McDonald's shuts down its spin-off, CosMc's, after less than 3 years as sales lag
McDonald's CEO Chris Kempczinski said in the company's last earnings call that drinks from CosMc's would be introduced to "hundreds of McDonald's restaurants" in the future.
"In connection with this next phase of testing, we will begin closing all stand-alone CosMc's pilot locations in late June, and the CosMc's app will be discontinued," a McDonald's spokesperson told Business Insider.
When it opened in 2023, CosMc's drew comparisons to Starbucks. Its menu included coffees, teas, lemonades, slushes, breakfast sandwiches, and small donut-like pastries called "McPops."
In a December 2023 meeting with investors, Kempczinski said that CosMc's is a "small format concept with all the DNA of McDonald's but its own unique personality."
"Its menu includes new customizable drinks, sweet and savory treats and familiar favorites such as the Egg McMuffin," Kempczinski said in the meeting.
In its announcement on Friday, McDonald's said CosMc's served as a good testing ground for different new flavors, and it plans to blend the "out of this world tastes" of CosMc's drinks into "the McDonald's experience."
"What started as a belief that McDonald's had the right to win in the fast-growing beverage space quickly came to life as a multi-location, small format, beverage-focused concept," the company said. "It allowed us to test new, bold flavors and different technologies and processes — without impacting the existing McDonald's experience for customers and crew."
The closing of CosMc's comes as McDonald's faces its lowest sales since the COVID-19 lockdowns. US same-store sales at McDonald's declined 3.6% during the first quarter.
With low-income diners pulling back their spending over the past year due to economic uncertainty, McDonald's saw even more middle-income buyers do the same during its first quarter, Kempczinski said in an earnings call.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
8 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Day traders scorched Wall Street pros with a hot summer. But September could chill their vibe.
Day traders have had a blockbuster summer, outpacing professional money managers and leaving some hedge funds bruised. But that dominance may be short-lived. If historical trends hold, a seasonal pullback in retail activity could collide with a surge in volatility this September, threatening to derail the rally they helped drive. While nothing has topped the meme-stock craze of 2021, retail traders have been enjoying a busy — and lucrative — summer. Citadel Securities, which handles more than a third of the US retail equity trades, said in a client note last week that Main Street has remained consistently bullish over the last three months. Retail has bought up stocks in 14 of the last 16 weeks since April and options buying has been bullish for 14 consecutive weeks, according to Scott Rubner, head of equity and equity derivatives strategy at the Miami-based trading giant. Their optimism has been rewarded. The S&P 500 has gained 8% since June and nearly 30% since its low in early April. The Nasdaq has fared even better. It's not just AI-adjacent companies driving the gains, either — day traders have led a rally in so-called "garbage" stocks with questionable business prospects, such as brick-and-mortar retailers Kohl's, American Eagle, and Krispy Kreme. Many professional money managers, by contrast, have missed the boat on the stock rally, taking a cautious approach amid signs of economic threats. Citadel Securities' institutional clients have been bearish 8 of the past 12 weeks, Rubner said. Citadel Securities Some hedge funds have been punished. The surge in junk stocks has confounded models at equity quant funds, contributing to a weekslong bloodletting, Business Insider previously reported. Many long-short equity hedge funds have navigated the market well, but those with more pessimistic outlooks have faltered. One hedge fund exec told BI that brick-and-mortar retailers with significant tariff exposure nonetheless trading higher than before tariffs were announced — especially with recession indicators blinking — "doesn't make sense to us fundamentally." David Einhorn's Greenlight Capital — which in the first quarter believed a recession and bear market were in the offing — lost 3.8% in the second quarter, trimming its year-to-date gain to just 4.1%, according to an August 7 investor letter seen by Business Insider. "While we anticipated the possibility of 'rip your face off' rallies, we certainly didn't expect the market to reach new all-time highs so quickly," the letter reads. "We still believe that the economy is slowing and could very well be headed into a recession. The market obviously disagrees." The diverging views among professional and amateur investors hit a new level in August after an unexpectedly poor jobs report and signs that inflation is ticking back up. Stocks fell that Friday, August 1 — but quickly rallied the following week. "The US stock market does not always reflect the broader economy," Rubner wrote, noting that competition is increasing for "dip alpha" — that is, investors are quick to buy stocks after a market dip, betting that stocks just went on sale and will rise in short order. A critical pivot point As we head toward fall, the stage is set for a reversal of fortune. If August is a lazy day at the beach for the stock market, September is like an icy cold plunge. While stocks generally rise in August — "consistent with the number of