Ethan Ives Griffiths' murderers are 'evilest people on Earth', dad says
Mr Griffiths also said "the way they treated him is like a bunch of chimpanzees, just playing with him and everyone having a go like it's a toy".
Ethan suffered a catastrophic brain injury at his grandparents' home on 14 August 2021, and died in hospital two days later.He was severely malnourished and underweight, and had more than 40 injuries on his body.Ethan went to live with his grandparents in June 2021 after a domestic dispute which saw Shannon Ives separate from Mr Griffiths. A few weeks later, Shannon Ives also moved in.The family's own CCTV was played during the trial showing Ethan's grandfather repeatedly carrying the little boy by one arm in a manner which the prosecution said was like "a bag of rubbish".He was also seen to apparently encourage another child to strike Ethan, who was regularly made to stand in stress positions and keep his hands above his head as a form of punishment.
Describing watching the images in court, Mr Griffiths said it was the "worst thing" he had ever seen a person do to a child."My stomach turns just thinking about the way he carried him over and over again. I know it would have hurt a lot," he said.He added: "I don't think you'd even see this in prisoners of war. I really don't think you would."It's very, very disturbing to think that these are people that were supposed to love him."And they've shown everything but love to him."The prosecutor said Ethan's fatal brain injury on 14 August must have been caused by a "forceful attack".His grandparents claimed he simply "collapsed" while watching TV at their home.
The following day, Mr Griffiths was phoned by his ex-partner Shannon Ives to say Ethan had fallen and was in hospital.He said on the way to hospital he picked up a get well soon card, thinking Ethan had had a "little fall" and was going to be OK.As he walked into the hospital room Mr Griffiths said he did not recognise his son, who he had not seen for 10 weeks."I couldn't believe it was my son. It didn't look like Ethan," he said."He was completely different from head to toe. There was no weight there. There was nothing of him… completely covered in bruises."It was a sight of horror."
The following day Mr Griffiths was called to hospital with members of his family and a decision was made to remove Ethan's life support, after doctors said there was nothing more they could do."The decision is by far the hardest thing I've ever decided on, and still to this day and to the day I die, I will regret making that decision," he said."I still see the image in my head. I still have the exact time in my head like it was yesterday."I got the chance to hold him while he took his final breath. At least he knew in his final moment somebody he loved was actually holding him."
The six-week trial heard there was social services involvement with Shannon Ives and Mr Griffiths, and their children.There had been an allegation of domestic abuse against Mr Griffiths, and he was also accused of being aggressive towards a social worker on 9 June 2021 – which led to him being arrested and his family moving out, eventually ending up with Michael and Kerry Ives.Other allegations were also made, including that he abused Shannon Ives, and had physically thrown Ethan. He denies all the allegations heard in court and no further action was taken after his arrest.When asked why, if all the allegations were untrue, his partner and children left, he replied: "Her family like to get into her head."He said they would "make up all kinds of stuff to make sure I don't get to see my children" but that he had always maintained his innocence.Mr Griffiths said his relationship with Michael Ives was "sour from day one", when he first got together with Shannon Ives, aged 18.
The couple went on to have three children together.Mr Griffiths said Ethan was a "beautiful little boy" who had the "biggest of smiles"."He was a very, very loving boy and he was always wanting to do something. We said he had ants in his pants. He was always wanting to be running around and jumping around playing."Like any child would. He was just full of life, absolutely full of life."He described Ethan as "sassy" and "boisterous" and that he loved nothing more than a cuddle."Ethan was in his best element with his wellies on in the garden, no matter the weather," he said.Mr Griffiths said one of the happiest moments of his life was when Ethan and his other children were all playing in the garden one summer."We were having a great laugh, enjoying the sunshine, soaking it all in.He added: "We were just so happy."It was the first summer we'd all had together."We had no distractions, no-one else. It was just me and my children. That was all."
