Khampepe Commission is the right platform for Mbeki, Mabandla to tell their story, court rules
Former president Thabo Mbeki and ex-justice minister Brigitte Mabandla have lost a court battle to intervene in a R167 million damages case related to the failure to prosecute apartheid-era crimes.
The case was brought by the families of the victims, including the Cradock Four.
They argue that the government violated their constitutional rights by failing to implement the recommendations of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) to prosecute those responsible for apartheid-era atrocities.
Government dragged to court over TRC prosecutions
The families allege that from 1998 to 2017, the government actively blocked investigations into TRC-referred cases.
They are asking the courts to award constitutional damages and set up a trust to manage the funds.
They also wanted a commission of inquiry into the lack of prosecutions.
However, President Cyril Ramaphosa established the commission in late April, before the court heard the damages application.
ALSO READ: Ramaphosa launches commission of inquiry into apartheid-era justice delays
Retired Constitutional Court (ConCourt) Judge Sisi Khampepe will chair the inquiry, which will focus on events from 2003 to the present day.
In response, Mbeki and Mabandla applied to the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria to join the damages case.
The duo argued that they risk being blamed and having their conduct in office declared wrongful, potentially paving the way for the damages award.
High Court judgment
But Judge Anthony Millar, in his judgment, dismissed Mbeki or Mabandla's application, stating that the families' court papers made no direct accusations against them.
'It is important to note that besides the fact that there are no direct allegations, the founding affidavit references the fact that the allegations of political interference are denied by Mr Mbeki,' Millar said.
'Neither Mr Mbeki nor Ms Mabandla are specifically named as having directly acted in any way to subvert or prevent the TRC investigations or prosecutions. References to them are by virtue of the offices that they held and by way of inference,' he added.
Mbeki and Mabandla told the high court that they had a direct and significant interest in the case, which justified their request to intervene.
READ MORE: Mbeki accused of trying to save his reputation by intervening in apartheid lawsuit
They argued that the serious allegations made against them were central to the case and would inevitably come up during the proceedings.
But the families contended that the damages case did not depend on whether Mbeki or Mabandla personally interfered.
That issue, they said, would be dealt with by the Khampepe commission.
'In their view, the application to intervene is made solely to address reputational concerns and 'set the record straight' regarding allegations which if established, would tarnish their reputation but not because there is any legal interest in the relief sought,' the judgment delivered on 1 August reads.
Mbeki, Mabandla lose bid to intervene in TRC prosecutions case
Millar concluded that the Khampepe commission is the 'appropriate forum' for Mbeki and Mabandla to 'tell their side of the story', since they have 'no direct and substantial interest' in the damages case.
The judge, therefore, dismissed their application but made no order for costs.
'Mr Mbeki and Ms Mabandla sought leave to intervene in their personal capacities and although unsuccessful, given the fact that the main application is constitutional in nature, I am of the view that no order of costs should be made.'
NOW READ: Apartheid-era survivors demand justice in court
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
8 hours ago
- The Citizen
Government under fire for splashing on employees' salaries
'For us to effectively compete with the Chinese, our salary structure must be similar.' Critics slam the South African government for allowing many of its employees to take home millions in salaries, while most of the ordinary citizens struggle to make ends meet. Public servants' salary increases are being implemented while most cities are collapsing right in the eyes of the world. This raises the question about the government's priorities. Many have suggested that instead of increasing public servants' salaries, the money can be used to repair or replace collapsing infrastructure. ALSO READ: More than R140 million in salaries paid to suspended government employees Increase salaries or fix the city? Moeletsi Mbeki, political economist, criticised the government on the State of the Nation podcast for the high salaries of employees. He highlighted that the money can be used to fix railway tracks, towns, roads, and water infrastructure. 'They are not building new railway tracks; they are destroying them. Instead of creating new towns. They are allowing the road, water, and electricity infrastructure to collapse while they tax the rest of the economy to pay themselves phenomenal salaries.' Mbeki was referring to the National Treasury's 2023 Medium Term Budget Policy, which outlined that 55 000 government employees take home more than R1 million per year in salaries. Government employees salaries breakdown The government employees that are being referred to include teachers, healthcare workers, police officers, military personnel, employees in national, provincial, and local government, as well as public entities and state-owned companies. National Treasury's 2023 Medium Term Budget Policy showed that most of the public servants moved into higher-earning categories, because of the higher cost-of-living adjustment. The number of employees who earn more than R1 million per year increased from 10 000 to over 55 000 in ten years. While 48% of employees earn between R350 000 and R600 000 per year. ALSO READ: Here's what some of South Africa's SOE bosses earn Salaries must be cut Mbeki in the podcast said the salaries of South Africa's government employees must be cut to align with those of key competitors. 