Astronaut lands at Merrimack College for commencement
NORTH ANDOVER — NASA astronaut Suni Williams was honored at Merrimack College during commencement for the School of Arts and Sciences in the Lawlor Arena on May 15.
Williams was the commencement speaker and also received an honorary degree. Merrimack College had 2,200 students graduating this year over its two-day commencement activities.
'Boy, I'm much more comfortable on a space craft,' she told the graduates.
Williams returned to Earth in March after an eight-day mission turned into more than nine months on the International Space Station.
She told the graduating students about the extended space stay. Williams said she and fellow astronaut Butch Wilmore could have worried about their situation, but had time to embrace the 'unbelievable things if you stop for a moment and look out the window,' and took in the sights of space.
The Needham, Massachusetts, native offered some advice to the Class of 2025 in her address.
'This is your time, your world to make better,' Williams said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
15 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Elon Musk's threat to withdraw Dragon capsule would leave NASA with 1 option: Russia
As President Donald Trump and Elon Musk argued on social media on Thursday, the world's richest man threatened to decommission a space capsule used to take astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station. After Trump threatened to cut government contracts given to Musk's SpaceX rocket company and his Starlink internet satellite services, Musk responded via X that SpaceX 'will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' It's unclear how serious Musk's threat was. But the capsule, developed with the help of government contracts, is an important part of keeping the space station running. NASA also relies heavily on SpaceX for other programs including launching science missions and, later this decade, returning astronauts to the surface of the moon. Wall Street rises as focus turns from Trump-Musk feud to the May jobs dataSpaceX is the only U.S. company capable right now of transporting crews to and from the space station, using its four-person Dragon capsules. Boeing's Starliner capsule has flown astronauts only once; last year's test flight went so badly that the two NASA astronauts had to hitch a ride back to Earth via SpaceX in March, more than nine months after launching last June. Starliner remains grounded as NASA decides whether to go with another test flight with cargo, rather than a crew. SpaceX also uses a Dragon capsule for its own privately run missions. The next one of those is due to fly next week on a trip chartered by Axiom Space, a Houston company. Cargo versions of the Dragon capsule are also used to ferry food and other supplies to the orbiting lab. Russia's Soyuz capsules are the only other means of getting crews to the space station right now. The Soyuz capsules hold three people at a time. For now, each Soyuz launch carries two Russians and one NASA astronaut, and each SpaceX launch has one Russian on board under a barter system. That way, in an emergency requiring a capsule to return, there is always someone from the U.S. and Russian on board. With its first crew launch for NASA in 2020 — the first orbital flight of a crew by a private company — SpaceX enabled NASA to reduce its reliance on Russia for crew transport. The Russian flights had been costing the U.S. tens of millions of dollars per seat, for years. NASA has also used Russian spacecraft for cargo, along with U.S. contractor Northrup Grumman. The company has used its rockets to launch several science missions for NASA as well as military equipment. Last year, SpaceX also won a NASA contract to help bring the space station out of orbit when it is no longer usable. SpaceX's Starship mega rocket is what NASA has picked to get astronauts from lunar orbit to the surface of the moon, at least for the first two landing missions. Starship made its ninth test flight last week from Texas, but tumbled out of control and broke apart.
Scientific American
an hour ago
- Scientific American
Can Trump's NASA Afford to Send Humans to Mars?
