Trump and Crypto Are Now in Perfect Alignment
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here.
The world of crypto can feel impenetrable. The basic technology is complicated enough, but the subculture—with its own particular argot and decorum—is what's truly forbidding. Even if you're not quite ready to figure out what DePIN or zk-SNARKs are, you can get a solid glimpse into the industry right now just by looking at the lineup of the 2025 Bitcoin Conference, held late last month in Las Vegas. Speakers included goofball meme-coin boosters, good-hearted cypherpunks, crypto podcasters with names such as 'Gwart,' and an army of Wall Street execs who seem to have waited until bitcoin hit $100,000 to give the whole crypto thing a shot.
There were also a whole lot of MAGA acolytes. Vice President J. D. Vance, the eldest Trump sons, and the White House crypto czar David Sacks all gave speeches that coalesced around a unifying theme: Trump and crypto are meant for each other. 'What's going on here in this very room, at this very conference, that's the financial side of everything we've been fighting for on the free-speech side,' Don Jr. said during a conversation with the CEO of Rumble, a social-media platform favored by right-wing users. 'They're inextricably linked.'
In other words, the message was that Trump cares deeply about the kinds of civil-libertarian ideas that the bitcoin world has long touted. It's a convenient narrative, a lofty way of explaining this once very bitcoin-skeptical president's sudden embrace of crypto. At least, it's one that transcends sheer self-enrichment: In the past year, members of the Trump family have launched two meme coins and announced a majority stake in a new crypto firm, World Liberty Financial. As I've previously written, crypto is quickly becoming the Trump family business: Last month, the president hosted the biggest investors in his $TRUMP coin for a private dinner at his golf course outside Washington, D.C.
But the linkages between Trump and crypto run deeper than just a couple of business investments. His White House has also ushered in a starkly pro-crypto agenda—rolling back regulations and dropping lawsuits to punish alleged crypto wrongdoing. The same week that Don Jr. spoke at the Bitcoin Conference, the Department of Labor eased a Biden-era guidance that made it difficult for Americans to invest their 401(k) plans in crypto because digital currencies can be volatile and prone to hacks. In cutting this language, regulators are taking away a guardrail, encouraging more investment in crypto. This, in turn, could boost the price of bitcoin and other coins, which is a boon to Trump's own enterprises. It always comes back to the president himself: Trump's crypto ambitions are as much about public policy as they are about his own meme coins.
Crypto has become the glue that binds together so much of what the president and his administration are doing. Consider Trump Media & Technology Group, best-known as the parent company of his social-media app, Truth Social. Trump Media didn't start as a crypto business, but now it's pivoting to crypto. Late last month, Trump Media announced that it would raise money to purchase $2.5 billion in bitcoin, effectively creating a corporate bitcoin reserve. Why? 'We view bitcoin as an apex instrument of financial freedom,' Devin Nunes, the CEO of Trump Media and a former Republican congressman, said in a statement. Putting the pseudo-utopian language aside, such a bitcoin reserve mostly just serves to tie the price of Trump Media's stock, $DJT, to the price of bitcoin writ large. A multibillion-dollar investment is unreservedly good for crypto, but it's also good for the Trump family, because much of the president's own net worth is now tied up in crypto assets. (Neither the White House nor the Trump Media & Technology Group responded to my requests for comment.)
Perhaps the idea of a bitcoin reserve sounds familiar. It explicitly mirrors the White House's announcement of a 'Strategic Bitcoin Reserve' in March, as part of a broader effort to make the U.S. a global leader in crypto. Both serve the same function: Such large-scale institutional investment in crypto—whether from the government or a company—further legitimizes these digital currencies, ensuring their long-term viability as an asset class. Trump's campaign to promote crypto and juice the price of these coins is in essence two-pronged: Once the White House sets its agenda, the Trump family's private-sector business can back it.
