Some two-room BTO flats to be set aside for first-time singles who want to live near parents
The new Family Care Scheme (FCS), which was first announced by Prime Minister Lawrence Wong in the National Day Rally last year, comprises two components: FCS (Proximity) and FCS (Joint Balloting).
PROXIMITY
FCS (Proximity) allows parents and their children, regardless of marital status, priority access if they are applying for a new flat to live with or near each other. This will be rolled out in the July BTO exercise.
Currently, up to 65 per cent of two-room flexi BTO flats and up to 5 per cent of Sale of Balance flats (SBF) are set aside for first-timer singles, after allocating flats to seniors.
Within these quotas, 30 per cent of BTO flats and 2 per cent of SBF flats will be set aside for first-time singles applying under FCS (Proximity). This applies to Standard and Plus flats.
For Prime flats, the percentages drop to 20 per cent and 1 per cent, respectively.
The remaining quota will be for other first-time singles.
Married couples and seniors currently have priority access under the Married Child Priority Scheme and Senior Priority Scheme when applying for new flats to live with or near their parents or married children.
FCS (Proximity) will replace both of these schemes, with no change to the priority access for married couples and seniors.
JOINT BALLOTING
FCS (Joint Balloting) allows parents and their children, regardless of marital status, to jointly apply for two units in the same BTO project, where there are two-room flexi or three-room flats in the same project.
This will start in the October BTO exercise, HDB said on Sunday.
It will replace the Multi-Generation Priority Scheme for married children and parents to live near each other in the same BTO project.
CHANGES FROM JULY
Other changes that will start from the July BTO exercise have been announced previously.
This includes HDB increasing the allocation quota of three-room and larger BTO flats for second-timer families by 5 percentage points.
The revised proportion of BTO flats set aside for second-timer families:
Up to 20 per cent of three-room Standard flats
Up to 10 per cent of three-room plus and prime flats, and four-room and larger standard, plus and prime flats
At least 80 per cent to 90 per cent of three-room and larger flats will continue to be set aside for first-time families.
Changes to the Deferred Income Assessment (DIA) scheme and the Fresh Start Housing Grant for eligible second-time families will also take effect from the July BTO exercise.
The DIA scheme allows eligible couples to apply for a new flat and delay their income assessment for housing grants or loans until just before they collect their keys.
This will be expanded such that only one party in a couple needs to be a full-time student or national serviceman to be eligible. Previously, both parties needed to meet this requirement.
The Fresh Start Housing Grant will be increased from S$50,000 to S$75,000 to support more second-timer public rental households with children to own homes. These families can use the increased grant to buy a new two-room flexi or three-room Standard BTO, or SBF flat, on a shorter lease.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
43 minutes ago
- Straits Times
UK to hold inquiry into miners strike 'Battle of Orgreave' four decades on
FILE PHOTO: A for sale sign stands by the closed Clipstone Colliery in Clipstone near Mansfield, central England, April 9, 2013. REUTERS/Darren Staples/File Photo LONDON - Britain said on Monday it would hold an inquiry into the "Battle of Orgreave", a violent confrontation between police and striking coal miners in 1984 at the height of a year-long industrial dispute with Margaret Thatcher's government. More than 5,000 striking miners clashed with a similar number of riot police who had been drafted in from across the country at the Orgreave coking plant near Sheffield in northern England. It was one of the most violent scenes witnessed during a British industrial dispute, and also a pivotal moment in the strike, launched against Thatcher's moves to close money-losing pits. The miners ultimately lost the broader fight to save their industry. The police have long faced accusations of brutality and using excessive violence at Orgreave on June 18, 1984. TV footage showed charges by officers on horseback and one miner being repeatedly struck on the head with a baton. More than 120 people were injured and 95 miners initially arrested and charged with riot and violent disorder. Those charges were all later dropped after the evidence was dismissed. Campaigners have for years demanded to know who was responsible for the deployment of the large number of police and their tactics, as well as what happened to some official documents. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper - Britain's interior minister whose Labour party was in opposition at the time of the strike - said an inquiry headed by Pete Wilcox, the Bishop of Sheffield, would be held to find out the truth. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Priority for singles, higher quota for second-timer families to kick in from HDB's July BTO exercise Singapore Witness stand not arena for humiliation in sex offence cases, judge reminds lawyers Asia Japan PM's future in doubt after election debacle Business Bigger, quieter, greener: High-volume low-speed fans see rising demand in warming Singapore Singapore New home owners in Singapore find kampung spirit on BTO Telegram groups Singapore What would it take for S'pore to shed the dirty image of its blue recycling bins? Business DBS hits record high above $47; CDL up after director Philip Yeo announces resignation World Gaza civil defence says Israeli fire kills 93 aid seekers "The violent scenes and subsequent prosecutions raised concerns that have been left unanswered for decades, and we must now establish what happened," she said. Kate Flannery, the Orgreave Truth & Justice Campaign Secretary, said they needed to be sure that the inquiry had the powers to have unrestricted access to all government and police papers. "We have waited a long time for this day and this is really positive news," she said. REUTERS
