Tom Mulcair: Opportunity knocks for the NDP; will they answer?
Tom Mulcair is a former leader of the federal New Democratic Party of Canada between 2012 and 2017, and a columnist for CTVNews.ca.
The NDP suffered the worst defeat in its history in last April's election, gaining the support of just six per cent of Canadian voters.
The seven remaining NDP MPs will have their work cut out for them as they try to repair the damage done by their decision to hop in the sack with Trudeau's Liberals.
That so-called supply and confidence agreement saw several NDP priorities like dental care and pharmacare become new strands of Canada's social safety net; a worthwhile initiative that came at a huge political price.
That deal deprived the NDP of any credible business case when knocking on doors during the last election. What possible argument was left to convince NDPers not to vote Liberal, when the NDP's MPs themselves had been voting Liberal for three years?
Justin Trudeau, Jagmeet Singh, Pierre Poilievre
File photo of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau shaking hands with New Democratic Party Leader Jagmeet Singh as Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre looks on at a Tamil heritage month reception on Jan. 30, 2023 in Ottawa. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld
The decision to back Trudeau may be the most obvious reason for the NDP's electoral disaster, but it's not the only one.
Canada's recent decision to join with 24 other countries in demanding the immediate cessation of the war in Gaza underscores the need for all political parties to have a consistent, long-term approach to this most complex, and existential, foreign relations issue. It's precisely because Canada has been such a historically strong ally of Israel that this signature carries so much weight.
Singh's NDP put itself at odds with the party's usually balanced approach to the complex issues of the Middle East, when some caucus members began to express strident anti-Israel positions.
This wasn't new. Jack Layton had to work hard to maintain that equilibrium, pushing back when a key caucus member had expressed support for boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel.
Jack made it clear that while all MPs can bring their own opinions to the caucus table, they don't get to make up their own party policy. The NDP still has a fairly nuanced public position on these issues, at least in its official policies as voted on by the membership. But the leadership and the caucus apparently felt that they were no longer bound by those.
Issue of Israeli-Palestinian conflict isn't going away
The ensuing flurry of increasingly harsh anti-Israel rhetoric made it difficult for the voting public to know whether those pronouncements represented the NDP position. When policy is being made up on the fly in reaction to changing events, no matter how compelling or tragic, a political party's credibility with voters is directly affected. How can they know what they're voting for?
That issue isn't about to go away. Several potential leadership candidates, including Singh's foreign affairs spokesperson, Edmonton Strathcona MP Heather McPherson, have been among the most one-sided in their criticism of Israel. Her statements have been increasing in intensity since the election and may signal that staking out a more extreme position on this issue is seen as politically advantageous to her leadership aspirations.
While that type of hardline attitude might get support from some elements within the party, the ability to talk evenhandedly and consistently about longstanding conflicts on the world stage is seen as a litmus test by a much wider group of Canadian voters.
The NDP has been a party of power in six provinces and now has strong capable governments in British Columbia and Manitoba. If the federal NDP is left talking to itself, the dream of one day also having an NDP government in Ottawa could be pushed to the backburner for decades.
Leadership race
The party has now set a timeline for its leadership race to replace Jagmeet Singh. It may be revealing about the state of the party that it wasn't able to actually announce a date. They only said that the vote would be held at the latest on March 29, in Winnipeg. That will give the NDP apparatchiks the summer to come up with rules for the race that they will be able to announce ahead of the official launch of the campaign in September.
The timing of the vote was being actively discussed by potential candidates, and it's understandable. This fairly long campaign will favour someone who is already ensconced in a good paying position; a sitting MP, for example.
Rules for the leadership campaign are not the only issue that has been affecting the party. When you only have seven MPs and three of them sign a letter decrying a lack of proper consultation on the choice of interim leader, you've got a problem. When those three MPs also happen to be the only racialized women in the caucus, you're setting yourself up for a fall.
Jack Layton
File photo of the late NDP Leader Jack Layton singing with NDP MP Pierre Dionne Labelle, left, and NDP MP Paulina Ayala as they took part in national holiday festivities in Gatineau, Quebec on June 24, 2011. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick
The NDP's diversity and inclusiveness have been among its strengths. They won't be for long, if they begin to be seen as a façade. One of the keys to Jack Layton's success was his ability to reach across the linguistic divide.
Jack and I were both English-speaking Quebecers. That gave us an understanding of the linguistic minority experience and reinforced our abiding support for the French fact in Canada.
Reaching out to Quebecers
Of the higher profile NDPers having expressed an interest in running for the leadership, only former MP and outgoing B.C. NDP cabinet minister Nathan Cullen is bilingual. Cullen would have no trouble taking part in a leaders' debate during an election campaign or participating in a fast-paced interview on a talk show like Tout le Monde en parle.