US President Donald Trump last week laid out one of the biggest challenges ever for NASA — to land the first humans on Mars. But his detailed budget request for the fiscal year 2026 also proposed cancelling dozens of the space agency's missions, including projects to study Earth, Mars and Venus. And the next day, on 31 May, Trump withdrew his nomination for NASA chief, the businessman and commercial astronaut Jared Isaacman. All of this has left the space agency in turmoil, and the scientists who normally participate in NASA's missions split over whether they support the push for the red planet. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. A budget shortfall NASA has wanted to put people on Mars for decades, but both technological and budget limitations mean that probably will not happen until the 2040s under current plans. Trump wants to accelerate that timeline. On 30 May, the White House proposed to spend some US$1 billion in 2026 on Mars plans, including research into new spacesuits and an astronaut landing system. 'These investments will provide the technologies necessary for future Mars exploration and eventual crewed missions to Mars,' the NASA budget plan said. If the space agency really does want to focus on sending humans to Mars, space-policy specialists say, it will need to massively ramp up its spending. A human mission to Mars is likely to cost hundreds of billions of dollars spread over a number of years; the agency currently spends $25 billion a year on all of its programmes, and Trump has proposed cutting that to under $19 billion. 'Right now, with the budgets that are proposed, we can't afford to send people to Mars,' says John Grunsfeld, an astrophysicist and former NASA astronaut who led the agency's science programmes from 2012 to 2016. Trump's latest rhetoric on Mars echoes decisions he made during his first term as president, when, in 2017, he announced that NASA would send astronauts back to the Moon. In 2022, the agency tested a mega-rocket that is intended to achieve that objective, but that mission, Artemis I, was uncrewed. Many technical challenges remain before people can be put on the lunar surface — a goal currently slated for 2027. One challenge is achieving success with the giant Starship vehicle, built by the aerospace company SpaceX in Hawthorne, California. Once NASA's mega-rocket has propelled astronauts into lunar orbit, they will rendezvous with Starship, which will fly them to the Moon's surface. But Starship has yet to orbit Earth successfully, much less demonstrate the frequent launches and in-space refuellings needed for the Moon landing; its most recent test flight ended in an explosion on 27 May. Days after that blow-up, Elon Musk, the billionaire chief executive of SpaceX who has advised Trump, said he still hoped to launch the first Starship to Mars next year. Some scientists have been put off the idea of landing humans on Mars by Musk's involvement. The technology entrepreneur has long talked of colonizing the red planet, but with little consideration of societal ethics or international norms. In recent months, he led the Trump administration's efforts to downsize the US government and slash its science funding, even as SpaceX is likely to compete for billions of dollars' worth of government contracts on the quest for Mars. A tough environment Others are more excited about the prospect of landing people on the red planet. NASA has overseen missions to Mars many times, sending a series of robotic spacecraft, including the Curiosity and Perseverance rovers. Some researchers say that astronauts could explore more quickly and gain better insight into whether Mars has ever hosted extraterrestrial life. 'If we definitively want to answer the question of whether Mars had life or has life today, I think we have to send humans,' says Tanya Harrison, a planetary scientist with the Outer Space Institute who is based in Ottawa, Canada. But even those in favour caution that a journey to Mars would not only be costly — taking funding away from numerous other research programmes — but would also pose many physical risks. On the way to Mars, astronauts would face extreme isolation and higher doses of deadly space radiation over longer periods than they have ever been exposed to on the Moon or on space stations. If they were to land successfully on Mars, they would have to get out of their capsule without collapsing after the zero-gravity voyage; begin working in a frigid environment where the soil is full of toxic chemicals and there is almost no air to breathe; and deal with abrasive dust storms. There are solutions, such as living inside an underground lava tube that was created by volcanic activity, which could offer protection against radiation and dust storms. But visiting Mars will be like visiting Antarctica — another hostile, perilous environment — with vastly greater risks, scientists say. 'I want to disabuse people of the assumptions that they have that humans are going to be fine,' Erik Antonsen, a researcher in space physiology at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, said at conference on human space exploration on 28 May. Science at the table Trump's proposal is likely to have support from some politicians in the US Congress. They might vote to appropriate at least a proportion of the vast sums required to go to Mars because they are keen to achieve exploration milestones before China's burgeoning space agency does. China has announced plans to put astronauts on the Moon by 2030, and on Mars after that. So some scientists are determined to make the best of it. 'Given that there is active planning going on for developing the architecture for human missions through NASA, we feel it's important that science has a seat at the table,' says Bruce Jakosky, a planetary scientist at the University of Colorado Boulder. He and others led a study in 2023 that identified key scientific goals, including studying astrobiology, that astronauts might accomplish on the red planet. In the near term, Jakosky says, NASA should prioritize a robotic mission to bring back dozens of rock, dirt and air samples gathered on Mars by the $2.7-billion Perseverance rover. Doing so would demonstrate that the agency is capable of sending spacecraft to and from Mars, he says, and would allow scientists to analyse the rocks for signs of life and for clues to how toxic the Martian surface could be. However, the agency has struggled with how to pay for such a mission, and Trump has proposed cancelling it. In Grunsfeld's view, NASA should focus on building a streamlined architecture to get humans to Mars as simply as possible. That could mean, for example, testing new spacesuit designs at the International Space Station and dropping plans for astronauts to build extensive Moon bases. 'We need to use the technology we have to the maximum extent,' he says. Whatever NASA, Congress and Trump decide, the current political uncertainty is a huge challenge, Harrison says. She worries that last week's proposals might not lead to sustained momentum: 'Is this blustering for right now, and will Mars be forgotten a year from now?'
