logo
Oregon bill takes aim at ‘epidemic of violence' around missing and murdered Indigenous people

Oregon bill takes aim at ‘epidemic of violence' around missing and murdered Indigenous people

Yahoo13-03-2025

This story was originally published by InvestigateWest.
Melanie HenshawInvestigateWest
A new bill progressing in the Oregon Legislature would allocate staff and resources within the Oregon Health Authority to address the state's ongoing crisis of missing and murdered Indigenous people.
The legislation, sponsored by Rep. Tawna Sanchez, D-Portland, would provide victim outreach and prevention services related to missing and murdered Indigenous people. In addition, it would instruct the health authority to create and maintain datasets on missing and murdered Indigenous people and to create several partnerships with tribal governments, Native American-led organizations, community leaders, and local, state, tribal and federal law enforcement.
The legislation, House Bill 3198, comes six years after another law that produced a report on the issue yielded limited results.
An InvestigateWest investigation into the state's response to the 2019 bill found there was limited progress on the report's recommendations for improving relationships between Indigenous communities and law enforcement and for improving data collection — and that Gov. Tina Kotek then had no awareness of progress on the law. Sanchez told InvestigateWest last May that she was formulating new legislation to spur further action.
Advocates were unsatisfied with the results of the 2019 bill, saying it didn't improve conditions for Native American families searching for loved ones.
As originally written, the 2025 bill would've ordered another study in collaboration with the U.S Department of Justice — but amendments proposed by Sanchez, the Legislature's second Indigenous lawmaker, moved it toward an 'action plan' that would provide long-sought resources.
In addition to ordering the collection of data on cases, the bill would dedicate staff within the Oregon Health Authority to establish interagency agreements with tribal governments, Native American-led organizations, law enforcement, and community leaders. These staffers would focus on victim services, outreach, education, and violence prevention for Indigenous communities. The bill's estimated cost is $500,000.
'Community wanted something to happen,' Sanchez told the House Committee on Judiciary in a public hearing Feb. 3. 'And they wanted it to happen sooner than taking a lot of time to continue to do more studies.'
The Oregon Health Authority, the state's health agency, would be tasked with the response, with Sanchez saying that it already has an existing prevention-model system used in public health crises and a good working relationship with the nine tribes.
As it stands, practical support for families, such as legal advocacy, emergency financial assistance, emotional support and assistance navigating the criminal justice system, has primarily come from individuals' communities or Native American-led community organizations.
Many family members, including in written testimony on the bill, cite the confusing and overwhelming process of juggling the search for a loved one, the associated emotional trauma and financial concerns. Jurisdictional complexities complicate which law enforcement agencies are responsible for managing a case involving a Native person, and families often find themselves without support.
'No family should be searching in the dark, without hope and without the help that they need,' testified Amanda Freeman, citizen of the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde, on Feb. 3. 'This bill is a step toward making sure our people are seen, heard and protected.'
Multiple tribal organizations, as well as Multnomah County and Portland's Office of Government Relations, support the bill, which advanced from the House Committee on Judiciary and is now before the House Ways and Means Committee.
One component of the bill addresses a priority for advocates across Indian Country — improved data collection on missing and murdered Native Americans.
Improved data collection was one of the major recommendations from the 2019 law that made little progress. Advocates for Indigenous people say that poor data collection due in part to racial misclassification has made it impossible to determine the true number of missing and murdered Native American individuals. Although there have been stated efforts to improve data collection at the federal level, there's been little improvement on the ground, with many Native Americans turning to other community members for support and community-based data organizations left to try to keep track of the missing.
'Our state cannot wait for federal efforts to catch up,' testified Luhui Whitebear, an assistant professor at Oregon State University and member of the Coastal Band of the Chumash Nation.
The bill would direct the health authority to work with tribal governments and Native American-led organizations to collect and maintain data on the missing and murdered, then use it to identify patterns and areas for targeted health interventions and violence prevention programs. It also calls on the health authority to work with representatives of the nine tribes within the geographic bounds of Oregon and representatives from Native American-led organizations to implement community education programs and support youth engagement initiatives to reduce vulnerabilities that disproportionately impact Indigenous people.
Supporters of the bill say it's an important step that moves beyond studying the problem and allocates staff from within the health authority to address the issue and begin to understand the root causes, though it doesn't touch on broader issues like criminal jurisdiction for tribes, which is limited.
'There have been task forces and studies and acknowledgments, but we still have a disproportionate impact to tribal people,' state Sen. Anthony Broadman, D-Bend, a former chief judge for the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs tribal court, said in his testimony supporting the bill. Broadman is sponsoring the companion bill to HB 3192 in the state Senate.
Advocates and tribal officials say criminal jurisdictional complexities on tribal lands complicate investigations and leave Native Americans vulnerable to violence. Tribes do not have full authority to prosecute all crimes that occur on tribal lands. Instead, they are governed by a jurisdictional patchwork that can involve tribal, state or federal law enforcement, depending on a crime's location and whether or not the victim or offender is a citizen of a federally recognized tribe.
In Oregon, tribes are still recovering from the termination era of the 1950s, when almost all federally recognized tribes sharing geography with Oregon were 'terminated,' losing their federal recognition, land base, funding and services from the federal government. Tribes had their status restored in the 1970s and 1980s, but it caused lasting damage to tribal communities, which Broadman highlighted as contributing to the ongoing crisis.
'Consider the systems that have brought us here today in what we all acknowledge is an epidemic of violence in the missing (and) murdered and Indigenous persons epidemic,' Broadman said. 'As a state we are still in the phase of restoration — restoration of safe communities, restoration of systems that protect all Oregonians adequately.'
Reporter Melanie Henshaw covers Indigenous affairs and communities in the region. Reach her directly at melanie@investigatewest.org.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lawmakers debating school funding as budget deadline looms
Lawmakers debating school funding as budget deadline looms

