logo
Elon Musk Bashes Republican Bill. It Will Harm Americans. Here's Why

Elon Musk Bashes Republican Bill. It Will Harm Americans. Here's Why

Forbes5 days ago

Computer graphics of dollar banknotes stream flying around United States Capitol. Colorful twilight ... More sky with clouds in backgrounds. Finance, banking, monetary policy and quantitative easing concept. The great wave off Kanagawa homage to Hokusai.
The federal government is continuing to do what it has done for decades; spending more than it collects. Though this may not be surprising, it should be alarming. Why? Because as the national debt continues to rise, the government will be required to pay more and more of its revenue to service the debt. This will leave less money for everything else such as benefits for many Americans and dealing with the next crisis.
The federal government's fiscal year ends September 30, 2025. The budget deficit is expected to be about $2.2 trillion. With Washington spending at such high levels is a balanced budget even possible? The last time the federal government balanced its budget was during the Clinton administration, when Republicans controlled both houses of Congress. This occurred between 9/30/1997 and 9/30 2001. The average budget surplus during this time was $139.8 billion. Since then, and especially since the global pandemic, federal spending has exploded while revenue has lagged. The last federal budget surplus prior to 1997 occurred in 1969, when Democrats controlled both sides of Congress. Going back to the federal budget of 1901, Congress has had a budget surplus in only 31 of the past 124 years (25%) and in 4 of the past 55 years (7%).
Based on the recently passed budget in the House, it's clear that neither party is willing to take the difficult action necessary to bring the federal budget back in line. It was assumed that DOGE would bring financial salvation to Washington, but the waste, fraud, and abuse proved to be less than anticipated. In fact, Elon Musk just voiced his disgust on X (formerly Twitter) over the current bill awaiting Senate approval. He wrote, 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' Those are harsh words from the man who started the DOGE effort.
For decades, Democrats were widely considered to be the party of excessive spending. Today, it appears that Republicans are equally culpable. For a more thorough look, let's examine the following chart which shows the annual budget surpluses and deficits in each fiscal year from 1990 to 2024. The chart also contains a projection of deficits from 2025 through 2034. Note that the future numbers are derived from the recommended levels for overall spending limits, revenue targets, and deficit levels for the period 2025 through 2034, included in the bill (H.Con.Res.14).
Fed Govt Budget Surplus-Shortfall 1990-2034 With Projection
The chart can be divided into four distinct segments of time including the last time the federal government budget had a surplus, the deficits resulting from the Financial Crisis and Covid-19, and the recommended deficit levels over the next 10 years. It's interesting to note how the deficits swelled during the two most recent crises and how spending remained elevated afterwards. This is because once Congress expands spending, it rarely reduces spending after an event has passed.
Let's take a closer look at this. The largest deficit prior to the financial crisis was $412.2 billion in the fiscal year ending 9/30/2004. Using the largest deficit prior to the financial crisis as a baseline, the smallest deficit since then was $441.9 billion, which occurred in FY ending 9/30/2015. The deficit reached a whopping $1.4 trillion in FY ending 9/30/2009 and an even larger shortfall of $3.13 trillion in FY ending 9/30/2020.
As the chart clearly demonstrates, deficits have been extreme in the years following the Financial Crisis. In short, every deficit since the financial crisis has been worse than the largest deficit prior to the crisis. It's clear that Congress has a spending problem.
Currently, interest payments on the national debt are the third largest budget expense, surpassing defense spending. The interest expense on the debt is about $1.026 trillion in the current fiscal year. The only budget items larger than servicing the debt are Medicare/Medicaid and Social Security. As the national debt continues higher, and especially if interest rates rise, servicing the debt could surpass Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid to become the largest item in the federal budget. At that point it will become increasingly difficult to service the debt.
If the one big, beautiful bill is passed by both houses, the national debt is expected to rise even further. While DOGE worked to reduce federal spending, this bill will increase spending, leading to even larger deficits, which will be added to the national debt. It's clear that a reduction in federal spending will require a great deal of courage, focus, and cooperation from both parties. Will Congress become fiscally responsible? Not to sound pessimistic, but that doesn't appear likely. Why? Because doing so will cause a degree of economic pain and if the resulting anger is directed at either party, that party will likely suffer at the polls. Therefore, this problem needs to be addressed by both parties and in this divisive time, cooperation seems highly unlikely.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ABC News suspends Terry Moran after Trump administration condemns ‘hater' post
ABC News suspends Terry Moran after Trump administration condemns ‘hater' post

