logo
Map Shows States With Highest Use Of Harmful Pesticides

Map Shows States With Highest Use Of Harmful Pesticides

Newsweek15 hours ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Midwestern and Southern states use much higher rates of the potentially harmful pesticide 2,4-D, according to U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) data.
A map by USGS, based on the latest data, collected in 2019, shows that use is most prevalent across Iowa, Missouri, Kansas, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky, with other states also using the herbicide in certain areas.
2,4-D was found to be "possibly carcinogenic to humans" in a 2015 report by International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in the World Health Organization (WHO), although the report states there was "inadequate evidence" at the time to determine the extent of its harm.
But there are justified concerns about potential harm, depending on exposure levels to 2,4-D.
Newsweek has contacted the Department of Agriculture (USDA) via email for comment.
Why It Matters
2,4-D has been used as a pesticide since the 1940s, and gained notoriety as one of the components of Agent Orange, the defoliant used by U.S. forces during the Vietnam War to destroy forestry and crops.
While the other component of Agent Orange, 2,4,5-T, contained high levels of dioxin which was found to cause cancer and other health problems, dioxins are reportedly not found at detectable levels in 2,4-D products sold and used in the United States, USDA said.
However, there is still some concern about the safety of its use, particularly as it has been used more widely in the last decade.
A map to show the use of 2,4-D pesticides in different US states.
A map to show the use of 2,4-D pesticides in different US states.
Uncredited/U.S. Geological Survey
What To Know
2,4-D is used to kill broadleaf weeds in various places, from lawns to fruit and vegetable crops, according to USDA.
"The Midwest, Great Plains, and Northwestern U.S. have the highest 2,4-D usage, largely because these regions are the primary producers of corn, soybeans, wheat, and other field crops that are commonly treated with 2,4-D," Gurumurthy Ramachandran, director of the Johns Hopkins Education and Research Center for Occupational Safety and Health, told Newsweek.
The increase in its use has been primarily due to the "rise of glyphosate-resistant weeds," Ramachandran said. Glyphosate, a once dominant herbicide, has become less effective as many weed species have developed resistance to it.
To combat these resistant weeds, farmers have turned to alternative herbicides like 2,4-D, given its effective and low-cost control of broadleaf weeds.
However, while USDA reported that "2,4-D generally has low toxicity for humans," others may disagree.
The herbicide has been linked to significant health concerns, including non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), endocrine disruption, a decrease in fertility and increase in birth defects, according to the nonprofit organization Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC).
The IARC report detailed that there was "strong evidence that 2,4-D induces oxidative stress, a mechanism that can operate in humans, and moderate evidence that 2,4-D causes immunosuppression, based on in vivo and in vitro studies."
"However, epidemiological studies did not find strong or consistent increases in risk of NHL or other cancers in relation to 2,4-D exposure," it added.
The IARC also told Newsweek that the classification does not indicate the level of risk associated with a given level or circumstance of exposure.
"The cancer risk associated with substances or agents assigned the same classification may be very different, depending on factors such as the type and extent of exposure and the degree of the effect of the agent at a given level of exposure," the organization said.
The issue is that pesticides "can remain on or in food, and chronic dietary exposure has been linked to increased risks of metabolic syndrome, cancers, and other health problems," Ramachandran said.
They can also "contaminate water, air, and soil, potentially affecting people living near treated fields or those exposed through drift and runoff," he added.
This means that's its important for Americans to "wash all fruits and vegetables thoroughly before consumption; consider choosing organic produce to reduce dietary pesticide exposure, especially for children and pregnant women; and avoid entering fields or areas recently treated with pesticides and follow posted warnings," Ramachandran said.
What People Are Saying
Cynthia Curl, a professor in the School of Public and Population Health at Boise State University, Idaho, told Newsweek: "I think we need to be judicious in our use of these agricultural tools, understanding that exposures to these chemicals have been associated with adverse health effects. We should be supporting federal programs like the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, the United States Department of Agriculture, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration that fund research, outreach and education to evaluate pesticide safety and support interventions to reduce pesticide exposures to workers, people living in agricultural communities and the general public."
David F. Goldsmith, an occupational and environmental epidemiologist at Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, D.C, told Newsweek: "I am concerned if farmers or farmworkers are not using effective safety gear and thus may be excessively exposed via inhalation or skin contact. I am also concerned that 2,4-D may contaminate drinking water sources. Although, I believe that there is a direct risk for people who buy produce from fields that have had 2,4-D used on them."
He added: "The public needs to be informed and vigilant about the use of herbicides, keeping them away from children, schools and using protective equipment such as gloves, face masks, and goggles. For farm workers, many of whom do not speak English, the information on the Material Safety Data Sheet needs to be translated and the farm managers who are sending them out into the fields need to ensure they have personal protective equipment, that they wear long sleeves and gloves."
Gerald LeBlanc, a professor in the Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, told Newsweek: "I am not concerned that 2,4-D may cause cancer in humans. IARC has classified 2,4-D as a Group 2B carcinogen, which means that it is possibly carcinogenic to humans. In my estimation, 2,4-D might cause cancer in humans, but only at unrealistically high exposure levels."
He added: "It's essential to recognize that toxicity is just one side of the coin when assessing chemical risk. The other side is exposure. Pesticide applicators are exposed to much higher levels than consumers of the agricultural products. Therefore, pesticide applicators may be at risk while the pesticide may pose no risk to consumers. The EPA sets limits on the amount of pesticides that can be found on agricultural products. As long as these limits are not exceeded, the pesticides are considered to be safe for human consumption. This is the case for 2,4-D, where residues associated with crops are typically well below levels that pose a risk of harm to consumers."
What's Next
Before the extent of the health impacts of 2,4-D are made clear, more research is needed and various governmental agencies are continuing to review the herbicide's safety.
It's also important to note, the USGS map is based on 2019 data, the latest data collected by the agency, so the prevalence and use of the pesticide may have changed in more recent years.
More recently, farmers have been finding "new replacements" for the pesticide, Diana S. Aga, a professor of chemistry at University at Buffalo, New York, and fellow of the American Chemical Society, told Newsweek.
The USGS also told Newsweek that final annual pesticide-use estimates, for approximately 400 compounds, from 2018 to 2022 will be published later this year.
"The pesticide use data releases are currently undergoing peer review, and we anticipate these products will be published around September 2025," they said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