Trump was all about pro-crypto policy even before he began launching his raft of crypto businesses. His campaign promise to fire Biden's top crypto cop, Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Gary Gensler, helped pull in donations from industry heavyweights. Especially after the downfall of Sam Bankman-Fried, Gensler was focused on prosecuting individual crypto companies—a policy now derisively referred to as 'Operation Choke Point 2.0' (a nod to the Obama-era initiative that put pressure on banks to stop working with payday lenders, pawn shops, and certain other businesses). During his keynote speech at the Bitcoin Conference, Vance put it bluntly: 'Operation Choke Point 2.0 is dead, and it's not coming back under the Trump administration.'
Indeed, the administration has dropped more than a dozen lawsuits and investigations against crypto firms. And as Trump's second term has gone on, the distinctions between what's pro-Trump and what's pro-crypto have blurred together, approaching something like a singularity. In MAGA cosmology, crypto, Trump, and America now exist in perfect alignment—what's good for one is good for the others. While Trump talks about bringing back manufacturing jobs to the U.S., the Trump sons are running a crypto-mining company called American Bitcoin and Trump Media is throwing its weight behind 'Made in America' crypto investment funds. After firing many of the top regulators responsible for keeping crypto in check, Trump has cleared the way for major cash injections throughout the crypto industry—including, of course, in his own businesses. The pretense for the regulatory rollbacks and Trump's personal crypto investments is the same: It benefits America.
The irony is that cryptocurrencies were supposed to be a form of protection against exactly this sort of connection to the state. Bitcoin was invented as a way to privately transfer money online, with the ambitious goal of creating a new financial order outside the purview of the international monetary regime, uncontrolled by any government. (After all, the technical basis for crypto is known as 'decentralization.') In loosening crypto restrictions that benefit the industry (and Trump himself), Trump is manifesting the old crypto dream of a new financial order. But far from being faceless and decentralized, the very concept of crypto is starting to reflect the image of just one man.
Article originally published at The Atlantic
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
19 minutes ago
- CBS News
Bay Area farmworkers hope for action as President Trump promises ICE reform
HALF MOON BAY — In a post to Truth Social on Thursday, President Trump promised farmworkers that changes are coming to how ICE operations are conducted. Mr. Trump acknowledged in the post that people within the farming industry have stated that his administration's "aggressive policy on immigration" has led to the industry losing longtime workers, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace." "This is not good. We must protect our Farmers, but get the CRIMINALS OUT OF THE USA. Changes are coming!" Mr. Trump said. It's the first sign of hope for the immigrant community that has lived in fear since the raids began. Sandra Sencion is a farmworker program director with ALAS. It stands for Ayudandos Latinos a Soñar, which means helping Latinos to dream. The last few months, though, have been a nightmare for the immigrant community in Half Moon Bay. "These ICE raids are happening all around us and the fear that that could happen to us, regardless of whether you're documented or not," Sencion said. The farmworkers in Half Moon Bay worked through the pandemic and a mass shooting that killed seven people in 2023. They now worry about their families being torn apart. Sencion says they've had to do more outreach as more and more people need mental health and legal support. "We have a wait list for our mental health line and we are increasing our presence within our local farms and housing sites," she said. Some of the farms in Half Moon Bay are locking their gates so federal agents can't freely walk on their properties to take workers away. Sencion says the same is being done at the ALAS house to make sure people feel comfortable reaching out for help. She said many farmworkers have told her they just want to work to provide for their families. Now, they wait to see if Mr. Trump will make any changes to his immigration policy. "It's a message of hope to some extent to hear our president say something that is promising, but again, we're hoping that there's action behind that," Sencion said.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘No Kings' protests are planned for North Texas. Here's how they will impact street closures
