logo
Suicide attack on Damascus church kills at least 22

Suicide attack on Damascus church kills at least 22

CNA10 hours ago

DAMASCUS: A shooting and suicide bombing at a Damascus church during a packed service on Sunday (Jun 22) killed at least 22 people, authorities said, blaming a member of the Islamic State group for the unprecedented attack.
The international community condemned the attack, the first of its kind in the Syrian capital since Islamist-led forces toppled longtime ruler Bashar al-Assad in December.
It was also the first inside a church in Syria since the country's civil war erupted in 2011, according to a monitor.
Security remains one of the greatest challenges for Syria's new authorities, with the international community repeatedly urging them to protect minorities.
AFP correspondents saw first responders transporting people from the Orthodox church as security forces cordoned off the area.
The church itself was strewn with wood from fittings and pews, with fallen icons and pools of blood on the floor.
"A suicide attacker affiliated with the Daesh (IS) terrorist group entered the Saint Elias church in the Dwelaa area ... opened fire then blew himself up with an explosive belt," an interior ministry statement said.
State news agency SANA, citing the ministry of health, reported a death toll of 22, with 63 injured.
Lawrence Maamari who was inside the church when the attack happened told AFP a man had entered and begun shooting. People "tried to stop him before he blew himself up", he added.
Ziad Helou, 40, who was at a shop nearby, said he heard gunfire then an explosion, and saw glass flying.
"We saw fire in the church and the remains of wooden benches thrown all the way to the entrance," he said.
"HEINOUS CRIME"
The blast sparked panic and fear in the church, which had been full of worshippers, including children and the elderly, eyewitnesses said. Families were still searching desperately for missing loved ones.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said it was the first suicide attack inside a church in Syria since war erupted in 2011. Other churches had been damaged or seen attacks in their vicinity during the conflict, but none had been so directly targeted.
The Orthodox patriarchate in Damascus called on "the authorities to bear full responsibility for what has happened and is happening concerning the violation of the sanctity of churches, and to ensure the protection of all citizens".
Syria's Christian community has shrunk from around one million before the war to under 300,000 due to waves of displacement and emigration.
The United Nations special envoy for Syria Geir Pedersen expressed "outrage at this heinous crime", calling for a full investigation.
United States special envoy Tom Barrack said Washington supported Syria "as it fights against those who are seeking to create instability and fear in their country and the broader region".
Turkey, which is close to the new authorities, expressed confidence that Syrians would stay united in "their fight against terrorist organisations that seek to sow chaos in the country".
France's foreign ministry restated its commitment to "a transition in Syria that allows Syrians, whatever their religion, to live in peace and security in a free, united, pluralistic, prosperous, stable and sovereign" country.
Egypt's Al-Azhar, Sunni Islam's prestigious seat of learning, called it a "blatant assault on the right to life" and worship.
INVESTIGATION
Syria's foreign ministry described the attack as "a desperate attempt to undermine national coexistence and to destabilise the country".
Assad had portrayed himself as a protector of minorities, who during Syria's nearly 14-year civil war were targeted by numerous attacks - many of them claimed by jihadist groups including IS.
Since the new authorities took power, the international community has urged the government to protect minorities and ensure their participation in Syria's transition, particularly after sectarian violence in recent months.
Interior Minister Anas Khattab said that specialised teams had begun investigating.
"These terrorist acts will not stop the efforts of the Syrian state in achieving civil peace," Khattab said according to a statement.
In an interview earlier this month, Khattab said that IS had shifted "to studied attacks on strategic targets" and had attempted "to carry out attacks against the Christian and Shiite community" that the authorities had thwarted.
Last month, IS claimed its first attack on Syria's new government forces. Authorities said they had arrested members of an IS cell near Damascus, accusing them of preparing attacks.
IS seized large swathes of Syrian and Iraqi territory in the early years of the civil war, declaring a cross-border "caliphate" in 2014 before being territorially defeated in 2019.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CNA Explains: What could Iran's next move be after US strikes on its nuclear sites?
CNA Explains: What could Iran's next move be after US strikes on its nuclear sites?

CNA

timean hour ago

  • CNA

CNA Explains: What could Iran's next move be after US strikes on its nuclear sites?

