Texas DEI ban in public schools gets House approval
The Texas House gave preliminary approval Sunday to a bill that would ban diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies and programs in public K–12 schools.
Senate Bill 12, authored by Sen. Brandon Creighton, would prohibit school districts from considering race, ethnicity, gender identity, or sexual orientation in hiring decisions. Training and programs on these topics will also be banned unless required by federal law.
Parents will have to give written consent to allow their children to join school clubs. They will also be able to file complaints if they believe schools do not follow the DEI ban.
The House advanced the bill in an 85-48 vote shortly after midnight Sunday. The Texas Senate voted in favor of the bill in February. Before the bill can go to the governor's desk, the House will have to take one more vote and the Senate will have to agree to changes the House made to the bill or members from both chambers will have to iron out differences behind closed doors.
Rep. Jeff Leach, the bill's sponsor, cast the bill as giving parents more control over their children's curriculum, school materials and safety. He also highlighted that the bill builds on the 2021 ban of teaching critical race theory in Texas, a study that explores how race and racism influence laws and institutions.
'The legislation further upholds parental authority by giving them the ability to opt their child in or out of specific programs, such as the requirement in this bill that a parent must opt in to a child's sex education curriculum, and this is so that parents can make informed choices that align with their family's values,' Leach said.
Supporters of the bill claim that DEI initiatives divert both class time and public funds toward promoting certain ideologies in schools.
'It's clear these programs are already in our schools using millions of taxpayer dollars meant for the classroom to fund political activism and political agendas,' Creighton said during a public hearing in January.
Opponents argue that banning these initiatives would disproportionately harm marginalized students, especially those who are LGBTQ+. They say it would take away safe spaces where students can find community and support, potentially leading to increased levels of depression and anxiety.
'Without DEI, you're going to see more students who might think that they are alone,' Ash Hall, a policy and advocacy strategist for LGBTQIA+ rights at the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, told The Texas Tribune.
The broad and vague language of the bill also creates a high risk of overapplication and could lead schools to censor themselves out of fear of violating unclear rules, critics worry.
During the discussion late Saturday, the House also approved an amendment introduced by Leach . The amendment clarifies that if a school employee is terminated for violating the DEI ban, they have the right to appeal. It also states that schools can recruit candidates from a specific ethnic group to increase diversity in their hiring pool, and it will not be considered a violation.
When SB 12 was first introduced, it included a broader definition of DEI practices and threatened to withhold state funding from schools that didn't comply. These concerns were later addressed, and the bill was revised to remove the risk of defunding school districts.
The latest version requires schools to provide an explanation if a parent files a complaint about a potential DEI ban violation. If the parent is not satisfied with the response, they can appeal to the Texas Education Commissioner, who must assign an examiner and hold a hearing to review the complaint.
School districts also must adopt a policy to discipline or even terminate employees who knowingly take part in DEI activities.
If passed, the bill will take effect Sept. 1.
First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stephen Miller Melts Down as Musk Exits With His Wife and an Attack on Trump
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller spammed social media Tuesday night in a raging display of his unwavering support for President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' as it faced increasing backlash from MAGA figures, including Elon Musk. The Trump loyalist went in hard to sell the 1,038-page document that passed the House by a single vote on May 22. Miller's comments came hours after former DOGE chief Musk attacked the mega-spending bill as the legislation moves to the Senate, labeling it a 'disgusting abomination.' The world's richest man also threatened to 'fire all politicians who betrayed the American people' at next year's midterm elections. