Denmark blasts ‘unacceptable' pressure from Trump over Greenland
President Donald Trump has expressed interest in the United States acquiring the strategically important, mineral-rich Arctic island for national and international security reasons, even suggesting the potential use of force.
Frederiksen, in a National Day speech, stated, "The world order we've built through generations is being challenged like never before."
She added, "In recent months Greenland and Denmark have been subjected to unacceptable pressure from our closest ally," alluding to the United States.
US Vice President JD Vance visited the island in March, criticising Denmark, a fellow NATO member, for its handling of Greenland's safety. Vance proposed that the United States could provide better protection for the territory.
Vance's visit occurred after the Demokraatit party's election victory in Greenland. The party advocates for a gradual approach to independence, differing from other parties that propose a more rapid departure.
Leaders of Denmark and Greenland have said only Greenlanders can decide the territory's future, and the Danish constitution gives the island the right to seek independence.
Fundamental principles in the transatlantic relationship such as national sovereignty, the respect for borders and people's right to self-determination are now at stake, Frederiksen said.
"But we don't bend. We Danes are not like that," she added.
Denmark's King Frederik, who is popular in Greenland, visited the island in late April in a show of unity amid the diplomatic stand-off with Trump.
A 1951 agreement between the United States and Denmark gives the US the right to construct military bases in Greenland as long as Denmark and Greenland are notified.
The island, whose capital Nuuk is closer to New York than Copenhagen, boasts mineral, oil and natural gas wealth, but development has been slow and the mining sector has seen very limited US investment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
NATO military leaders to meet on Wednesday to discuss Ukraine
Aug 19 (Reuters) - NATO military leaders are expected to meet on Wednesday to discuss Ukraine and the way forward, U.S. and NATO officials said on Tuesday, as Washington and European capitals work out details of what security guarantees might look like for Kyiv. Ukraine and its European allies have been buoyed by U.S. President Donald Trump's promise of security guarantees to help end the war during a summit on Monday, but face many unanswered questions. U.S. Air Force General Alexus Grynkewich, who also oversees all NATO operations in Europe, will brief the chiefs of defense on the results of the Alaska meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin last week. Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, chairman of NATO's military committee, said there would be a video conference on Wednesday. "As diplomatic efforts to secure peace in #Ukraine progress, looking forward to (Grynkewich's) update on the current security environment," Dragone said on X. Officials pointed out the meeting was taking place during unique circumstances and expected topics such as the security guarantee to be discussed. Reuters was first to report the meeting. A U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said U.S. General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was expected to attend the meeting, but plans could change. The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The British government said what is known as the Coalition of the Willing, which met virtually on Tuesday, had agreed their planning teams would meet with U.S. counterparts in the coming days to advance plans for security guarantees for Ukraine. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said after his meeting with Trump and European leaders that security guarantees for Kyiv will likely be worked out within 10 days. Earlier on Tuesday, Trump ruled out placing American soldiers in Ukraine and gave no specifics about the security guarantees he has previously said Washington could offer Kyiv under any post-war settlement. Officials have told Reuters the Pentagon is carrying out planning exercises on the type of support Washington could offer that goes beyond simply providing weapons.
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Donald Trump says UK troops will be sent to Ukraine to 'join American soldiers'
The US president firmly stated that the Ukraine are "not going to be part of NATO" but insisted European troops, including British forces, would be sent to "deter any future Russian aggression. Donald Trump has said Britain will deploy troops on the ground in Ukraine, less than 24 hours after suggesting American soldiers could also be sent to the war-zone. The US president firmly stated that Ukraine is "not going to be part of NATO" but insisted European troops, including British forces, would be sent to "deter any future Russian aggression. As the Mirror reports, the US president told Fox News: "(Ukraine) are not going to be part of NATO but we've got the European nations, so they'll front-load it and they'll have - some of them, France and Germany, a couple of them, the UK - they are going to have boots on the ground," he said. 'I don't think it's going to be a problem, to be honest. I think Putin is tired of it, I think they are all tired of it, but you never know. We are going to find out about President Putin in the next couple of weeks, that I can tell you.' Trump also conceded that a peace deal might not be achievable, saying: 'It's possible he doesn't want to make a deal.' The comments marked a dramatic shift in tone. Just a day earlier, the president, in front of Volodmyr Zelesnky, had floated the possibility that US troops could eventually be involved in Ukraine. When asked if the US will have boots on the ground as part of a security guarantee for Ukraine, as he had indicated on Monday, Trump categorically denied that. "You have my assurance, and I am president," he said. His subsequent assertion that only European allies would send soldiers appeared designed to calm domestic concern over American military entanglement while shifting responsibility for Ukraine's defence squarely onto Europe. During the Fox News appearance, which came just hours after European leaders, including the Prime Minister, left the White House, Trump said he had already discussed Washington's stance with US allies, as well as Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission. He described conversations in which he suggested Europe should prepare for a different approach once he leaves office. Asked if he had raised the issue of future security guarantees, Trump replied: 'We talked about it. You know, it is what it is. I could say the same thing about them. 'Supposing you got a terrible leader in UK or France or, you know, we had Ursula (von der Leyen) there who runs the whole gamut, you know, we just made the biggest trade deal in the world with. She's in charge of the Commission, the European Commission. And she's the boss. She was there too.' The president claimed his guests at the White House had praised his economic record, contrasting the current state of the US with what he described as national decline a year earlier. 