
Letters to the Editor: Holzhauer's positive actions stand out on divisive council; Mendrick wrong on almost every point in gubernatorial bid
'Public debate,' 'fight' and 'heated' are some of the words used in the last two years to describe Naperville City Council meetings. They have become openly partisan and divisive in the last two years, lacking the cooperation and good governance goals of previous councils that resulted in many accolades being bestowed upon Naperville.
Council member Ian Holzhauer has been the target of some of the partisan attacks, yet he has managed to rise above the political fray and even defend fellow council members also singled out on the dais.
Holzhauer has deep connections to Naperville, as a resident and public servant, and it shows in his consistent efforts to support such things as housing for disabled adults, increased funding for mental health for our police and firefighters, and the planned extension of the Riverwalk to Edward Hospital.
And who can forget his support of the LGBTQ+ community when members of this same council singled out NaperPride and wanted to eliminate their SECA funding? His pushback resulted in their regaining funding for their event at Naper Settlement.
He also recently used his knowledge as a contract lawyer in the discussion regarding the early contract renewal requested by the Illinois Municipal Electric Agency, offering some cogent reasons as to why the city should be wary of their request.
Local bodies of government are likely to feel the effects of the turmoil in Washington, D.C., in the coming years before the next election, and Naperville will benefit from having council members like Ian Holzhauer dedicated to serving Naperville and working with his colleagues towards a common goal.
We also recommend fellow incumbent Councilman Benny White and newcomers Mary Gibson and Ashfaq Syed to voters as candidates who believe in cooperation, instead of the sniping and partisan stunts we have seen from the present council.
Steve and Nancy Turner, Naperville
Mendrick wrong on almost every point in gubernatorial bid
I read with skepticism the March 2 article regarding DuPage County Sheriff James Mendrick's run for governor.
His first problem is the city of Chicago, which he says, based on everyone he's asked, should be run more like DuPage County. Obviously he didn't get outside of his own circle with that question.
Next he disparages the state's SAFE-T Act, which eliminates cash bail for nonviolent offenders. His jail would be pretty full and taxpayers would be paying a lot more money if criminals like shoplifters were kept in jail just because they couldn't make bail.
Then he moves on to the sanctuary laws barring local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration authorities. This is clearly a stab at people of color. They don't look like you so you don't want them here.
Next, he was among several county sheriffs who said they would not enforce provisions of the state's ban on certain high-powered, semiautomatic weapons while also saying he will make our state safe again. How are we supposed to be safe when anyone can own a high-powered, semiautomatic weapon?
Next he's on to taking away freedoms. 'Your entire way of life is changing,' he says. Does he mean my freedom to go to a movie or the mall without fear of being mowed down because he doesn't want to enforce the state's gun laws? Or does he mean the freedom of white men to run the show and no one else counts?
And then there was the zinger I knew was coming: God. Democrats have taken God out of society. 'I'm a strong believer in God. I believe that's how I get to where I go,' he said. No arrogance there. Democrats, who want equal rights and freedoms for all, safety for all and the ability to live without the fear of being shot? Who want to protect the freedom to love who you want, have a family when you want, live where you want?
Democrats took God out of society? Democrats are the party that wants all people treated as human beings.
Yes, our entire way of life is changing and under Republican ideology, not for the better. The citizens of this county and this country need to work toward leaving a better world for our children and grandchildren. That picture should include welcoming everyone to our society, banning weapons that eliminate dozens of people in seconds and not electing arrogant men who think God has called them to do exactly the opposite of what God has told everyone to do.
Brenda McDowell, Naperville
Council candidates need to say how they'll achieve change
The several candidates for Naperville City Council all sound alike. They seem to want what they perceive we the voters want. How do we tell the difference? They need to tell us how they plan on achieving these goals. That would be something of substance to help us decide.
Dave Parta, Naperville
Proposed massive EPA cuts endanger environment, health
President Trump and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin announced at the recent cabinet meeting that they plan to cut EPA staffing and budget up to 65%. Hundreds of EPA staff have already been terminated.