Business Times
43 minutes ago
- Business Times
Money in, promises out: Red flags in Vietnam's PE and VC dealmaking
[HO CHI MINH CITY] A planned stake sale by shareholders of EQuest Education, one of Vietnam's biggest private education groups, is facing setbacks after a school acquisition in Hanoi collapsed, in a case highlighting the broader risks of doing business in the country's fast-growing, but often unpredictable, business sector. KKR, the largest shareholder with a 54.8 per cent stake in EQuest, held through its Singapore-based vehicle Equinox II, invested more than US$200 million into the Vietnamese group in two funding rounds in 2021 and 2023. The PE juggernaut and other shareholders of EQuest were eyeing a stake sale this year, in hopes of raising funds and paving the way for KKR's exit four to five years since its investment in EQuest, sources familiar with the matter told The Business Times. That plan now hangs in limbo. The dispute has delayed negotiations and the due diligence process, causing uncertainties, particularly over valuation-related matters, a source noted. KKR did not respond to BT's queries. In 2021, a member company of EQuest signed deals worth one trillion dong (S$49 million) to acquire 80 per cent stakes in two schools in Hanoi. At the time, EQuest had already consolidated some 20 education institutions in Vietnam. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up The schools were part of the Ngoi Sao school system, a prominent private education network co-founded by Pham Bich Nga, a 66-year-old educator. The transaction for the second school, which was established in 2023, hit a deadlock. In a statement issued on Wednesday (Jul 16), EQuest alleged that Nga and her team withdrew funds from the first school and declined to transfer the agreed stake and management control of the second school. EQuest said it has lodged a police report on the matter, alleging embezzlement, misappropriation and fraud. In a Facebook post on Jul 16, Nguyen Quoc Toan, co-founder, chairman and chief executive of EQuest Education, alleged that the former partners claimed they 'did not understand' or had a 'different interpretation' of the contract, while retaining all the investor's funds over the past few years to develop the schools. A day earlier on Jul 15, Nga wrote on Facebook that she had proactively ended the partnership, citing major differences in educational direction and operational culture during their 2022 collaboration. 'Trying to forcibly maintain a partnership when the other party no longer wishes to continue – or attempting to claim what doesn't belong to them – cannot lead to a positive outcome for either side,' she wrote. Familiar red flags The case underscores the travails of doing business in Vietnam, which experts warn could weigh on investor confidence and undermine dealmaking in the long term. In fact, observers say disputes after deal closure between investors and Vietnamese target firms are fairly common, especially in PE and VC circles; legal experts cite mismatched expectations and poor mutual understanding as key sources of friction. David Harrison, a partner for global law firm Hogan Lovells in Ho Chi Minh City, said: 'We do a lot of transactions with Vietnamese targets – family businesses in many cases – where there's no law firm on the other side to help them understand what they're signing.' They may be eager to close the deal and secure cash for their business by taking a pragmatic view, which, in the long run, may not serve their best interests, he added. Tran Duy Canh, managing partner at Dentons LuatViet in Ho Chi Minh City, said post-deal disputes often arise when critical conditions in sale agreements are not met. These do not always arise out of bad faith; more often, it comes from 'overconfidence' or misunderstanding, he said, adding that some local firms assume they can sort things out later or renegotiate if the deal veers off course. One notable case involved Vietnamese plastics firm Rang Dong and Japanese investor Sojitz Pla-Net, over a 2017 deal in which Sojitz bought five million shares in Rang Dong's Long An Plastic unit for more than 174 billion dong. Sojitz later alleged that Rang Dong failed to meet post-closing obligations. On its part, the Vietnamese firm claimed that there were 'unreasonable' terms in the contract, such as requiring it to sign employment contracts with 700 people that Sojitz appointed. Their conflict lasted about three years, from 2020 to 2023, including arbitration at the Singapore International Arbitration Centre in 2022 and subsequent onshore court proceedings in Vietnam. The ruling ultimately went Sojitz's way. However, it remains uncertain whether Rang Dong can fulfil its financial obligations to Sojitz, because the Vietnamese company is now facing bankruptcy proceedings. Lessons from soured deals Such cases worry investors, who often bear the bulk of financial losses and face lengthy investigations and legal battles. Legal counsel typically recommend mediation over taking the matter to court, especially when both sides genuinely want to resolve the misunderstanding. Another high-profile case was VinaCapital's Vietnam Opportunity Fund (VOF) investing US$32.5 million for a 34 per cent stake in Vietnamese egg and poultry giant Ba Huan in early 2018. The deal quickly unravelled after founder Pham Thi Huan publicly