Shapiro on arson attack at home: ‘The devastation was shocking'
Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro (D) said 'the devastation was shocking' following the recent arson attack at his residence, adding in a New York Times opinion piece that 'it looked like a bomb had gone off in the middle of our home.'
'Windows were smashed in, and there was glass everywhere. Some tables were turned over, and others had just melted away. Artwork from the New Deal era that had hung on display for visitors to enjoy had disintegrated into the walls. Plates we had eaten our Seder dinner on were broken and covered in soot,' Shapiro said in the Times.
'The Haggadah — our prayer book for the Seder — was burned so badly, only a few short lines of text were recognizable. The devastation was shocking, and to me, it did not appear to be an accident. The damage was too extreme,' he added.
Shapiro said '13 hours after the arsonist invaded our home, I stood at the window that he had climbed through, receiving an update from the Pennsylvania State Police, and then made clear to the people of my state that nothing would deter me from doing my job — and nothing would deter me from practicing my faith openly and proudly.'
'And I meant it. After I concluded my remarks, I rejoined my family to celebrate our second Passover Seder,' he added.
According Pennsylvania State Police, the suspect who was arrested in connection with the arson attack at Shapiro's residence pointed to the struggle of the Palestinian people as his motivation.
On Tuesday, Shapiro said that President Trump called over the weekend to ask about the arson attack.
'He was very gracious. He asked how Lori and the kids were doing. [We] talked for a couple minutes about what transpired at the residence, and then we talked about for maybe the next 15 minutes or so about a whole host of other topics,' Shapiro said of the call.
'Obviously, I'm not going to get into our private conversation,' he continued, 'but he's attuned to the issues that are important to me. I, of course, know the issues that are important to him, and we agreed to stay in touch going forward.'
Shapiro said that the call from the president came from his cell phone, so he didn't recognize the number initially and let it go to voicemail.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UK will sanction Israel ministers Ben-Gvir and Smotrich, Times reports
LONDON (Reuters) -Britain and other international allies will formally sanction two far-right Israeli ministers, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, following their conduct over the war in Gaza, the Times reported on Tuesday. London will join Canada, Australia, New Zealand and other nations in freezing the assets and imposing travel bans on Israel's national security minister Ben-Gvir - a West Bank settler - and finance minister Smotrich. Britain's foreign office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the report. Britain, like other European countries, has been ramping up the pressure on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government to end the blockade on aid into Gaza, where international experts have warned that famine is imminent. London last month suspended free trade talks with Israel for pursuing "egregious policies" in the occupied West Bank and Gaza, summoned its ambassador, and announced further sanctions against West Bank settlers. Foreign minister David Lammy, who called Israel's recent offensive "a dark new phase in this conflict," has previously condemned comments by Smotrich on the possible cleansing and destruction of Gaza and relocation of its residents to third countries.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Greta's blind eye to murder
The Israelis know how to deport people. If this had been Britain, Greta Thunberg would be sitting in an asylum hotel right now, using a taxpayer-funded mobile phone, working as a Deliveroo driver and gearing up for 20 years of legal battles that will line the pockets of human rights lawyers. Good riddance, I say. My only regret is that Thunberg refused to watch the footage of October 7 at a screening provided by the Israeli authorities before she was sent back where she came from. Such are the reports, anyway. In an episode rich with irony, this was the turkey in the challah sandwich (provided to the activist by Israeli commandos upon arrival). First there was the voyage itself, which, as the Telegraph reveals, was organised by Zaher Birawi, who has been described in Parliament as having links with Hamas. Says it all, doesn't it? Intentionally or not, some of the loudest defenders of human rights turn out to be doing the bidding of Hamas. Of course, if Thunberg had made it to Gaza, the aid would likely have been seized by Hamas and sold to pay their jihadis, when the Israelis are providing food for free. In terms of irony, you can't get much better than that. Or so we thought. When the so-called 'selfie yacht' was picked up by the Israeli navy – which might have had more important things to do, you'd