'We're not interested in separation': Sask. government responds to sovereignty petition
A petition calling for a provincial referendum on Saskatchewan's sovereignty has garnered nearly 2,000 signatures in three days, prompting responses from both the provincial government and the Opposition NDP.
The petition, launched by advocacy group Unified Grassroots on May 2, aims to "empower the provincial government to negotiate new terms for Saskatchewan's relationship whether as part of Canada or as an independent nation."
If successful, the petition could kick-start a process to launch a plebiscite vote within 12 months of submission to the government. In order to be submitted, it must accumulate signatures from 15 per cent of eligible voters, or about 125,000 signatures. The result of the vote, even if it were to favour separation, would not be legally binding.
WATCH | The history of western separation in Canada:
The history of western separation in Canada
8 hours ago
Duration 3:28
On Monday, both the provincial government and Saskatchewan NDP said they do not support separation from Canada.
During question period on Monday afternoon, Saskatchewan Finance Minister Jim Reiter stated several times that the provincial government does not support leaving Canada, but would follow the legislation on plebiscites.
"I'm a proud Canadian, all members of this side of the house are," Reiter said. "We're not interested in separation.… We're also not interested in muzzling the voices of people who want to use freedom of speech."
NDP jobs and economy critic Aleana Young said earlier on Monday that Premier Scott Moe could easily put separatism calls to rest and is choosing not to.
"I have three calls for Premier Moe today: one, condemn [Alberta Premier] Danielle Smith, two, condemn Unified Grassroots, and three, be straight with the people of Saskatchewan and say out loud, clearly and unequivocally, that you would vote to stay as part of Canada," she said.
"This is a premier who is all too happy to get along, to go along with the fringe elements of his own base."
The provincial government reiterated its stance in a later statement.
"The Government of Saskatchewan does not support separating from Canada, however we also don't support the status quo," it said. "We believe in a strong and united Saskatchewan, within a strong and united Canada, and the role Saskatchewan can play in making Canada an energy superpower."
A public vote to separate from Canada can also happen through a government-initiated referendum. According to Saskatchewan's Referendum and Plebiscite Act, a government-led referendum would be legally binding if more than 60 per cent of voters vote for a single result and at least 50 per cent of eligible voters had cast a ballot.
That process would bring several challenges. The House of Commons would have the power to edit or cancel the question if it felt the wording would not clearly capture the will of the people. The federal government would also have to consult with all political parties in the province on the issue.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Calgary Herald
41 minutes ago
- Calgary Herald
Canada could be trade winner as U.S. tariffs undershoot global competitors by wide margin, says report
The tariff rate imposed on Canadian exports by the United States is estimated to be the lowest amongst the world's trading countries, meaning that Canada could end up coming out ahead in Donald Trump 's trade war, a new report says. Article content Oxford Economics Group Ltd. estimates the U.S.'s current effective tariff rate on Canada is 2.5 per cent, placing it below Mexico at four per cent and well below other major U.S. trading partners. Article content Article content For example, the U.S. tariff rate is 35 per cent on China, 15 per cent on Japan, 13 per cent on South Korea and eight per cent on the United Kingdom and the European Union, based on data from calculated duties as a share of imports, Oxford said. Article content Article content 'If the relatively low tariffs apparently being paid on imports from Mexico and Canada persist, these two economies could pick up some benefits from shifts in supply chains, although uncertainties over the endgame for tariffs and the future of the (Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement) will be near-term drags,' Adam Slater, lead economist at Oxford Economics, said in the report. Article content CUSMA-compliant goods escape U.S. tariffs, though the trade agreement is scheduled to be reviewed in July 2026, but some people, including Ontario Premier Doug Ford, think that deadline could be accelerated. Article content Still, Slater described the current estimates for the tariff rates 'as something of a puzzle.' Article content Article content One set of trade data from the U.S. Census Bureau indicates that 56 per cent of goods entering the U.S. from Canada and 47 per cent from Mexico are compliant with CUSMA, while other Census Bureau data suggests the rates are 91 per cent and 84 per cent, respectively. Article content Article content 'It may be the case that tariff exemptions for these economies are broader than assumed,' Slater said. Article content Slater said Oxford based its overall 2.5 per cent tariff rate for Canada on a higher level of CUSMA compliance, 'while not directly' adhering to the 91 per cent level. Article content But trade between the U.S. and Canada hasn't escaped unscathed. Article content 'The biggest negative impacts have been in Canada, where imports are down 25 per cent from January levels, and in China, where imports are down 50 per cent from January,' Slater said, adding that 'Chinese data on exports to the U.S. shows a much less dramatic decline of around 25 per cent since January,' possibly due to rerouting of goods through other countries.
