Turkish Tufts University student back in Boston after release from Louisiana detention center
A Tufts University student from Turkey returned to Boston on Saturday, one day after being released from a Louisiana immigration detention centre where she was held for over six weeks.
Upon arrival at Logan Airport, Rumeysa Ozturk told reporters she was excited to get back to her studies during what has been a 'very difficult' period.
'In the last 45 days, I lost both my freedom and also my education during a crucial time for my doctoral studies,' she said. 'But I am so grateful for all the support, kindness and care.'
A federal judge ordered Ozturk's release Friday pending a final decision on her claim that she was illegally detained following an op-ed she co-wrote last year criticizing her university's response to Israel and the war in Gaza.
Ozturk said she will continue her case in the courts, adding, 'I have faith in the American system of justice.'
She was joined by her lawyers and two of Massachusetts' Democratic members of Congress, Sen. Edward Markey and Rep. Ayanna Pressley.
'Today is a tremendous day as we welcome you back, Rumeysa,' Markey said. 'You have made millions and millions of people across our country so proud of the way you have fought.'
Appearing by video for her bail hearing the previous day, Ozturk, 30, detailed her growing asthma attacks in detention and her desire to finish her doctorate focusing on children and social media.
U.S. District Judge William Sessions in Vermont ruled that she was to be released on her own recognizance with no travel restrictions. She was not a danger to the community or a flight risk, he said, while noting that he might amend the release order to consider any conditions by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, in consultation with her lawyers.
Sessions said the government offered no evidence for why Ozturk was arrested other than the op-ed.
The U.S. Justice Department's Executive Office for Immigration Review did not respond to an e-mail message seeking comment Friday afternoon.
Ozturk was one of four students who wrote the opinion piece last year in campus newspaper The Tufts Daily. It criticized the university's response to student activists demanding that Tufts 'acknowledge the Palestinian genocide,' disclose its investments and divest from companies with ties to Israel.
On March 25 immigration officials surrounded Ozturk in Massachusetts and took her into custody. She was then driven to New Hampshire and Vermont and flown to a detention centre in Basile, Louisiana.
Her student visa had been revoked several days earlier, but she was not informed of that, her lawyers said.
Ozturk's lawyers first filed a petition on her behalf in Massachusetts, but they did not know where she was and were unable to speak to her until more than 24 hours after she was detained. A Massachusetts judge later transferred the case to Vermont.
A State Department memo said Ozturk's visa was revoked following an assessment that her actions ''may undermine U.S. foreign policy by creating a hostile environment for Jewish students and indicating support for a designated terrorist organization' including co-authoring an op-ed that found common cause with an organization that was later temporarily banned from campus.'
A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said in March, without providing evidence, that investigations found that Ozturk engaged in activities in support of Hamas, which the U.S. has designated as a terrorist group.
This week a federal appeals court upheld Sessions' order to bring Ozturk back to New England for hearings to determine whether her constitutional rights, including free speech and due process, were violated, as her lawyers argue.
Immigration proceedings for Ozturk, initiated in Louisiana, are being conducted separately in that state and Ozturk can participate remotely, the court said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
22 minutes ago
- CBC
Experts warn of Bill C-2 as "anti-refugee" and "anti-immigrant" giving Canada "unchecked powers" like the U.S.
