New VA policy sparks outrage as doctors may refuse treatment to Democrats and unmarried veterans alike
Live Events
Has the VA responded to the backlash?
What did the experts say about the policy?
Who could lose access to care under these rules?
FAQs
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
A new VA policy has sent shockwaves through both veteran communities and the medical community. The change, which follows a Trump-era executive order, has already raised serious ethical and legal concerns.A contentious policy change at the Department of Veterans Affairs allows VA doctors to refuse treatment to veterans based on their political beliefs or marital status. Critics describe it as discriminatory and dangerous.Psychologists, dentists, and a variety of other professions are also subject to the new regulations. The new regulations have already taken effect in certain VA medical facilities, as per a report by The Guardian.Executive order "Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government" issued by the president on January 30 is cited by VA officials as the reason for the modifications.Regardless of race, colour, religion, or sex, medical personnel are still expected to treat veterans, and all veterans still have the right to care.However, since federal law does not specifically forbid it, individual employees are now free to refuse to provide patient care due to personal characteristics.VA hospitals have the authority to exclude physicians and other medical personnel on the basis of union activity, marital status, or political party affiliation. Impacted are certified clinical social workers, podiatrists, speech therapists, chiropractors, CNPs, and optometrists, as per a document, reported The Guardian.The executive order sought to deny the majority of government protections to transgender individuals. The VA no longer offers the majority of gender-affirming care and has prohibited the use of terms like "gender affirming" and "transgender" in clinical settings.The VA press secretary, Peter Kasperowicz, responded to inquiries via email, saying that all eligible veterans will always be welcome at the VA and will always receive the benefits and services they have earned under the law.However, he did not dispute that the new rules allowed doctors to refuse to treat veteran patients based on their beliefs or that doctors could be fired based on their political affiliation or marital status.The new regulations were described as "extremely disturbing and unethical" by Dr. Arthur Caplan, the original head of the medical ethics division at New York University's Grossman School of Medicine.On the surface, it appears to be an attempt to exercise political influence over the VA medical staff, he stated.Veterans are worried about how new policies will affect their healthcare, especially those who are female, LGBTQ+, or reside in rural areas.To see a doctor, some people might have to travel more than a hundred miles, which could have a cascading effect. Because these changes were implemented without consulting the doctors in the system, medical experts are also worried about the process.Yes, under the new rules, VA doctors can refuse care based on factors such as political affiliation or being unmarried.Female veterans, LGBTQ+ veterans, and those living in rural areas are expected to be disproportionately affected.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
a few seconds ago
- First Post
Zelenskyy calls Alaska summit ‘personal victory' for Putin, says it delays sanctions, ends Russian leader's isolation
'First, he will meet on US territory, which I consider his personal victory. Second, he is coming out of isolation because he is meeting on US territory. Third, with this meeting, he has somehow postponed sanctions,' said Zelenskyy of Putin's visit to Alaska Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Tuesday said that his Russian counterpart has scored a 'personal victory' by receiving an invitation to meet President Donald Trump on US territory, asserting that the move has further delayed sanctions against Moscow. 'First, he will meet on US territory, which I consider his personal victory. Second, he is coming out of isolation because he is meeting on US territory. Third, with this meeting, he has somehow postponed sanctions,' AFP quoted Zelenskyy as telling reporters. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD President Zelenskyy warned that Friday's summit could delay the imposition of new US sanctions on Russia — measures Trump previously vowed to enforce if Putin failed to end the war. Reacting to Trump's suggestion that he and Putin might negotiate a land swap to end the war, Zelenskyy ruled out withdrawing troops from Ukraine's eastern Donbas region as part of a peace deal. 'We will not withdraw from the Donbas… if we withdraw from the Donbas today - our fortifications, our terrain, the heights we control - we will clearly open a bridgehead for the Russians to prepare an offensive,' AFP quoted Zelenskyy as telling reporters. The Donbas region, comprising the eastern Ukrainian territories of Luhansk and Donetsk, has been a key target of Russia since its full-scale invasion began in 2022. Moscow claims both regions as part of its own territory. Zelenskyy, who is not scheduled to take part, has expressed concern that Russia will put forward hardline demands and that Trump will hammer out a deal that will see Ukraine cede swathes of territory. Zelenskyy also said he had received a 'signal' from US envoy Steve Witkoff that Russia might agree to a ceasefire, without elaborating. 'This was the first signal from them,' Zelenskyy added. The summit, set to take place in Alaska on Friday, will be the first between a sitting US and Russian president since 2021 and comes as Trump seeks to broker an end to Russia's nearly three-and-a-half year invasion of Ukraine. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Russia planning new ground assaults On the battlefield, Zelenskyy warned that Russian forces had made significant gains near the coal-mining town of Dobropillia and were preparing fresh ground offensives in at least three separate sectors along the front line. 'Russian units have advanced 10 kilometres (six miles) deep in several spots. They all have no equipment, only weapons in their hands. Some have already been found, some destroyed, some taken prisoner. We will find the rest and destroy them in the near future,' Zelenskyy said. A map from Ukrainian battlefield tracker DeepState — which maintains close ties with the military — showed Russian forces making a double-pronged push roughly 10 kilometers (six miles) deep near Dobropillia, a narrow stretch of the front line. The town, which had a pre-war population of around 30,000, has faced frequent Russian drone strikes. The advance also puts pressure on Kostiantynivka, a heavily damaged city and one of the last major urban centers in Donetsk still under Ukrainian control. Russian troops have been steadily gaining ground for months, exploiting the strain on Ukraine's depleted defenses. The Ukrainian army said Tuesday it was engaged in 'difficult' battles with Russian forces in the east, but denied Russia had a foothold near Dobropillia. 'The situation is difficult and dynamic,' it said in a statement. Trump has described his summit with Putin on Friday as a chance to check the Russian leader's ideas for ending the war. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD European leaders have meanwhile sought to ensure respect for Kyiv's interests. Russia, which invaded Ukraine in 2022, has made costly but incremental gains across the front in recent months and claims to have annexed four Ukrainian regions while still fighting to control them. Ukrainian police meanwhile said that Russian attacks in the past hours had killed three people and wounded 12 others, including a child. With inputs from agencies
Hindustan Times
a few seconds ago
- Hindustan Times
RFK Jr. unveils ‘wholesome meal' initiative for $4 cheaper than Big Mac, netizens say ‘not easy'
US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced that the Trump administration is in discussions to expand the distribution of a 'very wholesome meal for under $5' to underprivileged communities. Kennedy's public health strategy under the Trump administration has focused heavily on the fight against ultra-processed foods. (Reuters) Kennedy's public health strategy under the Trump administration has focused heavily on the fight against ultra-processed foods. Kennedy has called these foods 'poison,' and he has stressed their significance in America's chronic disease epidemic, particularly among disadvantaged groups. It is still quite difficult to find reasonably priced, healthful food in many disadvantaged regions, which are referred to as 'food deserts.' The prevalence of diet-related diseases like diabetes is higher in these places, placing a burden on both public health systems and people. Healthy American diets are essential to Kennedy's goal of 'Make America Healthy Again.' While unveiling a new public health initiative on Monday, he has promised a move away from corporate profit incentives toward real health advances, particularly in marginalized communities. Also Read: What is the reason behind Ashley Biden's divorce from Dr Howard Krein? 'New life, new beginnings…' RFK Jr's reveals plan to provide wholesome meal Speaking to Scripps News, the US Health Secretary stated, 'We're going to launch a new rubric where we, the public health agencies, actually do public health rather than promoting the profit taking by private corporations. And there's some parts though in some underserved communities, there are food deserts where people don't have access to some of these foods. And if they do, sometimes it's too expensive.' Kennedy recognized the challenges in reaching lower socioeconomic groups, but he stressed that 'cheap food is an illusion.' 'If you say this food is cheap and you get diabetes from it, is it really cheap? We're working all over the country in food deserts,' he said. 'We're working with private corporations that are providing good meals. We looked at one company that we met with recently that can provide a very, very wholesome meal for under $5. A Big Mac costs, I think, $9 now,' Kennedy continued. 'You can get high-quality food as we change these rules to incentivize people to buy better food. You're going to see the markets respond, and you're going to see better food going into these food deserts,' he added. What we know about Big Mac meal According to McDonald's, the average cost of a Big Mac meal in the US in 2024 was approximately $9.29, whereas a Big Mac alone costs $5.29. However, costs may differ depending on where you are. According to Tasting Table, the price of a Big Mac may range from $8.69 in some places, such as New York, to less in other places. Internet reacts to RFK Jr's plan While Kennedy made no mention of the meals or the businesses that would produce them, several netizens were quick to react on his proposed plan. 'Would love to see exact details on the company and its food products. If they are actually good quality, this would be revolutionary for places around the country,' one X user wrote. 'Great idea! I wish there were grants for cooking classes and food trucks to roam the poorest streets throwing out fresh fruits for all!' another said. 'One of the most important things that needs to happen is fixing food deserts. Praying he can get this done. Not easy,' a third person stated.