'The evilest people on Earth'
Michael and Kerry Ives and their daughter Shannon Ives are all due to be sentenced on 3 October.Mr Griffiths said he thought Michael and Kerry Ives were "arguably, the evilest people on Earth"."They are vile and disgusting, evil pieces of trash."They don't deserve to still be able to breathe our air while my son doesn't get to."It's a very horrible thing that they still get life, whereas my son doesn't."He said he hoped they would spend the rest of their lives in prison."I don't think any punishment could make up for what they've done".He said when it came to Ethan's mum Shannon Ives he felt a "lot of disappointment"."I would say I'm angry, but it's gone past that. It's gone past anger with her, and I'm just disgusted and disappointed in everything she's done and said and shown."Mr Griffiths said he blamed himself for "not just turning up to their house" as he now believes he would have been able bring attention to what was going on."I do blame myself for quite a lot of nothing happening," he said.In a statement, Flintshire council said it was "inconceivable that his young life was taken by those who should have protected him".The council said it was co-operating with an independent child practice review by the North Wales Safeguarding Board."In line with agreed practice the North Wales Safeguarding Board has appointed a panel to review the involvement of agencies," it said."The independent reviewers will produce a report identifying their findings and recommendations. The report will be presented to the safeguarding board for scrutiny and assurance."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
12 minutes ago
- BBC News
Maguiresbridge: Victims of fatal shooting to be laid to rest in County Clare
The funeral service for the mother and her two children murdered in County Fermanagh last week will be held on surgeon Vanessa Whyte, 45, her 14-year-old son James Rutledge and 13-year-old daughter Sara Rutledge were shot dead in Maguiresbridge last week.A funeral Mass is to take place in the Church of the Immaculate Conception in Ms Whyte's hometown of Barefield, County Clare, at 12:00 local will then be buried together in Templemaley Cemetery. Mourners attending the funeral have been asked to wear bright and cheerful colours in their Friday, hundreds gathered in the village to pay respect to Ms Whyte and her children as they lay in repose Brendan Quinlivan from the Diocese of Killaloe, said there has been such an "incredible sense of sympathy and empathy and outpouring of grief for all of Vanessa's family"."There are no words that are adequate to describe the depth of feeling and the sense of tragedy that is being felt by Vanessa's family, but also by the community," he spoke about Vanessa Whyte and that when she was younger, living in Barefield, she was "a very vivacious and lively young person".He added that her career as a veterinary surgeon is "a reflection of the generosity of spirit that would have been very much part of her and her family, and that she received from her family". Emergency services were called to the home of Ms Whyte and her children on the Drummeer Road on 23 July, a rural area about 75 miles (121km) west of Belfast and about eight miles from the county's largest town, of the victims were declared dead at the scene and a third died later that day in South West Acute after the attack, police said a man from the same household was in hospital with gunshot the shootings, police said a suspected triple murder and attempted suicide was one line of inquiry for Monday night, the man suspected the killings, 43-year-old Ian Rutledge, died in investigating the shooting also reiterated their appeal for "anyone with information, no matter how insignificant it may seem, to come forward".
