NH House votes to criminalize helping minors receive abortions — but avoids the word abortion
An earlier version of the bill specified that this was — at least originally — about abortions. (Getty Images)
New Hampshire Republican lawmakers are working to make it illegal to help a minor travel to receive an abortion without parental permission, and they got one step closer to making that happen on Wednesday.
The New Hampshire House of Representatives voted, 180-164, to pass House Bill 191, which would make it a crime in the state to knowingly transport an unemancipated minor to receive a 'surgical procedure' without a parent's notarized permission. It also opens people up to civil lawsuits if they do so. Under the bill, a first offense would be a misdemeanor and a third offense would be a felony.
However, an earlier version of the bill specified that this was — at least originally — about abortions. The original text of the bill made it illegal to help a minor receive an 'abortion' without their parents' permission. The criteria for what constitutes a violation under the proposed law was also broader in the original text. The bill originally made it illegal to hide the fact that a minor is receiving an abortion or help them obtain an abortion, whether surgical or through drugs, without parental permission. However, before the House voted on the bill, it was amended to limit the scope and to change 'abortion' to 'surgical procedure.'
On the House floor, Rep. Alissandra Murray, a Manchester Democrat, argued the amendment 'attempts to conceal the real motives of obstructing abortion access.' She also said the amendment created 'unnecessary confusion' and means the bill would require 'notarized consent to drive a teen to get their tonsils removed or face criminalizing grandma.'
Republicans supporting the bill didn't buy that argument.
'I cannot imagine any world where anybody in this room can come up with a scenario where it's OK for somebody else to take their child for a scheduled medical procedure and them not have to know about it,' Rep. Jennifer Rhodes, a Winchester Republican, said. 'I wonder what that could be. Doesn't make any sense to me.'
The bill will need approval from the Senate and the governor before it can become law. Prior to Wednesday's vote, the bill was approved by the House Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee in a 9-7 vote.
Abortion has been legal up to 24 weeks of pregnancy in New Hampshire since 2021. The law has exceptions for medical emergencies and fetal abnormalities, but not for rape or incest.
There was an unsuccessful effort to further restrict that this year though. House Bill 476, sponsored by Wolfeboro Republican Rep. Katy Peternel, sought to ban abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy with exceptions for medical emergencies and fetal abnormalities. However, the House withdrew the bill in February after Peternel and her cosponsors no longer stood behind it.
This comes after Gov. Kelly Ayotte, a Republican, promised on multiple occasions, including during her inaugural address, that she would not approve legislation restricting abortion beyond the 24-week limitation already in place. House and Senate Republican leaders made similar promises during election season last year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House-Senate conference committee on budget formed
Legislative leaders have named the eight budget writers they want to resolve the seismic split between competing versions of a two-year spending plan that cleared each house of the New Hampshire Legislature. Senate President Sharon Carson and House Speaker Sherman Packard, both R-Londonderry, acted quickly in a sign that it could take some time for the two sides to find common ground. 'There are differences between the House and Senate-approved versions of the state budget. We look forward to working through them over the next two weeks and remain committed to delivering a balanced budget that protects New Hampshire taxpayers while serving all Granite Staters,' Packard and Carson said in a joint statement. As the first-named House member, Rep. Kenneth Weyler, R-Kingston, is likely to become chairman of the conference committee. Weyler chaired the House Finance Committee. The other four House members, who also serve on Weyler's committee, are Vice Chairman Dan McGuire, R-Kingston, House Deputy Majority Leader Joe Sweeney, R-Salem, Rep. Jose Cambrils, R-Loudon and Rep. Mary Jane Wallner, D-Concord and the ranking Democrat. Packard decided to name some alternates who had other experiences beyond writing the budget. The potential stand-ins are House Majority Leader Jason Osborne, R-Auburn, House Executive Departments and Administration Committee Vice Chairman Erica Layon, R-Derry, House Ways and Means Chairman John Janigian, R-Salem, Rep. Keith Erf, R-Weare, and Rep. Jess Edwards, R-Auburn. Erf and Edwards each co-chair subcommittees on the House Finance Committee. Carson names herself to commitee Carson chose to name herself as the first senator on the panel along with Senate Finance Chairman James Gray, R-Rochester, and Senate Deputy Democratic Leader Cindy Rosenwald of Nashua, the ranking Democratic Senate budget writer. The only Senate alternate is Majority Leader Regina Birdsell, R-Hampstead. Most House speakers don't get involved directly in state budget negotiations. It's not unusual for Senate presidents to get into the fray, however. Carson's predecessor, former Senate President Chuck Morse, took the gavel after serving as Senate finance chairman for many years. The House and