sought to cancel it, claiming the investor's terms risked eroding family control. She claimed VinaCapital imposed a 22 per cent annual return rate without consent, and that the Vietnamese contract included clauses missing from the English version, such as penalties for missed targets and a possible transfer of at least 51 per cent of the company's shares. VinaCapital maintained that all terms were lawful and in line with market norms, but later agreed to an amicable exit from the deal. Vu Nguyen Khanh, managing director and lead portfolio manager at VinaCapital's VOF, told BT: 'We may have a very clear view of what those terms mean, but at the same time, we want to make sure that the person on the other side of the table also understands that.' Founded in 2003 and managed by VinaCapital, VOF is a closed-ended investment trust listed on the London Stock Exchange with net assets exceeding US$970 million as at the end of June; it invests in listed equities and private companies in Vietnam. Khanh said the fund has invested in more than 200 companies in Vietnam over the past two decades. Harrison from Hogan Lovells stressed the importance of robust financial, legal and technical due diligence and forging direct ties with local partners, rather than relying on 30- to 40-page term sheets drafted for deals in other markets. He also highlighted the value of including downside protection mechanisms for investors – in the form of put rights, redemption rights, pull-back clauses, or earn-outs, for example – in case deals do not go as expected. 'The diligence, monitoring and the engagement process throughout the investment should pick up a lot of the flags,' VOF's Khanh added. He said if a situation calls for renegotiation, the first step should be to revisit the original agreements, which ought to include an avenue to resolve the issues before turning to the court. 'At the end of the day, our objective as investors is to create value and exit at a return. Disputes rarely create that kind of return,' he noted. Cultural gaps Hoang Minh Duc, special counsel at Duane Morris Vietnam, said investors are usually open to dialogue if founders stay transparent and actively work towards the best solutions for the businesses when obligations become difficult to meet. Drawing on his experience advising deals between foreign VCs and Vietnamese startups, he said many disputes stem from cultural gaps between Vietnamese business norms and those in more developed markets. He noted that Vietnamese startup founders often sign agreements without fully grasping the terms, sometimes without legal counsel or under guidance by inexperienced advisors. And when problems arise, some try to sidestep the investors. 'Vietnamese founders often value flexibility, while most venture capital investors, many of whom are from Singapore, prioritise transparency and an agreed structure,' he said, adding: 'This cultural gap can lead to painful partings, which may ultimately undermine dealmaking in Vietnam over the long term.'
CNA
43 minutes ago
- CNA
Pre-trial conference for Ong Beng Seng case rescheduled
SINGAPORE: A pre-trial conference set for the case of property tycoon Ong Beng Seng has been rescheduled to next week, after a request was made to push it back. The 79-year-old Malaysian, known for bringing Formula 1 to Singapore in 2008, was first charged with two offences in October 2024. These correspond to two charges admitted to by former transport minister S Iswaran. Ong was set to have the hearing on Wednesday morning (Jul 23) but that has been shifted to Jul 28. According to court records, a request was made to reschedule the court event and it was approved. It was not indicated who made the request. CNA has contacted Ong's PR firm and the Attorney-General's Chambers for more information. The latest development comes after a pre-trial conference on Jul 8 resulted in another adjournment for "parties to file revised papers", following a statement from the judiciary that both sides wished to file further submissions on sentencing. A pre-trial conference is a hearing before a judge away from the public and media, where both sides discuss administrative matters. This can be any issue that needs to be ironed out before going to open court, and does not always mean a trial is going to take place despite the name. It is not uncommon for a case to go through many rounds of pre-trial conferences before going to open court for a guilty plea or trial. Ong faces two charges, first for abetting Iswaran in obstructing the course of justice by helping the latter pay S$5,700 (US$4,480) to Singapore GP for a business class flight ticket from Doha to Singapore. This was a delayed payment allegedly made months after the flight itself and only after the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) discovered Iswaran's name on the flight manifest when investigating a separate case. The second charge is for instigating Iswaran to obtain flights and a hotel stay from Ong. This was when Iswaran knew Ong had business dealings linked with his official functions. Ong was previously set to plead guilty on Jul 3. Ong was the managing director of Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), which previously stated in a Singapore Exchange (SGX) announcement that Ong would plead guilty to the charge of obstructing justice, while admitting to have the other charge taken into consideration for sentencing. He stepped down on Apr 29 for medical reasons, the company said. If convicted of the charge under Section 165 of the Penal Code for abetting Iswaran in obtaining valuables, Ong could face a jail term of up to two years, a fine, or both. If convicted of obstructing justice, the charge under Section 204A, Ong could face a jail term of up to seven years, a fine, or both.