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote on X. Miller responded by calling Trump's bill 'the most essential piece of legislation... in generations' and 'the most MAGA bill ever passed by the House.' Miller pointedly described those on Trump's side of the argument as the president's 'closest allies.' It is unclear how much personal animus there is between Miller and Musk after the tech billionaire walked out on the administration, taking Miller's wife Katie with him. Katie Miller was hired by DOGE under the same 'special government employee' status as Musk, meaning that she was also time-limited to 130 days in office, but that has done little to quell unsubstantiated internet speculation about Musk and the Millers. She will now reportedly work for Musk full-time. Miller began his own barrage of posts on X, first by claiming Trump's bill would fund increased deportation. '[The bill] will increase by orders of magnitude the scope, scale, and speed of removing illegal and criminal aliens from the United States,' Miller wrote. 'For that reason alone, it's the most essential piece of legislation currently under consideration in the entire Western World, in generations.' 'Now or never,' the 39-year-old wrote in another post. Trump's bill is estimated to increase the budget deficit by approximately $600 billion in the next fiscal year. Miller tried to explain his take on the bill by breaking it down into three sections: 'The most significant border security and deportation effort' in history, a full 'extension and expansion' of Trump's tax cuts and finally cutting almost $2 trillion through 'the largest welcome reform in history.' 'Item 1 alone (border security + deportation),' Miller wrote, 'makes this the most important legislation for the conservative project in the history of the nation.' Critics of Trump's bill fear it would lead to millions of Americans losing health coverage by slashing Medicaid and introducing budget cuts to food assistance programs, with spending on border security and military programs increased. Some Republicans have also expressed fears about the rising cost of the bill, despite a deadline of July 4 to get the measure passed and signed into law. Miller's flurry of posts included him bragging that the bill 'was designed by President Trump and his allies in Congress to deliver on his core campaign pledges to voters and that is exactly what it does. This is the most MAGA bill ever passed by the House, and it's not even close.' 'The bill was designed by President Trump, his loyal aides, and his closest allies in Congress to deliver fully and enthusiastically on the explicit promises he made the American People,' he wrote in another post. Miller also called out GOP Kentucky senator Rand Paul, who told Fox Business his biggest objection to Trump's bill was the addition of '$5 trillion to the debt ceiling' over the next decade. 'Why doesn't Rand ever fight this hard to deport illegals?' Miller asked in a post. Miller clarified Trump's bill would not fund the Department of Education, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, or the Environmental Protection Agency. Experts have, however, warned the bill could ruin student loan borrowers and universities and will have an environmental impact through increased mining and logging of public lands to raise revenue. 'We could have never dreamed of a bill like this in 2017,' Miller posted on X. Miller's loyalty comes as other Republican senators have joined Musk in questioning the contents of Trump's bill. At least four are demanding changes, according to Reuters. They include Sen. Mike Lee and Sen. Ron Johnson. While Republicans have a 53-47 seat majority in the Senate, they cannot afford to lose support. Georgia Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene revealed she had not read a part of the bulky bill that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence systems for a decade. 'Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of (the bill) that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years,' Greene posted on X. 'I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there.' California Republican Jack Kimble was also critical of the bill on Tuesday. He posted on X: 'Full transparency, I did not know that the big beautiful bill was a real budget and would be used to determine spending levels. It seems to me that this is something that should have been made known to those in the House of Representative[s].' When a follower told him 'you're supposed to read the bills before you vote on them' Kimble replied 'Yeah, my bad.' Ron Johnson also agreed with Musk's 'disgusting abomination' comments on the bill. Speaking to NewsNation's The Hill on Tuesday, Johnson said, 'He's telling the truth... that's all I'm doing, too.' 'The trajectory of deficits is up, and no matter what the 'big, beautiful bill' does, it does not address that long-term prospect, it does not bend the deficit curve down. It supports it going up.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said President Trump was already aware of 'where Elon Musk stood on this bill' and that he would not be changing it. 'This is one, big, beautiful bill,' Leavitt said on Tuesday. 'And he's sticking to it.'
