logo
Mass. residents who take GLP-1 drugs for obesity tend to be white and affluent. But who needs them most?

Mass. residents who take GLP-1 drugs for obesity tend to be white and affluent. But who needs them most?

Boston Globe12-05-2025

Obesity, which
White people account for about 68 percent of Massachusetts residents with obesity but make up 82 percent of patients taking the drugs, according to the analysis, which relied on tens of thousands of insurance claims and data on assets.
Advertisement
Women make up 51 percent of the state's obese residents but about 71 percent of GLP-1 users. And nearly one-third of people taking the medicines have household incomes of $200,000 or more.
Meanwhile, Black, Hispanic, Asian, and low-income residents are underrepresented among people taking GLP-1s, based on their obesity rates. (In Massachusetts,
Advertisement
A variety of factors appear to contribute to the disparities, not the least of which is the cost of the self-injected drugs. GLP-1s have list prices of $1,000 or more a month, and insurance coverage of the medications varies widely.
The disparities worry health experts, who say the medicines have the potential to narrow differences in obesity rates among demographic groups, but may in fact be widening them.
'These drugs are very important for everyone to have access to,' said Jonathan Rossman, a senior analyst for Real Chemistry, 'not just the ones who have the means to pay for it.'
Related
:
Among those who have struggled to afford GLP-1 drugs is Jordan, a 37-year-old Cambridge resident and manager of a nonprofit that mentors high school students.
Jordan is Black, uses they/them pronouns, and only wanted to be identified by their first name because of privacy concerns. Weighing 285 pounds at their peak, Jordan first tried the daily drug Saxenda in mid-2022. They shed 40 pounds but then plateaued. In January of last year, they switched to the weekly drug Wegovy. In both cases, Jordan had a modest monthly co-pay of $20 through their insurance.
'It's been extremely meaningful,' Jordan said of losing weight. It helped to relieve asthma and back pain, they said, and had 'mental effects, like being on the subway and not worrying about whether I can squeeze into the seat.'
But when Jordan began working for the nonprofit last July, they said, their new insurance plan at CVS Caremark wouldn't cover Wegovy. It would cost $1,500 a month out of pocket, which was unaffordable.
Advertisement
So Jordan switched to a copycat version of the drug available online from a compounding pharmacy for $500 a month. However, the Food and Drug Administration has cracked down on copycat GLP-1s, saying in March that they 'can be risky for patients' because they haven't been approved by regulators. Jordan isn't sure what to do if the drug becomes unavailable; they have lost a total of 92 pounds since they began taking GLP-1s.
Related
:
Experts say some demographic groups aren't as aware of the medications as others. Some patients of color are more skeptical of medical care than white patients because of harm they historically suffered during such episodes as the infamous Tuskegee syphilis study. Black and brown patients may also
face greater challenges in finding a primary care physician to prescribe GLP-1s, or have
difficulty getting time off from work to see a doctor.
Cultural ideals about appearance may also play a role in the disparities between groups.
'That's basically the demographic that faces the most societal pressure for fitness, so they'd be the ones seeking the prescriptions most urgently,' she said. Anekwe sees about 20 patients a week with obesity, she said, and roughly 70 percent are white women.
To qualify for the medications, private and public insurers have generally required patients to have a body mass index of at least 30, or 27 if individuals have a weight-related medical condition such as cardiovascular disease or high blood pressure. (Someone who is 5 feet 7 inches tall and weighs 192 pounds has a BMI of 30.)