That loud boom over the Southeast? It was likely a fireball
That loud boom over the Southeast? It was likely a fireball

Axios

time11 hours ago

  • Axios

That loud boom over the Southeast? It was likely a fireball

Thursday's loud, rolling rumble — and, for some, a sudden flash and white streak in the sky — might have been a fireball from a meteor passing over metro Atlanta. Why it matters: More than 100 people from Georgia and parts of South Carolina and Florida reported to the American Meteor Society a potential fireball around 12:30pm. Driving the news: Mike Hankey, operations manager at the American Meteor Society (AMS), told Axios that metro Atlantans likely experienced a "daytime fireball" that caused a sonic boom. "This is usually indicative of a meteorite dropping a fireball, but not always," Hankey said. AMS is NASA's Center for Near Earth Object Studies' recommended organization for reporting fireballs. Catch up quick: Around 12:30pm on Thursday, people using social media across metro Atlanta reported what felt and sounded like a repeat of May's earthquake in Tennessee, felt as far south as Middle Georgia. However, the U.S. Geological Survey's earthquake monitor showed no nearby seismic activity. Yes, but: According to atmospheric scientist Matthew Cappucci, what appeared to be a meteor passed over Atlanta's east side, exploded and possibly scattered fragments in South Carolina. WSB-TV chief meteorologist Brad Nitz posted on X, formerly known as Twitter, that the spectacle was probably "rock, dust, or debris from a comet's trail that enters the [Earth's] atmosphere." "The friction creates heat and we can see it burn up in the sky." Stunning stat: Meteor events occur probably once a week, Hankey said. But meteor events on Thursday's scale are rare, likely happening 10 to 20 times a year globally. "For the U.S., we might get three to five like this each year." The intrigue: Roughly 10 meteorites are recovered every year, but most go unfound. By the numbers: People have found 28 "unique and classified" meteorites in Georgia, according to Hankey.

Map Shows States With Highest Use Of Harmful Pesticides
Map Shows States With Highest Use Of Harmful Pesticides

Newsweek

time15 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Map Shows States With Highest Use Of Harmful Pesticides

