logo
North Korea takes down propaganda loudspeakers from tense border

North Korea takes down propaganda loudspeakers from tense border

CNNa day ago
South Korea's military said Saturday it detected North Korea removing some of its loudspeakers from the inter-Korean border, days after the South dismantled its own front-line speakers used for anti-North Korean propaganda broadcasts, in a bid to ease tensions.
South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff didn't disclose the sites where the North Koreans were removing speakers and said it wasn't immediately clear whether the North would take all of them down.
In recent months, South Korean border residents have complained that North Korean speakers blasted irritating sounds, including howling animals and pounding gongs, in a tit-for-tat response to South Korean propaganda broadcasts.
The South Korean military said the North stopped its broadcasts in June after Seoul's new liberal president, Lee Jae Myung, halted the South's broadcasts in his government's first concrete step toward easing tensions between the war-divided rivals. South Korea's military began removing its speakers from border areas on Monday but didn't specify how they would be stored or whether they could be quickly redeployed if tensions flared again.
North Korea, which is extremely sensitive to any outside criticism of its authoritarian leadership and its third-generation ruler, Kim Jong Un, didn't immediately confirm it was taking down its speakers.
South Korea's previous conservative government resumed daily loudspeaker broadcasts in June last year, following a yearslong pause, in retaliation for North Korea flying trash-laden balloons toward the South.
The speakers blasted propaganda messages and K-pop songs, a playlist designed to strike a nerve in Pyongyang, where Kim has been pushing an intense campaign to eliminate the influence of South Korean pop culture and language among the population in a bid to strengthen his family's dynastic rule.
The Cold War-style psychological warfare campaigns further heightened tensions already inflamed by North Korea's advancing nuclear program and South Korean efforts to expand joint military exercises with the United States and their trilateral security cooperation with Japan.
Lee, who took office in June after winning an early election to replace ousted conservative Yoon Suk Yeol, wants to improve relations with Pyongyang, which reacted furiously to Yoon's hard-line policies and shunned dialogue.
But Kim Yo Jong, the influential sister of the North Korean leader, rebuffed overtures by Lee's government in late July, saying that the current government's 'blind trust' in the country's alliance with the United States makes it no different from its conservative predecessor.
She later issued a separate statement dismissing the administration of US President Donald Trump's intent to resume diplomacy on North Korea's denuclearization, suggesting that Pyongyang — now focused on expanding ties with Russia over the war in Ukraine — sees little urgency in resuming talks with Seoul or Washington.
Tensions between the Koreas can possibly rise again later this month, when South Korea and the United States proceed with their annual large-scale combined military exercises, which begin on August 18. North Korea labels the allies' joint drills as invasion rehearsals and often uses them as a pretext to dial up military demonstrations and weapons tests aimed at advancing its nuclear program.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

South Korea's Winning Trump Strategy Faces Moment of Truth
South Korea's Winning Trump Strategy Faces Moment of Truth

Bloomberg

time2 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

South Korea's Winning Trump Strategy Faces Moment of Truth

South Korean President Lee Jae Myung will be testing the limits of one of the more successful strategies of dealing with US President Donald Trump when he visits the White House this month. The summit will likely feature thorny issues including how to approach North Korea, the future of the US military alliance with South Korea and the details of a $350 billion investment pledge. So far, South Korea largely flew under the diplomatic radar, working mostly behind the scenes without some of the grand gestures seen from other leaders. The result was one of the most favorable tariff agreements, reached just before the deadline, and the upcoming meeting for Lee.

Netanyahu's unclear occupation strategy risks leaving Israel trapped in Gaza, former NSC head says
Netanyahu's unclear occupation strategy risks leaving Israel trapped in Gaza, former NSC head says

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Netanyahu's unclear occupation strategy risks leaving Israel trapped in Gaza, former NSC head says

