Christian commentator Pinesap seeks donations after losing job amid viral debate and controversy
During the widely viewed debate—garnering nearly 4 million views on YouTube—he openly described himself as a fascist and stated he 'doesn't care' if he was labelled a Nazi. He also defended expressing support for autocracy and made controversial remarks about Nazi persecution, noting that while Nazis 'persecuted the church a little bit,' he did not oppose human dignity being assaulted.
Following the backlash, Pinesap set up a fundraising campaign on GiveSendGo, a Christian crowdfunding platform known for hosting controversial causes.
Photo: X
He described the campaign as an 'emergency fund' for living expenses and job searching and accused society of engaging in "cancellation culture" by penalising him for voicing 'fully legal traditional right‑wing political views.'
His initial goal of $15,000 has already been surpassed, raising nearly $20,000 so far. One donor contributed with a message reading, 'We need a white nation! It's our only future! Vive le Fascisme,' referencing the extremist code '88.'
Pinesap also spoke about the fallout during an appearance on the Rift Report podcast, saying he lost his job due to societal backlash: 'It's just the culture that kind of exists currently surrounding the manner in which you're cancelled for voicing [...] any heterosexual, Christian, sort of moral belief.'
He did not provide details about the company or role from which he was terminated..
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
4 days ago
- Express Tribune
Donald Trump reacts to 'Republican' Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle ad amid backlash
US President Donald Trump expressed support for Sydney Sweeney's new American Eagle ad campaign after learning she is a registered Republican in Florida. Speaking with reporters in Allentown, Pennsylvania, Trump said, 'If Sydney Sweeney is a registered Republican, I think her ad is fantastic.' President Trump speaks on Sydney Sweeney being a registered Republican 'Sydney Sweeney is a registered Republican? Now I love her ad. If she is a registered Republican, I think her ad is fantastic' — FearBuck (@FearedBuck) August 4, 2025 The 27-year-old Euphoria and White Lotus actress has faced criticism online over the campaign's messaging, which includes references to both genetic and fashion traits. One tagline reads, 'Sydney Sweeney has great jeans,' with a play on the word 'genes.' In a promotional video, she states, 'my jeans are blue,' following a scientific breakdown of inherited traits. Sydney Sweeney x American Eagle, oh my god. — Sydney Sweeney Daily (@sweeneydailyx) July 24, 2025 According to public records, Sweeney has been registered with the Republican Party of Florida since June 2024. Her political affiliation surfaced as criticism of her campaign intensified, with some commentators accusing the ads of promoting harmful ideologies related to race and beauty standards. Trump's communications director Steven Cheung labelled the controversy 'cancel culture run amok.' Vice President JD Vance also commented on the backlash, stating, 'My political advice to the Democrats is: continue to tell everybody who thinks Sydney Sweeney is attractive that they're a Nazi.' While American Eagle has also defended the concept, Sweeney herself has not responded publicly to the reaction.