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Midwestern and Southern states use much higher rates of the potentially harmful pesticide 2,4-D, according to U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) data. A map by USGS, based on the latest data, collected in 2019, shows that use is most prevalent across Iowa, Missouri, Kansas, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky, with other states also using the herbicide in certain areas. 2,4-D was found to be "possibly carcinogenic to humans" in a 2015 report by International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in the World Health Organization (WHO), although the report states there was "inadequate evidence" at the time to determine the extent of its harm. But there are justified concerns about potential harm, depending on exposure levels to 2,4-D. Newsweek has contacted the Department of Agriculture (USDA) via email for comment. Why It Matters 2,4-D has been used as a pesticide since the 1940s, and gained notoriety as one of the components of Agent Orange, the defoliant used by U.S. forces during the Vietnam War to destroy forestry and crops. While the other component of Agent Orange, 2,4,5-T, contained high levels of dioxin which was found to cause cancer and other health problems, dioxins are reportedly not found at detectable levels in 2,4-D products sold and used in the United States, USDA said. However, there is still some concern about the safety of its use, particularly as it has been used more widely in the last decade. A map to show the use of 2,4-D pesticides in different US states. A map to show the use of 2,4-D pesticides in different US states. Uncredited/U.S. Geological Survey What To Know 2,4-D is used to kill broadleaf weeds in various places, from lawns to fruit and vegetable crops, according to USDA. "The Midwest, Great Plains, and Northwestern U.S. have the highest 2,4-D usage, largely because these regions are the primary producers of corn, soybeans, wheat, and other field crops that are commonly treated with 2,4-D," Gurumurthy Ramachandran, director of the Johns Hopkins Education and Research Center for Occupational Safety and Health, told Newsweek. The increase in its use has been primarily due to the "rise of glyphosate-resistant weeds," Ramachandran said. Glyphosate, a once dominant herbicide, has become less effective as many weed species have developed resistance to it. To combat these resistant weeds, farmers have turned to alternative herbicides like 2,4-D, given its effective and low-cost control of broadleaf weeds. However, while USDA reported that "2,4-D generally has low toxicity for humans," others may disagree. The herbicide has been linked to significant health concerns, including non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), endocrine disruption, a decrease in fertility and increase in birth defects, according to the nonprofit organization Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). The IARC report detailed that there was "strong evidence that 2,4-D induces oxidative stress, a mechanism that can operate in humans, and moderate evidence that 2,4-D causes immunosuppression, based on in vivo and in vitro studies." "However, epidemiological studies did not find strong or consistent increases in risk of NHL or other cancers in relation to 2,4-D exposure," it added. The IARC also told Newsweek that the classification does not indicate the level of risk associated with a given level or circumstance of exposure. "The cancer risk associated with substances or agents assigned the same classification may be very different, depending on factors such as the type and extent of exposure and the degree of the effect of the agent at a given level of exposure," the organization said. The issue is that pesticides "can remain on or in food, and chronic dietary exposure has been linked to increased risks of metabolic syndrome, cancers, and other health problems," Ramachandran said. They can also "contaminate water, air, and soil, potentially affecting people living near treated fields or those exposed through drift and runoff," he added. This means that's its important for Americans to "wash all fruits and vegetables thoroughly before consumption; consider choosing organic produce to reduce dietary pesticide exposure, especially for children and pregnant women; and avoid entering fields or areas recently treated with pesticides and follow posted warnings," Ramachandran said. What People Are Saying Cynthia Curl, a professor in the School of Public and Population Health at Boise State University, Idaho, told Newsweek: "I think we need to be judicious in our use of these agricultural tools, understanding that exposures to these chemicals have been associated with adverse health effects. We should be supporting federal programs like the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, the United States Department of Agriculture, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration that fund research, outreach and education to evaluate pesticide safety and support interventions to reduce pesticide exposures to workers, people living in agricultural communities and the general public." David F. Goldsmith, an occupational and environmental epidemiologist at Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, D.C, told Newsweek: "I am concerned if farmers or farmworkers are not using effective safety gear and thus may be excessively exposed via inhalation or skin contact. I am also concerned that 2,4-D may contaminate drinking water sources. Although, I believe that there is a direct risk for people who buy produce from fields that have had 2,4-D used on them." He added: "The public needs to be informed and vigilant about the use of herbicides, keeping them away from children, schools and using protective equipment such as gloves, face masks, and goggles. For farm workers, many of whom do not speak English, the information on the Material Safety Data Sheet needs to be translated and the farm managers who are sending them out into the fields need to ensure they have personal protective equipment, that they wear long sleeves and gloves." Gerald LeBlanc, a professor in the Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, told Newsweek: "I am not concerned that 2,4-D may cause cancer in humans. IARC has classified 2,4-D as a Group 2B carcinogen, which means that it is possibly carcinogenic to humans. In my estimation, 2,4-D might cause cancer in humans, but only at unrealistically high exposure levels." He added: "It's essential to recognize that toxicity is just one side of the coin when assessing chemical risk. The other side is exposure. Pesticide applicators are exposed to much higher levels than consumers of the agricultural products. Therefore, pesticide applicators may be at risk while the pesticide may pose no risk to consumers. The EPA sets limits on the amount of pesticides that can be found on agricultural products. As long as these limits are not exceeded, the pesticides are considered to be safe for human consumption. This is the case for 2,4-D, where residues associated with crops are typically well below levels that pose a risk of harm to consumers." What's Next Before the extent of the health impacts of 2,4-D are made clear, more research is needed and various governmental agencies are continuing to review the herbicide's safety. It's also important to note, the USGS map is based on 2019 data, the latest data collected by the agency, so the prevalence and use of the pesticide may have changed in more recent years. More recently, farmers have been finding "new replacements" for the pesticide, Diana S. Aga, a professor of chemistry at University at Buffalo, New York, and fellow of the American Chemical Society, told Newsweek. The USGS also told Newsweek that final annual pesticide-use estimates, for approximately 400 compounds, from 2018 to 2022 will be published later this year. "The pesticide use data releases are currently undergoing peer review, and we anticipate these products will be published around September 2025," they said.