vacations, pool parties, and the general unwillingness to put on a new short during August," Rubner says — September is the worst month for performance, according to data going back to 1928. It's also historically more volatile. This persistent seasonal quirk is in part a byproduct of the summer holiday — traders return from vacation and rebalance their books as they gear up for an end-of-year push, cutting positions to make room for new ones. Many mutual funds similarly rebalance in September, dumping losing positions and adding to the downward pressure. September is also the nadir for retail traders. Retail participation traditionally thins as fall arrives, decelerating in August before hitting September, the lowest activity month of the year. Whether they're reacting to September's historic weakness or a factor in driving it, if Main Street money pulls back, that may take some wind out of the market's sails. And both macroeconomic and fundamental weaknesses that the market previously shrugged off could loom large. Einhorn's Greenlight says outside of companies benefiting from AI and the data center boom, "it is hard to find other areas that are doing well." The fund expects "the increased bite from tariffs to show up on shelves and in the data by September or October." Additionally, Rubner expects systematic, factor-driven strategies to reach full exposure by the end of August, "increasing vulnerability to downside shocks." In dissecting the rally in junk stocks and corresponding quant hedge fund losses, former AQR financial market research head Aaron Brown said in a column for Bloomberg that the likeliest resolution "is that the garbage rally runs out of steam and the junk stock prices sag back." He continued: "The nimble traders who took daily profits keep their winnings, the quant funds make back their losses, and the losers are less nimble day traders and medium or long-term investors who overpaid for junk." Overall retail participation in the US stock market has steadily increased, but a showdown is looming next month. Seasonal headwinds could test the resilience of the day traders and end their summer winning streak over the professional money managers.
Business Insider
8 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Microsoft is trying to poach Meta AI talent and offering multimillion-dollar pay packages, internal documents show
Microsoft is going after Meta 's AI talent. The software giant has compiled a list of its most-wanted Meta engineers and researchers, and is starting a new process intended to make offers more competitive, including a mandate to match Meta's compensation for top talent, according to insiders and internal documents viewed by Business Insider. Microsoft recently reported blowout earnings, sending its market valuation toward $4 trillion, thanks in large part to excitement around generative AI. Microsoft needs to lure top AI engineers and researchers to keep that success going. The company has cut thousands of employees this year but has insisted its headcount will remain flat, suggesting significant hiring plans. Matching Meta offers is no small feat. The social-media company has been making nine-figure offers for top AI talent. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has said Meta is offering $100 million signing bonuses to his engineers, and Meta has recently hired AI researchers with pay packages as high as $250 million. Microsoft documents viewed by Business Insider show the software company is making multimillion-dollar offers, and two people familiar with the process say multimillion-dollar on-hire bonuses for AI talent are becoming more common. Microsoft AI, a team run by former Google DeepMind cofounder Mustafa Suleyman, and CoreAI, another Microsoft group overseen by ex-Meta engineering boss Jay Parikh, have special recruiting teams to help with competitive offers, these people said. They asked not to be identified discussing sensitive, private matters. Parikh's organizational chart, recently viewed by Business Insider, shows much of his roster includes executives with whom he overlapped at Meta. A spreadsheet of Microsoft's most-wanted Meta employees lists individuals by name, location, and position, and includes tabs for teams and positions that Microsoft is targeting such as Reality Labs, GenAI Infrastructure and Meta AI Research. The spreadsheet is being shared among hiring managers on certain AI teams, according to a person familiar with the matter. Microsoft has started a new process for competitive offers, asking recruiters to mark candidates as "critical AI talent," which gets the attention of higher-ups who respond with Microsoft's top offer within 24 hours. Documents viewed by Business Insider show how that process works, such as providing "offer rationale" about the candidate's AI skills and experience, using a private "compensation modeler" to come up with a bespoke range for the candidate, and enlisting a compensation consultant. The new process could help Microsoft compete with AI talent outside of its traditional pay ranges. Business Insider recently published Microsoft's internal pay guidelines for engineers and researchers. The highest compensation package includes $408,000 in salary, $1.9 million in on-hire stock awards, nearly $1.5 million in annual stock awards, and annual cash bonuses as high as 90%. Those documents included an important carve-out for competitive situations, such as cases involving top AI talent, where recruiters can seek approval for higher offers for exceptional candidates.