Advertisement
Traci Haddock, who works for a biotech in the Fenway area, said she first began taking GLP-1s about 18 months ago after her primary care doctor said her blood sugar levels indicated she was prediabetic. She weighed 330 pounds at the time.
Haddock, who is white, said she had struggled to lose weight all her life but didn't feel societal pressure to take a GLP-1 – just the opposite.
Related
:
'I feel like there's a bit of stigma against taking the medication, like it's the easy way out,' said Haddock.
She first used Saxenda, which her husband, Chris Angelli, a Somerville High School science teacher, takes for obesity. Haddock lost 25 pounds but then regained it. In December, she switched to Zepbound. She has lost 25 pounds again and says her cravings, or 'food noise,' have disappeared.
Haddock, whose annual household income exceeds $200,000, said she has a co-pay of $60 a month under her insurance plan from Harvard Pilgrim Health Care and can easily afford the treatment.
'We're very fortunate,' she said. 'I will pay $15 a week to lose one to two pounds a week, no problem.'
Traci Haddock and her husband, Chris Angelli. Haddock said she has a co-pay of $60 a month under her insurance plan from Harvard Pilgrim Health Care and can easily afford Zepbound.
John Tlumacki/Globe Staff
A new study by researchers from the Yale School of Medicine found similar disparities in prescriptions for GLP-1s written nationwide that the Globe analysis identified for prescriptions written in Massachusetts.
The Yale researchers examined electronic health records of 277 million patients from more than 280 US health care systems between July 2020 and October 2024. The team found more than 39 million adults qualified for GLP-1s to treat obesity, but only 2.3 percent of them obtained prescriptions for semaglutide (the active ingredient in Ozempic and Wegovy) or tirzepatide (the active ingredient in Mounjaro and Zepbound).
Related
:
Advertisement
Again, male patients were less likely than female patients to obtain prescriptions, and Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients were underrepresented, based on their obesity rates, according to the study published late last month in JAMA Network.
'We want to make sure these powerful drugs can reach the patients who need them most, but when we look at the obesity prevalence, there's a disparity there,' Yuan Lu, an assistant professor of medicine and the senior author of the study, said in an interview.
Although affordability appears to be fueling disparities in Massachusetts, the state actually has one of the more generous public insurance programs for lower-income residents seeking GLP-1s.
Massachusetts is one of 15 states that cover the cost of GLP-1s to treat obesity in patients on Medicaid, the federal health care program for people with low incomes, according to former Massachusetts Public Health Commissioner Christine Ferguson. Her firm, Leverage Global Consulting, tracks coverage of GLP-1s by public and private insurers.
MassHealth,
Related
:
'At least in Massachusetts, our Medicaid program works against disparity,' said Dr. James Morrill, a primary care physician and medical director at the MGH Charlestown HealthCare Center who prescribes GLP-1s several times a week.
In addition to treating diabetes and obesity, GLP-1s are being studied by scientists as potential treatments for disorders ranging from
Scientists have known for years that the drugs lessen the rewarding effects of addictive drugs, including alcohol, nicotine, and opioids, in laboratory rodents.
Advertisement
'There are, like, 60 different disease states that GLP-1s are being studied for in various clinical trials,' said Rossman, of Real Chemistry. 'It's an amazing class of drugs.'
Jonathan Saltzman can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Should You Invest $1,000 in Eli Lilly today?
Should You Invest $1,000 in Eli Lilly today?