Iran said on Monday (Jun 23) that air strikes by the United States on its nuclear sites have paved the way for a wider war in the region. It comes a day after US President Donald Trump boasted that the air strikes had 'completely and totally obliterated' Iran's main nuclear facilities in Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz. Experts warned that the conflict may be far from over, and hinges largely on Tehran's next move. Was Trump's 2-week deadline for US action a ruse? The latest conflict started when Israel on Jun 13 launched attacks on Iranian nuclear and military facilities. The two sides have been engaged in retaliatory strikes since. The White House said last Thursday that Trump would take two weeks to decide US involvement in the escalating conflict. Yet Washington's decision to strike Iran came much sooner. Saturday's top-secret mission, referred to as Operation Midnight Hammer, involved seven B-2 stealth bombers flying 18 hours from the US to Iran to drop 14 bunker-buster bombs. More than 125 aircraft participated in the mission, including refueling tankers and fighter escorts. Stephen Zunes, professor of politics at the University of San Francisco, believes the two-week deadline was a ruse, adding that 'it does appear that they were in cahoots (with Israel) from the very beginning'. The US has insisted that the strikes on Iran were intended as a one-off effort. 'Iran has repeatedly maintained their right to retaliate if attacked,' said Zunes. 'This idea that the US should just go boom, boom, boom and then have peace… seems highly unrealistic.' Can Iran afford to hold back after US strikes? Iran has since vowed retaliation. It could resort to various moves, including targeting US bases in the Middle East, hitting Israel harder, and blocking the vital Strait of Hormuz which handles about a quarter of the world's seaborne oil trade, said experts. Choosing to take military action against Tehran's enemies 'is extremely risky', stressed Amin Saikal, distinguished visiting fellow at the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies. 'It will invite massive American retaliation … President Trump has made that very clear in his speech about bombing the nuclear sites.' Iran could also downplay the damages to its nuclear sites and not directly engage the US, he told CNA's Asia Now. Saikal, who is also emeritus professor of Middle Eastern and Central Asian studies at the Australia National University, said Iran could block the Strait of Hormuz as a last resort. 'Iran is capable of doing that by sinking a number of ships in the strait and that will be enough to deter many ships from going through,' he added. 'My hunch at this point is that probably they will be focusing very much on hitting Israel as hard as they can, but of course, Israel is also hitting them very hard. 'But how long this can really continue and both sides can have the necessary resources to do so, that remains to be seen.' If Tehran blocks the Strait of Hormuz or targets ships traversing the waterway, that would disrupt global supply chains and upheaval markets. Such a move could create enough political backlash to force Trump to pull the plug on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's ability to escalate the conflict, said political analyst Ali Vaez. 'Unfortunately, this is a very perilous game of chicken that could really result in a disastrous regional conflagration, which I think would not have any winners,' he added. If Iran chooses not to take any action, it 'would signal to the US that these kinds of attacks are fair game', he told CNA's Asia First. 'So the Iranians will have to impose some kind of cost on the US for its intervention, as they have retaliated in the past 10 days against Israel,' added Vaez, director of the Iran Project at the International Crisis Group, an independent conflict resolution organisation. Have the strikes crippled Iran's nuclear capabilities? The University of San Francisco's Zunes said while Iran's missile stockpile has been depleted by over a week of Israeli attacks, Iranian authorities 'would have at least enough in their arsenal to inflict some damage if they chose to do so'. 'Given what's at stake here, I really would expect that there's going to be some kind of response, and then very likely a further escalation by the US,' he told CNA's Asia First. Trump has threatened to go after more targets if Iran did not make peace quickly. Zunes said: 'There may be some calculation as to whether the principle of fighting back is worth the enormous damage that could be done to the country, (to) both its military and civilian infrastructure.' While Trump has said Saturday's air strikes had "totally obliterated" key Iranian nuclear sites, experts have cautioned that the extent of damage was still unclear. 'I do not believe that a very accurate battle damage assessment is actually possible because there are no boots on the ground,' said International Crisis Group's Vaez. 'But the Trump administration could think, especially if there is no imminent Iranian retaliation, that because it can get away with conducting these kinds of strikes, it is possible that it would do a second round or a third round,' he added. 'This is precisely the kind of mission creep that the US has experienced in that part of the world. Quite often it goes in thinking that it can conduct a clean and contained operation, but it actually turns into a long nightmare, a quagmire that is not easy to get out of.' Even if the key nuclear sites are destroyed, observers believe the strikes would only delay – not eliminate – Iran's ability to develop a nuclear weapon. Zunes said Iran still has the knowledge to build these facilities, adding: 'It will set them back a few years, but they could just start all over again. And indeed, they may redouble their efforts.' Analysts have said Iran would likely have secretly taken its highly enriched uranium stockpile to hidden locations before the US strikes. 'Because (United Nations) nuclear inspectors are no longer able to access these sites, which are now war zones, we are not sure where the materials and the machineries are,' said Vaez. Will Iran return to the negotiating table? The US has called for Iran to return to the negotiating table, highlighting the risk posed by Iran's nuclear programme to international security. But observers are doubtful that diplomacy can break the deadlock. 'I don't see the odds of a deal very high right now, because the Iranians have concluded that Trump is not a reliable negotiating partner,' said Vaez, adding that the US president previously withdrew from a nuclear deal that the Iranians were complying with in 2018. 'It is very hard to imagine that the Iranians would come back to the negotiating table anytime soon.' In 2015, Iran agreed to dismantle much of its nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). The nuclear agreement was signed between Iran and six world powers, including the US. However, Trump withdrew the US from the accord in 2018, claiming it failed to curtail Iran's missile programme. Iran stopped honoring the deal's limits a year later. Meanwhile, Iran's key global allies, Russia and China, have condemned the US military action. But observers believe they are unlikely to risk too much by being directly involved. 'I think both would be very concerned about the unilateral nature of the Israeli and US attacks, and the idea that the US can get away with this,' said Zunes. 'Since Trump did not get the approval of Congress or anything, there may be a fear that he could take this as a blank check for further unilateral military action elsewhere.' Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi is set to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday (Jun 23), when they are likely to discuss the latest developments. But Vaez believes Moscow will tread carefully and not get pulled into the conflict, adding: 'The Iranians don't really have a lot of friends or the kind of strategic allies that they can count on.'

