Activists protest outside Parliament, demand justice for murdered child, 11
Jayden-Lee Meek was murdered outside his home after failing to come home on 12 May 2025.
Image: Supplied
At their own expense, a Johannesburg-based women's rights organisation has travelled to Cape Town to picket outside Parliament in a desperate bid to force the police to take decisive action in the brutal murder case of 11-year-old Jayden-Lee Meek.
The Women Empowerment Platform (WEP), led by founder Natalie Solomons, joined local activists and community leaders in calling for justice after Jayden-Lee's body was found just metres from his home in Fleurhof, Roodepoort.
The organisation is urging Parliament and the Portfolio Committee on Police to prioritise the case and ensure that an arrest is made.
'We got involved in the Jayden case because it's a child who was murdered in the very community we serve,' said Solomons.
'I still can't get the picture of how he was found that morning out of my head. It was a very evil sight to see – I don't know how somebody can do that to a little boy. I'm a mother. There's no way I could turn away from this. That's why we travelled from Johannesburg to Parliament. We want action. Someone needs to be held accountable.'
Jayden-Lee went missing on Tuesday, 12 May 2025. He was last seen being dropped off by school transport at around 3.30 pm at the Swazi Court complex, where he lived.
According to his mother, who works from home, Jayden never made it inside the flat.
His body was discovered the following day, just two metres from their doorstep. He was rushed to Discovery Hospital, where he was declared dead.
Anti-gender based activists picketing outside parliament demanding justice for slain Jayden-Lee Meek
Image: Supplied
According to witnesses, his body was still warm when found, indicating he may have died shortly before being discovered.
What followed has sparked outrage.
Community members say police and forensic teams only arrived after residents had already begun searching for Jayden's school clothes and bag.
According to community members, the crime scene was neither secured nor barricaded, and no arrests have been made more than two weeks after his death.
Community activist Althea Cluff, among the first to raise the alarm, said she fears the case will simply fade away.
'We are afraid this case will be buried like so many others — that it will become another cold case.'
Solomons and Cluff were livestreaming from the scene on TikTok the day Jayden's body was found, demanding urgent action from authorities.
The Women Empowerment Platform, established in 2020, runs a children's home called Legacy Children's Home and a gender-based violence (GBV) facility in Northcliff, Johannesburg.
The organisation currently houses over 10 children rescued from abusive environments.
'We see these horrors daily,' said Solomons. 'One of the girls we're housing now is 11, the same age as Jayden, and she was raped (and sodomised).
But Jayden's case hit differently. That picture of his body lying there... As a mother, I just couldn't turn away.'
Following pressure from activists, a meeting was held on 27 May at Parliament with MP Dereleen James.
The delegation submitted a formal request for a sitting with the Portfolio Committee on Police and was granted permission to hold a peaceful picket.
The case has since drawn national attention, with South Africans from multiple provinces donating to support the efforts of the self-funded group. But what the activists want most, is justice.
'We are not going anywhere until there is justice,' said Cluff. 'Jayden deserves that. All our children do.'
The community continues to call on SAPS, the Ministry of Police, and Parliament to ensure that the investigation proceeds swiftly, transparently, and with the urgency it deserves.
Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Police, Ian Cameron, confirmed that the committee had unanimously supported the call for a dedicated meeting to address Jayden-Lee's death and the broader policing challenges it exposes.
'This follows a formal request sent to me yesterday by committee member Dereleen James MP,' said Cameron.
'We will ensure that the necessary accountability mechanisms are activated without delay. South Africa's children deserve better, and we will act accordingly.'
