logo
Number of LGBTQ+ Wanting Children Goes Up: Survey

Number of LGBTQ+ Wanting Children Goes Up: Survey

Newsweeka day ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
A recent survey from the Pew Research Center polled LGBTQ+ and non-LGBTQ+ individuals about their marriage and family aspirations. Newsweek compared this data from 2025 to data from a 2013 Pew Research Center study to reveal how marriage and family aspirations have changed for the LGBTQ community.
Why It Matters
There are currently widespread concerns over Obergefell v. Hodges, the landmark case which guaranteed the right to same-sex marriage nationwide, potentially being overturned in the U.S.
Crowds watch outside of Stonewall National Monument as people take part in the 2025 NYC Pride March on June 29, 2025 in New York City.
Crowds watch outside of Stonewall National Monument as people take part in the 2025 NYC Pride March on June 29, 2025 in New York City.Justices like Clarence Thomas have signaled an openness to revisit the case as the court has shifted to the right. This shift on cultural issues was defined by the Supreme Court's 2022 ruling, which overturned Roe v. Wade, which for decades guaranteed abortion rights. If the courts were to overturn same-sex marriage nationwide, the issue would likely return to the states.
The data from the Pew Research Center comes as countries all over the world face declining birth rates. In the U.S., the fertility rate (the average number of children a woman has in her lifetime) is now projected to average 1.6 births per woman over the next three decades, according to the Congressional Budget Office's latest forecast. This is below the replacement rate of 2.1 births per woman required to maintain a stable population without immigration.
What To Know
The recent Pew Research Center poll, published in August of this year, polled both LGBTQ and non-LGBTQ adults.
The poll found that 59 percent of adults under 50 who had never been married say that they want to get married someday.
A third of LGBTQ adults under 50 who do not have children said they wanted children someday. This figure was higher among non-LGBTQ people, 47 percent of whom wanted children.
The number of LGBTQ adults wanting children has risen, though, compared to the Pew Research Center's 2013 study. That study found that about three-in-ten (28 percent) of these LGBT respondents say they would like to have children someday. 2025's data represents a 5 percent increase.
The 2013 study also polled individuals on marriage desires, but used different criteria. It found that a total of 60 percent of LGBT respondents were either married or intended to marry one day.
Newsweek spoke to experts about this data and what it represents.
Dr. Garry J. Gates, an expert on geography and demography of the LGBT population who co-authored The Gay and Lesbian Atlas, told Newsweek over email, "Unlike marriage more generally, child-rearing for LGBTQ people can often be more complex and expensive than child-rearing among their non-LGBTQ counterparts. Same-gender couples who want to parent likely face expenses associated with adoption, surrogacy, and reproductive technologies that many different-gender couples don't encounter.
"Surveys suggest that increases in the age of first marriage in the US are often associated with a desire for greater economic certainty before committing to marriage. So it's clear that economic factors affect the timing & possibly the desire for marriage among many. It's not surprising then to find that economic constraints associated with child-rearing for LGBTQ people could result in a lower desire to have children," Gates said.
Newsweek also spoke with Abbie Goldberg, a professor in the Department of Psychology at Clark University. "I'm actually not that surprised," she said of the findings. "Is the expectation that marriage would become more attractive over time? If so, I don't know that this is true, or why it would be true; LGBTQ+ Americans who were critical of marriage as an institution in 2015 might remain so."
"The key feature—consistent in the Pew data—that seems to drive marriage is the desire to be a parent. If we don't see steeply rising rates of LGBTQ+ folks who want to be parents, then perhaps we also won't see similar rises in marriage aspirations," Goldberg said.
Pointing to the factors influencing attitudes among LGBTQ+ people toward marriage and childbearing, Goldberg said "Compared with older generations, LGBTQI+ Gen Z report more mental health issues, including feelings of hopelessness and anxiety, which arise from a variety of sources including rising anti-LGBTQ+ sentiment and attacks on their rights, financial and housing instability, employment uncertainties, climate change, and lack of access to affirming health/mental health services."
What People Are Saying
Dr. Garry J. Gates, an expert on geography and demography of the LGBT population who co-authored The Gay and Lesbian Atlas, told Newsweek over email: "These findings suggest that views on marriage are becoming less associated with sexual orientation or gender identity. In short, marriage equality worked. In the case of child-rearing, very specific economic constraints that are more prevalent in LGBTQ populations likely play a large part in observed differences in the desire to have children.
Abbie Goldberg, a professor in the Department of Psychology at Clark University told Newsweek over email: "Much of my research suggests that marriage is attractive to LGBTQ+ people in part because they wish to protect current or future children. Beyond that, we see the typical reasons: desire for legal protections, love and companionship, and societal acceptance/symbolic value. Perhaps, as some of my recent data suggest, LGBTQ+ Americans right now are more fearful than ever that the right to marry could be taken away—and, if they are leaning toward marriage mainly for the legal protections, the fear that they could lose those protections could be a partial disincentive to hold back."
What's Next
There are ongoing concerns over the Supreme Court moving to overturn gay marriage. It currently faces a choice about whether to take a case, filed by the former Kentucky clerk Kim Davis, urging the overturn its decision in Obergefell v. Hodges.
The Supreme Court may decide whether to accept Davis' case in the coming months, but it has not indicated which way it is leaning.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Vladimir Putin Takes Swipe At Biden, Says 'No War' if Trump Was President
Vladimir Putin Takes Swipe At Biden, Says 'No War' if Trump Was President

Newsweek

time13 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Vladimir Putin Takes Swipe At Biden, Says 'No War' if Trump Was President

