logo
Emmanuel Macron's Wife Seen Shoving French Prime Minister's Face Moments After Arriving in Vietnam

Emmanuel Macron's Wife Seen Shoving French Prime Minister's Face Moments After Arriving in Vietnam

Video footage of French Prime Minister Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigette Macron, in what appears to be a lover's quarrel, as they arrived in Vietnam for a state visit is being widely circulated on social media.
The clip, captured moments after Macron and his wife touched down at the Noi Bai International Airport in Hanoi to kick off his Southeast Asia tour, appears to show the first lady shoving Macron in the face moments after the presidential plane's door opens up.
Brigette Macron remains concealed by the body of the aircraft but the French prime minister, seemingly taken aback by the shove, waves to the camera seconds later before making his way back inside the cabin.
The couple proceed down the staircase for the official welcome by Vietnamese officials, though Brigitte Macron does not take her husband's offered arm.
Macron's Office Responds to the Video, Claims it was a Harmless 'Squabble'
Macron's office initially denied the authenticity of the images, before they were confirmed as genuine. A close associate of the president later described the incident as a couple's harmless "squabble."
Another member of his entourage played down the significance of the incident. "It was a moment when the president and his wife were decompressing one last time before the start of the trip by joking around," the second source told reporters.
"It's a moment of togetherness. No more was needed to feed the mills of the conspiracy theorists," the source added, blaming pro-Russian accounts for negative comments about the incident.
This isn't the first time this month that the French minister's has gone viral on social media for the wrong reasons. Earlier this month, conspiracy theorists circulated a video showing Macron sitting at a table with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
They claimed the European leaders were trying to hide their drug use with what appeared to be a plastic bag with white powder in it on the table. The claim was later refuted by fact-checking websites with high-resolution images revealing that the white object in the video was, in fact, a tissue.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump ‘open' to meeting leaders of Ukraine, Russia to push ceasefire
Trump ‘open' to meeting leaders of Ukraine, Russia to push ceasefire

Business Times

timean hour ago

  • Business Times

Trump ‘open' to meeting leaders of Ukraine, Russia to push ceasefire

[ISTANBUL] US President Donald Trump is 'open' to meeting his Russian and Ukrainian counterparts in Turkey, the White House said, after the two sides failed on Monday to make headway towards an elusive ceasefire. Delegations from both sides did, however, agree another large-scale prisoner exchange in their meeting in Istanbul, which in mid-May also hosted their first round of face-to-face talks. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan proposed that Russian President Vladimir Putin, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Trump come together for a third round later this month in either Istanbul or Ankara. Putin has thus far refused such a meeting. But Zelensky has said he is willing, underlining that key issues can only be resolved at leaders-level. Trump, who wants a swift end to the three-year war, 'is open to it (a three-way summit) if it comes to that, but he wants both of these leaders and both sides to come to the table together', White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said in Washington. Zelensky said that 'we really expect Trump to take strong steps', and urged the US leader to toughen sanctions on Russia to 'push' it to agree to a full ceasefire. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up In Monday's meeting, Ukraine said that Moscow had rejected its call for an unconditional ceasefire. It offered instead a partial truce of two to three days in some areas of the frontline. Russia will only agree a full ceasefire if Ukrainian troops pull back entirely from four regions, - Donetsk, Lugansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson - according to its negotiating terms reported on by Russian state media. Russia currently only partly controls those regions. Moscow has also demanded a ban on Kyiv joining Nato, limiting Ukraine's military and ending Western military support. Prisoner swap Top negotiators from both sides confirmed their latest talks yielded a deal to swap all severely wounded soldiers as well as all captured fighters under the age of 25. Russia's lead negotiator Vladimir Medinsky said it would involve 'at least 1,000' on each side -- topping the 1,000-for-1,000 POW exchange agreed at talks last month. The two sides also agreed to hand over the bodies of 6,000 killed soldiers, Ukraine said after the talks. 'The Russian side continued to reject the motion of an unconditional ceasefire,' Ukraine's Deputy Foreign Minister Sergiy Kyslytsya told reporters after the talks. Russia said it had offered a limited pause in fighting. 'We have proposed a specific ceasefire for two to three days in certain areas of the front line,' top negotiator Vladimir Medinsky said, adding that this was needed to collect the bodies of dead soldiers from the battlefield. Kyiv said it would study a document the Russian side handed its negotiators outlining its demands for both peace and a full ceasefire. Zelensky said after the Istanbul talks concluded that any deal must not 'reward' Putin. 'The key to lasting peace is clear, the aggressor must not receive any reward for war,' Zelensky said at a press conference in Vilnius alongside several Nato leaders. The Ukrainian president has said a long-term peace deal can only happen once fighting has paused, and has called for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire to cover combat on air, sea and land. 'Constructive atmosphere' Ukrainian Defence Minister Rustem Umerov, who led his country's delegation, called for a next meeting to take place before the end of June. He also said a Putin-Zelensky summit should be discussed. Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan said after the talks - inside a luxury hotel on the banks of the Bosphorus - that they were held 'in a constructive atmosphere'. 'The parties built on the points they had agreed upon during the first meeting,' Fidan said on X. 'During the meeting, the parties decided to continue preparations for a possible meeting at the leader level,' he said. Tens of thousands have been killed since Russia invaded, with swathes of eastern and southern Ukraine destroyed and millions forced to flee their homes in Europe's largest refugee crisis since World War II. In the front-line town of Dobropillya in eastern Ukraine, 53-year-old Volodymyr told AFP he had no hope left for an end to the conflict. 'We thought that everything would stop. And now there is nothing to wait for. We have no home, nothing. We were almost killed by drones,' he said. After months of setbacks for Kyiv's military, Ukraine said it had carried out an audacious attack on Sunday, smuggling drones into Russia and then firing them at airbases, damaging around 40 strategic Russian bombers worth US$7 billion in a major special operation. AFP

