'I want to personally reiterate my sincere apologies for the offence caused and take my responsibility.' The statement pointed out that a third party prop's company supplied the materials on the shoot in question. In March this year, it was announced that Demna Gvasalia would be leaving Balenciaga. His destination, however, was a curveball; Kering choppering him into Gucci, its spangly jewel in the crown, a house of hi falutin glamour and those distinctive double G branded bags. Granted, Demna knows how to create buzz with logomania – although how much design nous it takes to emblazon your brand name across everything and anything is debatable – but Gucci's signature sense of seduction, throughout all of its iterations from Tom Ford to Alessandro Michele, isn't something Demna's dark arts dabble in. His is a deliberately jarring, quirky-ugly aesthetic that doesn't seem to tally with what Gucci stands for. Time will tell whether the house that once sold us must-have bags and defined the 1990s (and early 2020s) fashion is ready for a darkly turbulent aesthetic. Granted, Balenciaga couture can make some exceptionally beautiful clothes – as exhibited on the Cannes red carpet by Balenciaga ambassador Isabelle Huppert – but that's the rarity rather than the rule. Balenciaga is set to be taken over by Pier Paolo Piccioli, an Italian designer known for his sense of romance and feminine exuberance.

The Guardian view on the Conservatives and international law: a party trapped inside its own destructive obsessions
The Guardian view on the Conservatives and international law: a party trapped inside its own destructive obsessions

The Guardian

time26 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

The Guardian view on the Conservatives and international law: a party trapped inside its own destructive obsessions

Kemi Badenoch's announcement of a Conservative party inquiry into a British withdrawal from the European convention on human rights (ECHR) should fool no one. The working party under the shadow attorney general, David Wolfson, announced on Thursday, will not look dispassionately at whether the UK should withdraw. It will merely try to say why and how. The policy of withdrawal itself is almost, to coin a phrase, oven-ready. This back-to-front policymaking process exemplifies the party's rudderless drift under Mrs Badenoch. Tory policy is not now in the hands of the leader or the shadow cabinet. It is in the hands of Reform UK and the opinion polls. Mrs Badenoch is a follower of events. Hers is the approach of someone still trapped in a party bubble which is consumed by the belief that withdrawal is the key to regaining the Conservatives' squandered popularity. This is nonsensical politics for the Tories. But it is also dangerous for Britain. The UK's ​long commitment to international law is a cornerstone of this country's soft power standing in the world. Labour's reassertion of this approach, with its clear signal to the world that Britain can again be trusted as a partner, has generated national benefits since the party returned to office last year. This does not mean that every aspect of international law (of which the ECHR is part) is unchallengeable or holy writ. The primary responsibility for the rule of law and for human rights is at the national level. The states that signed international covenants and treaties after 1945 'did not give an open-ended licence for international rules to be ever more expansively interpreted or for institutions to adopt a position of blindness or indifference to public sentiment in their member states'. Those words come from the current attorney general, Richard Hermer. They were part of his lucid and balanced lecture on security to the Royal United Services Institute last week. To judge by the fury it unleashed among the Daily Telegraph and Spectator writing classes, you might think that Lord Hermer had insisted that only lawyers ​like him could solve the world's conflicts and injustices, and that anyone who disagreed with him was a Nazi. Lord Hermer said no such thing​s. Those who read his lecture will ​instead find an explicit attempt to depolarise the debate. He criticise​s as 'romantic idealists' those who treat international law as the reign of ​universal moral principle and who abhor all concession to nation-state interests. But he also denounced the 'pseudo-realists' who argue, amid the current unravelling of the post-1945 order, that nation-state interests can now take precedence over law. This, he said, was Russia's argument in Ukraine (he was too craven to mention that it is Donald Trump's philosophy of government too). British politicians drawn to this exceptionalist thinking in the name of realism risked committing 'deeply unserious acts in a deadly serious age'. To leave the ECHR would be just such an act. But its consequences would be desperately serious. It would give succour to authoritarian rulers on all continents. It would drain Britain's reputation for reliability again, as Brexit did. And it would achieve none of the goals in national security, criminal justice and migration control that its supporters imagine. Lord Hermer is right that serious problems can ultimately only be resolved through negotiations, driven by politics, which are then knitted together in laws that must be upheld. You cannot have one without the other.

Fed's Schmid: uncomfortable with looking through tariff-driven price push
Fed's Schmid: uncomfortable with looking through tariff-driven price push

Reuters

time27 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Fed's Schmid: uncomfortable with looking through tariff-driven price push

June 5 (Reuters) - Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank President Jeff Schmid on Thursday expressed concern that tariffs could rekindle inflation, saying upward price pressure could be apparent in coming months but not fully known for much longer. The comments show Schmid is likely inclined to hold the Fed policy rate steady not just at its upcoming June 17-18 meeting as is widely expected but for some time after that as well, to make sure that inflation, which is now near the Fed's 2% goal, doesn't get out of hand. "While theory might suggest that monetary policy should look through a one-time increase in prices, I would be uncomfortable staking the Fed's reputation and credibility on theory," Schmid said in remarks prepared for delivery to a banking conference hosted at his regional Fed bank's headquarters. At the same time, he said, he's "optimistic" about the economy's momentum, despite widespread belief that tariffs will slow growth and weaken the labor market. "While the tariffs are likely to push up prices, the extent of the increase is not certain, and likely will not be fully apparent for some time," Schmid said. "Likewise, the extent of the drag on growth and employment is also unclear." In response, he said, the Fed will "need to remain nimble" to balance its twin objectives of price stability and full employment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store