logo
‘Lucy's Law,' named after teen killed in Biscayne Bay boat crash, passes in session's final hours

‘Lucy's Law,' named after teen killed in Biscayne Bay boat crash, passes in session's final hours

Yahoo03-05-2025

A bill that came about after a boat pilot was charged initially with only minor misdemeanors in a crash that took the life of a 17-year-old Miami girl overwhelmingly passed the Florida Legislature late Friday and is headed to Gov. Ron DeSantis, who is expected to sign it into law.
'Lucy's Law' is named after Luciana 'Lucy' Fernandez, the Our Lady of Lourdes Academy senior who died Sept. 5, 2022, a day after George Pino crashed his boat into a fixed channel marker in Biscayne Bay during an 18th birthday celebration for the Doral real estate broker's daughter. Lucy was one of 12 teenage girls in the boat.
After hours of back-and-forth negotiating, the Senate passed the bill in a 31-0 vote. The House then passed it with a 93-1 vote.
The bill was the first item the House took up when the Legislative session began on March 4, and one of the last it approved in the final hours of the session late Friday night.
'We started our 60 days in the presence of Lucy, and end our 60 days in the presence of Lucy,' said House Speaker Danny Perez, a Miami Republican.
The bill boosts the penalties for operating a boat in a crash that ends in serious injury, for providing misleading statements to law enforcement during a boat-crash investigation and boating under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
'This is actually going to save lives,' said one of the bill's sponsor, Rep. Vicki Lopez, a Miami-Dade Republican. 'We are going to deter people from acting recklessly on the water.'
But the bill, also sponsored by Rep. Vanessa Oliver in the House and state Sen. Jonathan Martin, does not require law enforcement officers to give a boat operator a sobriety test on the scene in boat crashes with serious injury or death. In the Pino crash, investigators with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission did not give Pino a sobriety test, despite him admitting to them he had been drinking that day.
READ MORE: How investigators, prosecutors bungled probe into boat crash that killed teen girl
And in the late-hour horse trading between the House and the Senate, a key passage about the state revising its rules on who must pass a boater-safety course before operating a vessel was deleted.
The bill's passage is a bittersweet end to a years-long endeavor by Lucy's parents — Melissa and Andres Fernandez — to get it to lawmakers.
'Since the day we lost Lucy, our mission has been clear: to fight for her, to fight for safer waters, to fight for a culture of accountability—so all Floridians can enjoy the freedom and beauty of our waters responsibly,' the Fernandezes said in a statement Friday night.
The Miami-Dade County State Attorney's Office had initially charged Pino with three misdemeanor counts of careless boating in August 2023, outraging Melissa and Andres and the parents of Lucy's seriously injured classmate, now-19 year-old Katerina Puig, a soccer star with major college prospects who suffered traumatic brain injury and needs a wheelchair.
A year later, prosecutors reexamined the case after never-before-interviewed witnesses came forward disputing major aspects of the investigation. Three of the witnesses — boaters who were at the scene in the aftermath of the crash — spoke to the Miami Herald, prompting a fourth witness to come forward. That witness, a Miami-Dade Fire Rescue medic on the scene, said Pino appeared intoxicated when he pulled him from the water.
Last October, the State Attorney's Office dropped the misdemeanors and charged Pino with reckless boating resulting in death — or vessel homicide — a second-degree felony.
Had Pino pleaded guilty to the misdemeanors, he was looking at 60 days in county jail and a $500 fine. He now faces up to 15 years in state prison and a $10,000 fine if convicted of the vessel-homicide felony. His trial is scheduled for July.
Under the newly passed legislation, reckless boating resulting in serious injury will be a third-degree felony, instead of a misdemeanor. Reckless boating resulting in death remains as a second-degree felony. And, anyone convicted of boating-under-the influence manslaughter will be punished with a mandatory minimum four-year prison sentence.
'The Puig family is happy with the passage of the Lucy Law, a significant step toward enhancing safety on Florida's waters. This law aims to prevent accidents and promote responsible behavior,' Katerina's father, Rudy Puig, said in an email to the Herald.
When Pino hit the channel marker, his 29-foot Robalo capsized, hurtling all 14 people on the boat — the 12 teenage girls and George Pino and his wife Cecilia— into the bay on that Sunday evening of Labor Day weekend in 2022. Lucy was trapped under the boat and died the next day in a hospital. Katerina was found unconscious in the water along with another girl, Isabella Rodriguez, who has recovered. Katerina was left with physical and cognitive disabilities.
Pino told the FWC investigators that a larger boat's wake caused him to lose control of his boat.
All witnesses and photographic and global positioning satellite data dispute that.
Under Lucy's Law, if the operator of a vessel in a crash that results in the death of a person provides misleading statements to police, that person could be charged with a second-degree misdemeanor.
The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's decision to quickly rule out alcohol as a factor in the crash despite potential evidence to the contrary inflamed the victims' families.
The FWC, the state law-enforcement agency that investigates boat crashes, said it did not have probable cause to get a warrant to force Pino to take the sobriety test even though Pino told the lead FWC investigator at the scene he had 'two beers' that day. And training manuals from both the FWC and State Attorney's Office list significant injuries and deaths as probable cause for a blood draw in a sobriety test, a Miami Herald investigation found.
READ MORE: How investigators, prosecutors bungled probe into boat crash that killed teen girl
The day after the crash, FWC investigators pulled the boat from the bottom of the channel and discovered more than 60 empty booze bottles and cans on the boat. (Pino's defense attorney, Howard Srebnick, has said the empty booze containers stemmed from five boats tied up that day on Elliott Key.)
In the lead-up to Pino's trial, both prosecutors and defense attorneys have been taking sworn statements from witnesses, some of whom have cast more doubt on the rigor of the initial investigation.
Last month, an FWC patrol officer who was at the crash scene told lawyers in a deposition that Pino's eyes were bloodshot and he had a 'flustered demeanor' as he shined a flashlight in his face. He also told the FWC's lead investigator on the scene that he should conduct a sobriety test on Pino; the investigator didn't.
The officer's interaction with Pino was recorded on his body camera, he told the attorneys, but the footage was somehow deleted.
Rodney Barreto, whom the state Senate reconfirmed for his fourth term as FWC chair earlier this week, told the Herald in an email that the officer, Julian Gazzola, mislabeled the footage, resulting in it being automatically deleted 90 days after he submitted it.
Lucy's Law was to include another stipulation that would have impacted Florida's deeply ingrained boating culture.
Florida law requires those born after Jan. 1, 1988 — or those 37 years old and younger — to complete a boater-safety course before they can operate a vessel.
Lucy's Law would have expanded that requirement to those older than 37, but who haven't lived in Florida for five consecutive years at the time they first began operating a boat. That part of the bill was stripped before the final vote.
According to the FWC's latest data, in 2023, 83% of boat operators in fatal accidents had no formal boating education.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump won't allow 'mob rule in America,' White House says
Trump won't allow 'mob rule in America,' White House says

