
Trump gutted the National Climate Assessment. America will suffer as a result.
The National Climate Assessment is more than just a report. Aside from its unique status as the authoritative statement on the state of climate change in America, it is also an expression of service and passion from the national climate community to our fellow citizens.
The National Climate Assessment is developed through an incredibly rigorous process, which includes exacting deadlines and multiple rounds of scientific, technical and public review. This is all followed by closely monitored and recorded revisions and thoughtful consideration given by the author teams of each chapter.
By law, an updated report is delivered to Congress and released to the public every four years.
The Fifth National Climate Assessment, published in 2023, was late getting started. Authors — all of whom volunteer their time to contribute to the report — faced truncated draft deadlines that challenged even seasoned academic writers. For someone like me, it meant long nights pouring over reports and academic papers, seeking to bolster my understanding and expert perspective of climate change in the Midwest, and then pour out that expertise into a brief, unbiased, well-cited sentences. I cried — some nights, I cried a lot.
Despite the challenging timeline, the director of the Fifth National Climate Assessment didn't choose the easy path of doing what's always been done before. Instead, she further challenged us to seek out lived expertise, traditional ecological knowledge and credible, non-peer reviewed sources of information that would explain the changes that are occurring, what the risks are if we do not adapt and what options or strategies are there for taking action. We were, in my opinion, asked to write the closest thing the U.S. has ever had to a national climate adaptation report.
The Fifth National Climate Assessment didn't stop there. Authors of the report and the team at the U.S. Global Change Research Program recognized that sharing the story of climate change needed to happen through many mediums. Dedicated, insightful colleagues launched the Art x Climate project, soliciting art from across the country, showcasing what climate means to people — young and old, rural and urban, from all races and genders. The results of the competition were integrated into the report and have made the report itself a beautiful work of art.
Finally, a poetry anthology titled 'Dear Human at the Edge of Time' was published ahead of the report. It features the voices of many authors of the assessment and gave an opportunity for these scholars, activists and practitioners to transform their climate passion into climate poetry.
Contributing to the National Climate Assessment and attending the in-person meeting of over 400 authors, technical reviewers and editors was the most meaningful thing I have done in my climate career. I remember standing in the room and feeling overwhelmed at the magnitude of the effort and selflessness of people who were volunteering their time, expertise, knowledge and passion to this national resource.
But on April 29 of this year, the authors of the Sixth National Climate Assessment, due out in 2027, received a brief and unexpected message: 'Thank you for your participation in the 6th National Climate Assessment. At this time, the scope of the NCA6 is currently being reevaluated in accordance with the Global Change Research Act of 1990. We are now releasing all current assessment participants from their roles.'
The dismissal of the 400 authors followed closely on the heels of the firing of the majority of the Global Change Research Program staff and contractors who provided the leadership, coordination and technical support for the report and other direction across 15 federal agencies. The Trump administration is already acting to seed any future version of the assessment with climate denialism. These actions ignore decades of science and, more importantly, they put American communities at increasing risk in a rapidly changing climate.
I am beside myself at losing this resource. I don't want to become immune to feeling pain, shame, loss, sadness just because this awful administration continues committing unlawful, unethical and despicable acts. I don't want the erasure of my work — and the work of my colleagues and friends — to be normalized, when it is not normal and not acceptable. I am tired of trying to be okay when I am not okay. And I'm not okay because these are not remotely okay times.
The National Climate Assessment is more than a report. It is a selfless contribution that the climate community painstakingly compiles, expertly reviews and earnestly delivers to the American people. It is only one of the many meaningful, necessary and useful acts of human creation that are being erased by a small group of lawless ideologues who are undermining what truly makes this country great.
Beth Gibbons is the inaugural director of the Resiliency Office in Washtenaw County, Mich. She is a former executive director of the American Society of Adaptation Professionals. She served on the Federal Advisory Council on Climate Change Adaptation under President Biden and was a contributing author to the Fifth National Climate Assessment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
4 hours ago
- Associated Press
Medicaid enrollees fear losing health coverage if Congress enacts work requirements
It took Crystal Strickland years to qualify for Medicaid, which she needs for a heart condition. Strickland, who's unable to work due to her condition, chafed when she learned that the U.S. House has passed a bill that would impose a work requirement for many able-bodied people to get health insurance coverage through the low-cost, government-run plan for lower-income people. 'What sense does that make?' she asked. 'What about the people who can't work but can't afford a doctor?' The measure is part of the version of President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful' bill that cleared the House last month and is now up for consideration in the Senate. Trump is seeking to have it passed by July 4. The bill as it stands would cut taxes and government spending — and also upend portions of the nation's social safety net. For proponents, the ideas behind the work requirement are simple: Crack down on fraud and stand on the principle that taxpayer-provided health coverage isn't for those who can work but aren't. The measure includes exceptions for those who are under 19 or over 64, those with disabilities, pregnant women, main caregivers for young children, people recently released from prisons or jails — or during certain emergencies. It would apply only to adults who receive Medicaid through expansions that 40 states chose to undertake as part of the 2010 health insurance overhaul. Many details of how the changes would work would be developed later, leaving several unknowns and causing anxiety among recipients who worry that their illnesses might not be enough to exempt them. Advocates and sick and disabled enrollees worry — based largely on their past experience — that even those who might be exempted from work requirements under the law could still lose benefits because of increased or hard-to-meet paperwork mandates. Benefits can be difficult to navigate even without a work requirement Strickland, a 44-year-old former server, cook and construction worker who lives in Fairmont, North Carolina, said she could not afford to go to a doctor for years because she wasn't able to work. She finally received a letter this month saying she would receive Medicaid coverage, she said. 