BlackRock Reports Second Quarter 2025 Earnings
Teleconference and Webcast Details
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Laurence D. Fink, President, Robert S. Kapito, and Chief Financial Officer, Martin S. Small, will host a teleconference call for investors and analysts at 7:30 a.m. ET. Members of the public who are interested in participating in the teleconference should dial, from the United States, (786) 460-7166, or from outside the United States, (800) 401-3551, shortly before 7:30 a.m. ET and reference the BlackRock Conference Call (ID Number 1723819). A live, listen-only webcast will also be available via the investor relations section of www.blackrock.com.
The webcast will be available for replay by 10:30 a.m. ET on Tuesday, July 15, 2025. To access the replay of the webcast, please visit the investor relations section of www.blackrock.com.
About BlackRock
BlackRock's purpose is to help more and more people experience financial well-being. As a fiduciary to investors and a leading provider of financial technology, we help millions of people build savings that serve them throughout their lives by making investing easier and more affordable. For additional information on BlackRock, please visit www.blackrock.com/corporate.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Wire
30 minutes ago
- Business Wire
AI Investors Have Opportunity to Join C3.ai, Inc. Fraud Investigation with the Schall Law Firm
LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, announces that it is investigating claims on behalf of investors of Inc. ('C3' or 'the Company') (NYSE: AI) for violations of the securities laws. The investigation focuses on whether the Company issued false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose information pertinent to investors. C3 announced its financial results for Q1 2025 on August 8, 2025. The Company's revenues fell short of prior guidance, which it attributed in part to disruption related to its sales and services organizations. Based on this news, shares of C3 fell by more than 20% on August 11, 2025. If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate. We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm's website at or by email at bschall@ The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
The 'Layer 1' Fight Is Not About Stablecoins But The Future Of Finance
With the GENIUS Act signed, stablecoins are on a tear. According to the management consultancy McKinsey, the total value of issued stablecoins has doubled to $250 billion today from $120 billion 18 months ago, and it is forecast to reach more than $400 billion by year-end (and $2 trillion by 2028). Wow. In addition to stablecoins tokens, a number of yield-bearing tokens are out there now. These tokens, typically an investment in short-duration government securities, such as the BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund ($2.9 billion) and the Franklin OnChain U.S. Government Money Fund ($0.8 billion). Big money, and hence the reasons for the 'Layer 1' or 'Layer 2' discussions in decentralised finance (DeFi) circles. Who Cares About Layer 1 or Layer 2? I am sure you are all familiar with the distinction, but for those who are new to this space, when DeFi people talk about Layer 1 they mean a distributed ledger of some kind (such as the Bitcoin blockchain) whereas Layer 2 networks run on top of the Layer 1 blockchains in order to delivered improved performance or additional functionality. The Layer 2 networks execute transactions off of the ledgers but use Layer 1 to provide the underlying security and finality. So, for example: Bitcoin is a Layer 1 protocol, but on top of this people have built Lightning, which is a Layer 2 service that uses off-chain 'payment channels' to make Bitcoin transactions work at point-of-sale (POS). Similarly, Ethereum is a Layer 1 blockhain and Arbitrum is a Layer 2 service that uses a 'rollup' mechanism to anchor transactions. Well, so far, so technical. But there is escalating competition in this space and that has business implications. The news that major players, such as Circle and Stripe, are developing their own Layer 1 networks is rather interesting. Given their investments in the stablecoin space it seems logical for Stripe, for example, to create a new high performance Layer 1 blockchain specially designed to for payment processing. Their blockchain, known as 'Tempo', is compatible with Ethereum's programming language so developers will be able to easily migrate 'smart" 'contracts' to the new blockchain. Similarly, Circle announced its new Layer-1 blockchain 'Arc' (also compatible with the Ethereum programming language) which they say is optimised for stablecoin-based financial services. Arc has native support for the Circle Payments Network (CPN) and stablecoins including USDC, EURC and USYC1. It also has, rather interestingly from my point of view, an opt-in privacy schemes that offers selectively shielded transactions. Circle say that Arc is designed not only for stablecoins but for all forms of digital money and tokenized value in the future, a point I will return to later on. Now you might ask, since Bitcoin and Ethereum seem to work, why are serious players in the stablecoin space looking to build their own Layer 1 blockchains while others are already building Layer 2 rails (such as Robinhood's chain on Arbitrum and Coinbase's Base on the OP Stack) that also seem to work. There are, broadly speaking there are two business pressures: functionality and economics. Functionality first. A good reason to develop a Layer 1 is to ensure the development of features that are required by the ecosystem. Now that this infrastructure is no longer a technical detail but a defining factor in who leads the next phase of digital finance, business is paying attention and as stablecoins begin to be used in mainstream business applications, so operational pressures will increase and favour platforms that are secure, compliant and capable of high-throughput transactions. As the respected industry commentator Noelle Acheson noted in the case of both Circle and Stripe, these will be the priorities of most financial services players but they are not necessarily the priorities of blockchains such as the Bitcoin blockchain, which was optimised for censorship resistance. There is also the element of control: decentralisation sounds good but it would be annoying to find that your payroll payments to employees are held up because everyone is playing some sort of cryptokitties game or messing around with NFTs. Then there are the economics. The fact is that running decentralised network is expensive. If you want the censorship resistance of Bitcoin then you have to consume enormous amounts of energy and therefore charge significant fees. This is a key reason people started building Layer 2 networks in the first place. But if you don't need the pseudonymity and censorship resistance (ie, you are running a regulated financial service) then you can redesign the infrastructure in a far more cost-effective way. You can imagine, then, that if Stripe offers stablecoin services to its global customer base, it will offer them its own stablecoins running over its own network and the transactions will never go anywhere near the world's banking networks except for on- and off-ramps. Assuming, that is, that Stripe's customers won't want to hold stablecoin balances that are non-interest bearing. (Of course once the service is up and running then Stripe can offer their infrastructure to third-parties so that they can use the Stripe Layer 1 to provide stablecoin services to their own customers. Given that payments are such a huge, but vulnerable, profit pool for the TradFi incumbents they they will have to respond.) Layer 1 And The Real World Where does this take us then? I suspect that the average consumer (eg, me) will have zero interest in Layer 1 or Layer 2 of indeed how any payments get anywhere. If I tell my accounting package to go ahead and pay a supplier in Canada, I really do not care how the money gets there: if Stripe uses open banking to take the money out of my UK account, take Canadian Dollar stablecoins from their Treasury and then send these stablecoins over to Canada where they are then paid out to the supplier using Interac e-Transfer, or whether they send the money from my bank account via SWIFT to a Canadian bank account, I do not care. Hence the winners and losers here will be determined by their cost-benefit performance for business. The battle for Layer 1, though, is not only about the battle to control payments, because it is about much more than stablecoins. As Circle indicated, it is about the future of value, a future in which the continuous exchange of 'real world' digital assets replaces the traditional infrastructure (and associated overheads) of clearing and settlement vanish. In this world, the next-general financial market infrastructure of distributed ledgers, tokens and protocols (that is, 'defi') that will in essence become critical national infrastructure. Can this really be provided Circle or Stripe? Or will it ultimately need Big Tech or governments or someone else to deliver the platform for innovation?