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump won't allow 'mob rule in America,' White House says

The White House said Wednesday President Donald Trump would not allow "mob rule" after protests against his immigration policies spread across the United States despite a military-backed crackdown in Los Angeles. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt also attacked the Democratic governor of California and mayor of Los Angeles, claiming they had "fanned the flames" of the clashes. "President Trump will never allow mob rule to prevail in America," Leavitt told a briefing at the White House, backed by television screens showing images of burning vehicles and masked rioters. "The most basic duty of government is to preserve law and order, and this administration embraces that sacred responsibility." Leavitt's comments echoed Trump's in a speech at the Fort Bragg military base on Tuesday, in which he vowed to "liberate" Los Angeles and branded the protesters "animals." Trump is in conflict with California authorities who have accused the Republican president of being "dictatorial" and seeking political gain by sending in thousands of troops to break up the protests, which have largely been peaceful. Pockets of violence -- including the burning of self-driving taxis and hurling of stones at police -- have triggered a massive response from authorities, who have used tear gas and other less-lethal weapons. "Governor Gavin Newsom and Mayor Karen Bass shamefully failed to meet their sworn obligations to their citizens," Leavitt responded, accusing Newsom of having "fanned the flames and demonized our brave ICE officers." The protests erupted last week after Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers carried out a series of raids in Los Angeles to back up Trump's hardline immigration policies. Trump has also called the protesters "paid insurrectionists" -- alleging that some of them had professional anti-riot equipment -- but the White House did not say who it believed was paying them. "It's a good question the president is raising, and one we are looking into, about who is funding these insurrectionists," Leavitt said when asked by AFP about the president's comments. dk/aha

