
Stella Creasy and Richard Tice call for scrutiny over which EU laws UK ditches
The Labour and Reform UK MPs argue that there is no scrutiny or accountability over how Brexit is being implemented. Creasy, the MP for Walthamstow and chair of the Labour Movement for Europe, said the UK needed a 'salvage operation' to clear up the environmental and regulatory havoc caused by Brexit.
The analysis by the Guardian and the Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP) has found that since Brexit the EU has brought forward 28 new, revised or upgraded pieces of environmental legislation that the UK has not adopted, and the UK has actively chosen to regress by changing four different pieces of legislation including on protected habitats, pesticides and fisheries.
Creasy said the prime minister, Keir Starmer, needed to move more quickly to repair relations with the EU and realign on environmental law.
'I am working with Richard Tice as well as other Brexit sceptics on restoring some sort of European scrutiny committee in parliament so we can decide if and when we want to diverge rather than it all being passive,' she said.
Creasy said: 'We don't have a body in parliament that knows both UK and EU law and can forge a way forward. This data from the Guardian and IEEP makes the case for having a scrutiny committee looking at if we diverge, and if we strengthen or weaken environmental protections. MPs aren't scrutinising this at all at the moment; they don't even know about what's going on.'
One major issue is the planning and infrastructure bill, which overrides the EU's habitats directive and allows rare habitats such as chalk streams to be destroyed if developers pay a nature restoration levy to government.
Chris Hinchliff, the MP for North East Hertfordshire, had the Labour whip removed for proposing amendments to the bill, including one to protect chalk streams from harmful development.
Creasy said she supported Hinchliff and that the UK should not be regressing from EU law.
She said: 'I signed Chris Hinchliff's amendments as I think he was right to bring these issues to the fore. There are good reasons to be concerned. Nobody wants to be the dirty man or woman of Europe, do they?'
Starmer and the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, have consistently pitted the environment against growth, blaming bats and newts for a lack of housebuilding.
Creasy said this was wrong: 'There is no trade-off between the environment and growth; you can do both.'
She added that Labour had made some positive steps towards realigning with the EU: 'Under the Conservatives they were pushing very hard for isolation and they were saying there were benefits to have separate regulatory regimes as if pollution would stop at a border. It doesn't. The UK and EU reset deal is very clear about the climate crisis and the existential threats we face and that is encouraging.'
There was now less of a fear of joining in with Europe and adopting good policies that the bloc came up with, Creasy said. 'The Tories wouldn't even join the European biosecurity alerts because it had the word 'European' in, when there was foot and mouth in France they didn't even want to know. We are over the hump of saying because it's European then we couldn't possibly do it. But now we need to scrutinise this Guardian and IEEP data and find the way forward.'
She said she was relaxed about working with Reform MPs, even though their views are diametrically opposed to hers: 'Richard Tice and I can disagree over the benefits of alignment but we can both agree that parliament should examine these issues. Tracking environmental regulation has fallen to external bodies … no one's checking or holding the government to account.'
Brexit campaigners said leaving the EU would allow the UK to 'take back control', but the UK has not decided on what to do about EU environmental directives and instead has passively fallen behind. For example, the EU has banned dozens of harmful chemicals under its Reach programme, while the UK's new chemicals regulator has yet to ban a single one.
'Brexit has not led to parliament taking back control,' Creasy said. 'We aren't actively making decisions on divergence. Those conversations aren't happening.'
Creasy thinks the UK should 'dynamically align' with the EU, which means automatically adopting its environmental standards while reserving the right to reject some if they do not work for the UK. This means there would be less pressure on UK regulators to keep up, and it would also be helpful for trade, she believes.
'I've always been someone who supports the business case and the business case is you align by default unless there is a really good reason for why we shouldn't,' Creasy said. 'Since leaving the EU we have only actively chosen to diverge on a handful of things, but we have passively diverged on a lot.'
She added: 'We need to say: can we align, how do we do that, why does it matter? We need a salvage operation because Brexit has been so damaging to our environment – there is no time to waste. We need to fight for the thing which will save the planet, which is to work with our nearest neighbours as quickly as possible.'