'For us to effectively compete with the Chinese, our salary structure must be similar.' In the interview, he rejects the need for transformation, and calls for urgent, practical development — from green energy and infrastructure renewal to education reform and economic reindustrialisation. He argues the ANC's legacy has been one of mismanagement and elite enrichment, with South Africa's African middle-class prioritising 'eating' over nation-building. However, Mbeki remains hopeful, believing that new leadership and vehicles for progress will emerge. Public servants earn more than doctors Jacques van Wyk, CEO of JGL Forensic Services, argued in a post that most public servants earn more than qualified doctors. JGL Forensic Services is an internationally recognised forensic services company helping businesses and government departments develop ethical, sustainable practices. He said the public servants' salaries have put massive pressure on government finances. Rewarding a job well done 'I'm all for rewarding a job well done, but you don't have to look very far to see that South Africa's civil service is not doing its job very well at all,' said van Wyk. He made reference to Dawie Roodt, Chief Economist of the Efficient Group, on his view about how public servants are paid. 'We have approximately 1.3 million civil servants in South Africa, and they are mostly overpaid and underworked. The big question is, what can be done to improve government efficiency? We spend a huge amount of money on the whole state machinery, and this economy simply cannot keep on carrying this massive burden.' Van Wyk agrees with Roodt that 'the solution is not to suck more money out of the system, but rather to put policies in place to spend less.' NOW READ: Godongwana cuts government spending to offset VAT shortfall
IOL News
11 hours ago
- IOL News
Cyril fights to delay apartheid damages case
President Cyril Ramaphosa requests the Gauteng High Court to postpone a R167 million damages case related to apartheid atrocities until a judicial inquiry clarifies the facts surrounding the investigation and prosecution of these crimes. Image: Sandi Kwon Hoo / DFA LAWYERS representing the families of victims and survivors of apartheid-era atrocities believe President Cyril Ramaphosa does not want to delay the R167 million constitutional damages case against the government because it's politically awkward for him. 'Therefore he wants the inquiry first,' said Advocate Matthew Chaskalson. Ramaphosa urged the Gauteng High Court, Pretoria to stay the case until the conclusion of the judicial commission of inquiry, so that all the facts are on the table. Judge Nicolene Janse van Nieuwenhuizen listening to the arguments of Advocate Matthew Chaskalson SC on Wednesday during President Cyril Ramaphosa's application for a stay of the constitutional damages case brought by the families of apartheid era victims. Image: Zelda Venter Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ramaphosa had earlier signed a proclamation for the establishment of a judicial commission of inquiry to determine whether attempts were made to prevent the investigation and prosecution of apartheid-era crimes. Advocate Tim Bruinders SC, arguing on behalf of Ramaphosa and the government, said it is vital that all the facts first be established before the constitutional damages case is served before court. He said the commission will shed more light on why, and to what extent and by whom, efforts or attempts were made to influence or pressure the South African Police Service or the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) to stop investigating or prosecuting TRC cases. According to Bruinders, it is at this stage impossible for Ramaphosa and the government to issue an affidavit in the constitutional damages case if the facts are not clear. 'In fact, we do not know at this stage what the true facts are,' he said. Judge Nicolene Janse van Nieuwenhuizen questioned whether it is not the prerogative of the applicants (the survivors and families) to proceed with their constitutional damages case as they deem fit. Bruinders responded that the facts must first become clear - something which a commission can establish by calling witnesses - before a court could decide on damages. 