Senate meet Thursday to complete the naming of all conference committees that will try and forge compromise on other bills. They have until June 19 to reach agreements and then the House and Senate have to vote on all of them by June 26. The $15.4 billion House-passed budget relied on conservative revenue estimates, which meant their budget writers had to make deep cuts in spending. The House plan would lay off 100 workers in the state prison system and do away with the Office of the Child Advocate, the state Division on the Arts, the Commission on Aging and the Housing Appeals Board. The Senate updated the predictions for revenue, which meant it could spend about $250 million more in state dollars than the House plan did. The Senate budget pared the layoffs down to about 25 in the Department of Corrections. It kept the child advocate office in the running while erasing four of nine jobs, revived support for the arts by proposing a new business tax credit for companies that donate to the program and restoring groups on aging and housing appeals, though with smaller budgets than the ones that Gov. Kelly Ayotte proposed last February. The Senate plan also increased by nearly $70 million the level of state aid to the University System of New Hampshire compared to the House budget. USNH would receive in the Senate proposal $85 million a year, about a 10% cut from its support in the current state budget that ends June 30. klandrigan@
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump, Newsom collide over LA unrest
The fight between President Trump and California Gov. Gavin Newsom over unrest in Los Angeles reached new heights on Monday, with Trump saying he'd support the arrest of one of the top Democrats in the country and a possible presidential contender in 2028. Escalating protests in the City of Angels over raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement have pitted the two leaders together in a clash that has obvious political opportunities for Trump and risks for Newsom. For Trump, California provides a reliable foil as he aggressively pushes a crackdown on immigration. The images of burning cars and masked men waving Mexican flags form the perfect backdrop for the 'law and order' message the Trump White House says it will impose on the nation. And the images are weapons to use in Trump's argument that Democrats are too soft and unable to keep cities safe from violent unrest. There are opportunities for Newsom, too, as the battle provides a chance for the high-profile Democrat to stand up to Trump in a way that could bolster his standing the liberal grassroots. 'The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America,' Newsom posted Monday on the social platform X shortly after Trump's comments about arresting him. 'I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation — this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism.' Yet there are clear risks for Newsom as well if voters see him as too soft on those committing criminal acts in Los Angeles. Team Trump on Monday pushed its argument that the California leader and other Democrats cannot be trusted to keep the peace after Newsom said his state would sue the administration over its decision to send the National Guard to LA without the approval of local officials. 'Gavin Newsom's feckless leadership is directly responsible for the lawless riots and violent attacks on law enforcement in Los Angeles. Instead of filing baseless lawsuits meant to score political points with his left-wing base, Newsom sho/uld focus on protecting Americans by restoring law and order to his state,' White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said. If there is a risk for Trump, it is likely a familiar one to past presidents in both parties: overreaching. Trump is beginning the week by becoming the first U.S. president to send the National Guard to a state without the approval of local officials since President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1965, who at the time was seeking to protect civil rights protesters in the segregated South. At the end of the week, Trump plans to hold a full military parade. Both decisions feed into the Democratic narrative that he is a dangerous president with authoritarian impulses, an argument Newsom leaned into Monday. 'This is a real battle for both of them,' said one Democratic strategist before turning to the potential risks for the president. 'Trump thinks this is politically helpful for him and he's marginally right, but he has a tendency to overreach,' the strategist said. On the other hand, Newsom, the strategist said, 'is trying to balance this kind of reshaping of his public narrative as not your average San Francisco liberal. He's trying to position himself as a national liberal. Shaking off some of that image is showing a stiff upper lip in a situation like this.' Trump and Newsom have been political rivals for years, with the dynamic vacillating between fierce criticism and occasional displays of collegiality. Even on Monday, Trump called Newsom a 'nice guy' who he liked before adding that the Californian was 'grossly incompetent.' Newsom has praised Trump during times of crisis, including early in the coronavirus pandemic and during natural disasters that have impacted his state. The two men had a friendly exchange on the tarmac in January when Trump visited California to tour wildfire damage, and Trump hosted Newsom at the White House in February. But their dynamic has more frequently been marked by animosity. Trump and his allies have for years painted California as a symbol of everything wrong with liberal governance, pointing to high taxes, government regulation and issues with homelessness and immigration. Trump frequently berates the governor as 'Newscum' and has threatened to withhold federal funding from the state. Newsom has used his perch as governor of the most populous state in the nation to aggressively criticize Trump and his policies. Democrats and Republicans alike viewed Newsom's emergence as a top Trump critic during the Biden administration as setting himself up for a White House bid of his own. The current situation in LA is a perfect storm for Newsom, said Julian Zelizer, a professor of public affairs and history at Princeton University. 