Trump asked Japan to help with Golden Dome missile shield, Nikkei reports
President Trump and Prime Minister Ishiba discussed potential collaboration on the Golden Dome missile defense shield, according to the Nikkei. This partnership could involve joint development of interceptor systems. Tokyo's involvement might also provide leverage in ongoing trade negotiations with Washington, potentially securing concessions for Japan.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
U.S. President Donald Trump discussed cooperating with Japan on developing technology for his planned Golden Dome missile defence shield during a phone call with Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba this month, the Nikkei reported.The two countries are expected to work together on systems to intercept incoming threats, and Tokyo's participation could serve as a bargaining chip for it to win concessions in ongoing tariff negotiations with Washington, the paper said, without citing its sources.Trump this month said he had selected a design for the planned $175 billion defence shield and appointed U.S. Space Force General Michael Guetlein to head the project, which he wants to complete by the end of his term in 2029. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that Golden Dome could cost $831 billion over two decades.Japan and the U.S. have previously collaborated on ballistic missile defence, including the joint development of an interceptor capable of striking warheads in space.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘No Entry For…': Trump Imposes SUDDEN Travel Ban On Dozen Nations; Here's The Full List
President Donald Trump has issued a new travel ban targeting nationals from twelve countries. The White House said these nations present high security risks due to inadequate vetting systems. Countries on the list include Iran, Libya, Somalia, and others across Africa, the Middle East, and the Caribbean. The proclamation is being framed as a move to protect national security. Trump's spokesperson stated this fulfills his promise to safeguard Americans from foreign threats.#trump #TravelBan #BreakingNews #USPolitics #whitehouse #donaldtrump #ImmigrationPolicy #NationalSecurity #ExecutiveOrder #ForeignPolicy
Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump orders investigation into Biden presidency, alleges cognitive decline
US President Donald Trump has ordered an official investigation into the actions of his predecessor Joe Biden, alleging that Biden's aides may have masked his cognitive decline and taken executive actions on his behalf without his knowledge. The move follows an executive order signed on Wednesday directing Attorney General Pam Bondi and White House counsel David Warrington to lead the inquiry. According to The New York Times, the executive order aims to determine whether several of Biden's decisions while in office—such as presidential pardons and policy directives—are legally valid if made without Biden's full awareness or signed using an autopen, a device that mechanically replicates a signature. Central to Trump's directive is the claim that Biden's use of the autopen—employed by US presidents for decades—could invalidate certain executive documents. The executive order cited the device as a potential means for aides to usurp presidential authority. 'This conspiracy marks one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history,' Trump wrote in a memo, quoted by The Guardian. 'The American public was purposefully shielded from discovering who wielded the executive power, all while Biden's signature was deployed across thousands of documents to effect radical policy shifts.' However, a 2005 opinion from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel concluded that a president can direct a subordinate to use the autopen to sign bills, maintaining their legal validity. That opinion, written by Howard C. Nielson Jr.—now a federal judge appointed by Trump—supported the practice as constitutional. The executive order comes amid an ongoing Republican campaign to challenge the legitimacy of Biden's presidency. The Guardian reported that the House Oversight Committee, led by Republican Rep. James Comer of Kentucky, has called for testimony from five of Biden's top aides, including his former chief of staff, to assess Biden's 'mental and physical faculties.' Ed Martin, a Department of Justice attorney, also launched a separate investigation into clemencies issued by Biden in his final days in office, including pardons for death row inmates and family members. The narrative of Biden's cognitive decline has been a GOP talking point for years. Scrutiny intensified following Biden's poor debate performance during the 2024 election campaign, which led to him dropping out of the race. Democratic leaders have denounced Trump's move as politically driven. In an interview with CBS Sunday Morning, former President Bill Clinton defended Biden's mental fitness. 'We'd had several long talks. I had never seen him and walked away thinking, 'He can't do this anymore,'' Clinton said. Biden, 82, is only slightly older than Trump, who turns 79 later this month. The Department of Justice has not yet commented on the scope or legal merit of the newly ordered investigation. (With inputs from The New York Times, The Guardian)
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump's travel ban: What's the difference between a ban and restrictions?
In a move that has left the world in utter shock, US President Donald Trump has signed a ban on travel to the US from 12 countries, including Afghanistan, Haiti, and Iran, in a bid to "protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors. " Starting on Monday, 9 June, citizens from 12 countries are set to be banned from travelling to the US: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. In a video message, Trump cited the recent attack in Colorado as an example of foreign nationals entering the US without being "properly vetted". Although the alleged attacker was an Egyptian national, quite notably, Egypt has been left out of the ban. Another seven countries have come under a partial ban: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. For the unversed, the proclamation echoes an order from Trump's first term in 2017, when he announced a ban on travel from seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the US, and simultaneously fulfils a promise Trump made during his 2024 election campaign. However, there are some exemptions, including athletes travelling for major sporting events, some Afghan nationals, dual nationals with citizenship in unaffected countries, and immigrants who are "ethnic and religious minorities facing persecution in Iran." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trading CFD dengan Teknologi dan Kecepatan Lebih Baik IC Markets Mendaftar Undo But how exactly is a 'travel ban' different from 'travel restrictions'? What is a travel ban? A travel ban is an official prohibition on the entry of individuals from specific countries or regions into a nation. In the case of Trump's 2025 policy, the US government announced a full ban on nationals from 12 countries, including Afghanistan, Iran, Libya, and Somalia. This means that citizens from these nations are categorically denied entry into the United States, regardless of the purpose of their visit or their individual circumstances. The rationale behind such a ban typically centers on national security concerns, such as high visa overstay rates, inadequate vetting processes, or the potential for individuals from these countries to pose security threats. The administration cited these reasons when implementing the 2025 ban, emphasizing the need to protect US interests and prevent potential risks associated with travelers from these nations. What are travel restrictions? In contrast, travel restrictions are more nuanced and often involve limitations on specific types of travel or certain categories of travelers, rather than an outright ban. For instance, while a country may not impose a complete ban on nationals from another nation, it might restrict certain visa categories or impose additional vetting requirements. Under Trump's 2025 policy, nationals from seven countries—such as Cuba, Laos, and Venezuela—are subject to partial restrictions. These restrictions may include limitations on specific visa types, increased scrutiny during the application process, or additional documentation requirements. Unlike a full ban, these measures allow for the possibility of entry under certain conditions, provided the traveler meets the specified criteria. See More: Travel ban: 12 nations fully banned, 7 partially blocked; internet erupts over Donald Trump's travel crackdown Key differences between a ban and restrictions: While a travel ban is a complete prohibition of entry, travel restrictions deal with limited limitations on specific categories. A travel ban is implemented based on the rationale of national security concerns, whereas travel restrictions are due to specific risks or policy objectives. In the case of Trump's directive, while 12 countries have been 'banned' from traveling to the US, 7 countries have received travel restrictions regarding US travel. Is this ban going to affect the US? The implementation of travel bans and restrictions carries significant policy implications. Bans can strain diplomatic relations, particularly with countries whose nationals are affected. They may also impact international collaborations, trade, and tourism. As debates continue over the effectiveness and fairness of such policies, it remains essential to consider their legal, diplomatic, and humanitarian implications. 'Don't Want Troublemakers': Trump Wants Foreign Student Cap at Harvard; Indian Aspirants Furious One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change
