Democratic state Rep. Jermaine Johnson launches exploratory committee for 2026 governor's race
COLUMBIA, S.C. (WCBD) — State Rep. Jermaine Johnson, a Richland County Democrat, announced over the weekend that he is exploring a run for South Carolina governor in 2026.
Johnson said Saturday that he is launching an exploratory committee to connect with South Carolina voters and assess support for a potential Democratic bid, suggesting the state is at a 'crossroads.'
'We need leadership that listens, leads with integrity, and puts people before politics,' Johnson said in his announcement. I believe in South Carolina, where every child, every family, and every community has the opportunity to thrive—and I'm ready to explore how we make that vision a reality.'
Since being elected to the state house in 2020, Johnson has become a prominent voice in the state's Democratic coalition, often drawing on personal experiences to shape his arguments on the House floor.
His journey from growing up homeless and losing his brother to gun violence to becoming a College of Charleston basketball star and eventually rising to political power was chronicled in a documentary released last November.
'For years, I've worked to uplift our communities — not just with words, but with action,' he said. 'From expanding economic opportunity and improving education to advocating for criminal justice reform and protecting working families, I've stood side by side with South Carolinians through every challenge.
Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, in South Carolina remarks, calls on Democrats 'to be a little meaner'
Johnson joins a growing field of people reportedly considering campaigns to replace Republican Gov. Henry McMaster, who cannot run again due to term limits.
On the Republican side, U.S. Reps. Nancy Mace and Ralph Norman, Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette, Attorney General Alan Wilson, and state Sens. Sean Bennett and Josh Kimbrell have said they are exploring runs.
Johnson is the first Democrat to publicly express interest in the office.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk just humiliated Trump, the bromance is over & the internet is roasting
ALLISON ROBBERT/AFP via Getty Images;President Donald Trump and Elon Musk's bromance may finally be over. The bromance between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk may finally be over. Not only has Musk announced he was stepping away from his position with DOGE (the Department of Government Efficiency), but now he's openly criticizing the mega spending bill that will fund the Trump administration's legislative agenda, calling it a "disgusting abomination" in an extremely public post on X (formerly Twitter). "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination," Musk wrote. "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' This came amid a flurry of posts from Musk, where he openly admonished Republicans for voting for the 'One Beautiful Bill Act,' which the Trump administration claims will decrease the federal deficit, but Democrats have said will only serve to raise it while cutting social services like Medicaid. Musk spent $288 million on Trump's election campaign, and until recently, the two men have been joined at the hip as Musk helped him campaign, attended his inauguration (where he rallied the crowd with a, and held court alongside Trump at the White House as the head of DOGE. But now Musk has written on X that "Congress is making America bankrupt' and the spending bill 'will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden American citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' Although Musk hasn't posted anything about Trump specifically, he doesn't have to as the meaning is clear. The president has spent weeks whipping the vote and making veiled threats against any Republican congresspeople who oppose it. This public break from Trump is likely bothering the president bigly, and it's causing people across the internet to roast the MAGA president and Musk for a divorce that seemingly is in the air. Gay Democratic Rep. Robert Garcia tagged Musk in a post where he pointed out that 'the only people who voted for this bill were House Republicans.' Someone else quipped that "Elon's just mad because Trump's spending bill doesn't cut enough food aid for starving little Ethiopian children,' while other people joked that 'the breakup is complete.' Keep scrolling for the funniest reactions to the end of Trump and Musk being besties! "OMG the breakup is complete." "Hey @elonmusk, the only people who voted for this bill were House Republicans." "Trump is a failure and even Elon Musk knows it" "Elon's just mad because Trump's spending bill doesn't cut enough food aid for starving little Ethiopian children" "Elon Musk just went OFF on Donald Trump and the Republicans. Seems like their divorce is happening ASAP!" "Elon today." "Two things can be true at once: Elon is correct; and also no one cares what he thinks, least of all Trump." "ICYMI: Elon Muskrat just tweeted: "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." Only the GOP voted for it" "Elon Musk has gone woke" "Schumer: If even Elon Musk—who is Trump's buddy—says the bill is bad, you can imagine how bad this bill is." "The girls are fightingggg" "So in the elon musk and donald trump divorce who gets custody of MAGAts???' "As the child of divorce I know how hard it must be for Republicans in Congress to watch their daddies fight. But like a broken clock, Elon 'K-Hole' Musk is right." "'I don't know an Elon Musk, I take a lot of pictures with people. He may have brought me ketamine once or twice.' - DJT"