Vancouver Sun
41 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
Canada's first-past-the-post voting system is constitutional, Ontario appeal court rules
OTTAWA — A panel of three Ontario Court of Appeal judges unanimously affirmed the constitutionality of Canada's first-past-the-post electoral system in a ruling released on Monday. The system, laid out in the Canada Elections Act, sees the candidate who receives the most votes in a given riding or electoral district become the member of Parliament. Fair Voting BC and the Springtide Collective for Democratic Society argued in court that the first-past-the-post system violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms' guarantee of effective representation. The groups also said the system leads to the under-representation of women and other groups in Parliament, breaching the Charter's equality rights provision. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. In a proportional representation system, the number of representatives a political party elects reflects the percentage of the total vote the party receives. In November 2023, the Ontario Superior Court dismissed the challenge from Fair Voting BC and Springtide. It said that while a proportional representation system would be a fair alternative to the current system, it's not required by the Constitution. In its decision, the province's Court of Appeal also rejected the groups' key arguments. 'The electoral system is not in conflict with either the right to vote or the right to equality. It does not violate the Charter,' Justice Grant Huscroft said in written reasons delivered on behalf of another judge on the panel. 'The appellants' arguments that the electoral system violates the Charter are, in essence, a repackaging of failed political arguments as constitutional rights violations.' The expert evidence 'put forward in support' of those arguments, Huscroft wrote, is 'replete with highly contestable policy arguments about which reasonable disagreement abounds, not only in the academic community but amongst the public at large.' 'This evidence demonstrates the shortcomings of constitutional litigation in addressing public policy disagreements,' he added. The short answer to the argument that the electoral system violates the Charter is that Canadian citizens are free to vote for anyone they choose, and for any reason they choose, Huscroft added. 'There is no constitutional requirement that their individual choices aggregate in a way that achieves some ideal of representational diversity,' he wrote. 'Neither the political party affiliation nor the personal characteristics of the candidates who win election are relevant to the constitutionality of the electoral system.' During the 2015 election campaign, then-Liberal leader Justin Trudeau promised it would be the last federal election held under the first-past-the-post system. Once in office, however, Trudeau's government abandoned his pledge to replace the system. Fair Voting BC and Springtide argued that under the current system, small political parties do not enjoy the success they deserve, creating a disadvantage for people who vote for them. 'I do not doubt that small political parties fare poorly in Canada,' Huscroft wrote. 'They receive relatively few votes and invariably win few or no seats.' The failure of a political party cannot open the door to a claim for constitutional redress, he said. 'In short, the right to vote is a right to vote pursuant to the electoral system in operation — whatever that system is, and regardless of the electoral outcomes that may obtain,' he wrote. The appellants also argued the first-past-the-post system contributes to the under-representation of women and minorities in Parliament. Huscroft said no matter what sort of electoral system is in place, over- or underrepresentation of particular demographic groups might occur to a greater or lesser extent from time to time. He added that arguments based on degree of representation lose sight of the fundamental fact of the matter: that people are entitled to vote the way they want. 'This is the very essence of the freedom that lies at the heart of the right to vote,' he wrote. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
CTV News
41 minutes ago
- CTV News
‘I thought we'd have help': Denare Beach resident criticizes provincial wildfire response
Dustin Trumbley's home in Denare Beach was destroyed by the wildfire which devastated his community. He's now speaking out, voicing his disappointment with the province's response to the fires. 'I lost a lot of mementos from my grandfather. It bugs me to this day. I should have got more out, but I thought we'd have help,' Trumbley said at an NDP event Monday. The Opposition event criticized the Sask. Party for hosting an upcoming golf tournament fundraiser at Elk Ridge - not far from active wildfires and areas that are still reeling from their effects. The Sask. Party responded, noting that the NDP have also held fundraisers throughout the summer months. Trumbley shared his experience as an evacuee, noting that he is lucky enough to have family to stay with while he navigates the lengthy process of rebuilding his home, but many others aren't as lucky. 'I don't want to see it happen to you or your family ... We should not be at fault because I was born and raised in the North ... and that's how I feel, like we were forgotten about and abandoned,' Trumbley said. After a summer plagued by wildfires and air quality warnings, Premier Scott Moe and the Minister responsible for the SPSA, Tim McLeod, visited La Loche and Beauval to meet with local leaders and visit SPSA facilities. In a statement provided to CTV News, the province highlighted a task force assembled in June, to assist residents in Trumbley's community. 'The task force includes dedicated representatives from the Saskatchewan Public Safety Agency (SPSA), Ministry of Government Relations, Social Services, Environment and SGI,' the statement read. 'This joint effort has allowed the task force and communities to accelerate the achievement of multiple milestones, including establishing a Community Resiliency Centre in Denare Beach for individuals and families, clearing debris from properties and removing hundreds of lost vehicles.' But Trumbley expressed that this action comes much later than he would have liked to see, and he will be tentatively waiting to see how the province responds next wildfire season. 'I would really like to know for next time, that I know that the government and their programs will be in place to make sure that there will be help in place, that this will never happen again,' he said. 'That's all I've ever asked.'