The EPA has a permanent staff of about 15,000. A cut of 65% would reduce the staffing to the level the agency had when it was created in 1970 — about 5,000. That would in effect almost eliminate what EPA is all about, protecting the environment and public health.
In an op-ed in The New York Times, three former EPA administrators reported that 'between 1970 and 2019 EPA cut emissions of common air pollutants by 77 percent while private sector jobs grew 223 percent and our gross domestic product grew almost 300 percent.' In addition, thousands of toxic contaminated sites have been cleaned up; water pollution has been greatly reduced, making most streams 'fishable and swimmable' throughout the country; and safe drinking water was achieved throughout the country.
Multiple studies have shown that the health benefits of work done by EPA outweigh the costs by more than 30 to 1. Such large spending and staffing cuts as being proposed would eliminate such things as monitoring air and water quality, responding to natural disasters and lead abatement in our water supply, among many other agency functions.
Critical to Naperville citizens, there have been truly major actions taken by EPA to protect the waters of the Great Lakes, the source of our drinking water. Naperville has received millions of dollars in grant money from EPA to improve our wastewater treatment plant and to improve our infrastructure for water supply.
The draconian and reckless cuts to EPA, an effective agency with a record of huge successes, are unwise and extremely shortsighted.
It is up to Congress to ensure the EPA has the resources to do its job. Weakening environmental protections isn't just bad policy, it's a direct threat to public health and future generations. Every citizen should protest these planned cuts by contacting their elected representatives to stop this insanity.
Dale Bryson, Naperville
McBroom's revisionist history bolsters Gibson's candidacy
Regarding Naperville City Councilman Josh McBroom's recent column about city council candidates (Naperville Sun, Feb. 24), anyone who follows the council and park board knows his revisionist history regarding the ethics inquiry against him stems from his violation of Naperville Park Board policy by condemning a board action, undermining the executive director and staff's ability to do their job, and from posting a smiley emoji in response to a Facebook comment body-shaming women.
Although park district counsel found that he violated board policy, counsel felt it didn't warrant censure since Mr. McBroom 'learned his lesson.' He apologized to then-park district Executive Director Ray McGury and staff. Why is he now playing the victim?
Perhaps remembering this brush with censure, he voted to revoke city council's ethics ordinance. He also caused Naperville to be negatively portrayed nationally by exploiting the difficulties of undocumented people finding shelter. Why? To 'show the hypocrisy of progressives.'
Do we want council members who persist in creating controversy and sowing conflict among fellow council members, or are we better served by council and park district members who are committed to working collaboratively and constructively for Naperville residents?
A candidate for city council who will do that is Mary Gibson. Her tenure on the park board has been exemplary. She developed and implemented the current three-year strategic plan, stretching the budget while championing inclusive and accessible park and facility designs, and expanding programs and partnerships to reflect the rich diversity of our community.
These successes led to her being awarded master board member status from the Illinois Association of Park Districts. Elected unanimously as board president three times by her fellow commissioners, even Mr. McBroom voted for her when he was on the board.