Nathan Cullen
File photo of Bulkley Valley-Stikine NDP candidate Nathan Cullen, left, and Nechako Lakes NDP candidate Murphy Abraham, during a campaign stop in Terrace, B.C., on Sept. 24, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck
That's what the eight million francophone Canadians would expect, and indeed require, from an aspiring prime minister. If, during the NDP's own French leadership debates, certain candidates cannot really participate, they're toast. Or, to put it another way, if one of the unilingual Anglos were to win, the party would be condemning itself to the sidelines, no longer able to be real players in Canadian political life.
An ability to reach out to French voters isn't just seen as essential to francophones themselves. The vast majority of Canadians want a leader who can speak and understand both official languages. It is seen as being an essential skill for building, and keeping together, this great nation.
The stakes are high in this impending race. If it plays its cards right, the NDP could be in a much more favourable position come the next election. Prime Minister Mark Carney has been bequeathed a shivering economic dungpile by the outgoing Trudeau regime. Cleaning up that mess will require more than a broom; he'll need a Kärcher pressure washer.
Some of those tough management choices may prove as unpopular as they are necessary. That may provide the beginning of an opportunity for the NDP. But which NDP will run in the next election? A professionalized, credible NDP that can talk to all Canadians or a rump NDP that's trying to please the fringes?
Serious economic, environmental, social and foreign policy issues require thoughtful policies and the perceived ability to do more than just talk about them and emote. The impending leadership race will provide a window onto the future of a party with a proud, remarkable past.
It could be a new beginning, or it could be curtains.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
29 minutes ago
- CBC
Federal government taps Cohere to work on use of AI in public service
The federal government has signed an agreement with a Canadian artificial intelligence company to identify areas where AI can enhance public service operations. Cohere will look at how its products can improve federal public services, said Sofia Ouslis, a spokesperson for Artificial Intelligence Minister Evan Solomon. The agreement sets up "early-stage collaboration" between the federal government and the Toronto-based tech company, she said. Cohere develops large language models, a type of generative AI focused on language, and the company specializes in AI services for businesses. "The focus is on identifying where Cohere's Canadian-built AI tools can improve public services, making them faster, smarter and more secure. While there are no formal deadlines attached, the government sees this as a priority and is moving quickly to explore real-world applications," Ouslis said. Ouslis said the agreement does not include a "financial component." Cohere said in a blog post Tuesday it signed the agreement "to transform the public sector with our secure, sovereign AI technology." "Accelerating AI adoption will deliver massive productivity and efficiency gains to enhance public services and modernize operations," it said. A government news release also said the agreement with Cohere involves looking at building Canada's commercial capabilities to use and export AI, but did not provide details about what that effort will involve. Using artificial intelligence to increase efficiency in the public service was one of Prime Minister Mark Carney's election promises. Carney also promised to cap the size of the public service, and most departments and agencies have since been asked to find program spending cuts of up to 15 per cent. The government news release said AI "has the potential to significantly improve government operations and services for Canadians," and that Ottawa is "seeking to harness the power of this transformative technology while building a vibrant made-in-Canada technology sector."
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
Canada Post heads back into bargaining with union after delay
A Canada Post truck is seen at a distribution centre in Montreal on Friday, Dec.13, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Christinne Muschi OTTAWA — Canada Post and the union representing postal workers are set to return to the bargaining table today. Plans to rekindle talks late last week were delayed due to a lack of federal government mediators. The Canadian Union of Postal Workers claimed labour unrest at Air Canada was pulling attention from the postal service's dispute, which has stretched on for more than a year and a half. A few weeks ago, unionized postal workers rejected the Crown corporation's latest offer that would have included wage hikes of around 13 per cent over four years and added part-timers to the workforce. Canada Post is seeking a formal response from the union on those proposals and has warned the postal service is bleeding millions of dollars in business daily tied to uncertainty around collective bargaining. The union says it has prepared offers that meet members' demands and is upholding a ban on overtime work in the meantime. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 20, 2025.