have thought – in what has been dubbed the 'softest military operation in history' – they have range, the Israelis, I'll give them that – it was found to contain less than one truckful of aid. Over the last 18 months, the genocidal Israelis have facilitated an influx of more than 92,000 trucks into the Strip. The irony! Again, this told us everything we needed to know. But then we were hit by a further one-two of irony that was almost crippling: the activists were found to have consumed quite a lot of the aid on their voyage, according to Israeli authorities, but were still rather peckish. Hence that famous picture of Thunberg in her froggy sunhat gratefully receiving a kosher sandwich from a soldier, several years younger than her, who was doing something honourable with his life. What's Hebrew for thank you? Toda raba. Enough! Enough! I'm in danger of hyperventilating over here. Amid malicious allegations of starvation in Gaza, a Swedish child accepts a snack from a supposed genocidaire after apparently scoffing much of the ineffectual aid herself, which would only have supported jihadism anyway, but was good for the selfies. It is all painfully 2025. But there was more: in a selfie video apparently recorded some time beforehand, in which she was seen culturally appropriating a Palestinian keffiyeh – I bet she'd never dream of wearing a sombrero – Thunberg claimed to have been 'kidnapped' by the 'Israeli occupational forces'. How she kept a straight face, knowing that the Israeli hostages had been languishing in the jihadi dungeons underground for more than a year-and-a-half, one can only guess. In a further layer of the good stuff, her call for followers to pressure the Swedish government to free her from Israeli 'captivity' provoked so many calls to the emergency hotlines to help Swedes abroad that those truly in need of assistance were unable to get it. But who cares? The selfies won't share themselves, after all. There was a glimmer of good sense when Israel offered to provide some education to the activist, who had famously abandoned her free schooling at the age of 15. You care so much about suffering? Come and watch what happened on October 7. Be educated. But now we hear that she refused to do so. Closing her eyes to the reality of what caused this war in the first place, and what continues to perpetuate it today? Priceless. It was typical of the global effort to erase the casus belli of this conflict and rewrite history to make the victims the aggressors, the victims of attempted genocide the perpetrators of the same crime, the people who had their babies murdered the true baby killers. To be fair to Thunberg, she's hardly the only person at it. This week, our most distinguished foreign correspondent, Jeremy Bowen, produced a major piece of journalism – journalism? – which was criticised by the Board of Deputies as containing 'unacceptable bias', as it 'seemed not to consider the Hamas war crimes which started and sustain this conflict,' not to mention the gratuitous Holocaust references. For shame. If we are facing a monstrous NGO-media-digital industrial complex of propaganda, in which Bowen commands the broadcast arm, Thunberg is the brigadier general of its activist wing. In fact, her transition – may I use that word? – from climate campaigner to Gaza obsessive has been as revealing as it is opportunistic. The juncture between the two identities was quite amusing: for a while, she was chanting 'no climate justice on occupied land', as if the top priority for Hamas was a net zero policy. (Not that Gaza has been 'occupied' since 2005, but you know what she means.) Then she simply jettisoned the climate guff, which was feeling rather dated, and went full keffiyeh. Identified as a Gaza campaigner, I suppose. Let's stop beating around the selfie yacht. It was never truly about the climate, any more than it was truly about the conflict in the Middle East. Closing her eyes to the October 7 footage crystallised the sustaining principle of Greta Thunberg: she is absorbed in a world of her own. It is a world that began with hating her teachers; went on to hating the establishment; and has ended with hating the Jews and the West, powered by endless selfies. This spectacular teenage tantrum is most often indulged by people like Gary Lineker, like Dawn French, like Jeremy Bowen, like Thunberg herself, who all supposedly left their teenage years behind a long time ago. While Israel's youngsters were murdered at the Nova festival and are putting their lives on the line daily for their country, enduring unbelievable quantities of hatred and bigotry around the world, their greatest critics have never grown up themselves. That's the final irony. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Democrats disillusioned clear the path for Trump's rampage