Economic Times
a few seconds ago
- Economic Times
Hello, Mr Trump? Hello? Why New Delhi's outreach isn't reaching the only man who matters
'The number you've dialled is currently busy' It didn't have to come to this. India-US relations are in desperate need of Operation Salvage and a restorative touch. Donald Trump's insults and excessive tariffs on India totalling 50% are threatening to bury the relationship, a fate neither side can say that this too shall pass, and India will ride it out, but decisions made now, when tempers are high and vision is clouded, can affect the relationship for years to come. The famed friendship between Trump and Narendra Modi is already a casualty of the crisis. It's clear that Trump makes all the major decisions - be it to bend, to mend or to upend relations with other countries. He is the only one who matters, but India appears to have no effective channel to him that one can detect. It's proving to be the biggest gap in India's diplomacy. Meanwhile, Asim Munir was on his second visit to the US in less than two months, allegedly issuing nuclear threats against India and attending the farewell of the Centcom commander, Michael Kurilla, on the Delhi, clearly out of favour with Trump, is reduced to looking for a side door entry into Washington. MEA's adroit welcoming of Trump's peace-making efforts with Vladimir Putin and with Armenia and Azerbaijan was dip in relations comes against the backdrop of growing anti-India feeling within the MAGA ecosystem. Prominent MAGA voices are spewing venom against Indians on social media as job stealers, brown hordes, builders of 'pagan temples' and followers of strange-looking gods. It's ugly. Anger against H-1Bs - always present - has burst into the open. Trump's top political and immigration adviser, Stephen Miller, is leading the charge - there's little political price to pay for denigrating who think Trump will stand in the way because of economic compulsions may be in for a shock. He won't irk his base for India, especially when he feels aggrieved by Indian officials say multiple channels are at work to reach the president. But no breakthrough is discernible. The vast tech ecosystem has not been mobilised. Ditto for the diaspora and Indian-American donors, one of whom has gone public with offers of help. Asha Jadeja Motwani, one of the biggest donors with close to $2.5 mn to the Republican National Committee, who knows J D Vance and commerce secretary Howard Lutnick, has repeatedly said on X she can intervene on India's behalf. But she hasn't heard from the Indian embassy, she into Trump's inner circle should have ideally been made during the campaign and continuously broadened after he won. Assumptions that India can 'manage' Trump, depend on China hawks to keep the balance, and make tactical concessions on trade to keep Trump in good humour have proven painfully re-engagement with Pakistan came as a shock. Yes, the US has a long history with Pakistan, but the latest phase caught India unawares. Not knowing meant no preventive diplomacy and no chance for a counteroffensive. One can take refuge under the umbrella that everything about this president is crazy, all countries are suffering, and India is no exception - all true - but the fact remains that some countries have done better than some resentment against India in the aftermath of Op Sindoor has proved to be the main problem that compounds with each passing day. After the third time Trump claimed credit for the ceasefire, it should have become clear his umbrage was real and required a political touch. Perhaps it was unwise to dismiss it as 'Trump being Trump' as most of us did. Early outreach might have helped, but diplomatic wisdom ordained others have said, Modi could have called, finessed the whole thing, and acknowledged him as a 'peace president' without ceding ground on third-party mediation in Kashmir. This is not an argument for 'kissing the ring', but a call could have been used to creatively pull Trump into India's corner, thank him for 'pressuring' Pakistan into a ceasefire, and to remind him he has always been against terrorism and that peace in South Asia depends on ending cross- border that hindsight is 20/20, and no one can predict how Trump would have responded. But a more innovative approach was worth a try. Instead, Trump's capriciousness and extractive tactics, combined with India's stern diplomacy, have pushed the relationship to an uncertain place. Ignoring the personal has come at a heavy price, with Trump going the extra mile to punish India, to say nothing of the negative on both sides claim that apart from Trump, the relationship continues 'apace', citing bilateral activity as proof. Frankly, it doesn't ring true. This has been a reality check, and unless something changes dramatically, the coming three years under Trump with this level of difficulty will be hard. Riding it out with an actively hostile president in the White House? (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. As 50% US tariff looms, 6 key steps that can safeguard Indian economy As big fat Indian wedding slims to budget, Manyavar loses lustre Why are mid-cap stocks fizzling out? It's not just about Trump tariffs. The airport lounge war has begun — and DreamFolks is losing Stock Radar: UNO Minda eyeing fresh 52-week high in next few weeks; check target and stop loss for long positions Buy, Sell or Hold: Antique recommends buy on Siemens; Avendus upgrades SBI to Buy post June quarter results Stock picks of the week: 5 stocks with consistent score improvement and upside potential of up to 25% Weekly Top Picks: These stocks scored 10 on 10 on Stock Reports Plus