CNN

time36 minutes ago

  • CNN

ABC News suspends Terry Moran after Trump administration condemns ‘hater' post

Veteran ABC News correspondent Terry Moran was suspended Sunday after he posted a highly critical assessment of President Donald Trump and Trump's deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller on the social media platform X. In the missive, which was posted shortly after midnight, Moran said both Trump and Miller are 'world-class haters.' For Trump, he said, hatred is 'only a means to an end, and that end is his own glorification. That's his spiritual nourishment.' For Miller, on the other hand, 'hatreds are his spiritual nourishment,' Moran charged. 'He eats his hate.' Moran — who landed a rare Oval Office interview with Trump in April — later deleted the tweet and didn't post anything further. On Sunday morning, Trump administration officials condemned Moran and said the post reflected poorly on ABC News as an institution. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt publicly pushed ABC to discipline Moran. 'We have reached out to ABC to inquire about how they plan to hold Terry accountable,' she wrote on X. 'Hopefully this journalist will either be suspended or terminated,' Leavitt said in an interview on 'Sunday Morning Futures' on Fox News. As for ABC, 'they have said they will be taking action,' she added, apparently referring to a private conversation. About one hour later, the news division said Moran, its senior national correspondent and former 'Nightline' anchor, had been suspended. 'ABC News stands for objectivity and impartiality in its news coverage and does not condone subjective personal attacks on others,' a spokesperson said in response to CNN's inquiry about Moran. 'The post does not reflect the views of ABC News and violated our standards — as a result, Terry Moran has been suspended pending further evaluation.' Miller, often described as the architect behind Trump's immigration policies, is the subject of frequent and ferocious criticism, including the 'hater' label that Moran applied. A 2020 book called 'Hatemonger' documented Miller's longstanding ties to far-right groups that demonize immigrants. But it is highly unusual for a network correspondent like Moran to publish such a politically charged piece of commentary, particularly in the middle of the night on a free-for-all social media site. Miller reacted to Moran's post by saying that 'the most important fact about Terry's full public meltdown is what it shows about the corporate press in America.' 'For decades, the privileged anchors and reporters narrating and gatekeeping our society have been radicals adopting a journalist's pose. Terry pulled off his mask,' Miller wrote on X. Vice President JD Vance also posted a defense of Miller on X, stating that Miller is 'motivated by love of country' and that ABC 'should apologize.' CNN's Kit Maher and Betsy Klein contributed to this report.

If we want NC to be a great place to live, we all have to pay for it with taxes
If we want NC to be a great place to live, we all have to pay for it with taxes

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

If we want NC to be a great place to live, we all have to pay for it with taxes

Richard Bostic's May 29 editorial hit the nail on the head. The truth is you get what you pay for. If North Carolina Republicans, Independents and Democrats want good schools, highways and government services that benefit individuals and society (including housing assistance, environmental protection and disaster preparedness) and make our state a great place to live, we all have to pay for it. If we don't, we will reap what we sow. I am glad to pay my fair share in income taxes not just to get what I pay for but to benefit fellow citizens and build a future we can be proud of. John Saxon, Hillsborough The 100% tariff on Chinese electric vehicles and any additional tariffs Donald Trump may impose are hurting Americans and U.S. climate goals. We must eliminate these tariffs as soon as possible. Chinese EVs cost much less than American ones because of government subsidies and cheaper production. These tariffs force us to pay inflated prices for domestic EVs or stick with gas cars. How are Americans supposed to contribute to the fight against climate change when they can't afford low-emission vehicles? Chinese companies like BYD offer longer battery life, faster charging and hybrid systems that outlast most American models. Protectionist policy proponents fear that without these tariffs, American workers and automakers will be harmed. A solution would be to require Chinese automakers to establish plants in the United States. Workers will have even more job opportunities in a future-proof car market. Congress must end these tariffs. Americans deserve access to innovative, affordable electric vehicles while we fight climate change and strengthen our economy. Holton Mody, Chapel Hill Thank you for the May 29 edition's article on Scott Pelley's (CBS 60 Minutes) commencement address at Wake Forest University. I was inspired to stream it on C-Span and found it eloquent, inspirational, dynamic and reassuring. He wasn't afraid to voice the truth of what is happening today, unlike many who have compromised their integrity in fear. He supported his statements with facts, not in support of any political party, but for democracy. Wanda Easley, Cary We are deeply concerned about the proposed $2.7 billion cut — nearly 40% — to the National Cancer Institute's budget. As representatives of the American Cancer Society in Central and Eastern North Carolina, we know firsthand this funding saves lives. Federal investment in cancer research has led to every major treatment breakthrough over the last 50 years. Because of this support, more than 18 million cancer survivors are alive today in the U.S. Slashing funding would delay progress, limit innovation and hurt patients and families. Cancer doesn't discriminate. Cutting lifesaving research is a step backward we cannot afford. We urge people to contact their lawmakers. Protect cancer research. Richard Averitte, executive director American Cancer Society – Central & Eastern North Carolina, Raleigh Studies approximate that 18 per 100,000 people people are intersex, meaning they have male and female sex characteristics, and about 1.7% of people are born with some intersex traits, which can put them in a gray area of sexual identification and gender conformity. As newborns, many are, intentionally or unintentionally, falsely classified as male or female (some are correctly listed as intersex). Intersex has been documented throughout history. How does this fit in with many Christian institutions stating that there are only two sexes, and supporting policies that recognize only two sexes? T This is important to not only for LGBTQ+ communities, athletic and marriage issues but to all of us who care about discrimination. Marnie Cooper Priest, Raleigh Our don't confuse me with the facts president has done it again; chickening out on tariffs as markets deliver their verdict and chickening out with Putin every time. Trump is unable to stand his ground, let alone lead. All talk and no action, withering in every interaction with Putin. Instead of leading, Trump enables China to win the innovation race. By attacking our own academic institutions, drivers of innovation gave us the edge, Trump is following Sen. Joseph R. McCarthy's model to bully those in the U.S. It's no longer a place for the best and brightest. China seems to be benefiting from Trump's policies. Jacqueline Allen, Carrboro