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
East Texans react to failure of STAAR test bill
LONGVIEW, Texas (KETK) — The Texas Senate and House failed to come out of their closed-door negotiations with a compromise on House Bill 4, a bipartisan plan to eliminate STAAR testing in Texas Public schools. Lindale FFA member among 10 selected for scholars program 'The Senate and the House had a conference committee, which is ample people from House and the Senate, and they couldn't come to agreement, unfortunately,' State Rep. Joanne Shofner (R), Nacogdoches, said. The bill died after both chambers couldn't agree on a final version before the session deadline. 'Not only am I disappointed, but my granddaughter is very disappointed,' Shofner said. State Rep. Jay Dean / (R) Longview said the bill still has a chance to be brought back to life. 'I believe in trust that we'll end up going back to special session and get it fixed,' Dean said. Representative Dean said House Bill 4 was included as part of an overall education package and hopes this isn't the end. 'I'm going to do my best to, you know, try to persuade him to, hey, let's get this fixed,' Dean said. 'Let's get this straight.' East Texas Food Bank kicks off Summer Food Program in Tyler However, one organization in support of ending STAAR testing said the proposed changes made by the Texas Senate would actually make things worse than the status quo. 'The Senate rewrote the bill near the end of the session and made it worse than we have now,' Texas State Teachers Association, Clay Robison said. The association supported the proposed changes made by the Texas House, which included switching from one test to three tests throughout the year, with a shorter grading process. 'We're glad that the Senate bill died,' Robison said. He said the Senate's version gives too much power to the TEA's education commissioner, Mike Morath, allowing him to amend school grading standards without needing approval from the state legislature. 'If school districts contested the change in the grading standards or contested their accountability ratings, they would have been subject to state sanctions, including takeover by the state,' Robison said. Robison said the Texas State Teachers Association will not support the bill in its current version from the Senate. Lindale Fire Department welcomes new chief, officers 'We think we're better off with the bad, flawed system that we have now than we would have been with the new Senate version,' Robison said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House Republicans push for spending cancellations as Elon Musk and conservatives demand deeper budget cuts
And you thought you had just figured out what "reconciliation" means in Congressional budget terms. Here's a new vocabulary term: rescissions. You might not be able to spell it. But I can tell you what it does. A "rescissions" bill "rescinds" money which Congress has already allocated, ex post facto. For simplicity, I often describe rescissions legislation as "spending cancellations." Congress appropriated money. Then, under a recissions bill, Congress claws back dollars it previously appropriated. It's kind of like a reverse appropriation. And you thought that in elementary school, there were no takebacks. Read On The Fox News App Trump Sends $9.4 Billion Doge Cuts Proposal To Congress, Targeting Npr, Pbs Presidential administrations send "budget requests" to Congress. This is the opposite. An administration can send a "recissions request" to Congress, too. And that's what Budget Director Russ Vought is doing this week. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., is intent on moving fast. "I'd like to turn it around as quickly as possible," said Johnson. "There may be multiple rescissions packages coming and we'll process them as quickly as we can. It's a big priority for me." Congressional conservatives and Elon Musk were not pleased with the relative paucity of spending cuts in the Big, Beautiful Bill. Musk told CBS he was "disappointed" in the legislation. "Which increases the budget deficit, not decreases it. And it undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing," said Musk about the hallmark of President Trump's agenda. By Tuesday morning, the world's richest man incinerated the bill on X and chastised most Republicans in Congress. Musk characterized the legislation as "a disgusting abomination." He lectured the 215 House Republicans who voted yes, declaring "you know you did wrong." Scoop: House Freedom Caucus Draws Battle Lines As White House Readies $9.4B Doge Spending Cuts DOGE initially set a goal of unearthing $2 trillion in spending cuts. It then slashed the threshold to $1 trillion. DOGE finally homed in on about $150 billion in cuts by the end of next year. And many of those cuts aren't even in effect because Congress has the power of the purse. That's where Congress comes in with a potential rescissions package. Most Republicans are appreciative of the efforts by DOGE and