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Most Important Thing for Advance Auto Parts Investors to Watch in 2025
Key Points Advanced Auto Part's restructuring has returned the company to profitability, and it should start generating cash in the second half. The stock was recently sold off due to higher interest rate payments impacting profitability. Investors should look for progress in the company's efforts to improve its inventory in stores and how quickly it sells it compared to paying its suppliers. 10 stocks we like better than Advance Auto Parts › It's fair to say the latest earnings report from Advance Auto Parts (NYSE: AAP) was not well received by the market -- the stock was initially sold off by a mid-teens percentage. However, I think there was more good than bad in the actual numbers. That's not to say anyone should get overly excited, because this is still an underperforming company. Still, there are some positives here, and there are some things for the stock's bulls to build on. The investment case for Advance Auto Parts The case for buying the stock is well known, and if not, it should be, because the company has been around for over a decade. Simply put, the auto parts retailer's operational metrics are so woefully short of its peers, principally AutoZone and O'Reilly Automotive, that all it will take is some restructuring to get the company somewhere close to its peers' margins, cash flow, and earnings, and a substantial amount of value will be generated for investors. That was the gist of the case when activist investor Starboard Value got involved a decade ago (only to exit in 2021), having failed mainly in helping engineer any kind of significant closing of the gap with AutoZone and O'Reilly. In case you are wondering what I'm referring to, here are a few charts to demonstrate. They show earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) margins, free cash flow (FCF) generated from assets, and finally return on invested capital (ROIC). None of these metrics has improved over the last decade. The problem with Advance Auto Parts The main areas of improvement that Starboard articulated a decade ago still apply today. Auto parts retailing is a business that ensures the right stock is in the right store at the right time. In other words, it's a game of optimizing inventory, building supplier relationships, and above all, logistics management. Time is of the essence in the industry, as customers, whether in the do-it-yourself or especially in the do-it-for-me market, usually demand a part as soon as possible to help repair a vehicle and get it back roadworthy. It's also a game Advance Auto Parts hasn't played well over the years, as evidenced by its inability to generate good cash flow from its assets in the chart above. Simply put, the company has lagged its peers in converting inventory into cash. It outflows cash by paying its suppliers quicker than it generates cash from the parts it sells to retail customers. What happened in the recent results The recent results were in line with what management had pre-announced on July 24, except for one crucial detail. Management lowered its guidance for full-year adjusted diluted EPS from continuing operations from $1.50-$2.50 to a new range of $1.20-$2.20 "to account for higher net interest expense related to its recent senior notes offering," according to the earnings release. The company recently took on $1.95 billion in debt to redeem existing debt maturing in 2026 and provide it with cash to support its ongoing restructuring. The good news from the results On a more positive note, management's restructuring resulted in a return to profitability in the quarter. Furthermore, its full-year guidance for an outflow of $85 million to $25 million implies FCF generation of $116 million to $176 million in the second half, given there was a $201 million outflow in the first six months. These are positive steps, but as management noted on the earnings call, "we recognize that we are still in the early phases of our three-year turnaround plan." Moreover, turning back to the fundamental issue of selling inventory down quicker than paying suppliers, Advance Auto Parts continues to lag its peers. These charts show how many days it takes the company to sell its inventory compared to the days it takes to pay suppliers -- a low number is better. Investors should monitor this metric closely, as Advance Auto Parts will not be able to demonstrate improvement in its efforts to improve operational performance until it lowers this metric. Do the experts think Advance Auto Parts is a buy right now? The Motley Fool's expert analyst team, drawing on years of investing experience and deep analysis of thousands of stocks, leverages our proprietary Moneyball AI investing database to uncover top opportunities. They've just revealed their to buy now — did Advance Auto Parts make the list? When our Stock Advisor analyst team has a stock recommendation, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor's total average return is up 1,070% vs. just 184% for the S&P — that is beating the market by 885.55%!* Imagine if you were a Stock Advisor member when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,155!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,106,071!* The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The Most Important Thing for Advance Auto Parts Investors to Watch in 2025 was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
