logo
#

Latest news with #Talks

My partner and I settle arguments with PowerPoint debates. We each get 5 minutes and a limited number of slides.
My partner and I settle arguments with PowerPoint debates. We each get 5 minutes and a limited number of slides.

Business Insider

time3 days ago

  • General
  • Business Insider

My partner and I settle arguments with PowerPoint debates. We each get 5 minutes and a limited number of slides.

When my partner and I found ourselves stuck in an endless loop of petty arguments, like "Who forgot to take out the trash again?" and "Do we really need five kinds of mustard?" We didn't go to couples therapy or buy a book on conflict resolution. We opened PowerPoint. It started as a joke. One night, after an especially heated debate over the correct way to load a dishwasher (I maintain there is a correct way), I pulled out my laptop and said, "I'd like to present my findings on the Great Dishwasher Debate of 2024." I added a pie chart, some clip art, and a dramatic fade transition. He laughed. And then he made his own slide deck in response. That was our first "debate night." PowerPoint debates are now our go-to solution for minor conflicts Now, whenever a minor conflict starts brewing, we schedule a presentation. Each of us gets five minutes, a slide limit (usually five, but that's negotiable), and full creative freedom to make our case. We've made charts about whose turn it is to water the plants. Memes about condiment overcrowding. Graphs tracking the suspicious disappearance of socks. One time, my partner included a slow zoom-in on a photo of our overstuffed fridge with the caption: "Explain this." We do this because we are conflict-avoidant millennials. But more importantly, we do it because it works. The most surprising part? How intimate it feels. When my partner presents his slides, I'm not just hearing complaints, I'm seeing how his brain works. The effort he puts into choosing the right font or animating a title slide tells me he cares. I've seen him earnestly explain, with bullet points and supporting evidence, why my habit of leaving half-full mugs around the apartment is slowly destroying his will to live. And I've laughed, but I've also listened. These debates have given us a new way to connect PowerPoint gave us a new language of connection. Instead of escalating into shouting matches or icy silence, we invite each other into our weird little TED Talks of domestic frustration. We even have themes now. One week it was "present like a villain," another week we did "musical slideshow," and once we had to present each other's side as sympathetically as possible. That one was oddly moving. It's not always perfect. Sometimes we disagree about the rules (meta, I know). Sometimes one of us gets a little too smug when the audience (our cat) clearly favors one argument. And yes, it's still possible to have an actual argument about how we're arguing. But those moments are rare and far less intense than before. There's a strange joy in over-preparing for petty disputes. It turns everyday friction into a game, a performance, a creative outlet. We're not just airing grievances; we're co-authoring stories about our life together, even if those stories are titled "A Brief History of Bathroom Mirror Smudges" or "The Case Against Buying More Throw Pillows." And honestly, it's made us better communicators. Because when you only get five slides to explain why you're upset, you learn to distill your feelings. You learn what actually matters. You learn how to listen, not just to respond, but to understand and maybe to laugh a little, too. Last month, I gave a particularly impassioned presentation about the existential crisis I feel when our spice rack is disorganized. My partner responded with a color-coded system, laminated labels, and a closing slide that read: "Your chaos ends today." Reader, I swooned. This isn't a one-size-fits-all solution. I'm not saying PowerPoint can fix deep relationship issues. But for us, it's been a playful, surprisingly effective way to defuse tension and build empathy. We took something mundane to our disagreements and reframed them as creative collaborations. At the very least, we've made arguing weirdly fun. And honestly? That feels like a win.

Harvard Professor fired: The most shocking part? Not the fraud, but the salary
Harvard Professor fired: The most shocking part? Not the fraud, but the salary

