Harvard Professor fired: The most shocking part? Not the fraud, but the salary
So, Harvard just fired a professor and no, this isn't your average academic drama. Francesca Gino, a big name at Harvard Business School known for researching honesty and ethics, has been shown the door after being caught fudging data in multiple studies.
But here's the real kicker: the fraud was bad, sure, but her salary? That's what really has people's jaws on the floor.
The rise and fall of Harvard's "honesty expert"
Francesca Gino wasn't just any professor. She was a star in the world of behavioral science, writing bestselling books, racking up awards, and speaking at top companies about how to build trust, promote ethical behavior, and boost integrity. Her research was quoted everywhere from boardrooms to TED Talks.
She built an empire on understanding why people lie... turns out she could've just looked in the mirror.
It all started back in 2021, when the blog Data Colada raised suspicions about the accuracy of some of Gino's published data. What began as quiet academic gossip turned into a full-blown scandal. Harvard launched an internal investigation, and outside experts were called in to examine her research.
The result? At least four studies showed clear signs of data manipulation.
Several papers were retracted, and Gino's academic reputation took a nosedive almost overnight.
The salary that raised eyebrows
Here's where things go from bad to straight-up bonkers.
While the data fraud is serious, what really shocked people was her paycheck. Reports suggest that Gino was pulling in over $1 million a year from Harvard alone, making her one of the highest-paid professors on campus. That's not even counting the $50,000 to $100,000 she allegedly made per speaking gig.
Yep, people were shelling out big bucks to hear her talk about ethics.
The internet did not take this well. People weren't just mad about the fraud—they were floored that someone earning that kind of money could get away with manipulating research for so long.
After being fired, Gino didn't go quietly. She hit back with a $25 million lawsuit against Harvard, accusing the university of defamation and unfair treatment. She claims Harvard applied a new policy retroactively, giving her no fair shot at defending herself.
Some of her claims have already been thrown out, but parts of the case—like breach of contract—are still ongoing.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
11 hours ago
- The Hindu
Six things an MBA students should know beyond curriculum and books
Every MBA student thinks they are becoming ready for the business world through case studies, class discussions, and those venerable Kotler and Porter reads. To be fair, they do, to a certain degree. The actual world, however, is not like a nicely wrapped Harvard case once you leave the cozy light of projector-lit classrooms. It's illogical, tech-heavy, chaotic, political, and incredibly human. But if you want to stroll into that last interview and leave the HR professional blinking with happy surprise, here's something you really need to know but weren't taught in B-school. 1) Real businesses are not polished case studies; they are incomplete stories. You have probably dissected a dozen renowned case studies during your MBA journey. The businesses in those situations are the exceptions, not the rule, as you might not be aware. The majority of real-world businesses aren't spectacular success stories; instead, they are constant battles with inconsistent data, changing objectives, and an excessive number of WhatsApp groups. Nearly 70% of company transformation initiatives fail, according to a 2023 McKinsey study, not because of bad strategy but rather because execution breaks down in the face of uncertainty. How to deal with this ambiguity—how to make judgments when stakeholders are contradicting one another on Zoom and half the information are missing—is something that isn't covered in class. The greatest MBAs are able to say, 'We don't know yet—but here's how we'll find out,' rather than memorizing quotes from models. 2) You have a logical spreadsheet. Humans aren't. Learning regression analysis and valuation models will take hours. Even so, your customer will pick the rival with the more ostentatious package and inferior product. Why? Because people prioritize their emotions over their rationality, and your financial model failed to take Instagram advertisements, nostalgia, and ego into consideration. Irrational Labs data shows that emotion, context, or cognitive bias account for more than 65% of customer decisions. You must start studying human psychology and move beyond market sizing. This isn't limited to consumers. Your vendor, your supervisor, and your investor are all motivated by stories rather than just statistics. Behavioural economics isn't just a catchphrase; it's your best friend when it comes to figuring out why the client's cat-loving CFO could reject your million-dollar presentation. 