[email protected]
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
4 hours ago
- The South African
SECOND group of white Afrikaner 'refugees' arrive in United States
A second group of white South African Afrikaners have reportedly arrived in the United States under a controversial refugee policy signed by President Donald Trump earlier this year, sparking renewed global debate over race, immigration, and political messaging. According to posts from the US-based advocacy group Amerikaners , nine white South Africans landed in Atlanta this week as part of a pilot programme framed by the Trump administration as a response to alleged violence and land expropriation in South Africa – claims widely discredited by international human rights organisations. The executive order, quietly signed in February, granted refugee status to select white South Africans, citing fears of a so-called 'white genocide' – a term critics say is rooted in white nationalist rhetoric rather than verified facts. Organisations like Human Rights Watch and Africa Check maintain that while farm attacks do occur, there is no evidence of systemic targeting along racial lines. Among the recent arrivals is Charl Kleinhaus, 46, from Mpumalanga, who told the BBC he left his home, family, and dogs behind to pursue what he called a 'safer future' for his children. Another, 48-year-old Errol Langton, a farmer from KwaZulu-Natal, expressed hope to continue farming in the US. A source within the US government told The Hill that the goal is to resettle 'thousands more' Afrikaners by the end of the American summer, with consular processing already being expedited in Pretoria and Cape Town. This rapid acceleration has raised red flags. Critics say the policy selectively elevates a racially privileged group while overlooking far greater humanitarian crises in conflict zones like Sudan, Yemen, or the DRC. Still, right-wing US commentators have praised the move as a humanitarian response. South African reactions, meanwhile, remain split: some see it as a lifeline; others as a dangerous and racially charged distortion of the country's reality. Both the US State Department and the South African government have declined to comment publicly on the numbers or long-term intentions of the refugee programme. Analysts warn it could become a flashpoint issue in both domestic and foreign policy – particularly as the US heads into the 2026 election cycle. For now, however, the quiet arrival of these Afrikaner families marks the start of a broader, more contentious immigration experiment – one unfolding at the intersection of politics, identity, and international diplomacy. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
11 hours ago
- IOL News
Gauteng High Court's mediation directive faces legal action from accident victim
A car accident victim is challenging a directive by the Gauteng high court which makes mediation mandatory before civil trials are heard. She demands her day in court and says she cannot afford mediation. Image: Jacques Naude / Independent Newspapers WHILE the Constitutional Court has declined leave to a law firm to directly approach the apex court in an urgent bid to overturn a directive introducing mandatory mediation in the Gauteng Division of the High Court, a vehicle accident victim who is also objecting to the directives will take her plight to court. The Durban-based woman, who is left a paraplegic following the accident, will turn to the Gauteng High Court, Pretoria later in June to ultimately have the directives issued by the head of the court overturned. She said her accident occurred six years ago and she eventually obtained a court date issued in 2023 for her hearing. Her matter is scheduled to be heard in August this year, but her case is now first subject to arbitration in terms of the directive. This follows a directive issued by Judge President Dunstan Mlambo earlier this year that the Johannesburg and Pretoria high courts no longer allocate trial dates for civil cases (cases where evidence is being led, such as damages claims). Litigants, who in these cases want a judge to determine their issues, must first prove that they have tried to resolve their issues via mediation. A trial date will be allocated only if mediation does not resolve the issues, and they can prove via a certificate that they did try it. The Office of the Chief Justice earlier explained that there are no alternatives as the Gauteng Divisions simply cannot cope with the heavy workload. Judge Mlambo also commented in his directive that the bulk of these cases are, in any event, settled on the day of the trial. Thus, the mediation route is the practical solution so that judges can be freed to adjudicate over other matters. The woman will meanwhile bring her application in two parts - the first is that she and others may retain the court dates they have secured before the new directive came into force in April. The second part in which she is contesting the legality of the directive, will be heard at a later stage. The accident victim in this new legal challenge explained that it is expected of her (and others) to first pay the mediation fees before a mediator can adjudicate her case. She explained that before the accident she was a hairdresser. As she is now wheelchair-bound, her only income is a social grant. She is also HIV-positive and struggles with health issues. She said in an affidavit that this application is to ensure that she has her day in court. The applicant stated that the directive differentiates between plaintiff litigants and the RAF regarding the amount payable for mediation and when it's payable. The RAF, she claims, is only liable for R15,000 per mediation, which only becomes payable 30 days after the receipt of the mediation report. A plaintiff, on the other hand, must pay the balance of the mediation fee upfront. 'If a plaintiff litigant does not pay, no mediation can be conducted and no trial date can be obtained,' she stated. According to the plaintiff, she cannot pay for mediation and this will result in her being denied justice. She also questioned the constitutional validity of the directive. Gert Nel Inc Attorneys, through its director Gert Nel, in his now failed bid to the ConCourt, questioned whether this move for mandatory mediation is constitutionally sound. In an affidavit accompanying his urgent application, Nel said there are constitutional limits on judicial power.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
No Pause. Just Phanda Pusha Play
