Electoral reform, dinosaurs and ‘spite': the ‘Longest Ballot' protest, explained
The front-runner in the race, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, is seeking a path back to the House of Commons after losing his Ottawa-area riding in the last federal election. Poilievre has attacked the Longest Ballot Committee's efforts to stack the ballot with a large number of candidates as a 'blatant abuse' of democracy.
Here's what the Longest Ballot Committee says it wants, what its opponents say needs to change and how Elections Canada is planning to handle the Aug. 18 vote.
Why are these protests happening?
The Longest Ballot Committee is pushing for electoral reform, arguing that Canada must move beyond the first-past-the-post system to something that would better reflect the wishes of voters.
The Longest Ballot Committee was responsible for adding 85 of the 91 names on the ballot in Poilievre's former riding of Carleton in the last federal election. While Poilievre lost that seat to a Liberal after holding it for nearly two decades, none of the Longest Ballot candidates got more than 57 votes.
The group says it's trying to draw the public's attention to the need for electoral reform and has run dozens of candidates in multiple byelections in Ontario, Quebec and Manitoba since 2022.
What do the Longest Ballot Committee candidates promise?
The Longest Ballot Committee candidates are — no surprise — promising electoral reform. Some have been going off-script, however.
One Longest Ballot Committee candidate in Battle River-Crowfoot has a website that simply says they're running 'out of spite.'
'If you only get to vote once, vote for the person who isn't a politician,' the website for Abel Erazo-Ibarra says.
Another for Nicola Zoghbi promises 'dinosaurs for everyone.'
'My first move as MP will be to rename the electoral district Raptor River—Crowfoot, in honour of the velociraptors that once terrorized the Albertan plains,' Zoghbi's website says.
Zoghbi — apparently a Spielberg fan — is also vowing to lobby Universal to open a Jurassic Park-style theme park in the riding where 'visitors from all over the world will flock — like pterodactyls' to 'relive the adventures of Dr. Alan Grant and the other poor souls who had the (mis) fortune of seeing the dinosaurs up close.'
Lori Turnbull, a political-science professor at Dalhousie University, said that while electoral reform is a worthwhile cause, the long ballot protests are alienating voters.
'Federal elections are supposed to be serious events. It's a serious decision to decide who is going to represent you,' she said.
'These people aren't looking to get elected — they're looking to make a point. That's going to depreciate the integrity of democracy and the overall sense that the election is serious and it means something.'
What does the legislation say?
To run as a candidate in a federal election, one must be a Canadian citizen at least 18 years old on election day and must secure signatures from at least 100 people in the riding.
If the riding is larger or remote, the minimum signature requirement drops to 50.
What are people proposing to end long ballots?
Poilievre and Conservative MP Michael Cooper are pitching changes to the elections rules that would increase the required number of nomination signatures to 0.5 per cent of the population in a riding, rather than 100 people.
According to 2021 Census data, that means a candidate in Toronto Centre would need nearly 600 signatures, while a candidate in Malpeque, P.E.I. would need 192.
Poilievre and Cooper are also proposing that each of those signatures be exclusive to a candidate, and that official agents be barred from representing more than one candidate at any given time.
Asked whether the government is considering those changes, a spokesperson for House leader Steven MacKinnon said the government 'shares the concerns' about long ballots and is 'examining the issue.'
Turnbull said that while long ballots may cause frustration for candidates and those working the polls, the solution isn't to rewrite Canada's election laws. She said Longest Ballot Committee candidates don't receive a large enough share of the vote to affect elections in any meaningful way, beyond the administrative burdens they impose on Elections Canada.
She also worries that requiring candidates to collect a higher number of signatures might freeze out serious Independent challengers like Bonnie Critchley, who is running against Poilievre in Battle River-Crowfoot.
'That's not a reasonable test to put on a serious, Independent candidate,' Turnbull said.
How is Elections Canada planning to handle the byelection?
Voters in Battle River-Crowfoot will be using an 'adapted ballot' that will have a blank space where electors can write in the name of their preferred candidate, replacing the typical list-style ballot.
Sixteen candidates on the ballot have last names that are the same or similar. Most of them are candidates associated with the Longest Ballot Committee.
'As long as the elector's intention is clear, their vote will be counted, even if they misspell the candidate's name,' Elections Canada says.
'The list of candidates will be available at every voting table so that electors can find the name of their candidate of choice.'
Elections Canada says counting the ballots in Battle River-Crowfoot is likely to take longer than usual.
The agency has said long ballots create accessibility barriers for some voters because the ballots become 'overwhelming and confusing.'