Express Tribune
4 days ago
- Express Tribune
Pope's 'Jubilee of Youth' ends with mass for 1m pilgrims
Pope Leo XIV presiding over the mass outside Rome on Sunday, a highlight of the Catholic Church's Jubilee year. Photo AFP Pope Leo XIV presided over a final mass in Rome for over one million young people on Sunday, the culmination of a pilgrimage that has drawn Catholics from across the world. "Aspire to great things, to holiness, wherever you are. Do not settle for less," Pope Leo told the crowd. The week-long "Jubilee of Youth" — a highlight of the Jubilee holy year — was an enormous undertaking for the Vatican, with a half a million young pilgrims in Rome for most of the week. On Saturday night, before a twilight vigil led by the pope, organisers said there were 800,000 people in the vast, open-air space on Rome's eastern outskirts, and on Sunday the Vatican said that number had grown to one million. Most of them spent the night in tents, in sleeping bags or on mats in anticipation of Sunday's mass. Among them was New Yorker Christofer Delano, who said he was "so happy to see Pope Leo" but stunned by the crowds. "I didn't expect to see all these people. I knew there was going to be a lot of people — I didn't know it was going to be this many," he told AFP. In his homily, the first US pope and former missionary encouraged the gathered youth to "spread your enthusiasm and the witness of your faith to everyone you meet!" The Vatican has sought to highlight pilgrims who travelled to Rome from war-torn regions, and Leo said in his Angelus prayer: "We are closer than ever to young people who suffer the most serious evils which are caused by other human beings." "We are with the young people of Gaza. We are with the young people of Ukraine, with those of every land bloodied by war," said the 69-year-old pontiff. "My young brothers and sisters, you are the sign that a different world is possible, a world of fraternity and friendship where conflicts are not resolved with weapons but with dialogue." The colourful event was accompanied by music from a choir, and about 450 bishops and 700 priests, all in green robes. A towering cross dominated the massive golden arch covering the stage where the pope led mass. Italian pilgrim Tommaso Benedetti said the pope had passed his "first test" in the eyes of young people during the youth jubilee. "We feel quite satisfied. There were many references to peace, which is a theme that is very close to our hearts as young people," Benedetti told AFP. The young pilgrims -- from 146 different countries, according to the Vatican -- have filled Rome's streets since Monday, chanting, singing and waving flags of their countries. The festive atmosphere reached a peak Saturday ahead of the vigil presided over by Leo, with Italian broadcaster Rai dubbing it a Catholic "Woodstock". Hundreds of thousands camped out at the dusty venue, strumming guitars or singing, as music blasted from the stage where a series of religious bands entertained the crowds. Leo was greeted with deafening screams and applause after his arrival by helicopter and as he toured the grounds in his popemobile, with many people running to catch a better glimpse of the new pope. Roads leading to the Tor Vegata venue, about a 40 minute drive from the centre of Rome, were packed, making Leo's choice of helicopter transportation on both Saturday and Sunday more efficient. At over 500,000 square metres (125 acres), the grounds were the size of around 70 football fields. British student Andy Hewellyn sat in front of a huge video screen — a prime spot, as he could not even see the stage far away. "I'm so happy to be here, even if I'm a bit far from the pope. I knew what to expect!" he told AFP. "The main thing is that we're all together." The youth pilgrimage came about three months after the start of Leo's papacy and 25 years after John Paul II organised the last such youth gathering in Rome. It was announced by Pope Francis during World Youth Day in Lisbon in 2023. The Church planned a series of events for the young pilgrims over the course of the week, including turning the Circus Maximus -- where chariot races were held in ancient Rome -- into an open-air confessional.
Express Tribune
6 days ago
- Express Tribune
The people's mandate cannot be censored: why PTI still stands strong
Barrister Dr. Muhammad Ali Saif In the shadows of an increasingly autocratic political landscape, the people of Pakistan are witnessing a dangerous paradox. A political party which is silenced across traditional media, relentlessly demonised, legally persecuted, and institutionally cornered is somehow still standing and perhaps even stronger than ever in the hearts and minds of Pakistanis. That party is Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI). The more it is targeted, the more it grows. The more it is censored, the louder its voice echoes through every corner of this country and even abroad. And the question that is getting under the skin of the political mafia and haunting its sponsors is why don't people just let go of PTI? Over the last two years, the scale and intensity of the crackdown against PTI have exceeded even the darkest chapters of our political history. From midnight raids and enforced disappearances to mass disqualifications, party defections under coercion, media blackouts, social media throttling, and dozens of politically engineered court cases, the message has been loud and clear, this party must be erased at all costs. Yet the public response has been equally resolute, not without a fight, not without our vote. If we examine this unique phenomenon of political resilience of PTI from a sober and analytical lens, it becomes clear that you cannot convince people to start loving the leaders they themselves rejected. In any functional democracy, media plays the role of a mirror. In Pakistan, that mirror has