She is running a grassroots campaign, unlike Derek McDaniel and Meghna Bansal, who have both received $20,000 from a business PAC. Mary will represent Naperville residents and will bring her effective collaborative style to Naperville City Council. I'm looking forward to it.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
California schools protect students from ICE agents
(The Center Square) — California schools are providing resources for students if immigration officials visit their campus. As students get ready to go back to school, Southern California schools are taking proactive measures to protect students from federal immigration agents on campus. After federal agents detained a 15-year-old boy outside his Los Angeles high school last week, many families are fearful of immigration raids within schools. 'No child can learn if they're living in fear,' Estefany Castaneda, board president of Centinela Valley Union High School District, said. 'Our schools must be safe havens.' Alberto Carvalho, superintendent of the Los Angeles Unified School District, said there should be restrictions on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement near schools so that students can focus on their education. 'As our students return to school, we are calling on every community partner to help ensure that classrooms remain places of learning and belonging,' Carvalho said in a statement. 'Children have been through enough — from the pandemic to natural disasters. They should not have to carry the added weight of fear when walking through their school gates.' LAUSD told The Center Square that the district, which is the second largest in the nation, already practices what Senate Bill 98 is trying to accomplish across the state: Federal immigration enforcement would be required to notify schools when agents are coming onto campus. SB 98, also known as the Sending Alerts to Families in Education (SAFE) act, authored by state Sen. Sasha Renée Pérez, D-Pasadena, would require a notice to California schools if immigration enforcement is coming onto campus. LAUSD will also give students 'Know Your Rights' cards so they can be better equipped to respond to possible ICE enforcement. The district has also stated that there will be online classes for students who are fearful of attending school in person. California State University, Los Angeles, has also provided resources for students if they are approached by ICE agents on campus. The university's website states that if an immigration officer approaches a student, they are to 'notify the Cal State LA designees immediately.' If the officer is requesting information or documents, the website says to fill out a form depicting the incident. The form requests the student's contact information and then details of the encounter: the name and badge number of the officer, their contact information and a description of the request. 'The CSU is deeply committed to ensuring that academic opportunities are available to all students, regardless of immigration status. Core to the CSU mission is providing a space where all students feel welcomed and safe as they pursue their education,' Erik Hollins, executive director of strategic communications at CSU, told The Center Square. 'The CSU will do everything we can to support our undocumented community.' This has also become a priority in the nation's fifth biggest school district. The Clark County School District in Nevada has struck a deal with ICE to not conduct raids or arrests in schools in Las Vegas and other surrounding counties. Solve the daily Crossword


CNBC
2 days ago
- CNBC
OpenAI's Altman warns the U.S. is underestimating China's next-gen AI threat
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warned that the U.S. may be underestimating the complexity and seriousness of China's progress in artificial intelligence, and said export controls alone likely aren't a reliable solution. "I'm worried about China," he said. Over Mediterranean tapas in San Francisco's Presidio — just five miles north of OpenAI's original office in the Mission — Altman offered a rare on-the-record briefing to a small group of reporters, including CNBC. He warned that the U.S.–China AI race is deeply entangled — and more consequential than a simple who's-ahead scoreboard. "There's inference capacity, where China probably can build faster. There's research, there's product; a lot of layers to the whole thing," he said. "I don't think it'll be as simple as: Is the U.S. or China ahead?" Despite escalating U.S. export controls on semiconductors, Altman is unconvinced that the policy is keeping up with technical reality. Asked whether it would be reassuring if fewer GPUs were reaching China, Altman was skeptical. "My instinct is that doesn't work," he said. "You can export-control one thing, but maybe not the right thing… maybe people build fabs or find other workarounds," he added, referring to semiconductor fabrication facilities, the specialized factories that produce the chips powering everything from smartphones to large-scale AI systems. "I'd love an easy solution," added Altman. "But my instinct is: That's hard." His comments come as Washington adjusts its policies designed to curb China's AI ambitions. The Biden administration initially tightened export controls, but in April, President Donald Trump went further — halting the supply of advanced chips altogether, including models previously designed to comply with Biden-era rules. Last week, however, the U.S. carved out an exception for certain "China-safe" chips, allowing sales to resume under a controversial and unprecedented agreement requiring Nvidia and AMD to give the federal government 15% of their China chip revenue. The result is a patchwork regime that may be easier to navigate than enforce. And while U.S. firms deepen their dependence on chips from Nvidia and AMD, Chinese companies are pushing ahead with alternatives from Huawei and