Time of India

time7 days ago

  • Business
  • Time of India

Harvard Professor fired: The most shocking part? Not the fraud, but the salary

So, Harvard just fired a professor and no, this isn't your average academic drama. Francesca Gino, a big name at Harvard Business School known for researching honesty and ethics, has been shown the door after being caught fudging data in multiple studies. But here's the real kicker: the fraud was bad, sure, but her salary? That's what really has people's jaws on the floor. The rise and fall of Harvard's "honesty expert" Francesca Gino wasn't just any professor. She was a star in the world of behavioral science, writing bestselling books, racking up awards, and speaking at top companies about how to build trust, promote ethical behavior, and boost integrity. Her research was quoted everywhere from boardrooms to TED Talks. She built an empire on understanding why people lie... turns out she could've just looked in the mirror. It all started back in 2021, when the blog Data Colada raised suspicions about the accuracy of some of Gino's published data. What began as quiet academic gossip turned into a full-blown scandal. Harvard launched an internal investigation, and outside experts were called in to examine her research. The result? At least four studies showed clear signs of data manipulation. Several papers were retracted, and Gino's academic reputation took a nosedive almost overnight. The salary that raised eyebrows Here's where things go from bad to straight-up bonkers. While the data fraud is serious, what really shocked people was her paycheck. Reports suggest that Gino was pulling in over $1 million a year from Harvard alone, making her one of the highest-paid professors on campus. That's not even counting the $50,000 to $100,000 she allegedly made per speaking gig. Yep, people were shelling out big bucks to hear her talk about ethics. The internet did not take this well. People weren't just mad about the fraud—they were floored that someone earning that kind of money could get away with manipulating research for so long. After being fired, Gino didn't go quietly. She hit back with a $25 million lawsuit against Harvard, accusing the university of defamation and unfair treatment. She claims Harvard applied a new policy retroactively, giving her no fair shot at defending herself. Some of her claims have already been thrown out, but parts of the case—like breach of contract—are still ongoing.

Five Signs Trump and Netanyahu's Relationship is Worsening
Five Signs Trump and Netanyahu's Relationship is Worsening