A government spokesperson said: 'There are many areas of our environmental protections, like banning bee-killing pesticides, closing sand eel fisheries, restricting bottom trawling in sensitive marine areas, where the UK's approach is truly world leading. There is more to do, and we need to unlock growth and promote nature's recovery. Through initiatives like the nature restoration fund, our approach secures lasting improvements for nature and helps fix the failed status quo of time-intensive and costly processes to support the building of 1.5m new homes.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
28 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Diane Abbott: I told ex-Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn not to launch his new party
Diane Abbott, the veteran left-wing MP, said it was 'difficult to see how a new party wins'. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Veteran MP Diane Abbott has revealed she told Jeremy Corbyn not to launch his new political party. Ms Abbott, the independent MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington, said she understood why her close ally had made the move. But she insisted it was "difficult to see how a new party wins" under the first-past-the-post electoral system. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Corbyn launched the new venture last month with former Labour MP Zarah Sultana. It does not yet have a name, but is marketed as 'Your Party'. He has vowed it will 'take on the rich and powerful'. Diane Abbott at the Edinburgh International Book Festival | PA Ms Abbot, who was the shadow home secretary under Mr Corbyn, was asked about the move while appearing at the Edinburgh International Book Festival on Thursday to discuss her memoir, A Woman Like Me. She said there was a "tricky state of play", adding: "I wouldn't have thought that you would have a Labour government and they'd be cutting winter fuel allowance for the elderly, they'd be cutting benefits for the disabled." However, she added: "I told him [Mr Corbyn] not to. It's very difficult under the first-past-the-post system for a new party to absolutely win. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "If it wasn't first past the post, then you could see how a new party could come through. But I understand why he did it. "I understand why Zarah did it. Zarah is a lovely person, full of energy, and I think she and Jeremy are a great combination. But at this point in time, it's difficult to see how a brand new party wins. "However, I think Jeremy's party is going to do a lot better than people think, because a lot of people - not necessarily terribly left-wing people - are a tiny bit disappointed about the way we've gone in the party." Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Last month, Ms Abbott was suspended from Labour for a second time, after she doubled down on comments about racism for which she had previously apologised. She defended a letter she had written to a newspaper in 2023 in which she compared the racism experienced by people of colour with that seen by other groups. Former shadow chancellor John McDonnell, another key ally of Mr Corbyn, has also ruled out joining his new party. "Just to be absolutely clear, I am a Labour Party member,' he said last month. 'I have had the whip suspended, that's all, and I expect it back." Earlier this month, Chancellor Rachel Reeves said the public would reject Mr Corbyn's party like they rejected him twice before. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Chancellor Rachel Reeves during a speech at Siemens Healthineers in January 2025 in Eynsham, England (Photo: Peter Cziborra -) | Getty Images She told an audience at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival that Mr Corbyn had 'tried to destroy my party' during his leadership in which he lost two general elections, one in 2017 and one in 2019. 'The country has rejected him twice," Ms Reeves said. "The bloke's got a big ego. He can have another go, but I think the country will have the same verdict.' Ms Abbott also told the book festival event the decision to ban Palestine Action as a terrorist group was a 'disgrace' and 'absolutely dreadful'. She was elected to Parliament in 1987, and was the only black female MP in the Commons for a decade until Labour's landslide under Tony Blair. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad


BreakingNews.ie
29 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Diane Abbott advised Jeremy Corbyn against founding new party, event told
Diane Abbott advised Jeremy Corbyn against setting up a new political party, she said, over concerns it would struggle to get a foothold in Britain because of the voting system. Ms Abbott, who served as Mr Corbyn's shadow home secretary when he was Labour leader, said she had spoken to him before its launch, and said it was not a good idea. Advertisement Speaking at an event at the Edinburgh Book Festival, the current longest-serving female MP said: 'There were people around Jeremy encouraging him to set up a new party, and I told him not to. 'It's very difficult under first-past-the-post system for a new party to absolutely win. If it wasn't first-past-the-post, then you can see how a new party could come through, but I understand why he did it.' Ms Abbott said she thought the party, formed by her long-time friend Independent MP Mr Corbyn (Islington North) alongside Independent MP Zarah Sultana (Coventry South), would outperform people's expectations. It was launched last month, but is still without a formal name. She said she believed it would take advantage of a broader discontent with politics in Britain. Advertisement Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and then-shadow home secretary Diane Abbott during a visit to Finsbury Park Mosque in 2019 (Victoria Jones/PA She paid tribute to Mr Corbyn and Ms Sultana but said: 'At this point in time, it's difficult to see how a brand new party wins. 'However, I think Jeremy's party is going to do a lot better than people think because a lot of people who are not necessarily terribly left-wing people, are a tiny bit disappointed about the way we've gone in the past year.' The MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington indicated her disappointment with the Labour Government. She had the whip withdrawn for the second time in two years in July, after she expressed a lack of regret about comments to the Observer in 2023 that suggested that Jewish, Irish and Traveller people experience prejudice, but not racism. Advertisement However, she implied she would not join Mr Corbyn's party. Ms Abbott said: 'It's a tricky state of play. I wouldn't have thought that you'd have a Labour Government and they'd be cutting winter fuel allowance for the elderly and benefits for the disabled.' She was also critical of the Government's proscription of Palestine Action and labelled the decision 'a complete disgrace'. Diane Abbott in 1986 when she was Hackney North and Stoke Newington Labour election candidate. Photo: PA. 'What they are seeking to do is proscribe protest as such,' she said. 'I mean, we all saw the pictures of the people in Trafalgar Square – 500 people? Half of them over 60. Come on, these are terrorists? I think this is an attempt to bear down on (protest).' Advertisement She added her more than 40 years in Labour meant it was too late to leave it. She was elected to Parliament in 1987, and was the only black female MP in the Commons for a decade until Labour's landslide under Tony Blair. In response to a question about whether she thought she would ever be accepted 'at the heart' of the Labour Party, she replied: 'I think I am at the heart of the Labour Party, it's other people who aren't.' Ms Abbott, whose book A Woman Like Me, was the subject of the interview in the Scottish capital by campaigner Talat Yaqoob, also told the audience of her anger at not being called by Commons speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle in the aftermath of racist comments by Conservative Party donor Frank Hester in 2024. She said she had stood during a Prime Minister's Question session more than 40 times to be called to speak, after Sir Keir Starmer, Rishi Sunak and Sir Ed Davey had all spoken about the incident. Advertisement Mr Hester was reported to have said Ms Abbott made him want to 'hate all black women' and that she 'should be shot'. The remarks brought widespread condemnation, including from Sir Keir, but she told the event her office was used to receiving racist abuse. 'I've been an MP for 38 years, and custom practice in the chamber is if you're being talked about, you get called. It's just a courtesy. I was so shocked that I wasn't called. 'But I heard later from someone who had reason to know, that what happened was that Rishi didn't want me called, because (Hester) was a Tory donor and it would look bad for them, and I'm afraid Keir Starmer didn't want me called because he wanted to milk the issue (for) political advantage, without mentioning me.' She said Sir Keir had approached her after the questions session and asked what he could do to help. 'I said, 'Yes, you can restore the whip'. And as if he hadn't heard, he said, 'Is there anything I can do for you?' It was like he was deaf. And I said, 'Yes, you can restore the whip', and he realised I wasn't going to play that game and he went off.'