Time Magazine
2 hours ago
- Time Magazine
The Company Helping Build the Next Space Station Is Launching to the ISS
America's most expensive government housing project cost north of $100 billion, took 13 years to build, and has been continuously occupied since 2000—yet most of the time no more than six people live there. That's because the residence in question is the International Space Station (ISS), a million-pound orbital outpost with a footprint larger than a football field and the habitable volume of a six-bedroom house, circling the Earth 250 miles overhead. Over the past 25 years, on-board astronauts have done yeoman's work in the station's six laboratory modules. But the ISS is getting old, and NASA and the 14 other partner nations that built, maintain, and operate it have plans to de-orbit it by 2030, sending it tumbling down through the atmosphere for a controlled splashdown in a remote patch of ocean. Before the ISS dies, however, it will help birth its own replacement—one that will be built and launched by the private sector, with the new modules constructed by Houston-based Axiom Space, and launch services and the Dragon spacecraft provided by SpaceX. Over the past three years, Axiom has launched three private, paying crews of four astronauts to the ISS, preparatory to the commencement of station construction. On June 10 it plans to launch its fourth mission, straightforwardly dubbed Axiom Mission 4 (Ax-4)—one more milestone on the road to the first new space station module going aloft in 2027. 'It's important for the U.S. to maintain a human presence in space, and that's why I think the Axiom station is so important,' says former NASA astronaut and Axiom's director of human space flight Peggy Whitson, who commanded Axiom Mission 2 (Ax-2) and will command Ax-4. 'We've got to get the [new] station up and running before the ISS is decommissioned. That push for … expansion in space is important from a technology perspective [and] from a space power perspective.' Speedy but significant science Ax-4's mission will be a relatively brief 14 days—an eyeblink compared to the six months to a year that the station's long-term residents stay aboard. But as with the earlier Axiom flights, none of which went beyond 18 days, the crew will be performing a lot of solid science in the time they're aloft. 'This particular mission will comprise 60 scientific studies and activities representing 31 countries, including the U.S., India, Poland, Hungary, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, the UAE, and nations across Europe,' said Allen Flynt, Axiom's chief of mission services, at a May 20 press conference. 'This will be the most research…conducted on an Axiom space mission aboard the International Space Station to date.' Among the experiments to be performed will be studies of the effect of microgravity on the brain—crucial information to have in the run-up to long-term missions to the moon and Mars—as well as similar investigations of how the heart and muscles adapt to space. Also on the research manifest will be studies of eye-hand coordination, and even how to manage blood glucose in space, opening the door to future travel by astronauts with insulin-dependent diabetes. Perhaps the most ambitious work, however, will involve testing various drugs to treat cancer—work that can be dramatically accelerated if it takes place in space. 'People always say, 'Why do you go to space to look at cancer?'' says Whitson. 'Well, cancer cells proliferate faster [in microgravity], so in a very short period of time you can give them a drug and see if it's slowing them down. If you shut them off you can effectively say, 'Hey this is a very promising drug.'' During Ax-2, the crew was specifically studying colorectal cancer. This time around they will be looking at triple-negative breast cancer —an aggressive form of the disease—and should be able to finish the study even in the short time they'll be aloft. Collaboration is key The mission won't be just about the science, but about building global partnerships that go beyond the international suite of experiments the crew will