Dog Has Accident on White Rug, What Husband Does Leaves Wife Speechless
Dog Has Accident on White Rug, What Husband Does Leaves Wife Speechless

Newsweek

time15 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Dog Has Accident on White Rug, What Husband Does Leaves Wife Speechless

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. A mom of two has told Newsweek about her husband's unconventional approach to dealing with the mess their dog left on a rug. Becoming a father to a young child can change a man. One study published in the scientific journal Cerebral Cortex even suggested the experience changes the shape of the male human brain. That was the conclusion reached following an experiment in which the brains of 20 expectant fathers were scanned before and after the birth of a baby, and then compared with the brains of 17 childless men. Researchers identified changes to the cortex of the fathers' brains after the births, while the childless men experienced no such shift. The scientists behind the study theorized the change was likely part of an attempt in the brain to restructure thinking to better support fatherhood. However, it could also be linked to the added stress and sleep disruption that comes with being a dad. Fatherhood certainly appeared to change the way Justin Lehman from Ohio's brain worked, if the story shared to Instagram under the handle @twomuchtosay by his wife, Chelsea Lehman, is anything to go by. It recalls a time, just after the birth of their first child, when both mom and dad were feeling the strain of being new parents. "We were living in a one-bedroom apartment while waiting for our house to be built," Chelsea told Newsweek. "We had just had our first child. He was 4 months old and never ever slept. We were so sleep-deprived, we couldn't even form sentences." It was around this time that Chelsea went back to work, with Justin picking up shifts later in the day to be with their son for the first part. "His 82-year-old grandpa would come sit at the house with our son for an hour or two in the gap of time where Justin was gone to work and I wasn't home yet," Chelsea said. That arrangement worked well for everyone except their dog, Brutus, of course. Matters came to a head on one particular day when Justin's grandpa found himself with his grandson fast asleep on him and no way of getting up to let Brutus out for a walk without disturbing the 4-month-old's much-needed rest. Brutus was getting antsy. "He needed to go outside, but the baby was asleep," Chelsea said. "So, grandpa was nap-trapped and had to watch Brutus poop right on the shaggy, white rug." Justin returned from work an hour or two later to find his son still fast asleep on grandpa and a large pile of dog mess nearby. In that kind of situation, most would have started the arduous process of removing the dog poop and cleaning the rug. Justin wasn't most people, though, as Chelsea would later discover. "He pulled out his pocketknife and cut the rug and called it a day," she said. Chelsea was left speechless when she returned home later to find a chunk of the rug missing. "My mouth dropped open because it was so unlike my husband to do something like this that I couldn't believe my eyes," she said. "Then I just laughed, probably from the lack of sleep. I kept trying to figure out how he did it without cutting the floor underneath, I still don't understand that." When Chelsea asked Justin to explain his logic, her husband told her: "I don't know why. The rug was shaggy, and we didn't like it anyways, and I was just overwhelmed with trying to get the new house done and didn't want to spend an hour trying to clean sick dog poop out of a shaggy rug." To Justin's way of thinking at the time, he was better off just trying to "cut it out and be done with it." Though it took her by surprise, the fact is Chelsea was inclined to agree with her husband's assessment of the rug. "We both hated it. It was a cheap, itchy thing we bought from Walmart just so Brutus didn't slip all over the hardwood when he walked," Chelsea said. It may have been a strange thing to witness at the time, but it is also an amusing memory and hilarious reminder of how the arrival of a new baby can do strange things to a man.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store