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
After Air Canada strike, Section 107 of labour code is ‘dead,' says union leader
What could CUPE's defiance of Section 107 mean for future strikes in Canada? Rachel Aiello has the latest. OTTAWA — A rare show of defiance by Air Canada flight attendants in the face of a back-to-work order from the government has proven the ineffectiveness of the section of Canada's labour code that allows a minister to order the end to a strike or lockout, the president of the Canadian Labour Congress said. On Aug. 16, just hours after flight attendants hit the picket line after failing to reach a new contract deal with the airline, Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu invoked section 107 of the Canada Labour Code to order binding arbitration and get the flight attendants back on the job. The section grants the minister the power to act to 'maintain or secure industrial peace.' Flight attendants ignored the order and remained on strike until a deal was finally reached early Tuesday, a move Canadian Labour Congress President Bea Bruske lauded as effective. 'It sets a precedent (that) you can defy, and you will find a solution at the bargaining table,' Bruske said Tuesday in an interview with The Canadian Press. 'It sets a precedent for the reality that (section) 107 is no longer effective, it is effectively dead.' 'The best way to deal with it is to remove it entirely because unions, workers, the labour movement has been emboldened by this and we're not going to turn around.' Section 107 has been in the Canada Labour Code for more than 40 years but using it has become more common particularly in the last year. The Canadian Labour Congress says the Liberals have resorted to section 107 eight times since June 2024, including to prevent a strike by WestJet mechanics, and to end strikes or lockouts at the country's two main railways, ports in Montreal and Vancouver and temporarily a strike and lockout at Canada Post. Before then, section 107 was only used a handful of times, says the Canadian Labour Congress, including four times between 1995 and 2002. In 2011, the CLC says then-labour minister Lisa Raitt used section 107 after flight attendants rejected two tentative agreements, though the parties ultimately voluntarily agreed to send their dispute to binding arbitration. The CLC says it was used one other time between 2011 and 2024. Initially the government didn't seem willing to turn to it quickly to end the Air Canada work stoppage. On Aug. 17, a few hours before the deadline set by the union representing flight attendants to reach a new contract deal, Hajdu urged the airline and the union to go back to the negotiating table, and suggested she wasn't ready to intervene in the dispute. Hajdu told The Canadian Press that day that it was 'critical' the two sides return to the table to forge a deal on their own. The strike officially began just before 1 a.m. ET on Saturday and in turn, Air Canada locked out its agents about 30 minutes later due to the strike action. Hajdu announced just after 12 p.m. on Saturday that she was invoking the labour code section and directing the Canada Industrial Relations Board to order Air Canada and the Canadian Union of Public Employees to resume operations and resolve the dispute through binding arbitration. The minister said she made the call after meeting with both sides Friday night, finding that talks had broken down and the parties remained too far apart to resolve the conflict quickly enough. But CUPE defied the order, flight attendants stayed on the picket line and the union launched a legal challenge of the government's move. On Monday, the Canada Industrial Relations Board board declared the strike unlawful and ordered the union's leadership to tell its striking workers to go back to work. The federal government also announced that it was launching a probe into allegations of unpaid work in the airline sector. The union and Air Canada met late Monday night and very early Tuesday morning announced a tentative agreement had been reached, ending the work stoppage. Bruske acknowledged that Air Canada workers' defiance of back-to-work orders could set a precedent for future strikes. She said that, while the government was under 'a lot of pressure' from business groups and customers to avoid a disruption, their interference 'caused more of a problem than it solved.' 'It really gave the employer a way to avoid having to get serious at the bargaining table,' Bruske said. When the union decided to defy the return-to-work order, Bruske said it sent a 'strong message' that the only way to resolve the issue is at the bargaining table, 'which is where it needed to be found all along.' Bruske noted that the government used the labour code to force the Canadian Union of Postal Workers to vote on an offer from Canada Post, an offer the workers rejected. Canada Post and the union are returning to the bargaining table Wednesday. 'The labour movement is going to be with them no matter what they choose to do,' Bruske said. She said CLC and its affiliate unions, including the Canadian Union of Postal Workers, met on Sunday and labour leaders were unanimous that they supported CUPE in defying back-to-work orders and that they will 'do whatever' to support them. CUPE national president Mark Hancock said that, given the availability of Section 107, it seemed like the company felt that they didn't need to negotiate and were instead preparing to go to binding arbitration. Once it was 'pushed to the side,' Hancock said the company 'got serious' at the bargaining table and a tentative deal was reached. 'Hopefully this has sent a message to government and to everybody that the way to get a deal and a collective agreement is at the bargaining table,' Hancock said. 'Section 107 is just an impediment that makes it much more difficult to get an agreement on the table.' While he doesn't agree with forcing workers back in a dispute, Hancock said other options, like back-to-work legislation debated in Parliament, are more democratic. 'We're gonna continue talking about 107 and I'm hoping the government never, ever, ever uses it again because it's not a helpful tool,' he said. Hancock encouraged future unions that have to face Section 107 to 'respond appropriately.' He also said it's still unclear if there will be any consequences for the union or its members as a result of the strike but that CUPE will protect and defend workers and their jobs. 'Hopefully Air Canada has learned a lesson that we're not going to back down when it comes to bargaining and that we'll be there to support our members every step of the way,' Hancock said. 'I'm sure Air Canada wants to put this behind them and move forward and if they start disciplining or attempting to discipline people, that's not gonna be helpful for them or anybody.' Daniel Safayeni, president and CEO of FETCO, an employers' association comprised of federally regulated firms within the transportation and communications sectors, said CIRB and the Supreme Court have affirmed the constitutionality of Section 107, recognizing that the right to strike can be limited in exceptional circumstances when justified by threats to national economic stability. 'There is a time and place for the usage of this,' Safayeni said, adding that something like a special mediation process could be used before the invocation of Section 107. 'At the end of the day, the government is going to need a tool to keep particularly critical industries, critical supply chains moving, if a deal can't be reached.' He said unions are entitled to challenge decisions in court but can't just ignore orders because that 'sets a dangerous precedent.' 'That is normalizing behaviour that frankly, I think when we look south of the border, we see it and we are shocked and disappointed to see it, and I don't think we want to replicate those same norms here,' Safayeni said. With files from Kyle Duggan and Craig Lord This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 20, 2025. Catherine Morrison, The Canadian Press