perform. Axiom Space might be a U.S. company, but Whitson will be the only American aboard when Ax-4 lifts off. Joining her will be crewmembers Shubhansa Shukla, from India; Sławosz Uznański-Wiśniewski of Poland; and Tibor Kapu of Hungary. The mission comes after a long wait for all three countries. A Hungarian has not been in space since 2009, when paying space tourist Charles Simonyi traveled to the ISS aboard a Russian Soyuz spacecraft. The last Indian citizen in space was Rakesh Sharma, who was aboard another Soyuz, which docked with Russia's Salyut 7 space station in 1984. For Poland the wait has been longest of all, dating back to 1978, when Mirosław Hermaszewski launched aboard a Soyuz. 'Private astronaut missions are a great opportunity for our member states to fly more astronauts and do more experiments aboard the International Space Station,' said Sergio Palumberi, mission manager with the European Space Agency (ESA)—which includes Hungary and Poland—at the May 20 press conference. 'ESA will be executing 17 science investigations and technological demonstrations.' 'This is more than a space mission for us,' said Orsolya Ferencz, Hungary's ministerial commissioner of space research. 'It is a strategic national effort, an expression of Hungary's commitment to sovereignty in critical technological fields and to secure a place in the rapidly evolving space economy.' The four new arrivals aboard Ax-4 will join an equally international crew of seven already living on the ISS; they include three astronauts from the U.S., three cosmonauts from Russia, and one astronaut from Japan—Takuya Onishi, who is currently station commander. During Axiom-4's trips to and from space, Whitson will be in command of her three-person crew, but when they're aboard the station, she will cede most of her authority to Onishi. 'I'm responsible for my crew and our activities on the ISS, but the crew that's already up there will be responsible for the station as a whole,' Whitson says. 'It wouldn't be appropriate for a short-term person to take over.' Building the next 'ISS' The 14-day Ax-4 mission is being flown with an eye toward a more distant goal. This flight and the previous three have been dress rehearsals both for crews and for Axiom's onsite mission control, providing critical experience working in orbit and managing activities from the ground. That patient practice will be put to use in 2027 when the first Axiom space station module goes aloft and docks with the ISS. Over the course of the following three years, four more modules will be sent up and dock with the one already there, with the new cluster serving as a semi-autonomous space station budding from the larger existing one. In 2030, not long before the ISS is deorbited, the Axiom station will undock and become its own free-floating lab. The first module, known as the payload, power, and thermal module (PPTM), will, as its name suggests, provide power, temperature control, and storage space for the new station. Following the PPTM will come one airlock module, two habitat modules, and a research and manufacturing module (RMF), where the onboard science will be performed. The RMF also includes a windowed enclosure similar to but much larger than the ISS's cupola, providing 360-degree views of the Earth below and the surrounding space. 'It's way bigger than the cupola,' says Whitson. 'It's going to be an immersive experience, where you can get your whole body inside. It will be like doing a spacewalk without having to put a spacesuit on.' Axiom does not rule out adding more modules still down the line, especially as the company attracts private sector and government customers willing to pay to have experiments run and hardware tested in microgravity. The space community has gotten spoiled in the past 25 years, with a rotating corps of international astronauts always at work, always in orbit, making their homes aboard the ISS. The station may not attract the global excitement that the old Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo missions did, but we will surely miss it when it's gone. Axiom Space is prepared to fill that void.