Britain faces the most serious military threat since Cold War, Starmer says
Britain faces the most serious military threat since Cold War, Starmer says

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Britain faces the most serious military threat since Cold War, Starmer says

LONDON – Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain vowed on June 2 to bring his country to 'war-fighting readiness,' announcing plans to build up to 12 new attack submarines and invest billions of pounds in weapons, to fortify for a world caught between a hostile, aggressive Russia and a retrenching United States. The ambitious rearmament is part of a strategic defence review by the government, which laid out the threatening new landscape and called for increased production of drones and the stockpiling of more munitions and equipment. 'The threat we now face is more serious, more immediate and more unpredictable than at any time since the Cold War,' Mr Starmer said on June 2 at a shipyard in Glasgow, Scotland. He pointed to 'war in Europe, new nuclear risks, daily cyberattacks' and 'growing Russian aggression,' in British waters and skies. As if to underline his ominous message, Mr Starmer presented his plans hours after one of the most intense aerial bombardments of the three-year war in Ukraine, with Ukrainian drones striking air bases deep in Russian territory. The strategic review, led by Mr George Robertson, a former secretary-general of Nato, was set up last year soon after Mr Starmer won a general election. But its task was given fresh urgency amid growing evidence of President Donald Trump's weakened commitment to European security and his ambivalent and, at times, ingratiating attitude toward President Vladimir Putin of Russia. Among its recommendations: the procurement of up to 7,000 British-built long-range weapons and the creation of a new cybercommand, alongside an investment of £1 billion, equivalent to S$1.7 billion, in digital capability. Money will be invested in protecting critical British underwater infrastructure as well as in drones, which have proved highly effective in the war in Ukraine. More than £1.5 billion of additional funding will be put into repairing and renewing housing for the military to help recruitment and retention in the British army, where numbers have fallen to the lowest level since the Napoleonic era. 'This is the most ambitious defence review for a generation. It needed to be,' said Mr Malcolm Chalmers, deputy director-general of the Royal United Services Institute, a research organisation in London. Britain, he said, 'simultaneously faces two fundamental challenges: one geopolitical and one technological.' On June 2, the government stressed the benefits for the domestic economy of investing in rearmament, but the question hanging over the new strategy is how much, in fiscally strapped times, Britain can afford to spend. Mr Starmer has promised to increase Britain's outlay to 2.5 per cent of gross national product, paying for it by diverting resources from overseas aid. Speaking to the BBC, he said Britain needed 'to go on from there' but added that he could not set a precise date for when that number would rise to 3 per cent until he was sure of exactly where the money would come from. In a statement, the government said its conventionally armed nuclear-powered submarine fleet would be significantly expanded, with up to 12 new vessels to be built as part of a security alliance with the United States and Australia, known as Aukus, which is designed to counter China's growing influence. Questions about the pact have risen as Mr Trump has signaled less of a commitment to far-flung military alliances. Mr Chalmers said Britain's commitment to build more submarines was 'not a hedge against total US disengagement. But it can provide some assurance against a scenario in which the US is no longer prepared to export complete submarines to Australia.' The government described the new strategy as a 'landmark shift in our deterrence and defence: moving to warfighting readiness to deter threats and strengthen security in the Euro Atlantic area.' The review also called for young people to be educated in school about the role of the armed forces as part of a 'national conversation' aimed at strengthening the country's readiness for war, and for a 30 per cent expansion in the number of cadets. Legislation should be introduced to give the government more reserve powers in the event of an escalation toward war, the review suggests. Those could include plans to permit mobilisation of reserves and to allow access to private-sector infrastructure and to industry. Speaking on June 2, Mr Starmer was at pains to restate Britain's commitment to Nato and the trans-Atlantic alliance, a strategy he has pursued by assiduously cultivating Mr Trump on security and trade issues. The review also suggested purchasing fighter jets capable of firing tactical nuclear weapons, a potential harbinger of declining British dependence on the US nuclear umbrella. Writing on social media, Mr Mike Martin, a lawmaker for the Liberal Democrats and a military veteran, said that the details known so far about the review were a 'sign that the UK government no longer fully trusts the Americans to be engaged in European security.' He wrote: 'The drop dead giveaway is the air dropped nuclear weapons,' adding that 'this is a key capability that the US provides that enables nuclear escalation without going all the way up to destroying Moscow with nuclear weapons fired from our submarines.' British governments have produced defence reviews at least once a decade since World War II: The last one was conducted in 2021 and updated in 2023. Mr Robertson, who is now a member of the House of Lords, was assisted by Ms Fiona Hill, a former adviser to the first Trump administration, and Mr Richard Barrons, a former deputy chief of Britain's defence staff. Ms Hill, a British-born expert on Russia, emerged as a vocal critic of Mr Trump's dealings with Mr Putin after she left the National Security Council in July 2019. The tone of the latest document was in contrast to the one produced four years ago in which the Conservative government of Mr Boris Johnson promised to bind itself closer to the United States. That review laid out Mr Johnson's vision of a post-Brexit 'Global Britain,' one that his successors largely discarded and which Mr Starmer has replaced with an effort to reset ties with the European Union. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Ukrainian strikes cut power to Russian-held areas, officials say
Ukrainian strikes cut power to Russian-held areas, officials say