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House, Senate dispense with other priority bills
On a busy final day of regular legislative business, the New Hampshire House of Representatives and state Senate acted on some major bills including a permanent expansion of Education Freedom Accounts (EFA) along with a bell-to-bell ban on cellphone use in New Hampshire public schools. There were a few hiccups Thursday as the House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to set aside a Senate-passed bill (SB 54) that would impose more penalties on motorists accused of driving drunk who refused to submit to a blood alcohol test. State Rep. Terry Roy, R-Deerfield, had convinced the House Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee he chairs to add to the bill a proposed mandate that K-12 schools offer at least one hour a year of firearms training. Without debate, the House voted 256-106 to table the bill, effectively killing it for the year. State Sen. Victoria Sullivan, R-Manchester, authored the EFA expansion (SB 295) that has now passed both the House and the Senate. Currently, EFAs are only available to families that make up to 350% of the federal poverty level, which is just above $100,000 for a family of four. The bill would eliminate the income limit but place an initial enrollment cap of 10,000 students; presently abut 5,400 are enrolled. The Senate still has to agree with changes that the House made to the bill on Thursday before passing it, 190-178. Sen. Glenn Cordelli, R-Tuftonboro, said EFAs have been very popular among middle class New Hampshire families. But Rep. Kate Murray, D-New Castle, said this expansion will cost the state at least $17 million more a year and she said the public at large doesn't like EFAs. 'Between the thousands of emails and online sign-ins against this bill, and warrant articles passed in communities throughout the state, the public has repeatedly expressed its strong disapproval of the voucher program,' Murray said. 'Instead of listening to the people we were elected to represent, Republicans voted to raise taxes to expand an unpopular program to that subsidizes wealthier households whose students are already in private schools.' Cellphone ban The House gave final approval to the cellphone ban (SB 206) that would direct all school boards to adopt policies that prevent student access throughout the school day. Earlier this year, the House and the Senate approved separate, more limiting bills that merely directed local officials to adopt the plans to deal with the issue. Gov. Kelly Ayotte urged the Senate to approve the House plan, which was similar to what the governor proposed in her budget last February. 'Screens are distraction for students and a barrier for teachers to do their jobs. A bell-to-bell ban on cellphones in the classroom will help kids focus on learning and let teachers do what they do best without being the phone police,' Ayotte said in a statement. 'I'm glad to see the House pass this today and thank them for taking action to help deliver a best-in-class education for all of New Hampshire's students.' In another mild surprise, the House voted 170-168 against legislation to move the state primary election from September to June in time for the 2026 election. Last March, the House had approved a different bill to make that change but to not have it begin until 2028. Rep. Matt Wilhelm, D-Manchester, said state and local election officials along with the candidates need more time to cope with the change. House Election Laws Committee Ross Berry, R-Manchester, had said there was still time to act, but the House narrowly disagreed. 'OK, I guess it's 2028,' Berry said in response. The state Senate has yet to approve the House-passed bill (HB 481) to move the primary for the 2028 election. klandrigan@
Politico
34 minutes ago
- Politico
GOP leaders rush into Musk damage control
IN TODAY'S EDITION:— Johnson defends against Musk's attacks— Emmer's megabill confidence— Congress gets its rescissions deadline Hill GOP leaders are in full-on damage control as they scramble to save their megabill — and themselves — from the blast radius of Donald Trump and Elon Musk's breakup. But Musk doesn't seem interested in sparing any part of the GOP trifecta from his wrath on his way out of Washington. The president's new enemy attacked both Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune Thursday over the cost of the party's sweeping domestic policy package. Thune brushed it aside. Johnson, however, is mounting a multi-front rebuttal as he aims to keep Musk from hurting the megabill's prospects, our Meredith Lee Hill reports. He's questioning the tech mogul's motives for opposing the bill and challenging his claims about its impact on the deficit. Johnson already had to reassure hard-liners concerned about the bill's spending in order to squeeze the bill through the House last month. 'I'm the same guy that's always been a deficit hawk, and now I'm the speaker of the House, and I'm working on a multi-step plan to reverse the fiscal insanity that has haunted our country,' Johnson told reporters Thursday. 'We have to get the big, beautiful bill done.' Johnson's leadership team quickly claimed Musk wouldn't rattle their members. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise insisted it hadn't moved any votes. And Whip Tom Emmer, in an exclusive interview with Mia (more on that below), said he's not tracking Musk's onslaught on X. 'Sorry,' Emmer said, 'he's not on my phone.' Some fiscal hard-liners — who share in Musk's concerns about the bill but allowed it to pass the House — avoided immediately picking sides in the feud. Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris, bombarded with questions about Musk on Thursday, said only that he's 'right on the deficit.' Sen. Mike Lee posted on X: 'But … I really like both of them.' They may not have to choose. Signs of a détente emerged late Thursday, with Trump brushing off the clash in a phone call with our Dasha Burns and Musk seeming somewhat open to a reconciliation (just not the reconciliation bill). White House aides are working to broker peace. Still, if the Trump-Musk divorce goes through, MAGA will side with the president, our Rachael Bade predicts in her latest Corridors column. There were signs Thursday that Musk was alienating some of Trump's biggest Hill boosters. 'Elon is getting too personal. It's getting out of control,' Rep. Troy Nehls told Mia. 'Some of the most recent comments, I think: Elon, you've lost your mind.' Coming up in today's Playbook: Musk bankrolled the GOP back to power in Washington. Now his financial firepower could break Republicans' trifecta — and imperil their legislative agenda after 2026. TGIF. Follow our live coverage at the Inside Congress blog at and email your Inside Congress scribes at mmccarthy@ lkashinsky@ and bleonard@ THE SKED The House is in session and voting on a bill that requires proof of citizenship to apply for SBA loans at 10:10 a.m. — Financial Services will continue a hearing on digital assets at 9 a.m. — Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries will have his weekly press conference at 10:45 a.m. The Senate is out. Next week: The Senate will continue to take up Trump's nominations. The House is scheduled to take up Trump's rescissions package. THE LEADERSHIP SUITE FIRST IN INSIDE CONGRESS: Emmer projects confidence on Senate's megabill Emmer isn't concerned about the GOP megabill's fate in the Senate, despite the current policy disputes. During an exclusive sitdown with Mia on Thursday, the House majority whip was bullish about getting the bill to Trump's desk by July 4. 'The Senate will do their work. They're going to send the bill back to us,' Emmer told Mia. 'We are going to pass it and send it to the president's desk. The time for talking is over.' ON SALT — One thing Emmer said he hopes the Senate won't touch: the quadrupled state-and-local tax deduction cap carefully negotiated with blue-state Republicans in the House. Senate Finance Chair Mike Crapo recently said there's little appetite among his members for keeping the increase fully intact. But Emmer said he believes the Senate understands the House's more difficult math. 'John Thune was quoted somewhere as saying, you know, 'We understand it's 51 over here and it's 218 over there.'' Emmer said. 'That should tell you everything you need to know.' ON MEDICAID — Emmer said he believes senators who have raised concerns on the issue — specifically Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski and Josh Hawley — are 'going to be pleasantly surprised when they go through' the bill. 'A lot of their concerns that they thought they were going to have are just not there,' Emmer said, adding that 'there might be' tweaks, but no one has flagged any 'major problems' in the bill. Emmer said the only area he thinks there might be unease is about the provider tax. ON CLEAN ENERGY — A key group of senators could hold up the bill over the repeal or scaling back of the Inflation Reduction Act's clean-energy tax provisions, which could disrupt projects in their states. But Emmer said that's something the House was concerned about as well. 'That's one of the reasons why the sunsetting is out at least three years, so that people can continue projects and repurpose them,' Emmer said. 'That was the whole concept. Whatever the Senate does with it, that's their business.' Pros can read the rest of the Q&A with Emmer here. Reconciliation 2.0 ... or 3.0? Johnson has already floated the idea of a second reconciliation package. Now, he's hinting at a third. 'There may be a third one,' the speaker said Thursday, adding that 'we have to do it in the proper sequence.' Emmer didn't wave off the idea of a second or third megabill to Mia on Thursday, but noted they should 'get the first one done.' 'All of it's possible,' Emmer said. 'Is it probable? We'll see.' POLICY RUNDOWN SCOOP: WICKER QUESTIONS ARMY PARADE — Senate Armed Services Chair Roger Wicker told Lisa he 'would have recommended against' the Army's plan to hold a multimillion-dollar parade in D.C. on June 14, which is also Trump's birthday. 'On the other hand, the secretary feels that it will be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for thousands of young Americans to see what a great opportunity it is to participate in a great military force, that it will be a recruiting tool,' Wicker said. 