been shattered. In a desperate attempt to marginalise PTI after toppling their elected government, a campaign was initiated to erase PTI and Imran Khan. Mainstream television networks were instructed to erase Imran Khan's name, blur his image, or pretend he does not exist. Anchors were taken off air, columnists silenced, and editors summoned for "guidance." The campaign continues to get viscous and ruthless with every passing day. Communication experts believe that propaganda is only as effective as the public's willingness to believe in it. People listen to what they want to listen. This has been the first flaw in the state's strategy i.e. you cannot convince a population to hate the very leader they themselves chose, defended, and trusted especially when the alternative is riddled with incompetence and corruption. Following the ouster of Imran Khan from the government, he was replaced with an alliance of almost 12 opposition parties. As inflation spiked, governance collapsed, and the public lost hope in the alliance, the tailored media narrative began to collapse under its own weight. Instead of tarnishing PTI, censorship transformed the party into a symbol of resistance. Another key variable that was drastically underestimated was the internet. The architects of this repression didn't anticipate the rise of digital resistance. When one screen went dark, thousands of phones lit up. YouTube, TikTok, X (Twitter), and Instagram became the new battlegrounds and the people showed up in large numbers. No big studios, no funding, no instructions, just young men and women, volunteers at home, students, overseas Pakistanis, everyone adding their voice. Each telling the truth. Each refusing to accept silence. Despite attempts to throttle the internet and arrest online activists, this digital resistance lives on. And through it, PTI stayed connected with the people instantly, honestly, and unfiltered. Perhaps the most misunderstood aspect of PTI's resilience is that its supporters do not see it merely as a political party. They see it as a moral cause. In their view, this is not a fight for power, it is a fight for dignity, justice, and national independence. Imran Khan's political narrative, whether you agree with it or not, is the voice of many Pakistanis. The narrative that the Pakistani citizen is not a subject of dynastic families or foreign dictates, but a stakeholder in this nation's future. This idea struck especially deep in the youth, the middle class, and professionals. These segments were historically disengaged from politics but are now fully activated. This moral dimension i.e the belief that PTI is standing for truth against tyranny, is what makes it unshakable, even in the face of brutal repression. Purge, inquisitions, arrests , bans, and smear campaigns only validate their belief that the system is corrupt, and the struggle is righteous. Nowhere is this political loyalty more visible than in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, where PTI has governed with consistency and transparency for over a decade. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's political relationship with PTI is one of trust. Even in the face of federal neglect, financial strangulation, and security threats, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa under PTI demonstrated better service delivery, cleaner administration, stronger anti-corruption measures, and more responsive leadership. In tribal districts, FM radio network, public outreach programs, and developmental efforts built a bond of trust with communities that had long been ignored by the state. When the people of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa re-elected PTI with a landslide in the 2024 provincial elections, despite all odds and with zero establishment support, it was a message to the rest of Pakistan, "This is not about propaganda. We have seen results. We have lived under your governance. And we choose PTI again." Authoritarian strategies often fail not because they are weak, but because they are blind to human psychology. When the state resorts to visible injustice i.e. parading handcuffed leaders, dragging women into courts, slapping terrorism charges for tweets, it may silence some, but it radicalizes others. The crackdown after 9th May only deepened the divide between ruler and ruled. Instead of crushing PTI, it gave birth to questions that radicalised people's thinking and gave rise to one basic question: Is this a crackdown on criminals or a punishment for challenging the status quo? The answer for most Pakistanis has become crystal clear. Attempts to brand an entire political party as anti-Pakistan has backfired. It has revealed interests in control rather than constitutionality. Currently, Pakistan stands at a critical juncture. The institutions that were meant to protect democracy are being used to manipulate it. The courts are struggling between conscience and coercion. The media is wounded. The economy is crumbling. And the people's voice is being suffocated. But in this darkness, the continued popularity of PTI is not just a reality, it is a beacon for hope. It proves that the Pakistanis are neither ignorant nor indifferent. That despite censorship, economic pain, disillusionment, and inquisitions, they are paying attention and they remember Imran Khan's economic performance. They remember the dignity of a leader who refused NROs, who returned IMF money with honor, who spoke for national sovereignty on global platforms. And most importantly, they remember what betrayal looks like and who orchestrated it. What PTI represents today is more than a party. It is an idea whose time has come and ideas do not fade away with television bans or court cases. You can jail leaders, you can confiscate properties, you can censor speeches but you cannot jail a consciousness that has already awakened.