'It's already kind of tough to get on Medicaid,' said Strickland, who has lived in a tent and times and subsisted on nonperishable food thrown out by stores. 'If they make it harder to get on, they're not going to be helping.' Steve Furman is concerned that his 43-year-old son, who has autism, could lose coverage. The bill the House adopted would require Medicaid enrollees to show that they work, volunteer or go to school at least 80 hours a month to continue to qualify. A disability exception would likely apply to Furman's son, who previously worked in an eyeglasses plant in Illinois for 15 years despite behavioral issues that may have gotten him fired elsewhere. Furman said government bureaucracies are already impossible for his son to navigate, even with help. It took him a year to help get his son onto Arizona's Medicaid system when they moved to Scottsdale in 2022, and it took time to set up food benefits. But he and his wife, who are retired, say they don't have the means to support his son fully. 'Should I expect the government to take care of him?' he asked. 'I don't know, but I do expect them to have humanity.' There's broad reliance on Medicaid for health coverage About 71 million adults are enrolled in Medicaid now. And most of them — around 92% — are working, caregiving, attending school or disabled. Earlier estimates of the budget bill from the Congressional Budget Office found that about 5 million people stand to lose coverage. A KFF tracking poll conducted in May found that the enrollees come from across the political spectrum. About one-fourth are Republicans; roughly one-third are Democrats. The poll found that about 7 in 10 adults are worried that federal spending reductions on Medicaid will lead to more uninsured people and would strain health care providers in their area. About half said they were worried reductions would hurt the ability of them or their family to get and pay for health care. Amaya Diana, an analyst at KFF, points to work requirements launched in Arkansas and Georgia as keeping people off Medicaid without increasing employment. Amber Bellazaire, a policy analyst at the Michigan League for Public Policy, said the process to verify that Medicaid enrollees meet the work requirements could be a key reason people would be denied or lose eligibility. 'Massive coverage losses just due to an administrative burden rather than ineligibility is a significant concern,' she said. One KFF poll respondent, Virginia Bell, a retiree in Starkville, Mississippi, said she's seen sick family members struggle to get onto Medicaid, including one who died recently without coverage. She said she doesn't mind a work requirement for those who are able — but worries about how that would be sorted out. 'It's kind of hard to determine who needs it and who doesn't need it,' she said. Some people don't if they might lose coverage with a work requirement Lexy Mealing, 54 of Westbury, New York, who was first diagnosed with breast cancer in 2021 and underwent a double mastectomy and reconstruction surgeries, said she fears she may lose the medical benefits she has come to rely on, though people with 'serious or complex' medical conditions could be granted exceptions. She now works about 15 hours a week in 'gig' jobs but isn't sure she can work more as she deals with the physical and mental toll of the cancer. Mealing, who used to work as a medical receptionist in a pediatric neurosurgeon's office before her diagnosis and now volunteers for the American Cancer Society, went on Medicaid after going on short-term disability. 'I can't even imagine going through treatments right now and surgeries and the uncertainty of just not being able to work and not have health insurance,' she said. Felix White, who has Type I diabetes, first qualified for Medicaid after losing his job as a computer programmer several years ago. The Oreland, Pennsylvania, man has been looking for a job, but finds that at 61, it's hard to land one. Medicaid, meanwhile, pays for a continuous glucose monitor and insulin and funded foot surgeries last year, including one that kept him in the hospital for 12 days. 'There's no way I could have afforded that,' he said. 'I would have lost my foot and probably died.' ___ Associated Press writer Susan Haigh in Hartford, Connecticut contributed to this article.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Minnesota Shootings Shake Capitol Hill, Spark Security Fears
The names of some congressional officials from the state were listed in the suspected shooter's papers.

Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
'The BresnaVan' brings government to the people with new mobile office
Jun. 14—WILKES-BARRE — U.S. Rep. Rob Bresnahan Jr. said this week that he wants to make government more accessible, responsive and present in every corner of the district. Enter "The BresnaVan." "The BresnaVan will allow us to reach communities where we don't have permanent offices and make sure every constituent has access to the support and services they deserve," said Rep. Bresnahan, R-Dallas Township. Bresnahan announced the launch of a new initiative to expand constituent services across Pennsylvania's 8th Congressional District with the introduction of a mobile office, known as the "BresnaVan." Bresnahan said he has made history as the first member of Congress in Pennsylvania to launch a mobile constituent office. "This is an investment in the people of Northeastern Pennsylvania to break down barriers to ensure in-person access to staff for all PA-08 constituents," Rep. Bresnahan said. "The BresnaVan will travel across the district, reaching areas where we do not have permanent offices. Scheduled visits will be announced in advance, giving residents the opportunity to interact with staff who are able to assist with federal agencies, outreach, and other services. The mobile office will also partner with local officials to help address community needs on the ground." Designed with the people of Northeast Pennsylvania in mind, Bresnahan said the BresnaVan features unique design elements — subtle "Easter eggs" — that celebrate the region's culture, landmarks and traditions. It also prominently displays office locations, addresses and contact numbers to ensure residents can easily access support. What the BresnaVan offers The BresnaVan is a fully-equipped mobile office staffed by knowledgeable caseworkers ready to help with: —Navigating federal agencies. —Accessing veterans' benefits. —Social Security and Medicare issues. —IRS and tax matters. —Passport services. —And much more. By traveling to areas without permanent offices, the BresnaVan ensures no constituent is left without a direct line to our office. For details on the BresnaVan and how to access constituent services, visit Rep. Bresnahan's website. Reach Bill O'Boyle at 570-991-6118 or on Twitter @TLBillOBoyle.