In a briefing document posted on the Elections Canada website, the agency raised concerns about voters who use wheelchairs. It said it's difficult for them to reach past the middle of a long ballot without pulling it off the table, which risks damaging or spoiling the ballot.
'These visual and physical challenges impact the independence and secrecy of the voting experience since some voters with disabilities must resort to asking for assistance from an election officer to properly handle or mark the long ballot,' the document says.
— With files from Sarah Ritchie
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 29, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edmonton Journal
an hour ago
- Edmonton Journal
Lorne Gunter: Elections Canada put an end to Longest Ballot Committee's trickery
Article content So the Longest Ballot Committee has been thwarted — sort of — in its effort to hijack next month's byelection in Battle River-Crowfoot. Article content The committee's stunt of clogging the ballot in the central Alberta riding with more than 200 names worked. By the close of nominations on Tuesday, the committee had convinced more than 200 of its supporters to let their names stand, even though most of them have never been to the riding and have no intention of campaigning. Article content Article content Article content There is a provision in the federal Elections Act that permits voters to use write-in ballots, rather than the typical list-style ballot. It is usually only used for special electors, such as voters who show up at an Elections Canada office on a day not set up for advance polling. Article content Write-in ballots typically aren't used over a full riding in an official byelection, but Elections Canada decided there was no prohibition against using write-in at every polling station in the ranching, farming and oil-drilling riding. Article content So on election day Aug. 18 and at advance polls, voters will have a list of all the nominees to look at, if they want, Then they will write their preferred candidate's name on a single-line ballot. Perfectly correct spelling is not required, so long as it is obvious to returning officers for whom the ballot was cast. Article content Article content This saves Elections Canada from having to produce a ballot nearly seven feet long. Article content Article content That's a good thing. Such long ballots in the past have led to hours-long counting delays on election night. Article content Write-in balloting, however, discourages turnout. It seems to some voters to be more complicated and less reliable than choosing their candidate from a reasonably short list with party affiliation clearly shown. Article content And write-in balloting favours incumbents or, in the case of Pierre Poilievre, very well-known candidates. Article content Most voters in Battle River–Crowfoot or elsewhere in Canada know Poilievre by name. If you want to vote Conservative, you simply show up at the polls and write in his famous name.
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Trump's tariffs give chocolate makers in Canada, Mexico an edge over U.S. firms
"Elbows Up" chocolate for sale at the Maker House in Ottawa (Katie Griffin/CTV News Ottawa) LONDON/NEW YORK — U.S. President Donald Trump's trade tariffs are meant to boost domestic manufacturing. But in the chocolate industry, they're doing the opposite: ramping up the cost of importing already-pricey cocoa and hurting the competitiveness of local factories versus Canadian and Mexican outfits that supply the U.S., according to conversations with 11 industry executives, representatives, experts and traders. Under the United States-Mexico-Canada free trade pact (USMCA), which the Trump administration has confirmed remains in place, Canada and Mexico can export chocolate to the U.S. tariff-free no matter where they sourced their inputs of cocoa, a tropical crop that does not grow in the United States. Canada also has zero tariffs on imports of raw and semi-processed cocoa like butter and powder, while Mexico grows its own beans, meaning factories both north and south of the U.S. border can produce more cheaply than those domestically who now have to pay tariffs of between 10 to 25 per cent on cocoa inputs. The rates could rise to 35 per cent on Aug. 1. A government official said that the White House continues to monitor trends in trade and commerce and listen to industry feedback to deliver on Trump's economic agenda. Top U.S. chocolate maker Hershey, which mainly makes chocolate in the U.S. but has plants in Canada and Mexico, has estimated it would face US$100 million in tariff costs in its third and fourth quarters if the levies remain in place. Smaller firms like Somerville, Massachusetts-based Taza Chocolate, which produces chocolate from scratch using imported cocoa, have no alternatives to U.S. manufacturing. Taza in May had to pay $24,124 in duties on a container of cocoa from Haiti, subject to the blanket 10 per cent tariff imposed by Trump, a Customs and Border Protection invoice showed. Taza faces a customs check of more than $30,000 to release its next container of cocoa from the Dominican Republic, founder and CEO Alex Whitmore said. 