Putin tells Iranian foreign minister there was no justification for US attack
Putin tells Iranian foreign minister there was no justification for US attack

CNA

time2 hours ago

  • CNA

Putin tells Iranian foreign minister there was no justification for US attack

MOSCOW: Russian President Vladimir Putin told Iran's foreign minister on Monday (Jun 23) there was no justification for the US bombing of his country and that Moscow was trying to help the Iranian people. Putin hosted Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi in Moscow two days after US President Donald Trump sent US bomber planes to strike Iran's three main nuclear sites. "The absolutely unprovoked aggression against Iran has no basis and no justification," Putin told Araqchi in televised comments. "For our part, we are making efforts to assist the Iranian people," he added. "I am very glad that you are in Moscow today, this will give us the opportunity to discuss all these pressing issues and think together about how we could get out of today's situation." Araqchi told Putin that Iran was conducting legitimate self-defence, and thanked Russia for condemning the US actions. He conveyed best wishes to Putin from Iran's supreme leader and president. "Russia is today on the right side of history and international law," said Araqchi. It was unclear, however, what Russia might do to support Iran, an important ally with which Putin signed a strategic cooperation treaty in January. That agreement did not include a mutual defence clause. Before Saturday's US strikes, Moscow had warned that US military intervention could destabilise the entire region and plunge it into the "abyss". Asked what Russia was ready to do to help Tehran, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said: "It all depends on what Iran needs." He said the fact that Moscow had offered to mediate in the crisis was itself a form of support. Peskov condemned the US attacks. "An increase in the number of participants in this conflict is happening - or rather, has happened. A new spiral of escalation of tension in the region," Peskov told reporters. "And, of course, we condemn this and express regret in this regard, deep regret. In addition, of course, it remains to be seen what happened to (Iran's) nuclear facilities, whether there is a radiation hazard." Peskov said Trump had not told Putin in detail about the planned strikes in advance.

IAEA chief expects 'very significant damage' at Iran's Fordow site
IAEA chief expects 'very significant damage' at Iran's Fordow site

CNA

time3 hours ago

  • CNA

IAEA chief expects 'very significant damage' at Iran's Fordow site

VIENNA: United States bombing probably caused "very significant" damage to the underground areas of Iran's Fordow uranium enrichment plant dug into a mountain, though no one can yet tell the extent, United Nations nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi said on Monday (Jun 23). The US dropped the biggest conventional bombs in its arsenal on Iranian nuclear facilities on Sunday, using those bunker-busting munitions in combat for the first time to try and eliminate sites, including the Fordow uranium-enrichment plant dug into a mountain. "At this time, no one, including the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) is in a position to have fully assessed the underground damage at Fordow," Grossi said in a statement to an emergency meeting of the IAEA's 35-nation board of governors. The IAEA has not been able to carry out inspections in Iran since Israel started its military strikes on nuclear facilities there on Jun 13. "Given the explosive payload utilised and the extreme(ly) vibration-sensitive nature of centrifuges, very significant damage is expected to have occurred," Grossi added. Beyond the level of damage done to Fordow's underground enrichment halls, one of the biggest open questions is the status of its stock of enriched uranium, particularly its more than 400kg of uranium enriched to up to 60 per cent purity, a short step from the roughly 90 per cent that is weapons grade. That is enough, if enriched further, for nine nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick, though Iran says its intentions are peaceful and it does not seek atom bombs. Iran did, however, inform the IAEA on Jun 13 that it would take "special measures" to protect its nuclear materials and equipment that are under so-called IAEA safeguards, the oversight provided for by the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Grossi said. "In my response that same day, I indicated that any transfer of nuclear material from a safeguarded facility to another location in Iran must be declared to the agency," Grossi said. "Any special measures by Iran to protect its nuclear materials and equipment ... can be done in accordance with Iran's safeguards obligations ... This is possible."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store