Psychological humiliation and sexual harassment: Three former Ubisoft execs on trial in France
Three former top executives from French video game giant Ubisoft – the maker of games like Assassin's Creed and Far Cry - went on trial on Monday.
Serge Hascoët, Thomas "Tommy" François and Guillaume Patrux appeared before the Bobigny criminal court on charges of psychological abuse, sexual harassment and attempted sexual assault.
The trial is due to continue until Friday. During the week, the judges will hear the accounts of six women and three men, as well as accusations made by two trade unions.
The defendants deny all the allegations against them.
The Ubisoft omerta began to break in 2020. Three years prior, a Ubisoft employee tried to report psychological harassment to his superiors. The response? 'You stop talking about this immediately. There's no problem at Ubisoft.'
But then came an in-depth investigation conducted by French publications Libération and Numerama. The examination revealed working conditions plagued by harassment, humiliation and discriminatory comments.
Ubisoft then launched an internal inquiry in 2020 after anonymous testimonies emerged on social media accusing the company of a toxic work culture.
Investigators spoke to dozens of witnesses during the probe, but "many refused to file a complaint for fear of reactions from the video game community.'
Still, the testimonies that poured in painted a damning picture of what went on behind the walls of the Ubisoft studios.
Serge Hascoët, 59, Ubisoft's chief creative officer and second-in-command, who resigned after the allegations, is accused of sexual harassment and bullying. He is also accused of making racist comments. He allegedly told staff that a senior employee was irritating because she did not have enough sex and that he should have sex with her in a meeting room in front of everyone 'to show how to calm her.'
Thomas François, 52, former vice-president of editorial and creative services, is accused of forcing a young employee he had just hired to do a headstand in the open-plan office while wearing a skirt. He is also alleged to have often watched pornographic films in the open-plan office and, at a 2015 office Christmas party, he allegedly tried to kiss a colleague on the mouth as his other colleagues restrained the woman. She said she managed to break free and felt 'traumatised' by the incident.
Former game director Patrux, 41, has been accused of psychological harassment and was dismissed for serious misconduct. He is alleged to have mimed hitting staff, cracked a whip near colleagues' faces and drawn swastikas on a woman's notebook as he sat near her in a meeting.
Other examples which allegedly took place under the complicit or indifferent eye of Ubisoft management include shameful examples of public humiliation. For instance, a young Muslim member of staff allegedly found her screensaver changed to an image of a bacon sandwich, while sandwiches were thrown at her during Ramadan.
Other women alleged to police that sexual comments were made regularly, that they were called 'sluts' and told to wear shorter skirts. One woman who wore a coat with red lining was allegedly told by an executive: 'That's an invitation to rape.'
This week's trial is a pivotal moment for the gaming industry, one hailed by some as a #MeToo moment in the video games "boys club". Indeed, the male-dominated video game publishing industry has been scrutinised for years over its treatment of women and minorities, as well as the way these groups are depicted in games.
However, there are those who feel that this week's trial is not enough.
'This trial could have been exemplary,' according to Marc Rutschlé, union delegate at Solidaires Informatique. He told L'Humanité: 'It wasn't three isolated individuals who created this atmosphere of widespread harassment. Their impunity was organised. There are no defendants and many victims. The whole structural aspect has been evacuated.'
Indeed, Ubisoft is taking great care to keep out of the trial as neither the human resources department, nor any representative of the company as a legal entity or its CEO Yves Guillemot, will be making an appearance in court.
Guillemot allegedly previously referred to some of the accusations as 'generational differences of opinion' and 'creative friction'.