'Our country has gone from a dead country one year ago. We're the hottest country in the world, and every one of those people said it yesterday. They said, 'in six months, you've made this the hottest country in the world,'' he said. His comment came amid heightened anxiety in European capitals about Washington's reliability as an ally. NATO members have already increased defence spending and pledged long-term support for Kyiv, but Trump's insistence that Ukraine will not join the alliance while encouraging European troop deployments underscores the fragile balance between deterrence and escalation. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. His repeated suggestion that President Putin is 'tired of it' was received with scepticism in diplomatic circles, given Russia's sustained military campaign and reluctance to agree to a ceasefire. Critics argue that such comments risk emboldening the Kremlin while unnerving Western partners. By explicitly ruling out NATO membership for Ukraine and promising that Britain, France and Germany would provide troops instead of the US, Trump once again threw established alliance policy into confusion. It came as Keir Starmer said European and US leaders are drawing up "robust" plans to defend Ukraine if a peace deal is reached. The Prime Minister today headed a meeting of the 'Coalition of the Willing', with members agreeing to look at more sanctions on Putin's Russia. A No10 spokesman said after today's meeting: 'The Prime Minister co-chaired a virtual meeting of the Coalition of the Willing this morning with over 30 international leaders to update on the talks in Washington last night. 'The Prime Minister began by reflecting on the constructive meeting, saying it was clear there was a real sense of unity and shared goal of securing a just and lasting peace for Ukraine. Turning to next steps, the Prime Minister outlined that Coalition of the Willing planning teams would meet with their US counterparts in the coming days to further strengthen plans to deliver robust security guarantees and prepare for the deployment of a reassurance force if the hostilities ended. 'The leaders also discussed how further pressure – including through sanctions – could be placed on Putin until he showed he was ready to take serious action to end his illegal invasion. The Prime Minister said he looked forward to updating the group again soon, as further work progressed in the coming days and weeks.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Putin must tread carefully amid hyped up expectations of breakthrough
The mood in the White House on Monday was strikingly upbeat. Nato's ever-cheerful secretary general, Mark Rutte, set the tone as he addressed Donald Trump, Volodymyr Zelenskyy and the gathered European leaders. 'Let's make the best out of today,' he said with a smile, before repeatedly thanking the US president for his attention to the war in Ukraine. That ritual of praise and gratitude continued throughout the day, as Zelenskyy and European leaders hailed supposed breakthroughs and spoke of progress on issues that remain far from clear. Much of what unfolded at the White House looked less like serious planning to end the conflict than a performance for an audience of one: persuading Trump that Russia was the obstacle to peace. When the US president suggested that Putin was ready for a meeting with Zelenskyy, other leaders quickly echoed the claim until it acquired the ring of truth. Rutte even told Fox News Putin had agreed to meet Zelenskyy, a claim Moscow has conspicuously declined to confirm, instead saying that any such meeting would need to be 'prepared extremely carefully'. The conversation in Washington soon moved to security guarantees. European leaders made clear they were prepared to go further than before in pledging protection for Ukraine – from article 5-style mutual defence commitments to talk of a British-backed 'reassurance force' under a settlement. But those ambitious pledges were as much about perception as policy. Moscow has made clear that Nato troops in Ukraine are a red line, and Putin shows little interest in meeting Zelenskyy. Putin insists Zelensky is not a legitimate leader and has said that any meeting with him would only take place to sign a final peace deal. Yet European leaders continue to push both ideas, which some observers view as a tactic to make Putin appear the one unwilling to budge. 'Most of their [European] optimistic statements aren't true beliefs, but meant to influence Trump. Europeans hype up expectations to create a reality in which Putin disappoints,' Janis Kluge, a researcher at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, wrote on X. 'Europeans (hopefully) know that Putin will never agree to Nato troops in Ukraine. They know that Putin doesn't want to meet Zelenskyy. But they pretend all that is a realistic possibility to make Putin look as bad as he really is, to undermine Putin's own narratives,' Kluge added. Putin, who has himself shown little desire to compromise on his maximalist demands, has also tried to frame the other side as the obstacle to peace. In remarks after his Alaska summit with Trump, the Russian president warned that Kyiv and European capitals should not 'throw a wrench in the works' by pursuing back-room dealings that could derail the 'agreements' he reached with Trump. There remains widespread confusion over what exactly Trump proposed and what, if anything, Putin agreed to during the Alaska summit. Trump's team has presented Putin's core concession as agreeing to US and European security guarantees for Ukraine – though even that remains murky. Moscow is reported to have floated a different idea: that China, Russia's ally, act as one of the guarantors of Ukraine's security, reviving a proposal first tabled by Russian negotiators during talks in Turkey in spring 2022. For now, Europe's tactic seems to have paid off: Trump has temporarily refrained from attacking Zelenskyy or demanding that Ukraine hand over territory on the spot. Putin, meanwhile, is being forced to now tread carefully in response to Trump's push for a Zelenskyy meeting. The Kremlin is expected to intensify pressure on Kyiv to accept Russian terms, framing it as groundwork for talks. 'That way Moscow can deflect claims Putin won't meet Zelenskyy, while signalling that any talks depend on Kyiv's willingness to concede,' said Tatiana Stanovaya, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Centre. But Europe's far-reaching promises, designed in part to draw a reaction from Putin, may prove unrealistic once Ukraine needs clarity about what support it can truly expect. 'Security guarantees come in lots of shapes and sizes. But let's be clear: there's not going to be a US or European commitment to go to war with Russia if it reinvades Ukraine,' said Samuel Charap, a senior political scientist at Rand, a nonprofit global policy thinktank. 'This conversation is becoming divorced from reality,' Charap added.