'He has a genuine policy crisis on his hands, a rapid escalation of tensions within Los Angeles and with the president. He is dealing with serious issues of overextension of presidential power,' Zelizer said. 'At the same time as a possible candidate for president, everything is handled through a political prism: If the president turns this against him, makes him look like a candidate who cannot protect law and order, it could be extremely damaging to his own political career.' Trump on Monday would not rule out deploying Marines to California, which would further escalate the situation, though he signaled things seemed to be cooling down. 'We'll see what happens. I think we have it very well under control. I think it would have been a very bad situation,' Trump said at a White House event. 'And we hope to have the support of Gavin, because Gavin is the big beneficiary as we straighten out his problems.' Garry South, a prominent Democratic strategist based in California, said the idea of sending troops to the Golden State is dangerous. 'Newsom is doing the right thing both substantively and politically — by pushing back on Trump's unprecedented militarization of domestic policy,' he said. 'It's a fraught moment for our democracy, for a president to turn troops loose on the American people. 'Like everything Trump does, it's all for political benefit, to make himself look like a tough guy to his MAGA base by taking on California, but it's just another warning sign that we could end up being Chile under Pinochet if he is unchecked,' South added. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wheat ambassador connecting dots between Kansas crop fields, Kenyan refugee camps
Justin Gilpin, CEO of the Kansas Wheat Commission for 16 years, is in Washington, D.C., to lobby Congress in support of the idea that international food assistance programs are a tool to fight hunger, build global markets and help Kansas farmers. (Jill Hummels for Kansas Reflector) TOPEKA — Justin Gilpin visited a remote, windswept camp in northern Kenya serving hundreds of thousands of refugees fleeing conflicts in Somalia, Ethiopia, Uganda and South Sudan. 'To be able to see that and witness that firsthand, it was emotionally exhausting for sure,' said Gilpin, chief executive officer of the Kansas Wheat Commission and Kansas Association of Wheat Growers. 'Seeing how many young people — that was probably the thing I wasn't prepared for.' Gilpin took part in a food distribution line serving more than 250,000 refugees. Their rations had been cut to 40% of the caloric-intake goal, he said. He was in Kenya during February, a period that coincided with movement by the administration of President Donald Trump to dismantle operations of the U.S. Agency for International Development. Since 1961, USAID facilitated delivery of food, water and medicine through a humanitarian program that also provided aid to farmers and promoted peace. On Monday, Gilpin joined about 400 others in Washington, D.C., for the U.S. Global Leadership Coalition's 2025 Impact Forum. Representatives of business, agriculture, faith, nonprofit and national security organizations gathered in advance of Tuesday meetings with members of Congress in a bid to promote U.S. diplomatic and development efforts in the world. In Gilpin's case, he planned to argue the United States must not lose its grip on initiatives dedicated to international agricultural market development and global food security. Consider this: Kansas needs to find foreign markets for half its annual wheat crop despite a period of unusually volatile economics. 'At the end of the day, the U.S. and the Kansas wheat farmers want an opportunity to participate in global trade with fair trade,' Gilpin said. 'We want to be able to address trade barriers that might exist around the world.' In February, U.S. Sen. Jerry Moran and U.S. Rep. Tracey Mann, both Kansas Republicans, introduced legislation to shift Food for Peace from USAID to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. 'How do we maintain the integrity of that meaningful program? Can it fall under USDA?' Gilpin said in an interview. He said Food for Peace could to be reformulated to provide the Trump administration with confidence it was accountable to taxpayers. The program could be recast to demonstrate it made the United States both stronger and safer, he said. 'As long as it checks the boxes of what this administration wants to see out of foreign policy and foreign assistance … those are the kind of conversations we want to be a part of,' he said. Gilpin said his personal experience in Kenya offered insight into ways international assistance programs led by major food producing countries could promote societal stability. 'Humanitarian and emergency assistance is to help bring stability to people who have been displaced by things out of their control,' he said.