Musk. "I think this is the beginning and the whole conversation in Congress is changed because of it," said Rep. Mike Flood, R-Neb., on Fox. But DOGE evaluated "discretionary" spending. Congress has the "discretion" to spend or not spend certain money each year. That comes through the annual appropriations process. That's why GOPers are now using their "discretion." They intend to unwind some of that spending with a rescission plan. But the largest percentage of federal spending – by about two to one – is tied to entitlements like Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, plus interest on the debt. That spending is called "mandatory." House Republicans tried to address that slightly in the Big, Beautiful Bill since it dealt with Medicaid spending. But cuts to federal departments lie in the appropriations realm and falls on the discretionary side of the ledger. However, discretionary cuts via the Big, Beautiful Bill weren't going to happen. "Much of what DOGE has looked at is the discretionary spending," said Flood. "This is far more complicated than just doing it in reconciliation." White House Sending $9.4 Billion Doge Cuts Package To Congress Next Week And so here we are, with Republicans in Congress looking at the first major rescissions plan since 1993. "The House Freedom Caucus strongly supports these critical rescissions, and we will support as many more rescissions packages the White House can send us in the coming weeks and months," said the Freedom Caucus in a statement. "There is no excuse for a Republican House not to advance the first DOGE rescissions package the same week it is presented to Congress then quickly send it for passage in the Republican Senate so President Trump can sign it into law." The law requires the president to spend money which Congress approves. However, there are some loopholes where a President can "impound" money and not spend it. Gop Rebels Fire Warning Shot In Shutdown Showdown: No Doge, No Deal On CNN, Vought suggested that the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 "allows for a procedure called pocket rescissions later in the year to be able to bank some of these savings without the bill actually being passed." Vought signaled that President Trump would likely lean on that tool. But he wants to start with an initial rescissions request. A recissions plan requires a simple majority to pass the House. And, believe it or not, a simple majority in the Senate. There's no 60-vote requirement to break a filibuster. Moreover, the "motion to proceed" to start debate on a recessions package is "privileged." That means the Senate only needs 51 votes to begin the process. Many "motions to proceed" in the Senate need 60 yeas and can be subject to a filibuster. President Trump formally routed his recissions request to Capitol Hill on Tuesday. It aims to trim $9.4 billion dollars from public broadcasting and foreign aid programs. All of this is money which Musk targeted in his DOGE reviews. But these cuts only count if Congress approves them. "I want make sure you take the first tranche and see if it passes," said Vought on the targeted set of proposed spending reductions. "The wider you do in terms of a package, the harder it is to pass. And if it doesn't pass, this is the real world. And we will lose flexibility that we have to use executive tools to find other ways to make the DOGE cuts permanent." Speaker Johnson Sets Eyes On Cutting Government Spending, Vows To Take A 'Blowtorch' To The 'Regulatory State' Lawmakers are starting to process the rescissions proposal. Especially since Republicans often talk a good game about slashing spending. "We'll see if Congress can step up to the plate," said Rep. Chip Roy, R-Tex., noting the political consequences of not green lighting the rescissions package. "(Members will have) to go campaign on why they want to continue to fund PBS, NPR, and a whole bunch of foreign policy and foreign funding that most Americans don't like. So you go explain it." Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., represents one of the most-Democratic leaning districts in the country. He worries about the PBS and NPR cuts. "I have a great rapport with Nebraska Public Radio and TV. I think they've been great to work with. And so that would be one I hope they don't put in," said Bacon. Senate Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Susan Collins, R-Maine, flagged reductions to PEPFAR, short for the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief. "I consider that to be possibly the most successful public health program that has ever been used in Africa and other parts of the world. So I do not support the reduction in PEPFAR," said Collins. It's unclear whether this opening bid to cut spending – minimal as it is – can make it through Congress. Lots of Republicans will sweat this. And these are just negligible cuts. Republicans extolled the work of DOGE. But if they want to eliminate spending, they have to put their vote where their favorite program is. We'll know more in a few weeks whether Republicans can approve the recissions package and rescind what some characterize as wasteful spending. Otherwise, they may need to rescind those campaign article source: House Republicans push for spending cancellations as Elon Musk and conservatives demand deeper budget cuts