'For a company our size, that's our profit margin gone so the immediate thought is OK, the rules have changed, we just need to create the most cost-effective solution for the consumer,' said Whitmore. He initially explored offshoring part of Taza's manufacturing to Canada to benefit from USMCA terms, but decided against it given the significant investment of both money and time that would require, in a volatile business environment. 'Right now, the environment is so uncertain that we're just hunkering down and hoping this will pass,' Whitmore said. 'A lot of us business owners are kind of frozen.' Customs data compiled for Reuters by Trade Data Monitor (TDM) shows Canada's chocolate exports to the U.S. grew by 10 per cent in volume terms in the five months to end-May, indicating some Canadian manufacturers are taking advantage of the opportunity created by tariffs. Companies benefiting are mostly Canadian and Mexican contract chocolate makers, or multinational contractors like Barry Callebaut that have a significant footprint in Canada and Mexico, industry sources said. Barry Callebaut, which has just under half its North America chocolate factories in Canada and Mexico, declined to comment. Its CEO Peter Feld said at its July post-results conference call: 'On tariffs ... we have operations in the U.S., we have operations in Canada, we have operations in Mexico. So we can actually navigate this environment in the right way.' Contract chocolate firms produce raw chocolate that U.S. factories add ingredients to and sell as American chocolate. Tariffs - a pillar of Trump's 'America First' economic agenda - come at a delicate time for U.S. chocolate makers as consumers are already buying less after absorbing double-digit inflation over the past several years. In chocolate specifically, prices have risen sharply as cocoa tripled in value to hit record highs in the first four months of last year, and remains well above historical averages because of adverse weather and disease in top growers Ivory Coast and Ghana. Under pressure from rising input costs, Hershey earlier this month rolled out double-digit price hikes across its confectionary products like Reese's cups to retailers like Walmart and Kroger. Cocoa accounts for about 30 to 50 per cent of the cost of a bar of chocolate. Hershey said its recent price hikes were not related to tariffs. Taza has raised its wholesale prices by 10 per cent since a year ago, and the price of its chocolate bars on its website rose in June to $6.99 from $5.99 previously, but Whitmore also said tariffs would cause further price hikes. Because cocoa can't be sourced domestically, Hershey said in May it is 'engaging with the U.S. government to seek an exemption' for cocoa. It declined to comment on whether it was counting on imports from its Canada and Mexico plants to help mitigate tariff costs. M&Ms maker Mars, which said Tuesday it is investing $2 billion in its U.S. manufacturing, including chocolate, has not changed its sourcing structure and continues to make 94 per cent of its U.S. products locally. A Lindt LISN.S spokesperson said the Lindor truffle maker will decide on possible changes to its sourcing after Aug. 1. Paolo Quadrini, director general of Mexican chocolate and candy association Aschoco Confimex, said U.S. tariffs are 'creating new opportunities for Mexican companies.' 'The sentiment among companies and entrepreneurs, as well as requests from U.S. chocolate companies to manufacture in Mexico, is real and has been increasing,' he said. The chocolate market in the U.S., the world's top chocolate consumer, is worth $25 to 30 billion, according to investment bank TD Cowen, and imports from top supplier Canada account for about 10 per cent of that total, while those from No. 2 supplier Mexico account for some 2.5 per cent. Tareq Hadhad, CEO of mid-sized Nova Scotia-based chocolate maker Peace by Chocolate said tariffs had largely prompted Canadian and American firms to opt for locally produced goods but that contract chocolate makers in Canada had benefited from the new trade dynamic. 'It's an advantage for them,' he said. (Reporting by May Angel, Helen Reid and Jessica DiNapoli; Editing by Lisa Jucca and Anna Driver)
CTV News
3 hours ago
- CTV News
With Ottawa promising bail reform, what's driving the debate?