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Ukrainian strikes cut power to Russian-held areas, officials say

Ukrainian shelling and drone attacks triggered power cuts over swathes of Russian-controlled territory in Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions in the south of Ukraine, Russia-installed officials said early on Tuesday. Officials said there was no effect on operations at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power station - Europe's largest nuclear facility which was seized by Russia in the weeks after Moscow's February 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Russian officials running the plant said radiation levels were normal at the facility, which operates in shutdown mode and produces no power at the moment. Russia-installed governors in the two regions said the Ukrainian attacks prompted authorities to introduce emergency measures and switch key sites to reserve power sources. Power was knocked out to all parts of Zaporizhzhia under Russian control, Russia-installed Governor Yevgeny Belitsky wrote on Telegram. "As a result of shelling by the Ukrainian Armed Forces, high-voltage equipment was damaged in the northwestern part of the Zaporizhzhia region," Belitsky wrote. "There is no electricity throughout the region. The Energy Ministry of Zaporizhzhia region has been instructed to develop reserve sources of power. Health care sites have been transferred to reserve power sources." In adjacent Kherson region, farther west, Russia-appointed Governor Vladimir Saldo said debris from fallen drones had damaged two substations, knocking out power to more than 100,000 residents of 150 towns and villages in Russian-held areas. Emergency crews working to restore power quickly, he said. For many long months in the winter, it was Ukrainian towns and villages that endured repeated electricity cuts as Russian attacks focused strikes on generating capacity. Each side has repeatedly accused the other of launching attacks on the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant and running the risk of a nuclear accident. The U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, said last week in response to a Ukrainian complaint that it saw no sign that Russia was preparing to restart the Zaporizhzhia plant and connect it to the Russian grid. The IAEA has stationed monitors permanently at Zaporizhzhia and Ukraine's other nuclear power stations. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store