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Should You Invest $1,000 in Eli Lilly today?

Eli Lilly is a pharma player, but it offers the growth of a tech stock thanks to its weight loss drugs portfolio. The weight loss market could represent a multibillion-dollar opportunity well into the next decade. 10 stocks we like better than Eli Lilly › Eli Lilly (NYSE: LLY) sells a broad range of medicines, from cancer and immunology drugs to treatments for migraine. The pharma giant's presence across several treatment areas has helped it grow earnings over time. But, in recent years, one particular product portfolio has stood out and driven double-digit revenue growth: drugs to help people lose weight. Right now, Lilly sells tirzepatide, commercialized as Mounjaro for type 2 diabetes and as Zepbound for weight loss, though doctors have prescribed either one for patients hoping to shed pounds. Mounjaro and Zepbound each have become blockbusters, bringing in billion-dollar revenue annually. Lilly dominates the weight loss market along with rival Novo Nordisk, but a recent move by Lilly could help it push farther ahead in the coming years. Considering this, should you invest $1,000 in Lilly stock today? Let's find out. So, first, let's talk about Lilly's path so far in this market and what might lie ahead. Lilly's weight loss drugs are part of a class known as dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonists. They act on hormonal pathways involved in the digestion process and help control blood sugar levels and appetite. Novo Nordisk's rival drug, semaglutide -- sold as Ozempic for type 2 diabetes and Wegovy for weight loss -- targets only GLP-1 but works in a similar way. Novo Nordisk was first to market with its product, winning approval for Ozempic in 2017, and this offered it time to build a market-leading position. But demand has been so high for such weight loss drugs that Lilly quickly gained share soon after entering the market with Mounjaro in 2022 and then with Zepbound in 2023. In fact, demand has been so strong that these drugs held spots on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's drug shortage list for quite some time, only exiting the list in recent months. A better supply situation for weight loss drugs isn't due to a drop in demand but instead to increases in manufacturing capacity by both companies. So solid demand for these products still exists -- and is likely to grow. It's important to keep in mind, though, that both Lilly and rivals may face some headwinds in the years to come, and that's why Goldman Sachs Research recently reduced its forecast for global sales of anti-obesity medicines to $95 billion by 2030, from an earlier forecast of $130 billion. This is due to several potential challenges, including lower per-unit prices and weaker reimbursement from certain insurers. But even considering the challenges, "we see a significant growth opportunity for both existing players as well as new entrants into this market," said Goldman analyst Asad Haider. After all, from today's $28 billion market, the forecast figure represents a 239% increase. A look at Lilly's weight loss drug sales shows us this company has the momentum to benefit from this high-growth market. Last year, Mounjaro and Zepbound generated more than $11 billion and $4.9 billion in sales, respectively. And these two products are driving double-digit total sales growth at Lilly -- with a 32% gain in the full year and a 45% gain in the most recent quarter. Now, what may push Lilly past Novo Nordisk -- and keep it far ahead of newer rivals down the road -- is the company's progress on an oral weight loss candidate. Current products are in injectable form, which may be less convenient and even uncomfortable for certain users. Lilly recently reported positive results from a phase 3 trial of its oral candidate, orforglipron, and plans to request approval for use in weight management by the end of the year. Though Novo Nordisk sells an oral form of semaglutide, it involves strict food and water guidelines. The potential Lilly product doesn't, offering it a significant advantage. Now, let's return to our question: Should you invest $1,000 in Lilly right now? The shares are trading for 34 times forward earnings estimates -- that's around the same level as top tech companies such as Amazon and Nvidia, also known for delivering double-digit revenue growth. In fact, since the launch of tirzepatide, Lilly has traded at valuations resembling those of growth stocks. So it may seem pricey to you for a pharmaceutical player. But it's worth keeping in mind that Lilly stands out from the pharma crowd due to its presence in the high-growth market of weight loss drugs, yet at the same time it offers you the stability and dividend growth of a pharma stock. You generally can count on big pharma companies for steady revenue since patients always need their medicines -- regardless of the economic situation. And you can count on Lilly for passive income too, with a forward dividend of $6, representing a dividend yield of 0.8%. Meanwhile, valuation has come down from its peak to levels that look very acceptable for a growth stock. All of this means that, by investing in Lilly, you're getting growth worthy of a tech company along with the safety generally associated with a pharma stock. That makes the stock well worth the price, and a great place to park $1,000 right now. Before you buy stock in Eli Lilly, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Eli Lilly wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $656,825!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $865,550!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Adria Cimino has positions in Amazon. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Goldman Sachs Group, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends Novo Nordisk. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Should You Invest $1,000 in Eli Lilly today? was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio

Omada Health CEO talks about IPO and diabetes treatment
Omada Health CEO talks about IPO and diabetes treatment

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Omada Health CEO talks about IPO and diabetes treatment

