B-2 bombers on route to Guam just before Trump's D.C. arrival — signals mount ahead of U.S strikes on Iran
B-2 stealth bombers are on their way to Guam, just as President Donald Trump prepares for his return to Washington, D.C. The timing of this deployment is raising questions about a possible U.S. military strike on Iran, especially amid growing tensions in the Middle East. The timing couldn't be more critical. As fighting intensifies between Iran and Israel, the U.S. appears to be gearing up for possible direct involvement. Multiple military sources confirmed that six B-2 Spirit bombers, capable of carrying the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), are being moved to Andersen Air Force Base in Guam—a key U.S. outpost in the Pacific.
According to flight data reviewed by Fox News, six B-2 Spirit bombers left Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri this week, heading toward Andersen Air Force Base in Guam. These bombers were joined by multiple KC-46 Pegasus tankers, which help them refuel mid-air—extending their global reach. The deployment has sparked serious speculation about U.S. plans, especially since B-2s are the only aircraft that can carry the GBU-57 bunker buster, a 30,000-pound bomb built to destroy deeply buried targets like Iran's Fordow nuclear facility. This deployment isn't routine. The B-2 bomber is one of America's most advanced long-range weapons. It's the only aircraft designed to carry the 30,000-pound GBU-57 bunker buster, which can strike deeply buried targets like Iran's Fordow nuclear facility—one of Tehran's most fortified sites. The flight path and tanker support, including KC-46 Pegasus aerial refueling aircraft, suggest these B-2s are being prepared for missions far beyond Guam. Analysts say the bombers could soon reposition to Diego Garcia, a remote Indian Ocean island base with a clear path toward Iranian targets.
A senior U.S. defense official told Fox News that these bombers are 'positioned to rapidly respond if the President gives the order.' It certainly looks that way. Since the Iran–Israel war broke out earlier this month, U.S. forces in the Middle East have been mobilizing quickly. Fighter jets, missile defense systems, and naval assets have been moved across strategic locations including the Persian Gulf, Red Sea, and Eastern Mediterranean. Now, the focus has shifted to the skies. The B-2 deployment to Guam brings America's most precise and deadly airstrike capability closer to the conflict zone. Trump, who resumed presidential duties in January 2025, has made it clear in recent statements that Iran's nuclear escalation 'will not be tolerated.' While Washington has publicly called for a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, behind the scenes, military options are being actively reviewed. A source close to U.S. Central Command said, 'The window is narrowing. If Iran crosses the uranium enrichment threshold or hits Israeli civilian targets again, we expect a green light for strikes within days.'Diego Garcia is often used when the U.S. wants to strike in the Middle East without relying on regional allies' airspace. The island is British territory but leased to the U.S. military and has been a base for bomber operations in previous wars, including the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts. If B-2s are shifted from Guam to Diego Garcia, it could be the clearest sign yet that a U.S. strike on Iran's nuclear program is imminent. The Fordow facility is buried under a mountain and would require a powerful weapon like the GBU-57, launched from a stealth platform, to destroy it. That's what makes the B-2 bomber deployment so significant at this moment. The signs are pointing that way. The deployment of stealth bombers, along with movements of U.S. Navy carrier strike groups like the USS Nimitz and USS Carl Vinson, show a growing military buildup. Fighter jets like the F-22 Raptor, F-16, and F-35 have also been repositioned, along with refueling tankers and missile defense systems across key U.S. bases in the Gulf and Middle East. According to The Times, intelligence sources believe Trump could approve limited airstrikes targeting Iran's nuclear infrastructure within the next two weeks. The goal would be to weaken Iran's ability to enrich uranium without starting a full-scale war. Iran has recently warned the U.S. and Israel of 'consequences' if attacks continue. Tensions spiked after Israel reportedly struck several missile sites in Iran, with Tehran promising retaliation. With so many moving parts, Washington appears to be preparing for a worst-case scenario. The Iran–Israel conflict has already left over 4,000 people dead on both sides, according to regional reports. Missile strikes, drone attacks, and cyber warfare have intensified in recent days. Israel reportedly targeted Iranian missile sites and IRGC positions near Isfahan and Shiraz this week, escalating Tehran's threats of retaliation.
With Trump back in D.C. and briefed by top Pentagon officials, decisions are expected quickly. The President may opt for targeted airstrikes on Iran's nuclear infrastructure or command centers if Tehran crosses certain 'red lines.'
While no U.S. attack has been announced officially, the presence of stealth bombers in Guam, the potential use of Diego Garcia, and the broader U.S. military mobilization all point to a readiness posture—not just a show of force.
Q1: Why are B-2 stealth bombers moving to Guam now? To prepare for possible strikes on Iran amid rising tensions.