Mbonisi Zikhali came to Canada in 2009 from Zimbabwe to pursue a master's in journalism at Carleton University. Post-graduation, the international student found himself homeless in Windsor and applied for refugee status – a privilege soon unavailable if Bill C-2 becomes the law. "The bill is unnecessary and not sympathetic at all to people's well-being," Zikhali said. Many experts and community groups working with newcomers in Canada agree. They are calling on the Liberal government's sweeping new legislation, Bill C-2 or the Strong Borders Act, "anti-immigrant and anti-refugee" hoping the legislation is not voted on to become law. Zikhali said he came on scholarship and in 2012 found himself in Windsor picking tomatoes at a greenhouse. Soon enough, he was living on the streets, and lost his passport which also had his study permit in it. Applying for refugee status, Zikhali said, was his saving grace and worries this bill will deprive vulnerable people of a safe haven. What is Bill C-2? The legislation proposes changes to a number of laws including the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. Specifically it allows officials to cancel, suspend or change immigration documents immediately, pause the acceptance of new applications and cancel applications already in process if deemed in the public interest. Critics say new border legislation aligns Canada's immigration system with the U.S. 20 hours ago Duration 2:43 Asylum claims would also have to be made within a year of entering the country, including for international students and temporary residents. For example, an Afghan international student came to study here in July 2020 .The Taliban takes over in August 2021 and things become scary back home. That student could have applied for asylum. But with this bill, the one-year time period would have lapsed and they would be ineligible. Zikhali said had the bill been around when he was applying for asylum, it would have been "devastating" as he would have been denied. The immigration changes would also require irregular border crossers, people who enter Canada between official ports of entry, to make an asylum claim within 14 days of arriving in Canada. "Very U.S.-like" bill: refugee help centre Windsor's Matthew House gives refugees a place to live and helps them with resettlement. Mike Morency, their executive director, worries this bill will put more vulnerable people at greater harm. "It continues to align our immigration system with that of the United States," Morency said. "Refugee claimants are not the problem. The one year-ban is a major concern for us. The other major concern for us is the ability of the government to declare an emergency and suspend applications. That one to me feels very US-like." Morency said he understands the government's will to try to cut back on international students and migrant workers making a refugee claim as a way to stay in Canada, but worries for people who have a legitimate need for protection being unfairly targeted. "It also feels very much like a workaround to our commitment to the Geneva Convention. If the government wants to step out of the Geneva Convention, then then we need to do it with integrity and we need to approach the UN and say we're going to withdraw," he said. Syed Hussan, spokesperson for the Migrant Rights Network, agrees saying the bill violates Canada's "most basic legal obligations" and is "immoral". Hussan asserts the bill infringes upon Canada's legal commitments and ethical standards by granting the government excessive authority to cancel permits. "Every refugee gets to have the right to have their case heard. That's now being taken away," he said. "Collectively it's a bill that gives the government unchecked power to take away people's status… This is an anti-immigrant and anti-refugee bill. It's illegal." Without any ability for people to appeal or have their case individually heard, Hussan said, the bill allows the government to "make people undocumented or just throw people out of the country in the hundreds of thousands". The changes also allow the federal immigration department to share information more widely with different agencies within Canada. Hussan said anyone who was not a citizen or later became a citizen will have their data impacted by the bill. Hassan said this is similar to the US immigration policies. "This is Carney's first test and he's failed it. He's no different from Donald Trump." Sharry Aiken, professor of law at Queen's University, also finds the bill troubling. "Very disappointing. It's a betrayal of many Canadians that supported this government in the most recent election," she said, noting these issues weren't part of the Liberal election campaign. The omnibus bill, she said, is quite complicated with 16 different parts and neither serves to reform the asylum system nor address Canadians' privacy rights. Typically, omnibus bills don't get the degree of parliamentary scrutiny and oversight, she said, which is concerning. Aiken said the one year-bar for asylum claimants represents "a major rollback of rights". "No longer are these claimants eligible for a hearing before the Refugee Protection Division," she said. The division of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB) hears and decides claims for refugee protection in Canada. Aikens said this "arbitrary" bill will also very quickly develop a backlog. "The bill proposes a legislative fix for a problem that doesn't require new law. It requires operational intervention," she said. "This one year rule mimics what's in place in the U.S. and what has been the subject of extensive international criticism… This bill does a disservice to refugees and betrays the Canadian public's trust in the Liberal government for ensuring a fair refugee determination system consistent with international standards." She urges the MPs to separate out the provisions having the issues desegregated. 'Will make the process more cumbersome': immigration lawyer Toronto-based immigration lawyer, Mario Bellissimo, said with the bill creating "arbitrary distinctions" of 14 days and one year after June 2020, "an individualized assessment" approach is being taken away. While the number of refugee claimants have recently dipped, Bellissimo said the bill signals that Canada wants to potentially limit immigration. "It wants to send messages to individuals who want to traverse the system over many years without legitimate claims that this is not a destination of choice for you," he said. Bellissimo agrees that targeting individuals who impact the immigration system in a negative way is important but the bill will end up targeting individuals in genuine need of assistance.