Telehealth provider Omada Health (OMDA) raised $150 million in its IPO as the company makes its public debut on the Nasdaq on Friday. Omada Health CEO Sean Duffy sits down with Yahoo Finance senior health reporter Anjalee Khemlani at the Nasdaq MarketSite to speak more about Omada's approach to treating chronic diseases, like diabetes, and its relationship with patients and pharmaceutical companies. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Wealth here. And I have with me Sean Duffy, who's the CEO of Omada Health and a co-founder. Sean, thank you so much for joining us today. And, I mean, really exciting day. You're going with an initial public offering of 7.9 million shares at $19 per share. Talk to me about why now. Why is this moment so important because you're the second digital health company to go public this year and all eyes are on you. Well, firstly, thank you for having me. Such, such an exciting day. So congrats to everybody, you know, at Omada. So the why now really it's a mix of what we see in the business. So what we love is we've expanded from one care area to four. We love that last 12 months revenue grew 44%, while on the back of only 11% increase in OPEX. And meanwhile, we like what we see in this world of GLP-1s and feeling the customer demand. So that's that's the business. And then, and then the capital markets have in many ways asked us to come in. And these are not shy investors, you know, if you pause for that five minutes at the end and be like, what do you think? Like it, dislike it? Would you be interested? They're, they'll tell you, they'll tell you. So we felt pull. That's really good. And, and I'm glad you brought up the GLP-1s because I feel like that has been the focus on the company. Though you do have other chronic diseases that you cater to, why is it the moment right now, even though you don't sell GLP-1s and you don't prescribe them, why is it so important to meet the moment now and say, go public now versus during that pandemic time where a lot of digital health companies were coming to the market? Well, I mean starting backwards, you know, in the pandemic era, we had just expanded to new care areas. And I, I had sensed that these benefits leaders would really prefer working with one partner across multiple care areas, but we had just started that. And when you're becoming a public company, you want to make sure to have the proof points out there. So we'll hang out, we'll stay private, there's no rush. In retrospect, it's a great decision, you know, that worked out. And then for your comments, I mean, the GLP moment hit, it almost feels like the entire Omada journey leading up to today left us in a place to be able to serve our members on these meds. Because an injection is not getting to know you, an injection is not saying, you know, what might a week look like in your eating behaviors, your exercise behaviors, your strength training, your activity? And that's where Omada can come in to operate alongside the med. So when we're talking about these patients that you care for, you're guiding them through their journey, through their health journey. And part of it is, you know, digital technology and technology that didn't exist when you were, when you founded it in 2011, right? So you've had to spend a lot keeping up to pace with what the technology is, including AI, I'm assuming as well. But there's also the digital tech and wearable side of it. So CGMs, or continuous glucose monitoring devices are part of that story. We see that as used largely by diabetics, but it's become part of sort of the general public sphere. I see on social media, folks just wearing CGMs tracking, tracking their food. So is that included as part of the journey if someone has got access to a CGM on their own? Can they come to you and be part of the journey there as well? Yes. So I mean, CGMs are critical, especially for Omada's members who have diabetes. And so we have a device arsenal, if you will. Scales, blood pressure cuffs, glucometers, and CGMs. And I have a really neat relationship with Abbott, a proprietary relationship with Abbott, to ensure that all our members with diabetes start their journey with the CGM because our care teams love it. The fidelity of the data you get from CGM versus A1C gives them a better path toward helping our members. And our members love it. And so it's a combination of the devices, our compassionate care teams and the software that ties the room together and gets outcomes and a CGM has been a critical part of that journey for our people with diabetes. You mentioned that you were pulled into the market. Kicking and screaming against your will, I'm sure. And so, I'm curious about what you, what you want the market to do for you because you're going to start getting all sorts of questions about profitability, about how the company is growing and the markets and lines and areas. And, and that's going to be a lot. You're going to be under a microscope like you've never been before. So talk to me about that and, and what you think the market is looking for from the company. Well, well, you know what's fun is many of the shareholders that are joining today, I mean, we've known each other for years. And you know, I walk into these rooms, it's not like we know each other's kids' names yet necessarily, but they're like, Sean, like incredible progress, you know, phenomenal Q1, you just like keep doing what you said you're going to do. And I think that that's fundamentally what the markets want. And it's, and it's germane to our values at Omada, which is cultivate trust. And it's just a neat moment in time where the new shareholders that are coming in can help me and help us imagine a path to not just the millions of members, but the many tens of millions, which ultimately helps us achieve our end mission, which is explicitly to bend the curve of disease. And really quickly, to final question for you. Looking at the trajectory for the company, looking at the focus on the GLP-1, you've set yourself up with other chronic diseases. Do you anticipate that the GLP-1 market is one that will just sort of fold into natural conversation or is it a standout for you? You know, it's one where a couple years ago, we started to feel just enormous asks from our customers to help them solve their worries about the positives of the med and some of the potential complexities. So it's our view is it's an exciting new chapter. Now, that being said, we're really just getting going. I mean, last year in March, we were privileged to, you know, work with Express Scripts to encircle RX for that GLP solution. And now we work with two of the three major PBMs to support people alongside the GLP-1s with just excellent services and lifestyle change. So we'll be watching that. Thank you so much for joining us, Sean Duffy, CEO of Omada Health. Brad, back to you. Anjaly, thanks so much. Appreciate you for bringing us that interview. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Omada Health goes public at $23 per share, marking second major digital health IPO in 2025
Omada Health goes public at $23 per share, marking second major digital health IPO in 2025

