Iran's Khamenei says US nuclear proposal against national interest
Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Wednesday a US proposal for a nuclear agreement was against the national interest, amid sharp differences over whether Tehran can continue to enrich uranium.
The longtime foes have held five rounds of talks since April to thrash out a new accord to replace the deal with major powers that US President Donald Trump abandoned during his first term in 2018.
On Saturday, Iran said it had received "elements" of the US proposal through Omani mediators, the details of which have not been publicly disclosed.
"The (nuclear) proposal presented by the Americans is 100 percent against" the ideals of the 1979 Islamic revolution, Khamenei said in a televised speech.
"Independence means not waiting for the green light from America and the likes of America."
Iran's enrichment of uranium has emerged as a major point of contention.
Trump said on Monday his administration would not allow "any" enrichment, despite Tehran's insistence it is its right under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Khamenei said enrichment is "key" to Iran's nuclear programme and that the United States "cannot have a say" on the issue.
- 'Less than satisfactory' -
On Monday, Iran's lead negotiator, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, held talks in Cairo with Rafael Grossi, head of the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency.
In its latest quarterly report last week, the IAEA said Iran had further stepped up its production of highly enriched uranium.
In a separate report, it also criticised "less than satisfactory" cooperation from Tehran, particularly in explaining past cases of nuclear material found at undeclared sites.
Iran currently enriches uranium to 60 percent, far above the 3.67-percent limit set in the 2015 deal but still short of the 90 percent threshold needed for a nuclear warhead.
The reports came ahead of a planned IAEA Board of Governors meeting in Vienna later this month which will review Iran's nuclear activities.
Washington and other Western governments have continued to accuse Iran of seeking a nuclear weapons capability. Iran insists its programme is for peaceful purposes only.
The 2015 deal provided Iran with relief from international sanctions in return for UN-monitored restrictions on its nuclear activities.
Trump reimposed US sanctions when he quit the agreement in 2018 and has since tightened them with secondary sanctions against third parties who violate them.
Britain, France and Germany, the three European countries who were party to the 2015 deal, are currently weighing whether to trigger the sanctions "snapback" mechanism in the accord.
The mechanism would reinstate UN sanctions in response to Iranian non-compliance -- an option that expires in October.
Iran has slammed the IAEA report as unbalanced, saying it relied on "forged documents" provided by its arch foe Israel.
pdm-mz/kir
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
7 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump, Musk's Public Feud
The Pulse with Francine Lacqua Elon Musk signaled he would move to cool tensions with US President Donald Trump, after differences between the two exploded Thursday into an all-out public feud. Earlier in the day, Musk called for Trump's impeachment and insinuated he was withholding the release of files related to disgraced New York financier Jeffrey Epstein because of his own presence in them. Trump, in turn, proposed cutting off the billionaire's government contracts, following his onetime adviser's repeated exhortations for Republicans to vote against the president's signature tax legislation. Musk's olive branch came after Tesla Inc. shares tanked 14% and his personal wealth dropped by $34 billion. Today's guests: Emmanuel Cau, Barclays European Equity Strategy Head, Gregory Peters, PGIM Fixed Income Co-CIO, Maria Demertzis, The Conference Board Economy, Strategy & Finance Center Europe Lead. (Source: Bloomberg)
Bloomberg
7 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Bessent Looks to Revamp Currency Monitoring After Damage Done
I'm Chris Anstey, an economics editor in Boston. Today we're looking at the US Treasury's semiannual foreign-exchange report. Send us feedback and tips to ecodaily@ And if you aren't yet signed up to receive this newsletter, you can do so here. The first US Treasury semiannual assessment of American trading partners' exchange-rate policies since Trump returned to the White House read, in substance, much the same as the last one under President Joe Biden.
Travel Weekly
7 minutes ago
- Travel Weekly
The impact of Trump's tariffs on aviation is up for debate
NEW DELHI, India -- Aviation leaders at IATA's Annual General Meeting presented a divided front on the potential impact of President Trump's tariffs on the aviation sector. While some members warn that the tariffs could disrupt global supply chains and increase operational costs, others believe the industry can adapt without significant damage. IATA director general Willie Walsh said that if tariffs stay relatively modest, like the 10% baseline tariffs the U.S. currently has in effect for imports, their impact on consumer demand will be minimal. In some previous periods of high tariffs, Walsh said, the airline industry grew significantly. "Industries adapt. People adapt," he said. His confidence wasn't fully shared by the trade group's chief economist, Marie Owens Thomsen, who said that increases in tariffs and trade barriers will have a long-term downward impact on global flight demand. U.S. tariffs are currently at their highest level since the 1930s. "Tariffs are a tax, and anything that you tax will shrink," she said. Cirium analysts also sounded an alarm in a report produced ahead of the IATA meeting. "While it is too early to judge any likely impact of tariffs on the commercial aviation sector, they pose a risk to demand and to supply," the analysis reads. The most immediate impact could be on aircraft production costs, since suppliers Airbus, Boeing and others source parts for any particular plane from all over the world. "The reality is that the supply chain for aircraft production is extremely complicated, globally distributed and is even more directly impacted by tariffs, or concerns about them, than air travel demand," said Vik Krishnan, an aviation-focused partner for the consulting firm McKinsey. The sheer volume of parts on commercial aircraft are a key complication. For example, an Airbus A320 has 340,000 parts. And components for a single plane, said Krishnan, are assembled in a number of countries. Today's uncertainty around tariffs, he said, has a real impact on aircraft manufacturers. Walsh called for aircraft and engine parts to be exempted from all global tariffs. He also said airlines would resist cost increases for aircraft unless suppliers can demonstrate justification. "We don't want to see any of the manufacturers, any of the suppliers, using tariffs as an excuse or an opportunity to increase their prices to the industry," he said. Airlines still on track for a good year Despite those concerns, IATA's latest forecast indicates that global financial uncertainty will have only a mild impact on 2025 airline performance, mostly due to lower fuel costs. The trade group projects global airline revenues of $979 billion this year, down from its forecast in December that the industry would realize revenue of $1 trillion for the first time. But revenue reductions will be almost entirely offset by lower-than-projected costs for fuel. IATA now expects a global fuel bill of $236 billion for airlines in 2025, with average jet fuel prices of $86 per barrel. That compares to an average per-barrel cost of $99 in 2024 and industrywide fuel costs of $261 billion. Overall, IATA now projects 2025 industry net profits of $36 billion, only slightly down from its December projection of $36.6 billion. IATA's projection assumes global GDP will grow 2.5% in 2025, down from 3.3% growth last year. IATA projects U.S. GDP to grow 1.5%, down from 2.8% in 2024. IATA does not expect a global recession, in part because of the positive macro impact of cheap fuel and because the Trump tariffs only impact the manufacturing sector and not the servicing sector, which represents more than half of the global economy. Even in the transatlantic market, where flight data company Cirium showed that U.S. arrivals dropped by more than 10% year over year in the first quarter, Walsh remains modestly bullish. Forward bookings look fine in the months to come across the Atlantic, he said, and two-way traffic outperformed 2024 by 2.4% in April. "I suspect when we do look back on 2025," Walsh said, "transatlantic traffic will be slightly better than 2024."