Q2: Could Diego Garcia be used for Iran airstrikes? Yes, it's a key U.S. base for long-range missions near the Middle East.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
7 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump cancels August vacation in New Jersey to work on Russia-Ukraine
White House Press Secretary Leavitt said Trump skipped his usual vacation, considering working from Bedminster for a few weeks but ultimately deciding not to AP Washington The White House on Tuesday said President Donald Trump called off his traditional summer vacation in northern New Jersey due to the ongoing talks to end the war in Ukraine. Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, confirmed the president's decision. This is normally the time when the president goes on vacation, but not this president, Leavitt said, adding that there were discussions about him working from Bedminster for a couple of weeks but he decided against it. Bedminster is the location of his club in northern New Jersey, where Trump often goes for weekends. He also spent some stretches of time in August there for vacation during his first term. The comments from Leavitt came when the White House took a portion of the day's press pool out to the renovated Rose Garden as the president tested out the area's new speakers. Earlier, Deputy White House Chief of Staff Dan Scavino posted footage showing off new speakers installed as part of Trump's makeover of the White House's Rose Garden. One of Trump's favourite songs, Lee Greenwood's God Bless the USA, blares in the video, over a shot showing patio-style tables shielded by yellow umbrellas. The shot later focuses in on an American flag overhead. Leavitt subsequently brought reporters to the Rose Garden and said Trump was controlling the playlist as crews tested the speakers for what will be the best event in the history of the White House. She said the next party there will be hopefully soon. Other songs being played included Whiter Shade of Pale by Procol Harum. The music was loud enough to be heard in other parts of the White House. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Mint
7 minutes ago
- Mint
Putin calls Zelensky the West's illegitimate puppet. Can he talk peace with him?
The first and only time Russian President Vladimir Putin, right, met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, left, was in Paris in 2019. If Russian President Vladimir Putin agrees to meet his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, as urged by President Trump, he will come face-to-face with a man he has spent 3½ years excoriating as an illegitimate leader and puppet. Negotiating directly with Zelensky would run sharply counter to the narrative Putin has carefully constructed and sold to Russians in an effort to justify his 2022 invasion of Ukraine: that the war is part of a broader conflict with the West in which Zelensky and his country are mere pawns. Trump's call for a meeting puts Putin in a bind. If he declines, he risks angering the U.S. president, who has already threatened him with more sanctions. But sitting down with Zelensky could damage him politically with the Russian elite and the broader public. Trump said Tuesday that he was working to bring the two leaders together as the next phase in his efforts to forge a lasting peace in Ukraine, but he nodded to the challenge at hand. 'They haven't been exactly best friends," he said in an interview with Fox News, adding that Putin and Zelensky will have to iron out details of a possible meeting if they agree to one. The question of Putin's willingness to meet his Ukrainian counterpart has taken center stage following a Trump-Putin summit in Alaska and discussions Monday at the White House between Trump, Zelensky and European leaders. On Tuesday, Russian officials gave little indication they were working toward such a meeting. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said plans for any contacts between officials should be laid out 'with the utmost care." Other Russian officials ridiculed Zelensky as an unserious politician. Agreement from Putin to meet Zelensky won't likely come quickly—or easily. He has dismissed the Ukrainian leader repeatedly as a servant of the West, and has insisted that various complex issues be solved before the two leaders sit down. He has also questioned Zelensky's legitimacy after he extended his mandate beyond the usual five-year term, citing the problems with holding an election during a war. Putin has questioned his authority to sign any peace agreement. Ukrainian servicemen installing antidrone nets in the eastern Donetsk region words 'For Russia' on a wall in Mariupol, which Russian forces captured from Ukraine in 2022. Putin has said a meeting between the two leaders should come at the end of a peace process—and more as a formality to sign the necessary documents. 'I'm ready to meet, but if it's some kind of final stage, so we don't sit there endlessly dividing things up, but bring this to an end," he said in June. 'But we will need the signature of the legitimate authorities." The issues also go far beyond Zelensky. Putin sees the war as part of a broader Russian push to relitigate grievances the country has felt since the end of the Cold War, analysts say. Putin's engagement with the Trump administration is part of an effort to secure an agreement that goes far beyond territorial concessions in Ukraine and concerns the very makeup of Europe's security architecture. 'For Putin, this is a much wider confrontation with the West. And Ukraine is a battlefield between Russia and the West," said Tatiana Stanovaya, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center. 'In Putin's eyes, Zelensky is not a player," she added. 'The fact Ukrainians are fighting at all is because of Western support." Most important, a meeting with Zelensky could end the delicate dance Putin has performed around Trump's peace efforts. To avoid more punishing sanctions, the Kremlin leader has professed his desire for peace while escalating offensives have won Russian troops important gains in the country's east. A summit with Zelensky could bring an unwelcome moment of truth. 