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Russian President Vladimir Putin took a swipe at former President Joe Biden during a joint news conference alongside President Donald Trump on Friday following a summit regarding the ongoing war in Ukraine. Newsweek reached out to Biden's office via online form on Friday for comment. Why It Matters The high-stakes bilateral meeting concluded Friday ahead of schedule amid efforts to advance a potential ceasefire agreement in the war in Ukraine. It represented a direct U.S.–Russia engagement that could determine whether a ceasefire would be negotiated in Europe's deadliest conflict since World War II, while raising concerns among Ukrainian and European leaders that Ukraine might be sidelined in any agreement. Observers flagged that any agreement reached without Ukraine's direct participation risked freezing gains Moscow had made on the battlefield and could redraw security arrangements in Europe. During the news conference, Trump said he would get on the phone with NATO and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to brief them on the talks. What To Know While speaking to a host of international media outlets, Putin slammed Biden, saying in part that, "In the end, I would like to add one more thing. I'd like to remind you that in 2022, during the last contact with the previous administration, I tried to convince my previous American the situation should not be brought to the point of no return when it would come to hostilities. "I said it quite directly back then that it's a big mistake," Putin added. "Today when President Trump [said] that if he was the president back then, there would be no war. And I'm quite sure that it would indeed be so, I can confirm that. I think that overall, me and President Trump have built a very good businesslike and trustworthy contact. And I have every reason to believe that moving down this path we can sooner the better, to the end of the conflict in Ukraine." Putin's remarks were translated via CNN. President Donald Trump (R) and Russian President Vladimir Putin (L) can be seen holding a meeting at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson on August 15, 2025, in Anchorage, Alaska. (Photo by) President Donald Trump (R) and Russian President Vladimir Putin (L) can be seen holding a meeting at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson on August 15, 2025, in Anchorage, Alaska. (Photo by) What Happens Next Trump said that the two countries agreed on various points, but ultimately, no deal was made. Trump added, though, that "great progress" was achieved during the summit. This is a developing story that will be updated with additional information.

Donald Trump Leaves Vladimir Putin Summit Without a Deal in Hand
Donald Trump Leaves Vladimir Putin Summit Without a Deal in Hand

Newsweek

time43 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Leaves Vladimir Putin Summit Without a Deal in Hand

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. 🎙️ Voice is AI-generated. Inconsistencies may occur. President Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin ended a joint press conference on Friday without taking questions or sharing details of talks on Ukraine's future. Trump says "some great progress" was made with Putin, and he will speak with European leaders and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky soon. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

Federal judge guts major portion of Florida's book ban, in a blow to DeSantis
Federal judge guts major portion of Florida's book ban, in a blow to DeSantis

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Federal judge guts major portion of Florida's book ban, in a blow to DeSantis

A federal judge has closed the chapter on key parts of Florida's censorious ban on school library books that conservatives deem 'pornographic' and harmful to children. Amid a broader assault on diversity in the state, Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a law in 2023, known as House Bill 1069, that set up a process for parents to challenge books for removal from school libraries that they feel are unsuitable for young readers. The repressive law requires that schools remove books within five days of a parents' complaint and make them unavailable while they're reviewed. The process, broadly targeting books with 'pornographic' content or that 'describe sexual conduct,' has ensnared many titles by nonwhite and LGBTQ authors over purported obscenity. Last year, multiple publishing companies, Florida parents and authors filed a lawsuit seeking to thwart the bill, naming as defendants various members of the state education board and school boards in Orange and Volusia counties. And the suit appears to have succeeded, in large part. 'By enacting HB 1069, the Florida legislature sought to prohibit material from entering or remaining in school libraries that is not obscene for minors,' District Court Judge Carlos Mendoza said in his ruling on Wednesday, which found the section that targets descriptions of sexual conduct to be unconstitutional. He listed several examples: The following books, among others, have been removed: The Color Purple, Half of a Yellow Sun, Cloud Atlas, The Splendid and the Vile, I am Not Your Perfect Mexican Daughter, The Freedom Writers Diary: How a Teacher and 150 Teens Used Writing to Change Themselves and the World Around Them, On the Road, Nineteen Minutes, Paper Towns, Looking for Alaska, How the García Girls Lost Their Accents, The Kite Runner, Slaughterhouse-Five, Shout, Last Night at the Telegraph Club, The Handmaid's Tale, Native Son, Kaffir Boy: The True Story of a Black Youth's Coming of Age in Apartheid South Africa, Water for Elephants, Beloved, Song of Solomon, The Bluest Eye, and Homegoing. None of these books are obscene. The judge said the law's focus on books that 'describe sexual content' is 'overbroad' and 'unconstitutional,' and he said the law 'mandates the removal of books that contain even a single reference to the prohibited subject matter, regardless of the holistic value of the book individually or as part of a larger collection.' Mendoza also rejected conservatives' argument that libraries — and the books in them — are forums for 'government speech.' He wrote that 'many removals at issue here are the objecting parents' speech, not the government's,' and that 'slapping the label of government speech on book removals only serves to stifle the disfavored viewpoints.' Citing Supreme Court precedent, the judge said, 'To be sure, parents have the right to 'direct the upbringing and education of children,' but the government cannot repackage their speech and pass it off as its own.' Mendoza declined to strike down the law completely, writing that the law's reference to 'pornographic' content can be read as synonymous with content considered 'harmful to minors' under Florida law, which means some books could still be banned but only if they meet a rigorous standard for obscenity known as the 'Miller Test.' The Authors' Guild, which was a plaintiff in the suit and claims to represent more than 16,000 members, called the ruling 'a sweeping victory for readers and authors.' State officials said they plan to appeal the ruling. This article was originally published on Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store