CTV News
29 minutes ago
- CTV News
Quebec says it will drop permanent immigration targets to as low as 25,000 per year
Jean-François Roberge, Quebec's Minister responsible for Democratic Institutions, in the Quebec National Assembly on Thursday, April 3, 2025. (Jacques Boissinot/The Canadian Press) Quebec's immigration minister says the government will drop its permanent immigration targets to as low as 25,000 people per year. Jean-François Roberge says the government will study three scenarios of 25,000, 35,000 and 45,000 immigrants per year. Currently, Quebec is projected to accept about 64,000 permanent immigrants in 2025. But Roberge says that needs to go down due to rising unemployment, increasing strain on housing and the challenges of protecting the French language. Roberge says Quebec also wants Ottawa to reduce the number of temporary immigrants in the province under federally managed programs to 200,000 from more than 400,000. The minister said the government will hold consultations on the changes before announcing its final 2026 to 2029 targets. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 5, 2026.
CBC
38 minutes ago
- CBC
Musk vs. Trump: A power couple tumbles into a messy divorce
It's splittsville for a leading global power couple. Donald Trump and Elon Musk are tumbling into a messy public divorce. Simmering tension between the erstwhile Oval Office buds bubbled further into open view Thursday, as they exchanged digs in public and their own social media sites. The world's most powerful elected politician and its richest man had a blowout whose immediate cause is the U.S. federal budget. Musk has been increasingly disparaging the president's signature budget bill since leaving his unusual government role last week, fuming recently that the bill will plunge the U.S. even deeper into its debt hole, and calling it "a disgusting abomination." Trump's reply: Musk is just bitter. He suggests Musk is unhappy with parts of the bill that hurt his electric-vehicle business. He also suggests the Tesla billionaire misses the action in the White House. And because this is Donald Trump's Washington, the chancellor of Germany happened to be seated in the room, witness to one side of the feud. "Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore," Trump told reporters during a lengthy photo op Thursday in the Oval Office with Friedrich Merz. "He's not the first. People leave my administration and they love us. And then at some point, they miss it so badly ... I don't know what it is. It's sort of Trump Derangement Syndrome, I guess they call it," he said. "They leave, and they wake up in the morning, and the glamour's gone, the whole world is different – and they become hostile. I don't know what it is." Trump continued escalating the dispute on his own social-media site. On Thursday afternoon, he posted on his social-media platform Musk was "wearing thin," and suggested he'd fired him. "I asked him to leave," Trump wrote on Truth Social, to which Musk responded on X, formerly Twitter, "Such an obvious lie. So sad." The president also uttered a thinly veiled threat: Trump wrote that one easy way to trim the federal budget is to cancel government contracts with Musk's companies. "I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!" 'Without me, Trump would have lost' Musk, meanwhile, has been using X, the enormous online megaphone he happens to own, to continually broadcast digs at the administration. He's disputing that his own business interests soured him on the legislation. The bill, which has passed the House but faces an uncertain path in the Senate, eliminates an EV tax credit. And he's demanding a little more gratitude after he dumped the equivalent of nearly $400 million Cdn into electing Trump and his allies. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election," Musk posted Thursday on X. "[Democrats] would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate." Then he went a big step further. He suggested the real reason all the government files on the late sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein have not been fully released is because the president's name appears in them. "Have a nice day, DJT," Musk posted. Elon Musk gets Oval Office send-off from Trump 6 days ago Duration 2:03 Hints of trouble in political paradise It's an abrupt plot twist: The pair were all smiles and praise for each other just last week, as Musk announced his departure from Washington. But there were hints of trouble behind the scenes. There were occasional reports of blowups between Musk and other members of the administration, and the New York Times reported that sources were concerned about Musk's frequent use of different drugs, including, allegedly, so much ketamine that it was affecting his bladder. Musk denied it. Now Musk has gone from White House consigliere to chief heckler in under a week — a speed record even for D.C. As is custom in Trump-era Washington, the human-resources gossip risks overshadowing substantive challenges faced by the U.S. government. With American debt levels ballooning, and the cost of servicing the national debt recently outpacing even military spending, Musk was tasked with controlling finances. He slashed countless offices, programs, research initiatives, and even the entire agency that oversaw U.S. international aid.