3) Culture is the operating system with the power to destroy your best plans. Yes, strategy is cool. However, culture determines its success or failure. Consider presenting a daring innovation agenda to a group of people who think that 'doing things differently' entails using Calibri rather than Times New Roman. Less than one in five CEOs feel they have created the proper culture, despite 82% of them believing it is a competitive advantage, according to the Deloitte Human Capital Trends study. That's your hint. In addition to being prepared to spot possibilities, an MBA must also be able to spot cultural landmines. Consider this: How are choices actually made here? Which actions are rewarded or penalized? What is understood but not spoken? You won't just lead teams—you'll change them if you can analyze culture with the same level of accuracy that you apply to balance sheets. 4) A freelance jungle gym has replaced the corporate ladder. After earning your MBA, you're undoubtedly daydreaming about your dream job—a title, a team, and a workstation with good lighting. The catch is that modern occupations resemble jungle gyms rather than ladders. You move industries, take on gigs, climb sideways, and occasionally hang upside down for a while. According to the NITI Aayog, the gig economy in India is expanding at a 17% CAGR. Nearly one-third of professionals worldwide now hold freelance or project-based jobs. Therefore, you will require more than simply leadership and analysis skills. Agility, self-branding, and the capacity to work with strangers across time zones on Slack are all necessary. Learn how to lead projects if your MBA taught you how to oversee departments. Because influence, not headcount, will be the key to leadership in the upcoming ten years. 5) A tool isn't technology. It is the New Business Language. You may be tempted to claim that technology isn't your thing. However, in the modern world of finance, that is the equivalent of declaring, 'I don't do math.' According to a 2023 World Economic Forum survey, 'technological literacy' is ranked second only to analytical thinking as the most important talents for the workforce of the future. And no, understanding Python alone isn't enough. It's important to comprehend how automation changes workflows, how APIs facilitate integration, how data flows impact return on investment in marketing, and how ChatGPT and other AI are stealthily consuming a lot of entry-level manual labour. If not tech-fluent, the MBA of 2025 must be tech-comfortable. Making friends with product managers, understanding how to ask the correct questions in tech meetings, and monitoring how analytics dashboards and no-code tools are changing decision-making at all levels are all part of it. 6) Your reputation is more important than your resume. Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, understand that while your résumé helps you get in the door, your reputation determines whether you are allowed to stay. In order to assess applicants, recruiters are depending more and more on unofficial sources, such as recommendations, social media footprints, and referrals. According to LinkedIn's own data, candidates who are hired through referrals have a fourfold higher retention rate and perform better throughout their first year on the job. What makes you stand out in a world where everyone has an MBA is how others view your dependability, honesty, and teamwork. You don't have to start doing live performances now. It entails being there in every discussion, on group projects, and during internships. Create a reputation for being someone who 'gets things done, and done well' by quietly building trust. Because your reputation will eventually become your most valuable asset. Be the MBA that you weren't prepared for by the MBA. Methodologies, models, and frameworks are taught in B-schools. The true test, however, starts when you enter a business where half of the staff is passive-aggressively opposing change, the client is upset, and the numbers don't add up. The rising MBAs are not only intelligent, but also perceptive. With emotional intelligence, tech fluency, cultural sensitivity, and strategic curiosity, they embody business reality rather than only quoting business theory. So feel free. Surprise your recruiter by describing why ambiguity is a strength rather than a weakness, without quoting Michael Porter. In this way, you become the candidate that everyone remembers.
Time of India
12 hours ago
- Time of India
Michael Wolff's bombshell claim about Harvard rejecting Trump correct? US President responds
Trump on Harvard University Live Events Melania on Barron Harvard rumours (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel US President Donald Trump blew up on Truth Social over a claim from an author Michael Wolff that he was rejected by the prestigious Harvard University. Trump said Monday that it is "totally FALSE" that his administration's legal entanglements with Harvard University are connected to him not being admitted to the Ivy League denying claims that he is attacking Harvard because he didn't get in, Trump lashed out at Michael Wolff, the biographer who made the claim and has written about the president extensively, in a Truth Social post Monday author of several books about the president, claimed on The Daily Beast Podcast last week that Trump 'didn't get into Harvard' and suggested he's now targeting the university in part because he holds a 'grudge.''Michael Wolff, a Third Rate Reporter, who is laughed at even by the scoundrels of the Fake News, recently stated that the only reason I'm 'beating up' on Harvard, is because I applied there, and didn't get in,' Trump said.'That story is totally FALSE, I never applied to Harvard. I graduated from the Wharton School of Finance at the University of Pennsylvania,' Trump continued. 