
SECOND group of white Afrikaner 'refugees' arrive in United States
A second group of white South African Afrikaners have reportedly arrived in the United States under a controversial refugee policy signed by President Donald Trump earlier this year, sparking renewed global debate over race, immigration, and political messaging.
According to posts from the US-based advocacy group Amerikaners , nine white South Africans landed in Atlanta this week as part of a pilot programme framed by the Trump administration as a response to alleged violence and land expropriation in South Africa – claims widely discredited by international human rights organisations.
The executive order, quietly signed in February, granted refugee status to select white South Africans, citing fears of a so-called 'white genocide' – a term critics say is rooted in white nationalist rhetoric rather than verified facts.
Organisations like Human Rights Watch and Africa Check maintain that while farm attacks do occur, there is no evidence of systemic targeting along racial lines.
Among the recent arrivals is Charl Kleinhaus, 46, from Mpumalanga, who told the BBC he left his home, family, and dogs behind to pursue what he called a 'safer future' for his children.
Another, 48-year-old Errol Langton, a farmer from KwaZulu-Natal, expressed hope to continue farming in the US.
A source within the US government told The Hill that the goal is to resettle 'thousands more' Afrikaners by the end of the American summer, with consular processing already being expedited in Pretoria and Cape Town.
This rapid acceleration has raised red flags.
Critics say the policy selectively elevates a racially privileged group while overlooking far greater humanitarian crises in conflict zones like Sudan, Yemen, or the DRC.
Still, right-wing US commentators have praised the move as a humanitarian response.
South African reactions, meanwhile, remain split: some see it as a lifeline; others as a dangerous and racially charged distortion of the country's reality.
Both the US State Department and the South African government have declined to comment publicly on the numbers or long-term intentions of the refugee programme.
Analysts warn it could become a flashpoint issue in both domestic and foreign policy – particularly as the US heads into the 2026 election cycle.
For now, however, the quiet arrival of these Afrikaner families marks the start of a broader, more contentious immigration experiment – one unfolding at the intersection of politics, identity, and international diplomacy.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


eNCA
an hour ago
- eNCA
Court finds Cholota extradition from US was unlawful
BLOEMFONTEIN - The Free State High Court delivered judgment in the trial-within-a-trial involving Moroadi Cholota. She's accused alongside former Free State Premier Ace Magashule in the asbestos corruption case. Judge Phillip Loubser ruled her extradition from the US was unlawful. "The extradition of Ms Cholota from the USA to the Republic of South Africa is declared to have been done unlawfully for want of a valid and lawful request for her extradition by the South African executive power," Loubser said. "This court does not have the jurisdiction to try Ms Cholota on the offences she is charged with." She claimed she was taken illegally and that the court has no jurisdiction to prosecute her.


The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
BREAKING: US extradition of Magashule's ex-PA Moroadi Cholota declared unlawful
The Free High Court cannot try Cholota on charges of corruption. Moroadi Cholota (former PA to Free State Premier Ace Magashule) at the Bloemfontein High Court on 15 April 2025. Picture: Gallo Images/Mlungisi Louw The Free High Court in Bloemfontein has ruled that it does not have jurisdiction to try Moroadi Cholota, former personal assistant to ex-Free State premier Ace Magashule, for corruption. Judge Philip Loubser, who is presiding over the R255 million asbestos tender corruption case, handed down his judgment on Tuesday. ALSO READ: NPA argues Moroadi Cholota's challenge against US extradition 'tantamount to an appeal' This followed two weeks of testimony from state witnesses Benjamin Calitz and Nicholas 'Nico' Jacobus Gerber, both officers with the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI), commonly known as the Hawks, in a trial-within-a-trial relating to Cholota's extradition from the United States (US). The two had travelled to the US in 2021 to interview Cholota, who was initially a state witness, regarding emails that allegedly implicated her in the asbestos tender saga. While Cholota was initially charged with corruption, fraud and money laundering, the last two charges were withdrawn by the state. Free States asbestos trial: Moroadi Cholota's special plea judgment During Tuesday's proceedings, Lousber noted that Cholota had already pleaded guilty to the fraud charges before they were withdrawn. 'Although it remains a mystery to this court why the counts in question were put to the accused number 17 at all in view of the terms of the extradition order, it will not be necessary for the prosecution to stop the prosecution in relation to those charges,' he said. The judge said Cholota was not entitled to demand that she be acquitted or convicted on the withdrawn charges because she had pleaded guilty to them. He noted the accused's argument that her extradition was unlawful because the prosecutors and investigators submitted false claims to the US in their application to haul her back to South Africa. Cholota had claimed that she was charged for refusing to implicate Magashule. READ MORE: 'What if she went on holiday': Hawks investigator grilled on 'surprise' US trip for Magashule's ex-PA Lousber said the state did not deny that Calitz told Cholota that her lack of cooperation could result in her being charged. 'What appears pertainently clear is that it is undeniable that the state presented false and incorrect information to United States authorities. 'Two South African courts have already made this finding, and the US authorities relied on this information in good faith and acted on the extradition on an unknowingly unlawful basis.' He, therefore, ruled that the court cannot try Cholota and granted her the special plea. 'The unlawfulness of the extradition renders the jurisdiction of the South African criminal court void.'


The South African
2 hours ago
- The South African
Newspaper headlines from around the world - Tuesday, 3 June 2025
Here are the stories that made headlines on the front pages of newspapers worldwide on Tuesday, 3 June 2025. The New York Times front page reported that a man has been charged with a hate crime in a flame attack. The Wall Street Journal front page reported that Bitcoin is going all in on MAGA, shedding its Libertarian slant. The Hindustan Times' front page reported that the Prime Minister will meet delegations after his world tour next week. China Daily's front page reported that the US was slammed for repeated policy shifts. Daily Mail's front page reported Tory warnings over a 'backdoor blasphemy law' The Guardian front page reported that Starmer pledges to make Britain 'battle-ready' with drones and AI. If you wish to stay up-to-date – for FREE – on the latest international and South African news, then bookmark The South African website for all that plus the latest in the world of finance, sport, lifestyle – and more. Did we mention it was 100% free to read …?