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Lawmakers debating school funding as budget deadline looms

LANSING, Mich. (WLNS) – The clock is ticking to pass the state budget, and money for schools seems to be a sticking point. The Republican-led House passed its Wednesday night, and Democrats are responding. The Democrat-led Senate Appropriations Committee met Thursday, and lawmakers say the two chambers are far from agreeing on a final budget. State Sen. Sarah Anthony (D-Lansing) is in charge of the budget coming out of the Senate and said she has some serious concerns about the $21.9 billion school budget plan coming out of the House, including the timing of it. 'By this time last year, we had already negotiated the pretty critical pieces of our budget,' said Anthony. To get the two chambers on the same page by the July 1 deadline, Anthony says that lawmakers will have to work around the clock. 'I take that statutory deadline very seriously, but I'm not interested in cutting a bad deal for our school districts,' said Anthony. The House chose to eliminate funding for specific programs like free meals for students; mental health and school safety grants; and vision, hearing, and dental screenings. Instead, they are putting that money into a per-pupil payment that school districts can qualify for if they have a resource officer and a mental health support staff member. State Rep. Matt Maddock (R-Milford), who played a part in the House-created budget, said this gives school districts more flexibility. 'We are giving our schools more money, so they have more freedom to use it at their will. That's the best thing about this budget,' Rep. Maddock said. Anthony sees it differently, though, saying this is unsustainable and would have bigger impacts on low-income schools. 'In a time in which we are trying to right the wrongs of the past and meet the moment, that's just kind of unacceptable,' Anthony said. The senator says that another issue for her is one-time funding being used for programs that she feels deserve ongoing funding. However, Maddock says that dozens of these programs waste money and gave an example of one that he feels is unnecessary. 'It's a multi-million-dollar contract to have people from this company come in to teach our teachers and the people doing recess how to conduct recess in schools. That is a waste of money,' said Maddock. The representative said that the House did what was best for students and said that if they can't get the Democrats to agree, there could be consequences. 'Maybe the government might get shut down,' Maddock said. 'But it's a war worth fighting because Michigan people are great, and they've been taken advantage of for too many years. The Senate school budget plan is $21.8 billion, and has more specific funding designations and community violence intervention grants. Conversations will continue as lawmakers work toward a budget both chambers can agree on. 6 News will keep you updated with the latest. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

North Korea claims to have successfully repaired and relaunched into the water its damaged destroyer
North Korea claims to have successfully repaired and relaunched into the water its damaged destroyer

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

North Korea claims to have successfully repaired and relaunched into the water its damaged destroyer