Last week, I was standing at a busy bus stop in the late afternoon and a young man danced-walked up to me (he moved like Michael Jackson doing the moonwalk – while going forward). He was smiling and very happy. He leaned in towards me and announced that, 'Black people, we are time travelers! It all makes sense! This is a spaceship! I can see it all so clearly now! Black people are time travelers!' I paused for a few seconds. I then replied, 'Damn right. We are.' The young man danced-walked up to another Black person several feet away from me and shared his personal revelation again. He continued dance-walking down the long city block, the time-traveling Black town crier was waking up all those who would listen. I wondered if I was stuck in my own version of Terry Gilliam's film '12 Monkeys' or its French original 'La Jetée.' I concluded that this time machine, if it does exist, must be broken — or perhaps it is just operating in a way that I do not fully understand. Donald Trump has now been president for almost five months. It seems like a much longer amount of time has passed. The 'anniversary' of Trump's first 100 days back in power took place in April. That date was met by many essays and other commentaries and analyses by the news media and political class. 100 days felt like a natural moment to pause and seek out respite from Trump and his forces' unending shock and awe; The long Age of Trump and the flooding of the zone allows no such peace. In hindsight, Trump's first 100 days back in power now feels more like an arbitrary landmark in what will be a very long and very difficult journey. Unfortunately, there will be many Americans who begin this journey who will not survive to see the end of it. As politics and religion expert Matthew Taylor counseled in a recent conversation with me here at Salon, 'Here is a warning about this 'first 100 days' framework. It is a media construct that Trump and his people play along with because it's a Washington convention that they don't hate. But Trump and his people have no intention of slowing down after the first 100 days.' The next 30 days between April 20 and May 20 felt even longer while at the same time going by very quickly. Time dilation is a common experience of societies and individuals experiencing great stress. At the time of this writing, Donald Trump will be president for at least 1,320 more days. Marking every month of Trump's presidency and his growing authoritarian power is not sustainable emotionally, intellectually, psychologically, physically, or spiritually. Thus, the challenge of continuously documenting and sounding the alarm about how abnormal and dangerous the Age of Trump is while never normalizing it as being somehow quotidian, and therefore numbing. On this, Masha Gessen warns in a very important new op-ed essay at the New York Times that: The United States in the last four months has felt like an unremitting series of shocks: executive orders gutting civil rights and constitutional protections; a man with a chain saw trying to gut the federal government; deliberately brutal deportations; people snatched off the streets and disappeared in unmarked cars; legal attacks on universities and law firms.... We humans are stability-seeking creatures. Getting accustomed to what used to seem unthinkable can feel like an accomplishment. And when the unthinkable recedes at least a bit — when someone gets released from detention (as the Columbia University student Mohsen Mahdawi was a few weeks ago) or some particularly egregious proposal is withdrawn or blocked by the courts (as the ban on international students at Harvard has been, at least temporarily) — it's easy to mistake it for proof that the dark times are ending. But these comparatively small victories don't alter the direction of our transformation — they don't even slow it down measurably — even while they appeal to our deep need to normalize. They create the sense that there is more air to breathe and more room to act than there was yesterday. And so just when we most need to act — while there is indeed room for action and some momentum to the resistance — we tend to be lulled into complacency by the sense of relief on the one hand and boredom on the other. As I have been chronicling and trying to make better sense of Donald Trump's disastrous return to power, there is one image that keeps haunting me. I will never forget watching then-President Biden welcoming Donald Trump back to the White House a week after Election Day. Time Magazine described the surreal event in the following way: The logs were stacked high and flames filled the Oval Office fireplace as President Joe Biden sat next to President-elect Donald Trump on Wednesday. Biden smiled and extended his hand in welcome. It was a meeting Biden hoped could bring down the temperature in American politics but the halting introductions betrayed the awkwardness of the moment. It hadn't been that long since Biden had called Trump a threat to democracy and national security and Trump had called Biden 'crooked' and 'low I.Q.' 'Mr. President elect, and the former President, and Donald, congratulations,' Biden said. 