Minister of Justice Sean Fraser makes his way to a meeting on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Friday, June 13, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick OTTAWA — Premiers are putting pressure on Ottawa to implement tougher bail rules. With the federal government expected to table bail reform legislation in the fall, critics are expressing worries already about Ottawa's plans. So what's driving the debate on bail reform? What the government has promised During this spring's federal election, the Liberals promised to 'move aggressively' to implement stricter bail laws by introducing a reverse onus for a number of offences. A reverse onus moves the burden of proof from the prosecutor to the accused — meaning they would have to justify being granted bail. The Criminal Code already has a reverse onus for bail in place for many serious offences, including murder. The Liberals would add new offences to that list, including car thefts involving violence or those conducted for a criminal organization, and home invasions and some human trafficking and smuggling offences. Justice Minister Sean Fraser told The Canadian Press he plans to bring forward a crime bill in the fall. It's not clear what will be in it — Fraser said the government will consider including additional reforms but 'at minimum' it will implement the crime policies the Liberals promised during the election. Didn't the Liberals already reform bail? Yes, through amendments to the Criminal Code in 2023. They expanded reverse onus bail provisions to include more firearms and weapons offences, and more crimes involving intimate partner violence. In 2019, the government established a reverse onus for those charged with a violent offence involving an intimate partner if they have a prior conviction for a similar offence. The 2023 amendments followed calls from provincial premiers and police chiefs for the federal government to bring in stricter bail rules for repeat violent offenders. It followed some high-profile cases — including that of Ontario Provincial Police Const. Greg Pierzchala, who was killed while responding to a vehicle in a ditch. In 2024, Ontario police associations called for further reform, saying there are many cases 'of accused persons out on bail who are rearrested shortly after being granted bail,' including some that don't make the news. They said the public 'expects that in the name of public safety, violent and repeat offenders will not be released on bail unless there is a compelling reason and a sensible plan to ensure that they are not at risk of reoffending while awaiting trial.' Pressure from the premiers Premiers said earlier this month they expect the federal government to follow through with its promised reforms. At a press conference following a premiers' meeting in Huntsville, Ont., last week, Ontario Premier Doug Ford said the provincial leaders 'talked about the need for real bail reform that keeps criminals behind bars and keeps our communities safe.' He said the premiers would be holding Prime Minister Mark Carney 'accountable' for delivering 'full-fledged' and not 'half-baked' reform. Ford said he'd 'love to see mandatory sentencing so when someone breaks into your home, puts a gun to your head, terrorizes your neighbourhood,' that person doesn't 'get out on bail after being out on bail … five times.' The federal government is responsible for setting bail laws under the Criminal Code, but provincial and territorial governments prosecute most criminal offences, conduct bail hearings and enforce bail conditions. A spokesperson for Fraser said the federal government is 'working with provinces and territories to reform bail and sentencing, with a focus on repeat, violent offenders. This was a key topic at the recent First Ministers' Meeting, and minister Fraser has made it a top priority.' Why is bail such a hot political issue? The Conservative party has long campaigned on a promise of 'jail not bail' and has accused the Liberals of being 'soft' on crime and of implementing 'catch and release' policies. During the recent federal election, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre campaigned heavily on crime and said he would prohibit those convicted of three serious offences from getting bail. Anthony Doob, professor emeritus at the University of Toronto's Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal studies, said calls to toughen up bail law are based on the false assumption that large numbers of dangerous people are being released. 'Of course, the ones we hear about in particular are the ones who committed a serious and a violent offence,' he said. 'So we are hearing about those cases. But the assumption that we have a lenient system is questioned by the fact that 80 per cent of our prisoners in Ontario, in the provincial prisons … are now awaiting trial.' Calls to make bail tougher to get are bad policy but easy politics, he argued, because politicians can always point to someone who committed a crime while on bail. 'If you're going to be detaining another hundred people or a few hundred people in order to reduce the likelihood that one person is going to commit another offence, I think we should be a little bit cautious,' he said. What are the concerns about tougher bail rules? Shakir Rahim, director of the criminal justice program at the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, said that approximately 70 per cent of those in provincial remand centres are waiting for trial — up from about 20 per cent in 1982. The consequence of tougher bail rules is that they erode 'what is a core safeguard of liberty for the innocent,' he said. 'In an environment where we have record levels of bail being denied, and we have further erosions, whether through reverse onus provisions or otherwise, we really dilute the strength of that protection.' Rahim said there is a trend toward 'immediately' viewing people who have been arrested 'as guilty of it, or talked about in that way,' even though only half of cases in Canada result in criminal convictions. 'The more people that you deny bail to, it is a foreseen consequence that some of those people will have been factually innocent,' he said. Rahim said provincial jails are overcrowded, with conditions that include 23-hour-a-day lockdowns and a lack of medical care. 'When you take people and you deny them bail, it can be up to 30 months before they have their day in court,' he said. 'So one of the issues that we're concerned about is people feeling the pressure to plead guilty to certain offences just to get out of the terrible conditions that they are subject to.' Catherine Latimer, executive director of the John Howard Society of Canada, said pretrial detention rates are 'way too high.' That is 'the canary in the coal mine to suggest your system is really seriously flawed … It's not enough to think that the answer is to put more people in there by using more reverse onus provisions.' Latimer said 'we haven't even analyzed whether the last set of reverse onus provisions have done anything.' In 2023, when the federal government introduced the previous bail reform legislation, then-justice minister Arif Virani called on provinces and territories to collect better data on bail and share that with the federal government. Rahim said we don't have any data about the number of people who reoffend while out on bail, or whether they're ultimately found guilty. 'So how can we know about … the state of the bail system, about whether reverse onuses or other policy changes work, without this information?' This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 30, 2025. Anja Karadeglija, The Canadian Press