Business Insider
8 minutes ago
- Business Insider
'Inference whales' are breaching AI coding startup business models
The AI coding sector has a problem. Heavy users of AI coding services have been racking up huge costs, forcing some leading startups to overhaul their pricing structures and offerings to avoid big losses. "Inference whales," as some in the business call these customers, are making industry insiders question whether AI products that are just "reselling inference" can survive long-term. Inference refers to how AI models are run. Newer reasoning models break user requests down into multiple steps, which increases inference costs. When applied to AI coding services, where developers set automated agents to longer-term tasks, expenses can soar quickly. This is a problem for AI coding services because they're often offered through monthly subscription plans. Many plans allow unlimited use for a fixed monthly fee, and a few users have taken advantage by bombarding the services with huge projects. These startups must still pay for the underlying AI models, so they're getting squeezed between a relatively fixed revenue stream and rapidly rising backend costs. "If you're purely reselling AI inference, your business could be very fragile and vulnerable, because the winds can shift violently," said Eric Simons, CEO of StackBlitz, and startup that offers a popular AI coding service called Claude Code whales Anthropic offered its popular Claude Code service through a $200 a month unlimited plan earlier this year. Some subscribers went berserk, using thousands of dollars' worth of AI inference over a few weeks or months. Someone even built a website to rank these AI coding whales. The Claude Code Leaderboard lists one developer at the top who's burned through almost 11 billion tokens. Tokens are how AI models break queries down into digestible data chunks. Industry pricing is based on how many tokens are processed. That top-ranked developer's token usage costs almost $35,000, according to this leaderboard. That compares to the $200 a month he's been charged. Even if that's over a whole year, Anthropic would be getting about $2,400, while incurring much higher inference costs. Anthropic is changing its pricing That's clearly unsustainable, so Anthropic plans to change its pricing. The $200 a month plan will stay, but the startup will introduce weekly rate limits, starting August 28. If users blow through these new weekly rate limits, they will have to buy additional capacity. "We've identified extreme usage by a small number of customers that impacts capacity for our broader community," an Anthropic spokesperson told Business Insider. The startup said it's also seen "policy violations," such as account sharing and reselling access. "We're committed to supporting advanced use cases long-term, but need to ensure consistent performance for all developers in the meantime," the Anthropic spokesperson added. A Swedish whale I tracked down one of the whales near the top of the Claude Code Leaderboard. Albert Örwall, a developer based in Sweden, said he's been using the $200 a month Claude Code subscription to build his own vibe-coding platform, along with some open-source agentic tools. "I was probably running 3 to 4 fairly long-running tasks in parallel constantly while I was working, and that's when it really took off," he said of his Claude Code usage. Even excluding these big projects, Örwall said his regular workflow in Claude Code likely racks up inference costs of $500 per day, under a subscription that costs only $200 a month. "So I'm guessing my workflow might not be sustainable for Anthropic," he added. Cursor responded, too When Anthropic's new pricing kicks in, Örwall said he'll keep the $200 a month subscription for a while to get a feel for what the weekly limits actually mean for his budget. "I'll avoid paying anything beyond the $200 subscription," he said, noting that he can change how he writes code and develops projects to avoid breaching the new rate limits. "The reason I originally switched from Cursor to Claude Code was because usage-based pricing became too expensive in Cursor," Örwall added. Cursor is another popular AI coding service, which often uses Anthropic's AI models as the underlying intelligence powering its product. Cursor recently switched its $20 a month Pro plan from unlimited requests to a tiered system with usage-based pricing for "fast" requests, meaning users are charged extra for exceeding a certain limit. This change, coupled with a lack of clear communication, caused confusion and frustration among some users who expected unlimited usage. Cursor announced the initial change in mid-June. Then it updated with more details about 2 weeks later, and then again in early July. "New models can spend more tokens per request on longer-horizon tasks," the startup wrote in a blog post, apologizing for surprising users with unexpected new bills. "Though most users' costs have stayed fairly constant, the hardest requests cost an order of magnitude more than simple ones." Inference costs aren't falling The assumption across the industry has been that inference costs will drop dramatically, making these AI coding services more financially viable. However, in practice, this hasn't happened thus far. Instead, when a new top AI model comes out, all the AI coding services integrate it — along with its higher prices. "This is the first faulty pillar of the 'costs will drop' strategy," Ethan Ding, CEO of startup TextQL, wrote in a recent blog. "Demand exists for 'the best language model,' period. And the best model always costs about the same, because that's what the edge of inference costs today." Developers and other AI users usually want the best, not last month's leading intelligence. "Nobody opens Claude and thinks, 'you know what? let me use the shitty version to save my boss some money.' We're cognitively greedy creatures," Ding wrote. "We want the best brain we can get." Even when inference costs do fall, the rise of agentic AI workflows means that developers set up longer, automated projects that generate a lot more tokens. If a project uses 100 million tokens, rather than 1 million, the initiative's cost remains high, even if per-token prices may have fallen. "A $20/month subscription cannot even support a user making a single $1 deep research run a day," Ding said. "But that's exactly what we're racing toward. Every improvement in model capability is an improvement in how much compute they can meaningfully consume." "There's no way to offer unlimited usage in this new world under any subscription model," he added. "The math has fundamentally broken."