'And, uh, looking forward to having a, like we said, smooth transition, do everything we can to make sure you are accommodated, what you need.' Trump replied: 'Good.' With that, Trump was welcomed back to the same office he left four years earlier after trying and failing to overturn Biden's election victory. None of this was normal. Donald Trump is America's first elected autocrat and an aspiring dictator. On Jan. 6, as part of the larger plot to nullify the 2020 election, Trump and his MAGA followers broke the country's centuries-long tradition of a peaceful transition of power. As I have explained here at Salon and elsewhere, there is an America Before Trump and an America After Trump; Trump has cleaved American history into two parts. In his writing and interviews, D. Earl Stephens, who is a journalist and a former editor of 'Stars and Stripes,' has been among the most vocal critics of the Democratic Party and their failures to mount an effective defense of democracy in the Age of Trump. Stephens shares my sentiments about the incongruity of President Biden warmly receiving Donald Trump in the Oval Office after the 2024 Election. Via email, Stephens told me that: Try as I might, I just can't get past Joe Biden's reaction to Trump's win in November and the return of MAGA to the White House and the rapidly rising dangers of fascism. As I've written before, Biden's response was appalling at best, heartless at worst, and struck an incomprehensible tone. His double-talk and verbal whiplash were stunning in its ineffectiveness, and instead of paving a way forward, left a trail of smoke. It took Biden but a week to invite Trump, the man who tried to overthrow our government back to our White House where he seemingly couldn't wait to welcome Trump by the fire while literally smiling and saying, 'Welcome back!' Can somebody explain to me what the hell that was about? And, of course, it only got worse, because during those final days his 'welcome back' had turned into 'warning, warning!' when he addressed the nation on national TV and solemnly warned us, 'an oligarchy is taking shape in America of extreme wealth, power and influence that literally threatens our entire democracy …' Thanks, pal. Most of us were well aware of that eight years ago. Now HE'S gone, his family is safe, and WE are left holding the bag. Ultimately, the thought of Biden and Trump together in the Oval Office makes me sad and angry at the same time. The image of those two men in that moment is heavy with symbolic weight about a Democratic Party and its (ongoing) failures to protect American democracy and the American people. During the 2024 campaign, the Democrats repeatedly accused Donald Trump of being the next Hitler and the greatest threat to the country in modern times if not all of its history. Yet, President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris still welcomed Trump back to the White House. On January 6, 2025, Congress certified the Electoral College results that formally made Donald Trump the 47th president of the United States. During the ceremony, no Democrats protested or otherwise signaled their disgust at Donald Trump's return to power. If Donald Trump really was and is so horrible and existentially dangerous to the United States, why did no Democrat or other member of Congress speak up during the ceremony? The coroner's report and epitaph of American democracy will likely include a sentence that 'the Democrats were very polite as American democracy died.' The Democratic Party's national leadership has responded to Donald Trump's unprecedented assaults on democracy, the institutions, the rule of law, the Constitution, as part of his plans for permanent MAGA rule by doing such things as sending President Trump angry letters and singing, holding up signs during his speech to Congress, going on book tours, and sitting on the steps of federal buildings and offices in protest against his agenda — while also communicating how they will cooperate when possible with the Republicans and the Trump administration 'to advance the interests of working people.' The Democrats' weak response to Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans has been met with much-earned mockery by pro-democracy voices and others who want a real Resistance, most notably the Democratic Party's own base voters. The Democratic Party's leadership has repeatedly shown that they have no taste for such political battle. With few exceptions, it appears that they are listening to James Carville's advice to roll over, play dead, and then swoop in after Trump and the Republicans make terminal political errors. Again, I am made angry and sad (and frustrated) at the same time. I am not alone in having such feelings: Public opinion polls show that these general feelings of disgust, exhaustion, and frustration at the country's broken politics are common among a large percentage, if not the majority, of Americans. D. Earl Stephens also shared his thoughts about the Democratic Party's failed branding and messaging: The Democratic Party has a severe image problem, and is viewed by more than 70 percent of registered voters as out of