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Omada Health goes public at $23 per share, marking second major digital health IPO in 2025

Omada Health (OMDA) has become the second major digital health company to debut on the public markets this year, with an initial public offering valued at $1.1 billion. The company follows a successful launch of Hinge Health (HNGE) last month, which plays in one of the same markets as Omada: musculoskeletal health guidance. But Omada is better known as a clinical health guidance company for multiple chronic diseases, with an emphasis lately on weight loss management. Omada began trading at $23 per share on the Nasdaq on Friday. By midday, Omada stock traded as high as $28 per share, up 47% from the $19 per share the stock was initially priced at. Read more about Omada's opening stock moves and today's market action. The digital health platform has found its footing in the weight management space, though not by offering popular GLP-1 treatments. The company doesn't plan on doing so in the future either, CEO Sean Duffy told Yahoo Finance. Duffy said that's one reason why "the capital markets have, in many ways, asked us to come in" to the public markets. The company has differentiated itself and avoided the pitfalls of an ever-changing GLP-1 market, which was plagued early on by shortages and then disruption after the FDA removed GLP-1s from its shortage list, ending access to copycats of the popular drugs. Omada provides clinical guidance to patients once they leave their doctor's office. It's a concept that Duffy and his co-founders realized was needed more than a decade ago when the weight loss market and technology were very different. When asked if Duffy regretted not going public during the pandemic, when digital health was experiencing an investment boom, he said no and added that the company had only begun expanding beyond diabetes into other care areas, including weight loss. "When you're becoming a public company, you want to make sure to have your proof points out there," Duffy said. "In retrospect, it was a great decision." But Omada does have the pandemic to thank for its growth, as it put a spotlight on digital health services. The company has grown its user base through partnerships with large companies that offer the services to employees. In addition, Omada is partnered with pharmacy benefit managers, including CVS (CVS) and Cigna (CI) — the latter of which is also an early investor through its ventures arm. Omada began its journey by serving the needs of diabetics, including a partnership with Abbott (ABT) and users of its Freestyle Libre continuous glucose monitoring devices. It has since expanded to the GLP-1 market by providing the same guidance services, including meal kits and lifestyle change advice, to patients. Still, the company has yet to turn a profit in its 14-year existence. Duffy said the company's losses are decreasing over time, and revenue continues to grow year over year. "We have a history of net losses, due in part to the significant investments we have made in the design and development of our programs and platform enhancements, and have not yet achieved profitability on an annual basis," the company said in its S-1 filing. The company stated it incurred net losses of $67.5 million and $47.1 million in 2023 and 2024, respectively. In the first quarter ended March 31 of this year, Omada lost $9.4 million compared to a $19 million loss in the same period a year prior. "We incurred net losses of $67.5 million and $47.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2024, respectively, and $19.0 million and $9.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024 and 2025, respectively." Duffy said he hopes new investors can help guide the company to become a leading platform addressing chronic disease. "It's just a neat moment in time, where the new shareholders that are coming in can help me, and help us, imagine a path ... to bend the curve of disease," he said. Anjalee Khemlani is the senior health reporter at Yahoo Finance, covering all things pharma, insurance, care services, digital health, PBMs, and health policy and politics. That includes GLP-1s, of course. Follow Anjalee as AnjKhem on social media platforms X, LinkedIn, and Bluesky @AnjKhem. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store