Former NSC head Giora Eiland warns that confusion between Netanyahu and the IDF on Gaza strategy is weakening Israel's position and endangering outcomes. Confusion stemming from the government's lack of a coherent military strategy forthe Gaza Strip is undermining Israel's position and endangering the hostages, former head of the National Security Council (NSC), Maj.-Gen. (res.) Giora Eiland told 103FM on Sunday. Eiland, who served as head of the NSC during the 2005 disengagement from Gaza, said the cabinet's latest decision on the territory was unprecedented in its ambiguity. 'This is the first time, not only during this war, that a decision has been made, and I don't know what it is, so I don't have a complete opinion about it,' he said. 'Unlike all previous matters, this is something that, in my opinion, even those who made the decision have no idea what they actually decided. It truly reflects the great confusion that Israel is in.' He noted that before the cabinet meeting, Prime Minister BenjaminNetanyahu had spoken of a full occupation of Gaza aimed at 'absolute victory.' However, he said, Netanyahu later retreated under pressure from the IDF and other ministers, leaving Israel 'in a very strange situation where it's not clear what the decision is.' He also criticized Netanyahu's recent comments in English about besieging Gaza City, calling them disconnected from operational reality. 'I doubt anyone in the IDF General Staff would be able to turn them into any kind of coherent plan – good or bad,' he said. According to Eiland, mediators are working on a new deal to end the war in exchange for the return of all hostages. 'I hope the mediators are doing this after receiving some kind of green light from Israel,' he said. 'In the current situation, this is the most reasonable way out for Israel from the deadlock we are in.' Assessing the chances of such a deal, Eiland was blunt. 'It was already small six months ago,' he said. 'We wasted half a year, not only in terms of another six months of miserable people in Gaza's tunnels and other costs, but also in January–February when Trump stormed into the White House and made various threats, such as that the Gazans' fate would be in Jordan or Egypt. That put the Arab states under pressure. There was a huge opportunity for Israel – not only to go for a different deal that would end the war, but also to do so from a position of strength. Netanyahu, as usual, didn't want to. So now he might end up accepting what he absolutely refused to even consider before.' Eiland: Israel should have implemented "General's Plan" earlier on in Gaza war Eiland contrasted the government's approach with his own 'generals' plan,' which he said was ignored. At the start of the war, he argued, the cabinet adopted three flawed assumptions: that only military pressure would bring back the hostages and ensure victory; that victory could be achieved through high-intensity fighting; and that the population could be separated from Hamas. 'All three of these assumptions were wrong from the beginning,' he said. By late November 2023, Eiland noted, Israel had taken control of the Netzarim Corridor, effectively annexing the entire northern Gaza Strip – a third of its territory. He said this was the moment to tell the 300,000 residents there to move south, allow them to leave safely, and then cut off supplies. The approach, borrowed from the US Pentagon's siege manual, would have minimized both military and civilian casualties by enabling the population to evacuate. 'If that had happened, the northern area would be in our hands, but without a civilian population,' he said. Instead, Eiland argued, the IDF tried to fight inside a hostile civilian population, a strategy he said has failed. His plan, he added, would then have allowed Israel to tell Hamas: 'If you don't release all the hostages, you will permanently lose a third of the Strip's territory.' Looking ahead, Eiland said the best outcome would be for Israel to acknowledge that while it has severely damaged Hamas militarily, it has not met all its objectives. 'If Netanyahu had the mental strength to declare: 'Israel is ready to end the war, withdraw all IDF forces, and we have no further conditions except one – the immediate return of the hostages,' and Hamas accepted – great, we'd end the war,' he said. 'If Hamas said no, then at least we could tell the international community: What do you want from us – to accept the loss of the hostages in Gaza?'

IDF confirms killing Al Jazeera journalist, claims he was a Hamas member
IDF confirms killing Al Jazeera journalist, claims he was a Hamas member

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

IDF confirms killing Al Jazeera journalist, claims he was a Hamas member

The IDF confirmed killing Anas Al-Sharif, a Hamas terrorist who also worked as an Al Jazeera correspondent inside the Gaza Strip. The IDF killed Anas Al-Sharif, a Hamas terrorist who also worked as an Al Jazeera correspondent inside the Gaza Strip, on Sunday, the military announced. Al-Sharif was responsible for advancing rocket attacks and had served as a member of Hamas ever since 2013, the IDF said. Documents shared by the IDF Spokesperson Unit include personnel rosters, lists of terror training courses, phone directories, and salary documents for the terrorist. 'Prior to the strike, steps were taken to mitigate harm to civilians, including the use of precise munitions, aerial surveillance, and additional intelligence,' the statement also shared. Reports from Gaza claim several casualties Reports in Gaza claimed five people were killed during the attack, including two journalists from the Al Jazeera network. According to the Qatari network, four people from their staff were killed in the IDF strike near the Shifa Hospital. The network also confirmed that Al-Sharif was among those killed by the strike. Al-Sharif also posted on social media minutes before being targeted, with an X/Twitter post saying that "bombings had been going on for the last two hours." A press freedom group and a UN expert previously warned that Al Sharif's life was in danger due to his reporting from Gaza. "UN Special Rapporteur Irene Khan said last month that Israel's claims against him were unsubstantiated," the agency informed. The IDF didn't share details about the site of the strike, while it claimed that the documents shared were "proof of the integration of the Hamas terrorist within the Qatari Al Jazeera network." The Hamas terror group said that the killing may signal the start of an Israeli offensive. "The assassination of journalists and the intimidation of those who remain paves the way for a major crime that the occupation is planning to commit in Gaza City," they said in a statement. Reuters contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store