touch and ineffective, because it turns out that is exactly what it is. As unpopular as Trump is, the Democrats are viewed in an even dimmer light. In fact, since we started keeping track of such things 35 years ago, they have never been more unpopular. So, how are they reacting to this? By doing absolutely nothing to change the way they are going about their business, and in the Democratic National Committee's case, relitigating insider elections in their fancy club and ignoring people like us who pay their bills. Unless there are some changes — I mean REAL RADICAL changes — the Democrats are going to get their butts handed to them again and again on a national level, because they are not capable of showing themselves to be a viable alternative to the radical right-wing hell that is overrunning us. Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson's new book 'Original Sin' has received a great amount of attention from the news media and general public because of its 'revelations' about the role that Biden's age and alleged infirmities played in the Democratic Party's defeat by Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans in the 2024 Election. As Richard Tofel observes at The Columbia Journalism Review, "Joe Biden failed the country by deciding to seek a second term. But the press also failed in its job to confirm, in undeniable fashion, what the voters already knew. Unlike Biden, journalists will likely get another chance — and must do better." I am again made sad and angry at the same time. Future historians and others with the benefit of a more full view of the past, will likely conclude that President Biden, because of the weathering caused by time, stress, and many decades of public service, should have stepped aside much earlier to allow for Kamala Harris or another candidate to take the reins of the party. This was not a sufficient factor by itself to lift Donald Trump back to the White House, but the evidence suggests that it did play a huge role. As I chronicle the rapid collapse of American democracy and how the Age of Trump and the MAGAverse are rapidly cementing their growing power, I have been meditating on the dangers of hubris as explained by historian Alistair Horne in his book "Hubris: The Tragedy of War in the Twentieth Century." Horne writes: The ancient Greeks defined hubris as the worst sin a leader, or a nation, could commit. It was the attitude of supreme arrogance, in which mortals in their folly would set themselves up against the gods. Its consequences were invariably severe. The Greeks also had a word for what usually followed hubris. That was called peripeteia, meaning a dramatic reversal of fortune. In practice, it signified a falling from the grace of a great height to unimaginable depths. Disaster would often embrace not only the offender, but also his nearest and dearest, and all those responsible to him. In another version of this timeline, President Biden and his closest advisors would have realized the great folly of their hubris in the 2024 Election and the peril it represented for the future of the country and the American people. The universe and the Fates can be very cruel: they are now mocking President Biden and the Democrats — and the American people (or at least those Americans who believe in real democracy and want a return to normalcy and something approaching a healthy society). Several weeks ago, President Biden announced that he has a very aggressive form of prostate cancer. When did he and they know? Why didn't they tell the American people? The weight of this national tragedy keeps growing. Again, I am sad and angry at the same time. Donald Trump initially responded to this sad announcement about Biden's health with human empathy and concern. Almost immediately, Trump returned to insults and demagoguing. In a series of posts on his Truth Social propaganda platform Trump either directly stated or shared messages that Biden is 'scum,' a "decrepit corpse," and that he does not deserve sympathy because he is a "vicious person." Last Sunday, Trump went even further when he shared a conspiracy theory that President Biden was a clone, i.e., not a real person, a type of Manchurian candidate, and thus an illegitimate president and usurper. 'There is no #JoeBiden - executed in 2020. Biden clones, doubles & robotic engineered soulless mindless entities are what you see. #Democrats don't know the difference.' There are 1,320 days to go in Trump's presidency — which assumes he will leave office and not find a way to "win" a third term. Pro-democracy Americans and others who believe in fundamental human decency need to steel themselves for the emotional rollercoaster that lies ahead and the pull of mass disinhibition that is growing every day. Collective emotional health is both a prerequisite for and result of a healthy democratic culture. Unfortunately, the Age of Trump has revealed how poor the emotional health of the American people really was while making it all much worse in service to an autocrat and demagoguery.