ITHUBA confirmed that the National Lottery will continue uninterrupted from tomorrow Image: File NO Pause, Just Play. That was the go-ahead given by ITHUBA Lottery to avert a lotto blackout as uncertainty loomed over the sale of tickets following a legal wrangle, following a high court decision on Friday The Gauteng High Court ruled that ITHUBA Lottery, could only continue with operations for five months, until when the new operator Sizekhaya Holdings took over - a decision the National Lottery Commission (NCL) said could be rejected by ITHUBA. But in a statement issued tonight by Michelle van Trotsenburg on behalf of ITHUBA , she said after careful consideration and prioritising the interests of South Africans, ITHUBA has reached an agreement with the Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition and the National Lotteries Commission to operate the South African National Lottery, ensuring its ongoing contribution to good causes. "As a proudly 100% black-owned South African operator, ITHUBA remains steadfast in its commitment to operate the National Lottery with integrity, transparency, and for the benefit of South Africans. Participants can be rest assured that all games, draws, and prize pay-outs will continue as normal – with the same exciting jackpots and seamless service that they are accustomed to," read the statement. Sizekhaya Holdings is led by a consortium that includes KwaZulu-Natal business figures such as Moses Tembe, former Chairperson of the KZN Growth Coalition, and Sandile Zungu, owner of AmaZulu football club. Image: Sihle Mlambo/IOL Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC) Minister Parks Tau awarded a multibillion-rand contract on Wednesday to Sizekhaya Holdings to operate the National Lottery. The company is co-owned by KwaZulu-Natal business moguls, Moses Tembe, and Sandile Zungu, the chairperson of the Durban-based Premier Soccer League, AmaZulu FC. They are both linked to several companies. The decision was met with criticism from organisations that believe it goes against the true spirit of inclusive black empowerment. The crisis started after Pretoria High Court Judge Omphemetse Mooki ruled that Tau's attempt to extend the contract of the outgoing lottery operator, ITHUBA Holding by 12 months, was unconstitutional and illegal. Judge Sulet Potterill, instead, said ITHUBA, whose contract officially ended on Saturday, could continue for the next five months under a temporary licence until Sizekhaya was ready to take over. However, ITHUBA initially said five months was not financially viable. Sources within the DTIC and the NLC said the situation was intense as officials were working to avert a lotto blackout and losses of billions of rand. 'Our attorneys are still busy studying the judgment. Until we tick all the boxes, I cannot confirm whether we will have a lottery or we will not have the lottery, but our lawyers are looking at the interests of the masses, and I don't think there will be any crisis,' said NLC spokesperson Rudzani Tshigemane, prior to ITHUBA'S statement. Mooki ruled against the NLC's appeal against the previous judgment on the matter launched by a lottery contract bidder, Wina Njalo, against Tau and the NLC's decision to extend the ITHUBA licence by 12 months. Following the initial court order, Tau was forced to announce the winner on Wednesday, but extended the ITHUBA contract by five months through a temporary licence, as per court order. However, following ITHUBA'S indication that it was not prepared to accept the five-month extension as it was looking for 12 months, the NLC launched the appeal, which was rejected on Friday. Mooki heard that if ITHUBA's accepted only a five-month extension, it would incur a loss of R51 million. ITHUBA told the court that without it accepting the five-month extension, there would 'be an interruption to operations of the national lottery for 9 months from 1 June 2025' as there would be no operator, a situation that would harm members of the public. Wina Njalo told the court that ITHUBA was not entitled to make a profit through an unlawful tender. It also argued that the Lottery Trust Fund had R2.2 billion in its reserve, which was enough to continue paying the lottery beneficiary organisations until the new operator takes over. In his affidavit, Tau supported the NLC's application, however Mooki said it was not convincing enough for him to rule against the previous judgment, and therefore, he dismissed the NLC's application with costs. The EFF claimed Tau's decision was a conflict of interest and showed political exposure and backdoor dealings as Zungu and Tembe had links with the ANC. 'We highlighted in our correspondence with Minister Tau and the Portfolio Committee that this amounted to a breach of the National Lotteries Act, which explicitly prohibits the awarding of a licence to any entity with direct political affiliations. 'Minister Tau's refusal to listen and to appear before Parliament, and to proceed with this appointment anyway, represents a complete betrayal of his constitutional responsibilities. 'Instead of ensuring fairness, transparency, and compliance with the Lotteries Act, he has compromised a public asset, by awarding a contract worth over R180 billion to the ANC's cronies in a clear case of state capture,' said EFF national spokesperson Sinawo Thambo in a statement. Sizekhaya did not respond to a request for comment on the criticism over its appointment. The EFF said it was consulting with its legal counsel to consider a judicial review of the decision, "which includes, but may not be limited to, interdicting the awarding of the contract". The Aubrey Tau Foundation, which also condemned the awarding of the contract to Sizekhaya, said it would support legal action against Tau. 'We stand in solidarity with civil society and business leaders who are prepared to take this matter to the highest courts in the land in pursuit of transparency and justice,' the foundation said. The foundation said Tau should have awarded the contract to new entrepreneurs instead of continuing to enrich politically connected elites. 'Historically, it has been the same faces benefiting under the guise of Black Economic Empowerment (BEE). 'Instead of fostering BEE, in practice, empowered a small group of politically connected capitalists, fixers, and front persons acting as intermediaries between the government and established corporate interests,' said the foundation. President Cyril Ramaphosa had in November 2020 authorised the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) to investigate allegations of maladministration in the affairs of the NLC and to recover any loss that the NLC or the state has suffered. In a statement released on Saturday, Tembe said Sizekhaya's gaming pedigree is unmatched and that its shareholder, Goldrush, was bringing into the contract its business experience, including in gaming and online betting space. 'I bring over 35 years of business experience, including the gaming industry as a former chairperson of Phumelela Gaming and board member for KZN Tsogo Sun. 'Zungu Investments, led by Sandile Zungu, brings over 25 years of inveterate entrepreneurship across multiple sectors, including football,' he said. SUNDAY TRIBUNE