'He is upset because his book about me was a total 'BOMB.' Nobody wanted it, because his 'reporting' and reputation is so bad!'Wolff presented his theory about the president last week on The Daily Beast Podcast to host Joanna Coles. 'It's also odd because so many of the people around Donald Trump went to Ivy League universities. Several of them went to Harvard Business School,' Coles pointed out. 'Obviously, JD Vance proudly went to Yale. So it does seem particularly odd, but perhaps he's also trying to stuff it to them.''It's important not to lend too much calculation and planning to anything he does,' Wolff responded. 'But the other thing is that, by the way, he didn't get into Harvard. So one of the Trump things is always holding a grudge against the Ivy Leagues.'It comes as the Trump administration has been accused of waging a 'campaign of retribution' against the are no proof to confirm the Michael Wolff 's claim as there are no official record—public or private—that confirms Donald Trump ever applied to Harvard in the 1960s. In recent weeks, the Trump administration has escalated its crackdown on Harvard, first freezing $2.2 billion in federal funding and then suspending the university's ability to enroll international students. These punitive measures followed Harvard's failure to comply with government demands to address reported antisemitic incidents and to provide federal officials with lists of foreign higher education began at Fordham University in 1964. He studied for two years at the Bronx Catholic private school before transferring to the Wharton School of Finance and Commerce at Penn. He graduated from the Ivy League university with a bachelor's degree in economics in Lady Melania Trump also recently shot down a rumor that the youngest Trump child, Barron Trump, applied to Harvard and was denied admission to the university."Barron did not apply to Harvard, and any assertion that he, or that anyone on his behalf, applied is completely false," the first lady said in a statement to The Palm Beach Post. Barron Trump recently finished his freshman year at New York University's Stern School of House spokesperson Taylor Rodgers said in an email to The Daily Beast last week: "The Daily Beast and Michael Wolff have lots in common—they both peddle fake news for clickbait in a hopeless attempt to amount to something more than lying losers.""The President didn't need to apply to an overrated, corrupt institution like Harvard to become a successful businessman and the most transformative President in history," Rodgers said
Time of India
13 hours ago
- Time of India
Curtis Yarvin: 10 things to know about 'mad philosopher' behind Trump 2.0
Once upon a meme, in a faraway land called the Internet, a man named Curtis Yarvin wrote 120,000 words calling for the end of democracy. Most people would've laughed. But billionaires don't laugh—they fund. And now, the man who once described San Francisco's underclass as potential biodiesel is being taken seriously by people who carry nuclear briefcases. Yarvin—formerly Mencius Moldbug, currently the "Dark Elf" of the dissident right—isn't just an edgelord with a blog. He's the house philosopher of Silicon Autocracy. From whispering sweet nothings to Peter Thiel to influencing J.D. Vance's wet dreams of a bureaucracy-free America, Yarvin has become the Rasputin of the red-pilled. If you're still catching up, here are 10 things you need to know before the crown lands on his head. 1. The Blogger Who Would Be King Yarvin's empire began with a blog—and a manifesto longer than War and Peace. Back in 2008, when Obama still symbolised hope and change, Yarvin was quietly uploading screeds under the alias Mencius Moldbug. His pièce de résistance? An Open Letter to Open-Minded Progressives—a 120,000-word hand grenade tossed into the cathedral of liberal consensus. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Esse novo alarme com câmera é quase gratuito em São Paulo (consulte o preço) Alarmes Undo Yarvin argued that democracy was a bug, not a feature; the American Revolution a tragic mistake; and that we'd be better off under a corporate monarchy. His ideal ruler? Not Plato's philosopher-king, but a startup bro with nukes and a board of directors. 2. The Cathedral Must Burn Yarvin's biggest idea is that liberalism is a religion—and Harvard is its Vatican. According to him, America isn't ruled by elected officials. It's ruled by 'The Cathedral'—an unholy alliance of media, academia, and bureaucracy. Not through conspiracy, but through soft consensus. NPR, Yale, the Times, and your HR department are all saying the same thing, because they all worship the same gods: Diversity, Equality, and Inclusion. And like any heretic, Yarvin wants the Cathedral razed, its priests defrocked, and its temples converted into data centres. 