Gayton McKenzie at centre of political storm over his past utterances
Department of Sport, Arts and Culture
Open Chats podcast
FILE: Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture, Gayton McKenzie. Picture: @SportArtsCultur/X
CAPE TOWN - Sport, Arts and Culture Minister Gayton McKenzie has found himself at the centre of a political storm since announcing he plans to sue podcasters who made derogatory statements about coloured people. Instead, it's McKenzie who's facing backlash, with his past utterances being dug up on social media.
From complaints lodged with Parliament and the SA Human Rights Commission (SAHRC), to calling for him to lose his Cabinet job, his political opponents are now coming after the Patriotic Alliance leader, accusing him of stirring racial divisions.
ALSO READ:
• Calls mount for Gayton McKenzie to be removed as sports minister amid racism claims
• ActionSA lodges complaint with SAHRC against Gayton McKenzie for racist remarks
• PA lays criminal complaint against Open Chats podcasters for insulting coloured community
While initially agreeing with McKenzie that the Open Chats podcasters should face repercussions for insulting the coloured community, political parties are now turning the tables on him. The African Transformation Movement (ATM) said it had written to Parliament's ethics committee to investigate McKenzie's past use of racial slurs in his social media posts. ATM parliamentary leader, Vuyo Zungula, said that McKenzie's use of language towards black people was indefensible and corrosive. He wants McKenzie to be investigated in terms of the Executive Members' Ethics Act and the parliamentary code of conduct. Meanwhile, the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) thinks he should be axed from Cabinet, saying that his job requires him to promote unity and inclusion of the country's diverse heritage. Democratic Alliance (DA) spokesperson, Willie Aucamp, said there could be no double standards in the handling of this matter. "When Gayton McKenzie, the leader of the Patriotic Alliance uses the K-word and fuels division with dangerous rhetoric, it is no different to any other hate speech, and it deserves the same consequences."
ActionSA said it had reported McKenzie to the SAHRC for his social media posts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
an hour ago
- TimesLIVE
Should podcasts be regulated?
The podcast industry has come under scrutiny and is facing calls for regulation after concerns about hate speech. The Open Chats podcast recently sparked outrage over racist remarks about the coloured community. Podcaster MacG also sparked anger after making derogatory comments about media personality Minnie Dlamini. With the podcast industry growing rapidly and reaching a wider audience, calls to implement stricter rules have intensified. The South African Podcasters Guild said the actions of a few creators shouldn't lead to strict restrictions that compromise freedom of expression. 'We can't negate the right to freedom of speech because less than 1% of podcasters are causing an issue. We advocate strongly for free speech, but within the context of the law,' said director Diego Domingo.
Eyewitness News
2 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Parliament's appropriations committee to query funding of National Dialogue
CAPE TOWN - With the total cost of the National Dialogue still unclear and a major point of contention, Parliament's appropriations committee plans to query the expenditure. Chairperson Mmusi Maimane said he was concerned about how the National Dialogue would be funded and implemented. Over the weekend, the Presidency said the full budget was yet to be determined and would depend on donations and other free services. ALSO READ: • Presidency compares upcoming National Dialogue to CODESA • National Dialogue: Legacy foundations say it wasn't a knee-jerk reaction to withdraw • COSATU backs national convention despite tensions • Presidency caught up in battle with civil society groups over direction & cost of National Dialogue On Monday, the organising committee said this week's two-day national convention, which will precede the dialogue, would cost eight million rand. While the Presidency has indicated that it would be funding the first phases of the National Dialogue, along with NEDLAC, there's still no firm price tag for the undertaking. Initial estimated costs of more than R700 million have been criticised by some quarters, given the many competing demands on a constrained fiscus. Chairperson of Parliament's appropriations committee, Mmusi Maimane, said that while the National Dialogue was a critical initiative towards reimagining South Africa's future, he was concerned about the lack of a funding strategy. "There is no dedicated allocation in the national budget and, in an already constrained fiscal environment, we cannot afford to divert resources from other critical priorities. Any funding model must be sustainable, accountable and must not place additional burdens on taxpayers." He's now written to the National Treasury to provide clarity on the budget votes that will be funding the dialogue, and whether any government programmes will be affected by the diversion of funds. Maimane said that Treasury must provide a comprehensive list of the programmes that would be affected by funding the National Dialogue. He added that it was concerning that respected civil society voices were stepping away from the process. On Friday, several foundations, including those linked to former presidents, announced their withdrawal from the convention over disagreements with the Presidency over budget and logistical issues.
The South African
3 hours ago
- The South African
One of the SA's famous seaside towns could get a name change
Three places in the Eastern Cape could be facing a possible name change, following the Eastern Cape Geographical Names Committee's push to replace colonial-era place names with indigenous ones. According to BusinessTech , a pre-planning meeting in Port Alfred last week drew more than 250 stakeholders, marking the first step in what could be a significant shift for the region's map. The changes would correct colonial adaptations of indigenous words and reverse cultural erasure in these Eastern Cape towns. The committee plans to rename the seaside town of Port Alfred, the farming town of Alexandria, as well as the Kowie River. Under the current proposal, Port Alfred would be renamed either iCawa or iCoyi, the Kowie River would become iQoyi, and Alexandria would be renamed Nkosi Chungwa or eMnyameni. Christian Martin, chairperson of the Eastern Cape Geographical Names Council, said the changes follow international guidelines on correcting colonial place names. He explained that 'Kowie' is a colonial adaptation of a Khoi word, while 'iQoyi' is its isiXhosa equivalent. In his view, these names were never neutral. The proposals have sparked concern among residents, business owners, and tourism operators, with the Democratic Alliance (DA) also coming out strongly against the changes, urging Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture Gayton McKenzie to block the application. 'Renaming Port Alfred, which is an international tourism hub, and Alexandria would deal a devastating blow to the tourism brand and economy of these towns,' the DA said, as per BusinessTech . The consultation process is ongoing, with no final decision yet on whether the proposed names will be adopted. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