Times
42 minutes ago
- Times
How drivers were sold a car finance compensation fantasy
Britain has narrowly avoided a costly car finance compensation free-for-all after a landmark court ruling derailed chances of a payout for millions of drivers. Claims lawyers had been bombarding consumers with adverts suggesting they may have been entitled to thousands of pounds in a scandal over hidden commission on car finance deals. The scandal had been expected to rival the mis-selling of payment protection insurance, which cost banks more than £38 billion. It was thought that nearly 15 million drivers could be entitled to payouts worth as much as £44 billion in total — although Friday's Supreme Court ruling means the numbers are set to be far smaller. Questions have now been raised over whether those using car finance really lost out and how many of them deserve compensation at all. The chancellor, Rachel Reeves, had tried to intervene ahead of the ruling — arguing that a colossal compensation bill for the industry would damage the economy and consumers. The Supreme Court ruled on three cases where consumers bought cars on finance and argued that they had been treated unfairly because they had not been told about commission involved in their deals — which ranged from £183 to £1,651. The court rejected two of the three cases, but upheld a complaint by Marcus Johnson, a factory worker from south Wales — because in his case the £1,651 commission in his loan was 55 per cent of the fee (including interest) on his loan over five years. 'The fact that the undisclosed commission was so high is a powerful indication that the relationship between Mr Johnson and the lender was unfair,' the court's judgment said. It leaves the door open to claims for compensation on deals that contained large amounts of commission, or where the commission model influenced what they paid. How much would be needed for a deal to be unfair is something that is likely to be decided by the City regulator, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which said it would confirm if it would introduce a redress scheme before stock markets open on Monday morning. The FCA had been investigating finance deals that had used a model called discretionary commission, which incentivised dealers to give customers a worse interest rate on their loan. However, a judgment by the Court of Appeal last October opened the door to compensation claims by millions of motorists who had bought cars on finance, regardless of the commission model. Lenders appealed to the Supreme Court over the ruling. About nine in ten cars are bought on finance and £39.7 billion was borrowed on more than two million cars in the year to May, according to the Finance and Leasing Association, a trade body. The Court of Appeal had ruled in October that car dealers had a duty to make clear the nature and value of any commission paid to them to ensure that borrowers could give 'informed consent' before agreeing to a deal. Reeves was among those concerned about a claims free-for-all, with the Treasury reportedly drawing up contingency plans to shield lenders from having to pay out billions of pounds in compensation. The Treasury attempted to intervene in the Supreme Court case, arguing that a ruling had 'the potential to adversely affect the United Kingdom's reputation as a place to do business, with a consequent impact on economic growth'. In the meantime complaints about car loans to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), a body that solves disputes, have risen from 4,130 in the first three months of 2023-24 to 37,230 in the last three months of 2024-25. Most of these have been brought by claims companies and no-win, no-fee law firms that file complaints on behalf of consumers in return for up to 30 per cent of any compensation. These companies have swamped radio, social media and television with adverts that tell consumers they could be owed thousands of pounds. On Thursday the FCA said it had required 224 adverts from claims firms about car finance to either be taken down or changed. There had been highly speculative figures advertised for how much consumers could get back, it said, including compensation figures that did not make clear they covered multiple car loans and misleading claims that refunds were guaranteed. It said companies had been signing up consumers without their consent after they clicked on adverts. Philip Salter, a former FCA regulator now at the consultancy Sicsic Advisory, said: 'I haven't liked a lot of the claims company advertising. You've had a lot of companies arguing that time is running out, but the clock hasn't even started. It's been a bit of an unseemly scramble.' • Common sense has triumphed over compensation culture If there is to be compensation for consumers, it is expected that the FCA will announce a free redress scheme where lenders will contact those eligible, meaning consumers should not need to use a claims company. Gary Greenwood from the investment bank Shore Capital said: 'It's one of those things where if you go by the letter of the law of the previous Court of Appeal judgment, you're almost coming to the conclusion that commission is bad. But the problem is that if you look at the reality of what had happened, there doesn't seem to have been a lot of consumer harm that's gone on. 'So any sort of redress has got to come down to: has there been any consumer harm here, or are people just trying to claim money back on a technicality?' Greenwood said. Charlie Nunn, the chief executive of Lloyds Banking Group, which runs Britain's biggest car finance lender, Black Horse, has denied the scandal was on the same level as PPI. 'Some 80 per cent of people need finance to buy a new car, and a large number of second-hand car buyers do as well,' he told The Times in January. 