'So, we'll see.' Army Secretary Dan Driscoll told lawmakers in a budget hearing Thursday that the parade could cost $25 million to $40 million. He was not able to provide an exact cost, he said, because the Army will also need to cover whatever damage its tanks do to Washington's streets. Other GOP senators aren't happy with the price tag. Collins told Lisa she's 'glad that we're honoring the Army' but 'the cost does seem a bit steep.' Sen. Ron Johnson was blunt: 'If it costs money, I won't go.' SCOOP: RESCISSIONS DEADLINE SET — Congress must act by July 18 on Trump's request to claw back $9.4 billion in funding or the White House will be required to spend the money, the Senate parliamentarian said. If the House and Senate follow their current schedules, the 45-day clock on Trump's request will expire at midnight that day, people granted anonymity to discuss private guidance from the Senate's rule-keeper told our Jennifer Scholtes. Before that deadline, the House and Senate can vote to approve or reject Trump's request to nix $8.3 billion for foreign aid and $1.1 billion for public broadcasting. TRUMP'S 'EITHER WAY' ON TAX PERMANENCE — Sen. Steve Daines, one of the chamber's tax writers, told our Benjamin Guggenheim Thursday that Trump was noncommittal during their White House meeting on whether his business tax incentives should be extended or made permanent. 'He said: 'I'm open to permanence. I'm open to kind of go either way, even on a five-year provision'' like what the House included in its version of the megabill, Daines said. Daines told Benjamin he believes there's a consensus among Senate Finance Republicans for permanence, calling it a 'once-in-a-generation opportunity' for lasting tax reform. ABOUT THOSE CLEAN ENERGY CREDITS — GOP senators who want to keep clean-energy credits under Democrats' 2022 climate law are expressing confidence that their chamber will ease off the harsh phaseouts in the House-passed megabill. Sen. Thom Tillis told our Josh Siegel that 'every one of them is going to have some sort of an extension' from the sunset dates in the House bill. Murkowski told reporters Thursday she's also looking to ensure 'more reasonable' phaseout timelines. 'You can't have real dominance unless you have all aspects of energy,' Murkowski said. 'And it's not too much to say that 'all of the above' includes things still like wind and solar, and geothermal, and nuclear, and biofuels, and ocean energy.' GOP SENATORS TO REWRITE AI FREEZE — Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz said Thursday his committee would attempt to rewrite the 10-year moratorium on enforcement of state and local artificial intelligence laws that the House tucked into their version of the megabill. Several GOP senators expressed skepticism this week that the current language could clear the Senate's strict rules for what can be included in the filibuster-skirting reconciliation package. Thune sounded supportive of the House measure Thursday, but conceded it was unclear if it could pass the Byrd test. 'The goal is to make sure that we aren't losing the race in AI and making sure that we have a policy that's consistent,' Thune said. Best of POLITICO Pro and E&E: POLITICO PRO SPACE: Need an insider's guide to the politics behind the new space race? From battles over sending astronauts to Mars to the ways space companies are vying to influence regulators, this weekly newsletter decodes the personalities, policy and power shaping the final frontier. Find out more. TUNNEL TALK SPOTTED — Laura Loomer was on the Hill on Thursday, waiting outside the House Judiciary room. She was trying to meet with Reps. Eric Swalwell and Jared Moskowitz, among other Democrats, to talk about designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization, according to our John Sakellariadis. THE BEST OF THE REST Exclusive: New video shows tussle between Rep. Nadler staffer and federal officers, by Arya Sundaram at the Gothamist Democrats Say Trump's New Travel Ban Won't Be as Central to Messaging as Last Time, by Torrence Banks at NOTUS JOB BOARD Melissa Burnison is now clerk for the Senate Appropriations Energy-Water Subcommittee. She previously was VP for federal legislative affairs at Berkshire Hathaway Energy, and is an Energy Department alum. Christiana Nulty (née Reasor) has joined Thune's office as health policy adviser. She previously was director of federal affairs at Genentech and is a Jerry Moran and Lynn Jenkins alum. HAPPY BIRTHDAY Sen. Marsha Blackburn ... Reps. Madeleine Dean and Eugene Vindman (5-0) … Alexander Vindman (5-0) … former Reps. Eric Cantor, David Bonior (8-0) and Allen Boyd (8-0) … Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth … ABC's Katherine Faulders … Fabiana Corsi Mendez of Rep. Eugene Vindman's office … Ward Baker … Margaret White of No Labels ... Max Docksey ... POLITICO's Gabby Miller ... CQ's Caroline Simon Coudriet … Allie Freedman … Sarah Gadsden … Julia Masterman of Angerholzer Broz Consulting TRIVIA THURSDAY'S ANSWER: SP correctly answered that China was the first country to sign a Fulbright agreement. TODAY'S QUESTION, from Mia: What current member of Congress was formerly a scuba instructor in Thailand? The first person to correctly guess gets a mention in the next edition of Inside Congress. Send your answers to insidecongress@