other domestic suppliers — raising questions about whether cutting off supply is having the intended effect. China's AI progress has also influenced how OpenAI thinks about releasing its own models. While the company has long resisted calls to make its technology fully open source, Altman said competition from Chinese models — particularly open-source systems like DeepSeek — was a factor in OpenAI's recent decision to release its own open-weight models. "It was clear that if we didn't do it, the world was gonna head to be mostly built on Chinese open source models," Altman said. "That was a factor in our decision, for sure. Wasn't the only one, but that loomed large." Earlier this month, OpenAI released two open-weight language models — its first since GPT-2 in 2019 — marking a significant shift in strategy for the company that has long kept its technology gated behind application programming interfaces, or APIs. The new text-only models, called gpt-oss-120b and gpt-oss-20b, are designed as lower-cost options that developers, researchers, and companies can download, run locally, and customize. An AI model is considered open weight if its parameters — the values learned during training that determine how the model generates responses — are publicly available. While that offers transparency and control, it's not the same as open source. OpenAI is still not releasing its training data or full source code. With this release, OpenAI joins that wave and, for now, stands alone as the only major U.S. foundation model company actively leaning into a more open approach. While Meta had embraced openness with its Llama models, CEO Mark Zuckerberg suggested on the company's second-quarter earnings call it may pull back on that strategy going forward. OpenAI, meanwhile, is moving in the opposite direction, betting that broader accessibility will help grow its developer ecosystem and strengthen its position against Chinese rivals. Altman had previously acknowledged that OpenAI had been "on the wrong side of history" by locking up its models. Ultimately, OpenAI's move shows it wants to keep developers engaged and within its ecosystem. That push comes as Meta reconsiders its open-source stance and Chinese labs flood the market with models designed to be flexible and widely adopted. Still, the open-weight debut has drawn mixed reviews. Some developers have called the models underwhelming, noting that many of the capabilities that make OpenAI's commercial offerings so powerful were stripped out. Altman didn't dispute that, saying the team intentionally optimized for one core use case: locally-run coding agents. "If the kind of demand shifts in the world," he said, "you can push it to something else." Watch: OpenAI's enterprise bet pays off as startups in Silicon Valley switch to GPT-5


Chicago Tribune
5 days ago
- Chicago Tribune
Letters to the Editor: Only smart move is for Naperville to extend IMEA contract; Trump's tariffs on India amount to bullying a friend
The Naperville City Council is facing a critical deadline Tuesday when it must decide whether to renew or reject a contract extension with the Illinois Municipal Electricity Agency to be the city's energy supply for another 20 years. IMEA is the nonprofit organization with which Naperville and 31 other communities have partnered for many years. If the amended contract is ratified, Naperville will secure a stable and affordable electric supply for future years. If rejected, it will be necessary for the city to purchase electricity on the open market from companies driven by profit. This will undoubtedly result in significantly higher prices, especially if only zero carbon options are chosen. The rush to zero carbon premium energy is shortsighted because IMEA power plants will continue to operate for the community members that renew the contract. IMEA opponents will not shut down the coal power plants but they will burden Naperville with runaway electric costs. Naperville also will forfeit the accumulated power plant bond payments estimated at $650 million to date and give up the reduced electric rates that will result from the construction bonds paid off by 2035. A provision option tied to the extended contract allows Naperville to utilize the Member Directed Resource (MDR) to purchase 26% of its energy from zero carbon suppliers. In addition, this provision can be 'moved forward' immediately into the current contract. This is an opportunity to supplement the current energy profile with 26% of zero carbon sourcing. The uncertainty of green energy capacity, rising electric demand due to expanding AI centers and higher projected green energy costs create a very volatile market. This can all be avoided by re-signing with the IMEA, an action that will keep costs stable, provide a consistent electric supply and avoid spot market chaos by dealing with power marketers offering profit-motivated electric supply options. I encourage the Naperville City Council to approve the IMEA contract extension so we can maintain a reliable power grid and provide fiscally responsible costs for residents while transitioning toward greener energy options.U.S. President Donald Trump's additional 25% tariff on India for buying Russian oil brings the total tariff amount to 50%. But the fact is the United States also did about $3.5 billion worth of trade with Russia in 2024. How is this not helping Russia fund its war in Ukraine? With Trump's tariffs, the price of generic medicines, clothes and food from India will increase in America. How will small businesses in both countries survive such high tariffs? Trump is not putting additional tariffs on China for buying Russian oil because he does not want to strain relations with China. Then why is Trump doing it with India? India and the U.S. have been allies since President George Washington's time. Trump has said that India is friends with the United States. So then why is he being a bully to India?