France Moves to Curb ‘Ultra-fast' Fashion With Bill Targeting Shein and Temu
France Moves to Curb ‘Ultra-fast' Fashion With Bill Targeting Shein and Temu

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

France Moves to Curb ‘Ultra-fast' Fashion With Bill Targeting Shein and Temu

PARIS — As major brands scale back their sustainability initiatives, France is pressing ahead with legislation aimed at reining in 'ultra-fast fashion' platforms such as Shein and Temu, known for their extremely low-cost clothing. The bill, introduced by Anne-Cécile Violland, a member of parliament from the Horizons party, passed the Senate one year after clearing the lower house of the French Assembly. More from WWD Inditex Sales Slow as Economic Headwinds Hit the High Street Rebag Expands Access to Pre-loved Luxury Goods With New Amazon Collaboration Designer Vincent Van Duysen Opens Antwerp Home for Zara Home+ 4th Collection The unusually long gap between votes led to some watering down of the original provisions, exempting traditional fast-fashion players such as H&M, Primark, and Inditex-owned Zara. 'It's a relief that it moved forward, but there has been a shift in the goal of the legislation that it is now specifically targeting what is called 'ultra-fast fashion,'' said Pierre Condamine, spokesperson for the Anti Fast Fashion Coalition, an umbrella group of 11 environmental organizations in France. Earlier drafts had adopted a broader definition of fast fashion that included Europe-based brands. 'There is sort of a shift in what was supposed to be an environmental legislation, with the objective to shift the whole sector towards sustainable practices, while now it's sort of becoming a protectionist text,' he told WWD. The revised bill targets ultra-fast fashion directly, proposing a tax on small parcels shipped from outside the EU ranging from 2 to 4 euros per package. The fee is intended to slow the influx of packages from Chinese platforms to France, in a move reminiscent of the U.S. ending its de minimis exemption. Shein and Temu together shipped 800 million packages to France in 2024 — more than half of all parcels sent to the country. The French government will first notify the European Commission, as several measures, including a total advertising ban on ultra-fast-fashion platforms, require approval at the EU level. This process could take up to three months before the bill goes to the Assembly and Senate joint committee for resolution, likely in the fall in late September or October. Several key provisions may face scrutiny in Brussels, including the parcel fee, which could conflict with the European Commission's plan for a bloc-wide fee by 2028, and the proposed national advertising ban. Although Shein is registered in Singapore, its European headquarters in Ireland could present a legal loophole. As it stands, the bill mandates eco-contributions from fashion companies based on a 'bonus-malus' system — rewarding sustainable practices and penalizing environmental harm. Penalties could rise to 10 euros per item by 2030, though the methodology for valuing items has yet to be defined. The bill would also eliminate tax advantages for 'donating' unsold stock by ultra-fast-fashion brands, which are not permitted to destroy unsold items under an anti-waste law passed in 2020. A critical element of the bill is its specific definition of 'ultra-fast' or 'ultra-express' fashion. This distinction leaves out more traditional fast-fashion companies that have a retail presence like H&M, Primark and Zara. By differentiating between ultra-fast platforms and fast-fashion brands with physical retail locations, the legislation potentially creates a loophole for companies headquartered in Europe — Sweden, Ireland and Spain respectively — even though their production relies heavily on low-wage countries like China, India and Bangladesh via subcontractors and diffuse supply chains. The original bill passed by the Assembly featured the broader definition, but companies lobbied intensively over the past year for the narrower language, arguing that they contribute to local employment. Senator Sylvie Valente Le Hir of Les Républicains, who ushered the bill through the Senate, highlighted its targeted approach: 'We have drawn a clear line between those we want to regulate — ultra-express fashion — and those we want to preserve, accessible but rooted fashion, which employs in France, which structures our territories, which creates links and supports a local economic fabric,' she said. The industry group La Fédération Française du Prêt à Porter Féminin praised the bill as a 'step forward' in tackling ultra-fast fashion. 'It formalizes the long-standing collective commitment of many stakeholders to defend a fashion industry that respects workers, consumers, citizens, French businesses, and the planet,' the organization said in a statement. However, Condamine noted that while large global fast-fashion retailers remain profitable – Zara's parent company Inditex reported sales were up 4.2 percent in constant-currency in the first quarter on Wednesday — French high street brands like Camaieu and NafNaf have entered administration, and independent stores continue to shutter. 'The economic crisis in the clothing industry in France, it started way before Shein,' Condamine said. 'It started when fast fashion — Zara, H&M, Primark — arrived. Now they are saying if they're targeted, it will be a catastrophe [for jobs]. But they're doing great economically, and they're part of the problem.' Some lawmakers described the bill as a 'strong first signal' and indicated that fast fashion as a whole — including the European players with physical presence — could face future regulation due to unsustainable business practices. On the other hand, critics — chiefly Shein — have said the legislation punishes cost-conscious consumers and lower-income households. The company, which markets itself under the slogan 'Fashion is a right, not a privilege,' has staged events in French cities like Béziers. On Sunday, its director of government relations, Fabrice Layer, held a presentation in front of the southeastern town's city hall to rally public support for the company. 'We ultimately find ourselves with a law that is not only anti-Shein, but anti-Shein customer,' Quentin Ruffat, Shein's spokesperson in France, told AFP. 'This law, if passed, will directly penalize our customers' wallets and drastically reduce their purchasing power.' The company has also accused France's fashion establishment of protecting legacy brands and says it will continue lobbying to amend the bill further. Shein representatives did not respond to requests for comment. New research from l'Institut Français de la Mode (IFM) shows that in the first quarter of 2025, Amazon, Shein and Temu together accounted for 24 percent of online apparel sales by value, representing 7 percent of total apparel consumption across all channels. Online sales made up 29.4 percent of apparel purchases by value, including the online stores of traditional retailers. Best of WWD Walmart Calls California Waste Dumping Lawsuit 'Unjustified' Year in Review: Sustainability's Biggest Controversies of 2021 Year in Review: Sustainability's New Strides