Newsweek

time28-05-2025

  • Politics
  • Newsweek

Five Signs Trump and Netanyahu's Relationship is Worsening

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Israel has dismissed a New York Times report that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu threatened to disrupt U.S.-Iran nuclear deal talks by targeting Iran's main enrichment facilities, calling it "fake news." But the report nonetheless highlighted deepening tensions between Netanyahu and U.S. President Donald Trump, who is eager to secure a deal despite Israeli concerns over Tehran's nuclear program. This dispute is one of several signs revealing a worsening relationship between the two leaders, reflecting broader disagreements on Iran, regional conflicts, economic policy, and diplomatic priorities. Newsweek has reached out to the White House and the Israeli prime ministers office for comment. Why It Matters While the broader U.S.-Israel alliance remains strategically robust, the relationship between Trump and Netanyahu has frayed significantly. Though much of the current tension revolves around policy disputes—over Iran, Gaza, and regional diplomacy—the personal rift between the two leaders began earlier. One notable rupture came in 2020, when Netanyahu publicly congratulated Joe Biden on his election win. Trump, who still disputes the result, saw the move as a betrayal. "The first person that congratulated [Biden] was Bibi [Benjamin] Netanyahu, the man that I did more for than any other person I dealt with. He has made a terrible mistake," Trump said in an interview. That moment marked an early turning point in their relationship, which has since been defined by policy disagreements and reduced personal alignment. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin (L) talks to U.S. President Donald Trump during a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House on April 7, 2025 in Washington, DC. President Trump is meeting with Netanyahu... Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin (L) talks to U.S. President Donald Trump during a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House on April 7, 2025 in Washington, DC. President Trump is meeting with Netanyahu to discuss ongoing efforts to release Israeli hostages from Gaza and newly imposed U.S. tariffs. More Kevin Dietsch/AP Photo What To Know 1. Iran Nuclear Talks President Trump has taken a more diplomatic approach to the nuclear talks with Iran, seeking a deal that limits Tehran's program without resorting to military confrontation. In contrast, Netanyahu remains highly skeptical, repeatedly warning that any deal allowing Iran to maintain uranium enrichment facilities endangers Israel's security. Netanyahu has threatened military action even if diplomacy succeeds. Israeli officials worry that Trump's urgency to reach an agreement might lead to concessions unacceptable to Israel, particularly allowing Iran to keep enrichment sites that Netanyahu views as a "red line." Trump has not turned against Israel, but he's not willing to make an exception to America first. Trita Parsi, Executive Vice President of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft 2. Gaza Conflict The recent release of Israeli-American hostage Edan Alexander has sharpened tensions between Trump and Netanyahu, exposing their increasingly divergent strategies on Gaza. While Trump framed the release as a diplomatic breakthrough and a sign of progress toward a ceasefire, Netanyahu downplayed its significance and emphasized that no concessions were made to Hamas, signaling his continued focus on military objectives. This difference in tone reflects deeper disagreements: Trump has pushed for humanitarian access and de-escalation, backing a new Gaza aid delivery system aimed at bypassing Hamas. Netanyahu has supported the mechanism but remains primarily committed to a hardline campaign to dismantle Hamas, regardless of the mounting humanitarian toll. Israeli-American hostage Edan Alexander arrives in Israel after being released from Gaza, where he was held in Hamas captivity for 19 months, May 12, 2025, Israel, Reim. Israeli-American hostage Edan Alexander arrives in Israel after being released from Gaza, where he was held in Hamas captivity for 19 months, May 12, 2025, Israel, Reim. Kobi Gideon/AP Photo 3. Yemen Ceasefire Earlier this month, the Trump administration brokered a ceasefire agreement with the Houthi rebels in Yemen that does not cover Israel, a development that caught Israeli officials off guard. The Houthis have a history of targeting Israeli sites, including missile attacks near Ben Gurion Airport, and Israel was not consulted before the ceasefire announcement. This sidelining has fueled concerns that the U.S. is prioritizing broader regional diplomacy over Israeli security interests. 4. Economic Tensions In April, President Trump imposed a 17 percent tariff on certain Israeli imports, citing concerns about the cost of U.S. financial aid to Israel and the need to protect American industries. This tariff shocked Israeli officials and businesses, raising questions about the future of economic cooperation. While trade between the two countries has historically been strong, the tariffs signaled a more transactional and contentious phase in economic relations. US President Donald Trump delivers remarks on reciprocal tariffs as US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick holds a chart during an event in the Rose Garden entitled "Make America Wealthy Again" at the White House... US President Donald Trump delivers remarks on reciprocal tariffs as US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick holds a chart during an event in the Rose Garden entitled "Make America Wealthy Again" at the White House in Washington, DC, on April 2, 2025. Trump geared up to unveil sweeping new "Liberation Day" tariffs in a move that threatens to ignite a devastating global trade war. Key US trading partners including the European Union and Britain said they were preparing their responses to Trump's escalation, as nervous markets fell in Europe and America. More5. Middle East Trip Perhaps the clearest symbol of the fraying personal relationship was Trump's recent Middle East tour, which included visits to Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE but conspicuously omitted Israel. Despite Israeli lobbying efforts, Trump chose not to include Netanyahu or Israeli officials on the trip. This decision raised eyebrows across the region, signaling a shift in U.S. diplomatic priorities away from the traditionally close U.S.-Israel axis and toward Gulf partners. What People Are Saying Trita Parsi, Executive Vice President of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft told Newsweek: "Trump has not turned against Israel, but he's not willing to make an exception to America First. In matters that he finds important, he will not defer to Israel and allow Israel's interest to be prioritized over that of the U.S. So on Iran, Yemen, and Israel's efforts to push the U.S into more wars in the Middle East, he pushes back. But on Gaza, he is still deferring to Israel." Israeli TV host and commentator Dana Fahn Luzon said: "Trump is signalling to Netanyahu, 'Honey, I've had enough of you.'" What Happens Next The widening rift between Trump and Netanyahu underscores a complex dynamic where personal and political disagreements threaten to overshadow a historically strong U.S.-Israel alliance. How these leaders navigate their differences will significantly influence the trajectory of regional diplomacy, security cooperation, and the broader stability of the Middle East.

India-US Trade Talks: Racing Against Trump's Deadline  Vantage with Palki Sharma
India-US Trade Talks: Racing Against Trump's Deadline  Vantage with Palki Sharma

First Post

time26-05-2025

  • Business
  • First Post

India-US Trade Talks: Racing Against Trump's Deadline Vantage with Palki Sharma

India-US Trade Talks: Racing Against Trump's Deadline | Vantage with Palki Sharma | N18G India-US Trade Talks: Racing Against Trump's Deadline | Vantage with Palki Sharma | N18G India and the United States are rushing to sign a trade deal before the 8th of July — a deadline set by U.S. President Donald Trump. His goal: a zero-tariff agreement. But India is pushing for a more measured approach, protecting sensitive sectors like agriculture and textiles. Both sides are now aiming for an interim deal — one that avoids U.S. Congressional hurdles. Palki Sharma unpacks what's at stake, and how India is diversifying its trade strategy beyond Washington. Operation Sindoor: India's Military, Diplomatic and Strategic Triumph. Check out the special edition Firstpost e-paper here: See More

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store