The Guardian
29 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Pro-Israel lawyers investigated over alleged legal threats to suppress support for Palestine
An organisation of pro-Israel lawyers in the UK is under investigation by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) after a complaint that it has threatened people with legal action in order to suppress support for Palestine. UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI) has been accused of sending eight letters to individuals and organisations between January 2022 and May 2025 that 'demonstrate a seeming pattern of vexatious and legally baseless correspondence aimed at silencing and intimidating Palestine solidarity efforts', according to the complainants. The complaint was lodged with the SRA by the Public Interest Law Centre (PILC) and the European Legal Support Center. They allege 'serious breaches' of the SRA's principles and code of conduct. A spokesperson for the SRA said: 'We have had a complaint and are investigating before deciding on next steps.' UKLFI was formed in 2011 to use its members' legal skills 'to combat BDS [Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions] and the delegitimisation of Israel'. Its website says: 'We employ advocacy, legal research and campaigning to support Israel, Israeli organisations, Israelis, and/or supporters of Israel against BDS and other attempts to undermine, attack or delegitimise them.' According to the complaint, UKLFI uses 'strategic lawsuits against public participation (Slapps), which are lawsuits intended to limit freedom of expression on matters of public interest'. One of the letters included in the complaint was sent by Caroline Turner, a director of UKLFI, to the Scottish Storytelling Centre, an arts centre in Edinburgh, that had announced plans to host a Palestinian film festival in May in partnership with Traditional Arts and Culture Scotland. According to the complaint, UKLFI's letter claimed the scheduled events were 'inherently antisemitic and anti-Zionist in nature' and could lead to a referral to the Scottish charity regulator. UKLFI requested the festival's cancellation. Another letter was sent by Turner on behalf of UKLFI to the Cornelius Cardew Concerts Trust which had organised a classical music concert called The World Stands With Palestine at a London college in November 2024. The concert was to feature new music written 'in response to the struggle of the Palestinian people'. Flyers advertising the concert included an image of a placard reading: 'Stand with Palestine!! Stand with the Resistance!!'. According to the complaint, UKLFI's letter said the concert was 'siding with the viewpoint' of Hamas and was likely to be in breach of the Terrorism Act 2000. It appeared to be 'designed to stir up racial hatred against Jews and Israelis, and to sympathise with the aims of the Hamas terrorist organisation'. The concert was cancelled by the college that was due to host the event. Paul Heron, the founder of PILC, said: 'UKLFI are acting in a manner that chills public participation and intimidates those who stand in solidarity with Palestine … We will not allow legal threats to shut down the public's right to speak out on Palestine. The SRA has a duty to step in, to uphold professional standards, and to protect civil society from intimidation dressed up as law.' The SRA's website describes Slapps as a 'type of abusive litigation' that can 'undermine freedom of expression, the rule of law and amount to a misuse of the legal system'. In a statement published on its website, UKLFI said the allegations against it were unfounded. It said: 'We are accused of writing vexatious and baseless letters, and the complainants say they have acquired eight examples from a period of over three years.' It added that since October 2023 UKLFI had been called on to address 'hundreds of requests for help every year from Jewish members of the public expressing genuine concerns in many areas of life including medical services, retailers, education and the arts'. 'Many of the concerns relate to conduct creating an intimidating, hostile and offensive environment for Jewish patients, workers, customers or students, and sometimes excluding them altogether. 'If appropriate, we write to the relevant organisation and point out what is happening, the effect that this has had on the Jewish or Israeli customer or patient, and how applicable laws or regulatory requirements are being breached. We also explain how the problem may be solved.'