'These are families who have the sympathy of the government. They don't have closure. This is a concern for any government, but the facts must still be explored,' he said. Bruinders added that the government wanted the truth as to why these cases were not investigated and prosecuted. But it first needed the facts. Judge Janse van Nieuwenhuizen also questioned whether it was not possible for the court hearing the constitutional damages claim to deal with the cases of each of the 25 families and to establish the facts then. But Bruinders said as witnesses usually do not testify in motion court proceedings, such as this, the commission of inquiry is in a better position to establish the facts, as it has the tools to investigate the issues. Chaskalson implored the judge not to stay the constitutional damages case, saying the families have been waiting for between 30 and 50 years for justice. "They are getting older, many have meanwhile died, and those who are still surviving want to see justice done and get closure while they are still here. They are entitled to their day in court after decades of waiting.' Chaskalson added that the commission of inquiry can go on for months before it makes any recommendations. He pointed out that the commission can only make recommendations, which are not binding on the president. Chaskalson said the issue will in any event have to serve before court, as the president cannot simply dip into public funds and pay compensation to the victims and families. This is a matter for the court to determine and for it to then issue an order. He accused the president of not wanting to choose where he stands in this matter. "He does not want to go ahead in court because it's politically awkward for him,' Chaskalson said. In asking that the case not be delayed, Chaskalson said the applicants and their legal teams are confident that they have a good case in the constitutional damages matter. Judgment was reserved. Cape Times
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
Ramaphosa seeks apartheid damages case delay, but victims' families argue perpetrators are dying
The court was told that the government's interest lies in uncovering the truth. President Cyril Ramaphosa has asked the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria to stay a damages case brought by families of victims of apartheid-era crimes. However, lawyers for the applicants have warned that the alleged perpetrators are old and dying. The legal action, initiated by 25 families and survivors of apartheid victims – including relatives of the Cradock Four – seeks R167 million in constitutional damages. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa launches commission of inquiry into apartheid-era justice delays The applicants accuse the government of blocking the investigation and prosecution of murder cases referred by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). Ramaphosa has since established a commission of inquiry chaired by retired judge Sisi Khampepe to investigate the lack of prosecutions. Ramaphosa urges court to delay apartheid damages case On Wednesday, Advocate Timothy Bruinders, representing Ramaphosa and government, argued in court that the commission should be allowed to complete its work before the damages case proceeds. 'There was notice put out by judge Khampepe in which she set out what the progress will be over the next month. 'I think she has just started work on it so it's settled that there is a commission,' he told the court. Bruinders pointed out that both the TRC and the families had previously called for the establishment of such a commission to investigate the apartheid-era crimes. 'The reason for the commission of inquiry is because the facts are as yet unknown,' he said. ALSO READ: Mbeki accused of trying to save his reputation by intervening in apartheid lawsuit Judge Nicolene Janse van Nieuwenhuizen, however, raised a concern about whether it was not the applicants' prerogative to go ahead or withdraw their case. Bruinders responded that the case relied on the commission's findings in order for the court to make a ruling on damages. He argued that former National Director of Public Prosecutions Vusi Pikoli did not provide enough detail to conclude that interference occurred in one of the TRC cases. 'One could conclude from that there was an attempted interference.' Watch the case below: Bruinders added that the government and president sympathise with the families. 'They don't have closure. As they say, the prosecutions haven't happened. 'This is of concern to any government who cares about its citizens and those who died in fighting for what he ultimately sees now in the Constitution.' He emphasised that the government's interest lies in uncovering the truth. 'It is not to fight the families on procedural matters. One can imagine how that would go down politically. I do not think it would go down very well.' Victims' families demand justice Later, Advocate Matthew Chaskalson – representing the families – criticised the government's request to the court to delay the damages case, particularly as it had years to establish the commission. 'The applicants are seeking justice for crimes that were committed 30 and 35 years ago. That's the period we are dealing with. 'The perpetrators of these crimes have either already died or are dying at a rapid rate,' he said, pointing out that most suspects are now likely in their 70s. Chaskalson told the court that the applicants themselves are aging and that some have already died. 'They do not have time to wait indefinitely for the commission of inquiry to report and for relief to be recommended,' the lawyer said, adding that the applicants are entitled to their day in court while they are still alive. He further argued that commissions of inquiry have a tendency to 'drag on and on'. 'It is an extraordinarily optimistic proposition to put forward the idea that this commission will be able to do a thorough job on its investigation and report in four months' time, which is all it has left of the originally six months.' The court has reserved the judgment. NOW READ: Khampepe Commission is the right platform for Mbeki, Mabandla to tell their story, court rules