Trump ally stands firm against 'big, beautiful bill' despite pressure: 'It'll completely backfire'
Trump ally stands firm against 'big, beautiful bill' despite pressure: 'It'll completely backfire'

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

Trump ally stands firm against 'big, beautiful bill' despite pressure: 'It'll completely backfire'

EXCLUSIVE — One of the leading opponents of President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" declared not even the commander in chief will be able to deter him from speaking out against what he sees as a bill that falls short of Republicans' goal of cutting government waste. "It'll completely backfire on him," Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., told Fox News Digital of any attempts by Trump to sway him on the current legislation. Johnson has become a prominent voice of opposition against the House GOP's offering to the budget reconciliation process. Senate Republicans finally began the tedious process of parsing through the bill this week. Lawmakers in the upper chamber, Johnson included, are determined to make changes to the bill, with most wanting to make reductions to Medicaid and food stamps more palatable. Trump has made it clear his bill must pass but has acknowledged the Senate will need to make a few changes. Trump's directive has been to deliver a bill that can survive the razor-thin majorities in both chambers. Johnson, however, wants to see spending returned to pre-pandemic levels, cuts that are trillions of dollars deeper than what House Republicans could stomach. And he is ready to vote against the bill unless he sees the changes he wants. And he believes that a pressure campaign from the president against him and other like-minded fiscal hawks will fail. He said a better approach would be to work with lawmakers and fiscal hawks like him to gain a better understanding of the reality of the country's fiscal situation, a reality that "is grim," he said. Johnson has been up front about his disdain for the bill but has so far avoided public retribution from Trump. In fact, the two have spoken twice this week, once on Monday and later during a Senate Finance Committee meeting at the White House Tuesday. The lawmaker has told Trump he's in Trump's corner and that he wants "to see you succeed," but he has been steadfast in his position that the bill does not go far enough to tackle the national debt. And the debt continues to climb, nearing $37 trillion and counting, according to Fox News' National Debt Tracker. The House's offering set a goal of $1.5 trillion in spending cuts over the next decade, which lawmakers in the lower chamber have pitched as a positive step forward to righting the country's fiscal ship, an offering Johnson panned as falling drastically short of the GOP's promises to cut deep into government spending. "What's so disappointing about what happened in the House is it was all rhetoric. It's all slogans," Johnson said. "They picked a number. Literally, they picked a number out of the air." Johnson views this attempt at the budget reconciliation process as a rare opportunity to "do the hard things" when it comes to spending cuts, but others in the GOP have been more hesitant to cut as deep. Johnson said a main reason Republicans have so far fallen short of meeting the moment for the most part is that lawmakers don't understand just how much the federal government shovels out the door year in and year out. The lawmaker recalled a moment roughly three years ago during a debate over another year-end omnibus spending bill, when each of the dozen appropriations bills is crammed into one, bloated package that is universally reviled and almost always passes. He asked his colleagues if they really knew just how much the government spends, and no one "volunteered to answer." "Nobody knew. I mean, think of that. The largest financier in the world. We're supposedly, in theory, the 535 members of the board of directors, and nobody knew," he said. "Why would they? We never talked about it." Johnson has been busy trying to better educate his colleagues, putting together his own charts and graphs that cut out the "noise," like the latest nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office report that found the legislation would add $2.4 trillion to the national debt over a decade. The GOP has universally panned that projection. "We can't accept this as a new normal," Johnson said. "We can't accept — you can take pot shots of CBO, but you can't deny that reality. [It] might be off a little bit, but that is the trajectory, and that's undeniable."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store