'No Kings Day' demonstrations are planned across North Texas this weekend to protest President Donald Trump and his administration's policies. On Saturday, June 14, demonstrations are planned in a number of cities in the Metroplex, including Dallas, Arlington and Fort Worth. These protests coincide with Trump's 79th birthday and a planned massive military parade in Washington, D.C. to celebrate the U.S. Army's 250th birthday. Gov. Greg Abbott said he will deploy National Guard troops and Texas Department of Public Safety officers across the state to 'to uphold law and order' during the planned protests. Most of these protests are taking place in parks or other public areas. Here's what to know about any planned street closures surrounding these events. ⚡ More trending stories from our newsroom: →What's the difference between TX law enforcement and the National Guard? →Can you get in trouble for not slowing down in a work zone in Texas? →How to stay safe at Texas protests Fort Worth's 'No Kings' protest will be from noon to 2 p.m. at Burk Burnett Park (501 W. 7th St.). The city told the Star-Telegram that Downtown Fort Worth Inc., who manages the park, has permitted a First Amendment Event on the property. Separately, a Downtown Fort Worth spokesperson confirmed this with the Star-Telegram and said there are no planned street closures around the event site. If anything changes leading up to the protest, residents can receive updates from the organization by texting 'Downtown Closures' to 817-904-4255. The city said it has not received any permit applications as of Thursday afternoon for any counter-protests to the 'No Kings' demonstration. Furthermore, the city said Fort Worth police are working closely with the community and its Intelligence Fusion Center to 'monitor all activity during any peaceful protests.' There is also a 'March of Dissent' event planned for downtown Fort Worth on Saturday morning. Arlington's 'No Kings' protest will be from 10 a.m. to noon at the Arlington Sub Courthouse (700 E. Abram St.) A city spokesperson told the Star-Telegram there are no planned street closures related to the protest. Burleson: 1 p.m.-3 p.m. at 100 NW John Jones Drive Dallas: Noon to 2 p.m. at Akard Plaza, 1500 Marilla St. Denton: 11 a.m.-1 p.m. at Denton Square, 110 W. Hickory St. Flower Mound: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. at Parker Square Gazebo, 1500 Cross Timbers Road Frisco: 9:30 a.m.-11 a.m. at FM 423 (both sides) between Main/King and Stonebrook, 155 Old Newman Road McKinney: 10 a.m.-noon, on the north side of Hwy. 380, west of Hwy. 75, 2025 N. Central Expressway
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Appeals court blocks ruling requiring Trump to hand National Guard back to California
The Brief An appeals court has blocked a federal judge's ruling requiring Donald Trump to return control of the National Guard to the state of California. San Francisco judge Charles Breyer made the initial ruling Thursday, calling Trump's deployment of the National Guard unconstitutional. Another hearing in the case is scheduled for June 17. LOS ANGELES - Hours after a federal judge ruled President Donald Trump's deployment of the California National Guard in Los Angeles was unconstitutional, an appeals court temporarily blocked the ruling Thursday night. National Guard troops have been in Los Angeles for a week after anti-ICE protests. Another hearing on the issue is scheduled for next week. What we know San Francisco federal judge Charles Breyer made the initial ruling on Thursday, June 12. In his ruling, Breyer said that Trump overstepped his power and violated the Tenth Amendment by calling in the National Guard without Newsom's consent. The order required Trump to hand control of the troops back to Newsom by noon on Friday, June 13. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked Breyer's order on Thursday night. Dig deeper Below is part of Breyer's ruling: "On June 6, 2025, the federal government initiated immigration raids across the City of Los Angeles. Protests swiftly followed, and some individuals involved in those protests were unruly and even violent. State and local law enforcement responded. The following day, President Trump ordered that members of the California National Guard be federalized, and thereupon assumed control of those forces. At this early stage of the proceedings, the Court must determine whether the President followed the congressionally mandated procedure for his actions. He did not. His actions were illegal-both exceeding the scope of his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. He must therefore return control of the California National Guard to the Governor of the State of California forthwith." Prior to Thursday night's ruling, Trump took to Truth Social to blast Newsom for his handling of the weeklong anti-ICE protests: "Incompetent Gavin Newscum should have been THANKING me for the job we did in Los Angeles, rather than making sad excuses for the poor job he has done. If it weren't for me getting the National Guard into Los Angeles, it would be burning to the ground right now!" What they're saying Newsom praised Breyer's ruling, saying that the case was "a test of democracy, and today we passed the test." The other side The White House had called Breyer's order "unprecedented" and said it "puts our brave federal officials in danger." What's next The appeals court has set another hearing for June 17. The Source This report used court documents obtained by FOX 11 and information from the Associated Press.