'We need a well-functioning motor finance industry that supports consumers.' The National Franchised Dealers Association, a trade body, told the Supreme Court that 'nobody goes to a car dealer with a reasonable expectation that it is acting without self-interest in relation to any of the products it sells'. The Supreme Court's judgment could have been the difference between lenders facing a compensation bill of £11 billion — for complaints about a specific form of commission — and £29 billion, according to Royal Bank of Canada Capital Markets, an investment bank. It could also have led to compensation claims about the sale of other financial products such as insurance where commission was involved but not properly disclosed. Consumers in turn could have had to foot the bill. Stuart Masson, the editor of the advice website The Car Expert UK, said that if lenders have to pay compensation to millions of people, car finance could get more expensive in the future as the industry tries to 'claw back' that money. 'That's not money they're going to find down the back of the sofa,' he told the BBC. 'They're going to have to get that back from increasing the costs of future lending, which won't just be on car finance. It could be on credit cards, it could be on personal loans, it could be on mortgages.' In January Reeves told bankers at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland: 'There is nothing pro-consumer about making it harder for people to buy an affordable car for their family.' Before the courts widened the scope of possible mis-selling, the FCA had been investigating a specific model of commission called discretionary commission. This is where the cut that lenders paid dealers was linked to the interest rate consumers were charged, incentivising dealers to charge borrowers more. This model was used in about 35 per cent of car finance deals, according to the FCA, before it banned the practice in January 2021. The FCA said consumers could have paid about £1,100 more in interest over a four-year £10,000 car finance deal because of this commission model — which is being used as the basis for many of the estimates around possible compensation. Salter, who worked on the ban when he was at the FCA, said: 'That previous Court of Appeal ruling surprised me. I think everyone knows that if they're buying a car the salesman's getting commission, don't they? But discretionary commission never felt right to me.' The FCA began its investigation in January last year on whether consumers had been properly told about the link between their repayments and the commission. The investigation was kicked off by two rulings by the ombudsman against Lloyds and Barclays last year, which ordered the banks to refund two consumers more than £1,000 each. The FCA is expected to set out its next steps, including whether there will be a redress scheme, within six weeks. Any scheme would be free and easy for consumers to use, it said, while the FOS is also free for consumers to appeal to. Rob Lilley-Jones from the consumer group Which? said: 'It's vital that finance firms are held accountable for mis-selling and if a large number of motorists are eligible for compensation consumers are likely to be bombarded with ads from claims firms offering to take on their case. 'Affected customers should be careful when enlisting the services of claims management companies as the wrong choice could lead to their case being poorly handled, losing a significant portion of the compensation in legal fees — or both.' Coby Benson from the law firm Bott & Co, which helped win the ombudsman's case against Lloyds, said the experience from PPI was that consumers could sometimes recover more money by going to court than through a redress scheme. He said: 'We would support a proactive redress scheme if it fairly compensated consumers. But we have doubts over the effective implementation of a scheme, because our data shows that about half of clients have a different address now to that which the lender had from the time of the agreement.'
BBC News
42 minutes ago
- BBC News
Council condemns drivers breaching Lowestoft bridge safety lights
More than 100 breaches of a bridge's red safety lights have been branded as "irresponsible" by a March and July 112 motorists using the Gull Wing Bridge in Lowestoft were caught racing through the lights to avoid waiting for the bridge to be raised, Suffolk County Council the Highways Code, motorists at flashing red lights at places like lifting bridges must stop. Failure to do so could result in penalty points or West, the council's cabinet member for operational highways, said tougher measures were being considered to tackle the issue and prevent accidents including installing automatic number plate recognition cameras. "I'm surprised it is so high," he said. "It's irresponsible driving. The majority of people are law abiding and are very sensible, but a very tiny minority are trying to jump the red lights and it only puts themselves and others in danger."Obviously one or two people always try these things, but we need to get across the message that the barrier and the red lights are there for a reason - to protect all road users. People need to adhere to that even if they're in a hurry."They need to stop at the red light, that's the safe thing to do." West added that taxpayers have to bear the cost of repairing any damage to the began recording breaches after they noticed more one occasion a van raced through and collided with the barrier, leaving it inoperable until it was council was pursuing a claim for the costs, but West said this would not be possible to do in every case. The authority was also considering putting ANPR (Automatic Number Plate Recognition) cameras in place."It isn't something we're ruling out, we're looking at that seriously because we've got to get those numbers of people jumping the red light down," West bridge opened in September and is the third crossing over Lake Lothing. Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