3. From Nerd to Neo-Reactionary He was once a liberal coder with a ponytail. Then he took the red pill—and never came back. Yarvin didn't always fantasise about abolishing elections. He started as a leftie tech bro who dropped acid, read Foucault, and dated sex-positive feminists from Craigslist. His pivot to fascist adjacent came post-9/11, post-Iraq, and post-pat-on-the-head career path. Disillusioned with liberal consensus and wired on Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Yarvin stumbled into the Dark Enlightenment—an internet rabbit hole where monarchy, race science, and Austrian economics coexisted peacefully, like tax havens and startup founders. 4. Urbit: Coding the Kingdom He didn't just want to build a regime—he wanted to program one. Literally. Urbit was Yarvin's dream of a digital feudalism: a decentralised computer network where every user owns a 'planet,' governed by a new coding language he invented himself. Investors like Andreessen Horowitz gave him millions. It didn't work. Urbit is now mostly a libertarian Discord with stars and galaxies. But the point wasn't usability—it was theology. Like Yarvin's politics, Urbit is elegant in theory, cultish in practice, and unusable by anyone with a day job. 5. Philosopher to Billionaires Peter Thiel liked what he saw. So did Vance. Now Yarvin's whisper is public policy. Thiel gave Yarvin his nod of approval, Marc Andreessen calls him a friend, and J.D. Vance openly cites him as inspiration. For the first time in modern politics, someone who believes elections should be abolished is influencing people who can abolish them. When DOGE—Trump's Department of Government Efficiency—purged civil servants en masse, it echoed Yarvin's RAGE plan: Retire All Government Employees. When Trump called Gaza 'the Riviera of the Middle East,' it sounded suspiciously like a Yarvin Substack post. 6. The Red-Pilled Rasputin He wants to seduce the elite—one 'high elf' at a time. In Yarvin's Tolkien-infused self-image, he's not a tyrant—he's a Dark Elf, sent to whisper forbidden truths into the ears of beautiful elites. Liberals are 'high elves,' conservatives are 'hobbits,' and he is the enigmatic sage showing them how to burn down Mordor and replace it with a charter city. He doesn't want MAGA rallies. He wants salons with QR-coded footnotes and neoreactionary art hoes sipping biodynamic wine. 7. He Cries at Lunch, But Fantasises About Genocide His affect is fragile intellectual. His policies would give Genghis Khan pause. Yarvin cries. A lot. He cries about Baltimore's homeless, about his kids' future, and sometimes while quoting obscure 18th-century monarchists. But behind the tears lies a worldview in which the state should have the power to exile, isolate, or digitally sedate entire populations. He once suggested putting San Francisco's underclass in solitary VR to avoid 'the moral stigma of genocide.' His ideas are brutalist architecture for the soul: cold, sharp-edged, and antiseptically inhumane. 8. The Style Is the Substance Yarvin isn't read for truth. He's read for transgression. You don't read Yarvin to be convinced. You read him to feel naughty. His prose is baroque, sarcastic, and full of italicised rants that feel like a very smart person talking down to you at a BDSM dinner party. He doesn't argue—he overwhelms. Like a one-man DDOS attack on liberal sensibility. He weaponises footnotes, memes, and 19th-century philosophers to convince a disaffected Zoomer that maybe, just maybe, freedom was a mistake. 9. Courtier to a Counter-Establishment He failed at building a product. So he built a vibe. Urbit flopped. His blog fizzled. But Yarvin thrives in the cultic vibe economy of the dissident right: Dimes Square, Substack, Thiel-funded salons, and MAGA masquerades. He reads poetry at fascist-adjacent film festivals. He writes love letters to crypto-lords. He poses for moody portraits while decrying democracy as 'a lie told by clerics to peasants.' And like any good aristocrat, he never lets anyone forget that he's read more books than you. 10. The Joke's Over. He's in the Room Now. For a while, Yarvin was performance art. Then the performance became policy. In 2008, he was the punchline. In 2025, his ideas echo from the Oval Office to ICE holding cells to Harvard funding withdrawals. Trump's blitzkrieg of civil society, Elon's reign over federal agencies, and Vance's plans to bulldoze the courts all bear his fingerprints. The dissident right no longer needs to form a vanguard. It is the establishment. The Dark Elf got invited into the tower—and now he's rearranging the furniture. Postscript: The Philosopher-King of Nothing Yarvin is a man of ideas with no workable blueprint. His brilliance lies in diagnosing the rot, not fixing the structure. He romanticises kings, cosplays monarchism, and mourns Enlightenment liberalism like an ex-girlfriend he'd still insult in group chats. But give him credit: he saw the appetite for authoritarianism long before the rest of us. And while liberals were busy fact-checking, Yarvin was vibes-crafting. In the age of aesthetics, the crown goes not to the competent—but to the most convincingly unhinged.