The trial continues in Bobigny until Friday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
Illinois Republican mistakes Sikh for Muslim, calls him delivering prayer in House ‘deeply troubling'
Rep. Mary Miller (R-Ill.) said it was 'deeply disturbing' that a Sikh delivered a prayer in the House chamber on Friday — after apparently mistaking him for a Muslim man. The since-deleted post Friday morning sparked immediate bipartisan criticism. 'It's deeply troubling that a Muslim was allowed to lead prayer in the House of Representatives this morning. This should never have been allowed to happen,' Miller said in a post on X. 'America was founded as a Christian nation, and I believe our government should reflect that truth, not drift further from it. May God have mercy!' She attached a photo of the guest chaplain, who was wearing a yellow turban, leading the customary prayer that occurs every day at the opening of the House floor. But the guest chaplain was not a Muslim, but a Sikh: Giani Surinder Singh of Gurdwara South Jersey Sikh Society in Vineland, N.J. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who opened the floor, had introduced the guest chaplain. Miller later edited her post on X to replace 'Muslim' with 'Sikh' before deleting the post altogether. Her office did not respond to a request for comment about the incident. The House has long welcomed guest chaplains from many types of faiths — including Muslims, with a Muslim guest chaplain notably reading from the Quran in November 2001 following the 9/11 terror attacks. Members of Congress regularly invite guest chaplains to deliver prayers Miller's post sparked bipartisan condemnation. Rep. David Valadao (R-Calif.) said on X he was 'troubled' by the post. 'Throughout the country—and in the Central Valley— Sikh-Americans are valued and respected members of our communities, yet they continue to face harassment and discrimination.' 'While yes, we are a nation rooted in Judeo-Christian values and our laws reflect that, we are also a nation that recognizes we are all God's children and whatever our differences, we can and should respect differences of faith,' added Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) in another post commenting on Miller's post. Democrats, meanwhile, went much further in their criticism. 'Our country was founded on the Constitution – which happens to care enough about freedom of religion that it's in the very first amendment,' Rep. Veronica Escobar (D-Texas) said in a post responding to Miller. 'Not only is this racist, it dishonors the 'founding document' you referenced.' Singh, during his prayer, had called for peace. 'Almighty God …. We call you by many names, sir. But you are one. Keep your devine hand over the members of this House … Keep truth on our tongues, sir, love in our hearts, and sound judgement in our minds. Remind us, sir, of our purpose: To love and serve one another and create a more peaceful world. We ask you for blessings unto all leaders, sir, and their work for the common good. Give all who govern this land humility and courage, integrity and compassion,' Singh said. 'Help us remember that we belong to one family.' 'We ask for the almighty also to keep watch over our nation's protectors who work tirelessly day and night to ensure our safety and our freedom,' Singh also said.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Egyptians prepare for Eid al-Adha, Feast of Sacrifice
Egyptians buy and sell sheep, goats cows and camels at a livestock market as they prepare for the Muslim feast of Eid al-Adha, also known as the Feast of Sacrifice, in Cairo on Friday. Eid al-Adha runs through Monday.


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Republican said Sikh should not be allowed to deliver House prayer
Rep. Mary Miller (R-Ill.) posted — then quickly deleted — that a Sikh should have "never been allowed" to lead the House of Representatives' daily prayer on Friday after initially incorrectly calling the man a Muslim. Why it matters: This is not the first time Miller has fallen into hot water for inflammatory remarks. Shortly before she took office in 2021, she made headlines for saying "Hitler was right about one thing." After Roe v. Wade was overturned in 2022, Miller called the decision a "historic victory for white life," which her office later said was based on a misreading of her prepared remarks. A Miller spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. What happened: Giani Singh, a Sikh Granthi from Southern New Jersey, delivered the House's morning prayer on Friday. Miller responded later in the morning by incorrectly identifying Singh as a Muslim, saying it was "deeply troubling that a Muslim was allowed to lead prayer in the House of Representatives this morning." "This should have never been allowed to happen. America was founded as a Christian nation, and I believe our government should reflect that truth, not drift further from it. May God have mercy," she added. Miller quickly edited her post to change "Muslim" to "Sikh," before deleting it altogether minutes later. What they're saying: " I often say that I serve in Congress with some of the greatest minds of the 18th century. With Rep. Miller I may need to take it back a few more centuries," Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.) said in a post on X.