North Korea says it has repaired its damaged second destroyer and launched it into the water in the presence of leader Kim Jong Un. North Korea's Korean Central News Agency said it launched the destroyer - the second it built this year - off the east coast of the country on Thursday. KCNA cited Kim as saying the country's two destroyers will play a big role in improving the North Korean navy's operational capabilities. Kim reiterated previous claims that his naval buildup is a justified response to perceived threats posed by the United States and its allies in Asia, which in recent years have expanded their combined military exercises and updated their deterrence strategies to counter Kim's nuclear ambitions. He said the North will respond to the threats by his rivals with 'overwhelming military action' and vowed to build a navy with 'long-range operational capabilities.' Last month, North Korea said the ship was damaged in a failed launch, sparking fury from Kim, who has vowed to build a stronger navy to cope what he calls escalating US-led threats against his country. Kim earlier said the failed launched was caused by criminal negligence. North Korea's state media later said that authorities detained four officials including the vice director of the Workers' Party's munitions industry department over the botched launch. North Korea's extremely secretive nature makes it virtually impossible to independently confirm its announcement on the ship's repair. Outside experts earlier said it remained unclear how severely the 5,000-ton-class destroyer was damaged and questioned North Korea's announcement that it could repair the ship's damage at an early date. The damaged warship was North Korea's second known destroyer and seen as a crucial asset toward Kim's goal of modernizing its naval forces. It was in the same class as the country's first destroyer unveiled in April, which experts assessed as the North's largest and most advanced warship to date. Kim lavishly praised that ship, which was launched in the western port of Nampo, saying it advances his goal of expanding the military's operations range and nuclear strike capabilities. This is a developing story and will be updated.

‘Killed off Elmo': Jeffries brings along stuffed friend for stunt on House floor
‘Killed off Elmo': Jeffries brings along stuffed friend for stunt on House floor

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

‘Killed off Elmo': Jeffries brings along stuffed friend for stunt on House floor

Elmo has a friend, indeed. Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., brought along a stuffed friend to help make a point on the House floor Thursday. Jeffries held up a stuffed Elmo doll while accusing Republicans of targeting beloved children's shows like "Sesame Street" in their push to slash federal spending."Today, we are on the floor of the House of Representatives debating legislation that targets Elmo. And Big Bird. And Daniel Tiger and 'Sesame Street,'" Jeffries said, waving the puppet as he railed against the GOP-led rescissions Sends $9.4 Billion Doge Cuts Proposal To Congress, Targeting Npr, Pbs The moment, widely circulated online, came during debate over the Republican-backed Proposed Rescissions of Budgetary Resources from President Trump, which would eliminate over $9 billion in unspent or low-priority federal funds. Among the targeted programs: $3 million in taxpayer support for an international version of Sesame Street in Iraq. Democrats objected to what they characterized as cultural and humanitarian vandalism disguised as fiscal responsibility. Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove, D-Calif., delivered one of the sharpest lines of the day: "While you all have killed off Elmo, I urge my colleagues to vote no on this trash and I yield back," Garcia said. Read On The Fox News App Republicans dismissed the theatrics and defended the package as a commonsense rollback of bloated, ideological spending. The bill also includes broader cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which supports PBS and NPR, long-time targets of fiscal conservatives who argue the taxpayer shouldn't subsidize public Lisa McClain, R-Mich., rebutted, "I never realized Elmo was more important to my colleagues on the other side of the aisle than the American people." House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., pushed back forcefully: "The Minority Leader held up a Sesame Street character here on the floor as if Sesame Street's somehow going to go away," Scalise said. Sesame Street's Pride Month Post Sparks Backlash From Republican Lawmakers Amid Pbs Funding Threats "I was watching a commercial on TV yesterday where the Cookie Monster was actually doing an advertisement for Netflix because a private company is paying money to run Sesame Street. It's not going away. It's doing just fine. Very lucrative." Scalise argued the bill doesn't threaten Sesame Street's survival, only its taxpayer subsidy, and called out what he described as "far-left, radical views" being promoted through outlets like NPR and PBS."There is still going to be a plethora of options for the American people," he said. "But if they are paying their hard-earned dollars to get content, why should your tax dollars go to only one thing that the other side wants to promote?" He concluded bluntly: "They can still watch Sesame Street in Iraq. But let the Iraqi people pay for it — not the taxpayers of the United States of America's children." Even more eyebrow‑raising was the inclusion of taxpayer‑funded global health spending for procedures like the line items flagged by GOP lawmakers: $3 million to subsidize circumcisions, vasectomies and condoms in Zambia, alongside similar grants for transgender surgeries in Nepal. Republicans contended that pulling back these types of low-impact or ideological slush funds was a logical first step toward returning more than $9 billion to the U.S. Treasury. The bill passed the House Appropriations Committee earlier this week and Senate Democrats have signaled strong opposition. The bill passed the House in a 214–212 vote. Four Republicans, Reps. Mark Amodei, R-Nev.; Mike Turner, R-Ohio; Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa.; and Nicole Malliotakis, R-N.Y., broke ranks to vote against the bill. All Democrats voted article source: 'Killed off Elmo': Jeffries brings along stuffed friend for stunt on House floor

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store