'A meeting could indicate that he's really willing to negotiate the end of this war, and I don't think he's ready," said Samuel Charap, veteran Russia watcher and senior political analyst at Rand Corporation. The first and only time Putin met Zelensky was in 2019 at a very different moment in Russian-Ukrainian relations. At the time, Putin appeared to have high hopes for a relationship with his newly elected counterpart who had made peace with Russia a main campaign priority. The meeting between Putin and Zelensky was hailed as a step toward peace after Russia had seized Crimea and backed separatists in eastern Ukraine with soldiers and money. But far from being the start of a working relationship, disagreements erupted over the details of a peace deal, including disengagement across the front line. Ties quickly deteriorated thereafter and the two haven't met since. Since the start of the war, Zelensky has believed that he could make headway in his relationship with Putin if he could sit down face-to-face with the Kremlin leader, but he has also drawn the ire of Moscow by issuing a vaguely worded decree that calls talks with the Kremlin leader impossible. To satisfy Trump and Zelensky's own desire to meet, Putin has said he isn't opposed to talking face-to-face, but that various conditions would need to be met, including signals from Kyiv that it is ready to make serious concessions. Zelensky, for his part, has shown openness to meet without preconditions, most recently abandoning an earlier demand for a cease-fire to facilitate talks. 'If Ukraine begins setting various preconditions for a meeting—including justified ones regarding a cease-fire—then the Russians will present 100 of their own," he said after his meeting with Trump and European leaders in Washington on Monday. 'I think we should meet without conditions and explore what further progress there can be on this path to ending the war." Zelensky has successfully used the Kremlin leader's resistance against him. In May, Trump had expressed his desire for Putin to come to Turkey where he could meet face-to-face with Zelensky. When Putin passed up the chance, Zelensky flew into Turkey and bemoaned how the Kremlin was 'too afraid" to meet. This time, however, the political stakes are higher, adding pressure on the Kremlin leader. With rising demands from Trump and European leaders, Moscow has hinted it will double down on its refusal and continue to paint Zelensky as a dilettante that Putin shouldn't stoop to meet. Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova went on the offensive on Tuesday to level accusations against the Ukrainian leader to justify Putin's own refusal to meet. Ultimately, analysts say, Putin is likely to pour cold water on the idea of a meeting without actually refusing one outright—a strategy he has previously deployed in response to calls for a cease-fire. Agreement over maximalist peace terms that Russia handed to Ukraine in Istanbul, according to Stanovaya, is likely to serve as Moscow's precondition for a meeting. Those terms include Ukraine's disarmament, political neutrality, and abandonment of its aspiration to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. 'What Putin will say now is 'let's do it,' but first we need to talk about common documents we can finalize in such a meeting," she said. 'And we'll find ourselves in the same situation as before the Alaska summit." Write to Thomas Grove at and Matthew Luxmoore at
Mint
7 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump administration to screen immigrants for ‘anti-American' views
The Trump administration plans to scrutinize social media for 'anti-American ideologies" when deciding to grant visa or green-card applications. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the primary agency in charge of legal immigration, said Tuesday that its officers should give significant weight to evidence that an immigrant 'has any involvement in anti-American or terrorist organizations" when reviewing residency, work and visa applications. When it comes to what registers as anti-American ideology, the updated guidance points to a provision of immigration law dating back to the Cold War that prohibits immigrants from becoming U.S. citizens if they are members of communist or anarchist organizations. It doesn't specify the range of speech the administration would categorize as anti-American. The Department of Homeland Security didn't respond to a request for clarification. 'America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies," USCIS spokesman Matthew Tragesser said Tuesday. Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, a national immigrant advocacy group, said relying on broad phrases to determine eligibility to live and work in the U.S. could be problematic. 'The term anti-American is ill-defined and malleable," he said. 'What one person may consider anti-American another person might consider pro-American." The latest directive builds on the agency's April announcement that it would screen immigrants' social media for evidence of antisemitism. As part of that shift, many immigrants, including those applying for tourist or student visas to the U.S., must now submit their social-media handles and make their profiles public for officers to review. It is another step in the Trump administration's goal of not only reducing overall immigration levels, but also in shaping the types of immigrants permitted to come to the country. The administration has also used allegations of anti-American and antisemitic activity against students who have participated in pro-Palestine protests. The administration also tightened citizenship standards last week in a separate policy memorandum that said applicants will need to prove 'good moral character." That includes contributing to the community, having a good education, holding down a job and paying taxes on time, according to Homeland Security. Write to Jack Morphet at Victoria Albert at and Michelle Hackman at