Poll reveals how Americans feel about Trump sending troops into LA over ICE protests
Poll reveals how Americans feel about Trump sending troops into LA over ICE protests

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Poll reveals how Americans feel about Trump sending troops into LA over ICE protests

As President Donald Trump has deployed the National Guard and the United States Marines to Los Angeles in the wake of violent protests over federal immigration raids, Americans have soured on the president's response as Angelenos continue to take to the streets. Forty-five percent of adults disapprove of Trump deploying the California National Guard, while 38% approve, according to a YouGov poll released on Tuesday. The poll also shows that 17% of Americans are not sure about the deployment. Another YouGov poll released Tuesday showed that more Americans disapprove than approve of the Pentagon sending the Marines to Los Angeles, with 47% disapproving and 34% approving. There are 19% — about 1 in 5 — who are unsure. Conducted on June 10, the YouGov poll surveyed 4,309 U.S. adults. Since protests began on Friday, June 6, Trump has repeatedly defended his actions. On Monday, he took to Truth Social to suggest that Los Angeles would be 'completely obliterated' if he did not send in the National Guard. 'If I didn't 'SEND IN THE TROOPS' to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great City would be burning to the ground right now, much like 25,000 houses burned to the ground in L.A. due to an incompetent Governor and Mayor,' Trump wrote on Truth Social on Tuesday. Gov. Gavin Newsom did not approve or consent to Trump's deployment of the National Guard and has attacked the president's actions since last week. When Trump and White House border czar Tom Homan floated the idea that Newsom should be arrested for not approving, Newsom dared them to arrest him. Among several elected Republican lawmakers who have criticized Newsom and the developments out of Los Angeles, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said the governor should not be arrested. But he offered an outdated alternative. 'I'm not going to give you legal analysis on whether Gavin Newsom should be arrested but he ought to be tarred and feathered, I'll say that,' Johnson told reporters. Newsom saw this and replied in an X post. 'Good to know we're skipping the arrest and going straight for the 1700s style forms of punishment,' the governor wrote Tuesday. As of Wednesday morning, Trump ordered the deployment of over 4,000 California National Guard troops to Los Angeles, the Los Angeles Times reported. The Pentagon also deployed 700 U.S. Marines from Camp Pendleton, with a military convoy heading from Twentynine Palms toward the City of Angels. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass ordered an 8 p.m. to 6 p.m. curfew on Tuesday, but 25 people were arrested in connection with violating the curfew, the Times reported. Colombian fugitive living 30 years in Mass. deported after deadly secret uncovered Mayor Wu seeks transparency on ICE arrests, 'secret police tactics' Can Trump deploy the National Guard to stop protests? Here's what the law says What Gov. Newsom said after an Ala. senator called LA 'a third world country' Mass. labor groups rally against ICE arrest of California union leader Read the original article on MassLive.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store